The numerical under-representation of women in Westminster is a source of particular embarrassment for the Liberal Democrats who claim to fight for equality of opportunity for all. This article addresses the current situation within the Liberal Democrats through empirical analysis of qualitative and quantitative research. It identifies recruitment, political culture and thoughts on positive action as the key themes in relation to the question of supply and demand, drawing on ideas from feminism and the wider field of political science. In so doing it tackles substantive questions surrounding the party's commitment to increasing its number of women MPs.
AbdelaL. (1989) Women with X Appeal (London: Macdonald Optima).
2.
ButlerD. and WestlakeM. (2000) British Politics and the European Elections 1999 (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
3.
CampbellR. and LovenduskiJ. (2005) ‘Winning women's votes? The incremental track to equality’, Parliamentary Affairs, 58:4, 837–853.
4.
ChaneyP. (2006) ‘Critical mass, deliberation and the substantive representation of women: Evidence from the UK's Devolution Programme’, Political Studies, 54:4, 691–714.
5.
ChildsS. (2004) New Labour's Women MPs (London: Routledge).
6.
ChildsS. (2005) ‘Feminising politics: Sex and gender in the election’, in GambleA. and GeddesJ. (eds), Britain Decides: The UK General Election 2005 (Basingstoke: Palgrave), 150–168.
7.
ChildsS.LovenduskiJ. and CampbellR. (2005) Women at the Top 2005: Changing Numbers, Changing Politics? (London: Hansard Society).
8.
DahlerupD. (ed.) (2006) Women, Quotas and Politics (Abingdon: Routledge).
9.
DenverD. (2007) Elections and Voters in Britain (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
10.
HarrisonL. (2006) Selecting Women Candidates: A Critical Evaluation. Conference Paper, British Liberal Political Studies Group, University of Wales.
KlausenJ. and MaierC. S. (eds) (2001) Has Liberalism Failed Women? Assuring Equal Representation in Europe and the United States (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
MansbridgeJ. (1999) ‘Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent “yes”’, The Journal of Politics, 63:1, 628–657.
15.
NorrisP. (2001) ‘Breaking the barriers: Positive discrimination policies for women’, in KlausenJ. and MaierC. S. (eds), Has Liberalism Failed Women? Assuring Equal Representation in Europe and the United States (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 89–111.
16.
NorrisP. and LovenduskiJ. (1995) Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
17.
PhillipsA. (1995) The Politics of Presence (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
18.
RaoN. (2005) ‘The representation of women in local politics’, Policy and Politics, 33:2, 323–329.
19.
RallingsC. and ThrasherM. (2005) The 2005 General Election: Analysis of the Results (University of Plymouth: The Electoral Commission).
20.
RussellA. and FieldhouseE. (2005) Neither Left nor Right: Liberal Democrats and the Electorate (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
21.
RussellA.FieldhouseE. and CuttsD. (2007) ‘De facto veto? The parliamentary Liberal Democrats’, The Political Quarterly, 78:1, 89–98.
22.
Shepherd-RobinsonL. and LovenduskiJ. (2002) Women and Candidate Selection (London: Fawcett Society).
23.
SonesB.with MoranM. and LovenduskiJ. (2005) Women in Parliament (London: Politico's).
24.
SquiresJ. (2007) The New Politics of Gender Equality (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
25.
WebbP. (2000) The Modern British Party System (London: Sage Publications).
