Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2007-5
‘Victims,Perpetrators and Actors’ Revisited: 1 Exploring the Potential for a Feminist Reconceptualisation of (International) Security and (Gender) Violence
In the discipline of International Relations (IR), which takes seriously issues of war and peace, there has been a lack of attention paid to theorising security in relation to violence. In this article, I explore the potential for a feminist reworking of these concepts. With reference to a range of literature addressing security and violence, I offer some insights into the relevance of such a reconceptualisation. I draw attention to the ways in which work on issues of violence and security function to reproduce understandings of these concepts that delimit the value of both academic theorising and policy prescription. In the study of security, because of the discursive power of the concept, and of violence, these considerations are particularly important, as they can literally be issues of life and death.
ButlerJ. (1993) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’ (London: Routledge).
11.
ButlerJ. (1994) ‘Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of postmodernism’, in SeidmanS. (ed.), The Postmodern Turn: New Perspectives on Social Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) [original 1990, presented at the Greater Philadelphia Philosophy Consortium], 153–170.
BuzanB. (1991) People, States and Fear (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf).
15.
CampbellD. (1998) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (rev. edn) (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
16.
CarverT. (ed.) (2003) ‘The Forum: Gender and International Relations’, International Studies Review, 5:2, 287–302.
17.
CarverT.CochranM.SquiresJ. (1998) ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, masculinities’, Review of International Studies, 24:2, 283–297.
CockburnC. (2001) ‘The gendered dynamic of armed conflict and political violence’, in MoserC.ClarkF. (eds), Victims, Perpetrators or Actors? Gender, Armed Conflict and Political Violence (London: Zed Books), 13–29.
20.
CroftS.TerriffT. (eds) (2000) Critical Reflections on Security and Change (London and Portland, OR: Frank Cass).
21.
DalbyS. (1997) ‘Contesting an essential concept: Reading the dilemmas in contemporary security discourse’, in KrauseK.WilliamsM. (eds), Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases (London: UCL Press), 3–32.
22.
D'CruzeS.RaoA. (2004) ‘Violence and the vulnerabilities of gender’, Gender and History, 16:3, 495–512.
23.
Der DerianJ. (1990) ‘The (s)pace of International Relations: Simulation, surveillance and speed’, International Studies Quarterly, 34:3, 295–310.
24.
DigeserP. (1992) ‘The fourth face of power’, The Journal of Politics, 54:4, 977–1007.
25.
DillonM. (1996) Politics of Security: Towards a Political Philosophy of Continental Thought (London: Routledge).
26.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1992) Women, Violence and Social Change (London: Routledge).
27.
DotyR. L. (1996) Imperial Encounters (London and Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
28.
DunneT.WheelerN. (2004) ‘“We the peoples”: Contending discourses of security in human rights theory and practice’, International Relations, 18:1, 9–23.
29.
EnloeC. (1996) ‘Margins, silences and bottom rungs: How to overcome the underestimation of power in International Relations’, in BoothK.SmithS.ZalewskiM. (eds), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 186–202.
30.
EnloeC. (2000) Bananas, Beaches and Bases (2nd edn) (London and Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
31.
FlaxJ. (1990) ‘Postmodern and gender relations in feminist theory’, in NicholsonL. (ed.), Feminism/ Postmodernism (London: Routledge, 1990), 3–62.
32.
GroszE. A. (1987) ‘Feminist theory and the challenge to knowledge’, Women's Studies International Forum, 10:5, 475–480.
33.
HanssenB. (2000) Critique of Violence: Between Poststructuralism and Critical Theory (London: Routledge).
34.
HerzJ. (1950) ‘Idealist internationalism and the security dilemma’, World Politics, 2:2, 157–180.
35.
HoogensenG.RottemS. V. (2004) ‘Gender identity and the subject of security’, Security Dialogue, 35:2, 155–171.
36.
HopgoodS. (2000) ‘Reading the small print in global civil society: The inexorable hegemony of the liberal self’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29:1, 1–25.
37.
JonesA. (1996) ‘Does gender make the world go round? Feminist critiques of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 22:4, 405–429.
38.
KeohaneR. (1986) ‘Realism, neorealism and the study of world politics’, in KeohaneR. O. (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press), 1–26.
39.
KeohaneR. (1989) ‘International Relations theory: Contributions of a feminist standpoint’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 18:2, 245–254.
40.
KrauseK. (1998) ‘Critical theory and security studies: The research programme of “critical security studies’”, Co-operation and Conflict, 33:3, 298–333.
41.
McDonaldM. (2002) ‘Human security and the construction of security’, Global Society, 16:3, 277–295.
42.
McRaeR. (2001) ‘Human security in a globalised world’, in McRaeR.HubertD. (eds), Human Security and the New Diplomacy (London: McGill-Queen's University Press), 14–27.
43.
McSweeneyB. (1999) Security, Identity and Interests: A Sociology of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
44.
MarcusS. (1992) ‘Fighting bodies, fighting words: A theory and politics of rape prevention’, in ButlerJ.ScottJ. (eds), Feminists Theorise the Political (London: Routledge), 385–403.
45.
