The set of works reviewed here suggest that the problems inherent in post-Cold War democracy promotion cannot be explained solely by policy failures. Attempts to push for democracy have been met with resistance, whether in response to the imposition of democracy or to ‘softer’ approaches. Collectively, the research in these volumes suggests that if democratization efforts are to succeed, those who hope to promote them must be more reflective about their own role in the process and cognizant of the fact that democracy promotion efforts are subject to political forces at the domestic, global and intermestic levels.
BridouxJ. (2011) American Foreign Policy and Postwar Reconstruction: Comparing Japan and Iraq. Abingdon: Routledge.
2.
BurnellP.SchlumbergerO. (eds) (2012) International Politics and National Political Regimes: Promoting Democracy: Promoting Autocracy. Abingdon: Routledge.
3.
DahlR. (2000) On Democracy. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
4.
DiamondL. (2004) ‘What Went Wrong in Iraq’, Foreign Affairs, 83 (5), 34–56.
5.
FukuyamaF. (1992) The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
6.
GleditschN. P. (2007) ‘The Liberal Moment Fifteen Years On’. Presidential Address, 49th Convention of the International Studies Association, San Francisco, 27 March, International Studies Quarterly, 52 (4), 691–712.
7.
KurtenbachS. (2010) ‘Why is Liberal Peacebuilding so Difficult? Some Lessons from Central America’, European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 88 (April), 95–110.
8.
LevitskyS.WayL. (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
LevyD. (2010) ‘Recursive Cosmopolitanization: Argentina and the Global Human Rights Regime’, British Journal of Sociology, 61 (3), 579–97.
10.
ZanottiL. (2011) Governing Disorder: UN Peace Operations, International Security, and Democratization in the Post-Cold War Era. University Park PA: Penn State University Press.
