This article argues that, contrary to Goodwin's recent arguments, nudges are compatible with the coalition government's stated aspiration to further self-empowerment. This is because, despite its libertarian roots, nudging is compatible with the promotion of personal autonomy and thus can be used to promote self-empowerment in a non-paternalistic fashion. Further, I argue that nudging may play a valid role in tackling large-scale social problems in tandem with other traditional policy measures. Consequently, Goodwin is wrong to reject choice architecture for these reasons.
ChristmanJ.AndersonJ. (2005), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
CohenG. (1995), Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
ColburnB. (2010), Autonomy and Liberalism, New York: Routledge.
7.
Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) (2001), Gambling Review Report, London: Stationery Office.
8.
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2008), A Framework for Pro-environmental Behaviours, London: DEFRA.
9.
Department of Health (DH) (2004), Choosing Health: Making Healthy Choices Easier, London: Stationery Office.
10.
Department for Transport (DfT) (2007), Manual for Streets, London: Thomas Telford Publishing.
11.
DworkinG. (1988), The Theory and Practice of Autonomy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
ElsterJ. (2007), Explaining Social Behaviour: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
GausG.F. (2011), The Order of Public Reason: A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
GoodwinT. (2012), ‘Why We Should Reject “Nudge”’, Politics32(2), pp. 85–92.
15.
HannaJ. (2011), ‘Consent and the Problem of Framing Effects’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice14(5), pp. 517–531.
16.
HausmanD.M.WelchB. (2010), ‘To Nudge or Not to Nudge’, Journal of Political Philosophy18(1), pp. 123–136.
17.
House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee (HOL STSC) (2011), Behaviour Change, London: Stationery Office.
18.
HurkaT. (1987), ‘Why Value Autonomy?’, Social Theory and Practice13(3), pp. 361–382.
19.
KantI. (1998 [1785]), Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. GregorM.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
LockeJ. (1980 [1698]), Second Treatise of Government, ed. MacphersonC.B., Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
21.
MeleA. (2003), Motivation and Agency, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
National Health Service (NHS) (2012), Blood and Transplant Strategic Plan 2012–17, London: Department of Health.
23.
NozickR. (1974), Anarchy, State and Utopia, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
24.
Organ Donation Taskforce (ODT) (2008), The Potential Impact of an Opt Out System for Organ Donation in the UK, London: Department of Health.
25.
OtsukaM. (2005), Libertarianism without Inequality, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
26.
QuongJ. (2011), Liberalism without Perfection, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
RazJ. (1978), Practical Reasoning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
RazJ. (1986), The Morality of Freedom, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
29.
RebanatoR. (2012), Taking Liberties: A Critical Examination of Libertarian Paternalism, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
SaundersB. (2012), ‘Opt-Out Organ Donation without Presumptions’, Journal of Medical Ethics38, pp. 69–72.
31.
ScanlonT.M. (2000), What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
ShiffrinS.V. (2000), ‘Paternalism, Unconscionability Doctrine and Accommodation’, Philosophy and Public Affairs29(3), pp. 205–250.
33.
ShoveE. (2010), ‘Beyond ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change’, Environment and Planning A42, pp. 1273–1285.
34.
SwiftA. (2006), Political Philosophy: A Beginner's Guide for Students and Politicians (2nd edn), Cambridge: Polity.
35.
TaylorJ.S. (2005), Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
ThalerR.SunsteinC.R. (2003), ‘Libertarian Paternalism is Not an Oxymoron’, University of Chicago Law Review70(4), pp. 1159–1202.
37.
ThalerR.SunsteinC.R. (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness, London: Penguin.
38.
WallS. (1998), Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
WallS. (2009), ‘Self-Ownership and Paternalism’, Journal of Political Philosophy17(4), pp. 399–417.
