AgambenG., (2005), State of Exception, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AndersonB., (2011), ‘Preemption, precaution, preparedness: anticipatory action and future geographies’, Progress in Human Geography, 34 (6): 777–798.
3.
BijkerW. E., (2007), ‘American and Dutch coastal engineering’, Social Studies of Science, 37 (1): 143–151.
4.
CarrL. J., (1932), ‘Disaster and the sequence-pattern concept of social change’, The American Journal of Sociology, 38 (2): 207–218.
5.
ClarkN., (2010), Inhuman Nature: Sociable Life on a Dynamic Planet, London: Sage Publications.
6.
ColletD., (2010), ‘Storage and starvation: public granaries as agents of food security in early modern Europe’, Historical Social Research, 35 (4): 234–252.
7.
DemerittD.NobertS.ClokeH. L. and PappenbergerF., (2013), ‘The European Flood Alert System and the communication, perception, and use of ensemble predictions for operational flood risk management’, Hydrological Processes, 27 (1): 147–157.
8.
DupuyJ.-P. and GrinbaumA., (2005), ‘Living with uncertainty: from the precautionary principle to the methodology of ongoing normative assessment’, Comptes Rendus Geosciences, 337 (4): 457–474.
9.
EriksonK. T., (1976), Everything in its Path: Destruction of Community in the Buffalo Creek Flood, New York: Simon and Schuster.
10.
EwaldF., (1986), L'Etat providence, Paris: B. Grasset.
11.
GarfinkelH., (1967), ‘Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities’, in GarfinkelH. (ed.), Studies in Ethnomethodology, 35–75, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12.
GrahamS. and ThriftN., (2007), ‘Out of order: understanding repair and maintenance’, Theory, Culture and Society, 24 (3): 1–25.
13.
GuggenheimM.KräftnerB. and KröllJ., (forthcoming), ‘“I don't know whether I need a further level of disaster”: challenging the media of sociology in the sandbox’, Distinktion, Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. DOI: 10.1080/1600910X.2013.838977.
14.
HeathC.KnoblauchH. and LuffP., (2000), ‘Technology and social interaction: the emergence of “workplace studies”’, British Journal of Sociology, 51 (2): 299–320.
15.
JencsonL., (2001), ‘Disastrous rites: liminality and communitas in a flood crisis’, Anthropology and Humanism, 26 (1): 46–58.
16.
KendraJ. M. and WachtendorfT., (2007), ‘Community innovation and disasters’, in RodríguezH.QuarantelliE. L. and DynesR. C. (eds), Handbook of Disaster Research, 316–334, New York: Springer.
17.
KleinN., (2007), The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, New York: Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt.
18.
LakoffA. and CollierS. J., (2010), ‘Infrastructure and event: the political technology of preparedness’, in BraunB. and WhatmoreS. (eds), Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life, 243–265, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
LaneS. N.LandströmC. and WhatmoreS. J., (2011), ‘Imagining flood futures: risk assessment and management in practice’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369 (1942): 1784–1806.
Oliver-SmithA. and HoffmanS., (2002), ‘Introduction. Why Anthropologists should study disasters’, in Oliver-SmithA. and HoffmanS. L. (eds), Catastrophe and Culture: The Anthropology of Disaster, Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
22.
PerryR. W., (2007), ‘What is a disaster?’, in RodríguezH.QuarantelliE. L. and DynesR. C. (eds), Handbook of Disaster Research, 1–15, New York: Springer.
23.
PotthastJ., (2007), Die Bodenhaftung der Netzwerkgesellschaft. Eine Ethnografie von Pannen an Grossflughäfen, Bielefeld: Transcript.
24.
SchmittC., (2005), Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
StengersI., (2005), ‘The cosmopolitical proposal’, in LatourB. and WeibelP. (eds), Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, 994–1003, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
TierneyK. J., (2007), ‘From the margins to the mainstream? Disaster research at the crossroads’, 33: 503–525 (accessed 29 January 2010).
27.
TierneyK. and BevcC., (2007), ‘Disaster as war: militarism and the social construction of disaster in New Orleans’, in BrunsmaD.OverfeltD. and PicouS. J. (eds), The Sociology of Katrina: Perspectives on a Modern Catastrophe, 35–49, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
28.
WoodhouseE., (2011), ‘Conceptualizing disasters as extreme versions of everyday life’, in DowtyR. and AllenB. L. (eds), Dynamics of Disaster: Lessons on Risk, Response and Recovery, London: Earthscan.
29.
WynneB., (1988), ‘Unruly technology: practical rules, impractical discourses and public understanding’, Social Studies of Science, 18 (1): 147–167.