MearsheimerJ. J. (1990) ‘Back to the future: Instability in Europe after the cold war’, International Security, 15:1, 5–56.
46.
MearsheimerJ. J. (1995) ‘The false promise of international institutions’, International Security, 19:3, 5–49.
47.
MillikenJ. (1999) ‘The study of discourse in International Relations: A critique of research methods’, European Journal of International Relations, 5:2, 225–254.
48.
MorgenthauH. (1948) ‘World politics in the mid-twentieth century’, Review of Politics, 10:2, 154–173.
49.
MorgenthauH. (1973) Politics among Nations (5th edn) (New York: Knopf).
50.
MoserC. (2001) ‘The gendered continuum of violence and conflict: An operational framework’, in MoserC.ClarkF. (eds), Victims, Perpetrators or Actors? Gender, Armed Conflict and Political Violence (London: Zed Books), 30–52.
51.
MoserC.ClarkF. (eds) (2001) Victims, Perpetrators or Actors? Gender, Armed Conflict and Political Violence (London: Zed Books).
52.
NewmanE. (2001) ‘Human security and constructivism’, International Studies Perspectives, 2:3, 239–251.
ParisR. (2001) ‘Human security: Paradigm shift or hot air?’, International Security, 26:2, 87–102.
55.
PetersonV. S.RunyanA. S. (1999) Global Gender Issues (Oxford and Boulder, CO: Westview).
56.
PetersonV. S.TrueJ. (1998) ‘“New Times” and new conversations’, in ZalewskiM.ParpartJ. (eds), The ‘Man’ Question in International Relations (Oxford and Boulder, CO: Westview), 14–27.
57.
RadfordJ.KellyL.HesterM. (1996) ‘Introduction’, in HesterM.KellyL.RadfordJ. (eds), Women, Violence and Male Power: Feminist Activism, Research and Practice (Buckingham: Open University Press), 1–16.
58.
ScholteJ. A. (2002) ‘Civil society and governance in the global polity’, in OugaardM.HiggottR. (eds), Towards a Global Polity (London: Routledge), 145–166.
59.
ShawM. (2001) ‘The unfinished global revolution: Intellectuals and the new politics of international relations’, Review of International Studies, 27:4, 627–647.
60.
SheehanM. (2005) International Security: An Analytical Survey (London and Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).
61.
ShepherdL. J. (2006) ‘Loud voices behind the wall: Gender violence and the violent reproduction of the international’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 34:2, 377–401.
62.
ShepherdL. J.WeldesJ. (forthcoming) ‘Security: The state (of) being free from danger?’, in BrauchH. G. (eds), Globalisation and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualising Security in the 21st Century (Mosbach: AFES-PRESS).
63.
SmithS. (2005) ‘The contested concept of security’, in BoothK. (ed.), Critical Security Studies and World Politics (London and Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner), 27–62.
64.
SteansJ. (2003) ‘Engaging from the margins: Feminist encounters with the “mainstream” of International Relations’, The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 5:3, 428–454.
65.
StoneA. (2005) ‘Towards a genealogical feminism: A reading of Judith Butler's political thought’, Contemporary Political Theory, 4:1, 4–24.
66.
SylvesterC. (1994) Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
67.
SylvesterC. (1996) ‘The contributions of feminist theory to International Relations’, in SmithS.BoothK.ZalewskiM. (eds), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 254–278.
68.
SylvesterC. (2002) Feminist International Relations: An Unfinished Journey (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
69.
TehranianM. (ed.) (1999) Worlds Apart: Human Security and Global Governance (London: I. B. Tauris).
70.
ThomasC. (2000) Global Governance, Development and Human Security (London: Pluto).
71.
ThomasC. (2001) ‘Global governance, development and human security: Exploring the links’, Third World Quarterly, 22:2, 159–175.
72.
ThomasN.TowW. (2002) ‘The utility of human security: Sovereignty and humanitarian intervention’, Security Dialogue, 33:2, 177–192.
73.
TicknerJ. A. (1997) ‘You just don't understand: Troubled engagements between feminists and IR theorists’, International Studies Quarterly, 41:4, 611–632.
74.
United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (1994) ‘Human Development Report 1994’, Available online at: http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/1994/en/ [accessed 29 August 2006].
75.
WalkerR. B. J. (1997) ‘The subject of security’, in KrauseK.WilliamsM. C. (eds), Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases (London: UCL Press), 61–82.
76.
WaltzK. (1959) Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis (New York: Columbia University Press).
77.
WaltzK. (1979) Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
78.
WaltzK. (1993) ‘The emerging structure of international politics’, International Security, 18:2, 44–79.
79.
WaltzK. (2000) ‘Structural realism after the cold war’, International Security, 25:1, 5–41.
80.
WeberC. (1994) ‘Good girls, little girls and bad girls: Male paranoia in Keohane's critique of feminist International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23:2, 337–349.
81.
WendtA. (1992) ‘Anarchy is what states make of it’, International Organization, 46:2, 391–425.
82.
ZalewskiM. (1995) ‘Well, what is the feminist perspective on Bosnia?’, International Affairs, 71:2, 339–356.
