AndersonM.Den BoerM. (eds) (1994), Policing Across National Borders. London: Cassell.
2.
BouchardL-P. (1996), ‘Les Quinz a la Croisée des Chemins? Sur les Formes Possible del’ Union Européenne’, études internationale, 27(3), pp. 485–500.
3.
BorzelT. (1997), ‘Policy Networks: A New Paradigm for European Governance’, Working PaperRSC 97/19, Florence, European University Institute.
4.
BreckinridgeR.E. (1997), ‘Reassessing Regimes: The International Regime Aspects of the EU’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 35(2), pp. 173–187.
5.
BulmerS. (1994), ‘The Governance of the EU: A New Institutional Approach’, Journal of Public Policy, 13(4), pp. 351–380.
6.
ChristiansenT. (1994), ‘European Integration between Political Science and Sovereignty’, Working PaperRSC 94/4, Florence, European University Institute.
7.
ChristainsenT. (1996), ‘A Maturing Bureaucracy? The Role of the Commission in the Policy Process, in, RichardsonJ. (ed) European Union: Power and Policy-Making. (London: Routledge).
8.
CobbR. (1976), ‘Agenda Building as a Comparative Political Process’, American Political Science Review, 70, pp. 126–138.
9.
CohenM.D. (1972), ‘A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), pp. 1–25.
10.
CrawfordS. (1996), ‘Explaining Defection from International Cooperation: Germany's Unilateral Recognition of Croatia’, World Politics, 48(4), pp. 482–521.
11.
CurtinJ. (1993), ‘The Constitutional Structure of the EU: A Europe of Bits and Pieces’, Common Market Law Review, 30.
12.
DehisceR.WidderJ. (1990), ‘The Legal Dimension’ in, WallaceW. (ed) The Dynamics of European IntegrationLondon: Pinter.
13.
GallieW.B. (1956), ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’ in, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 55–56.
14.
GarrettG.TsebelisG. (1996), ‘An Institutionalist Critique of Intergovernmentalism’, International Organization, 50(2), pp. 269–299.
15.
GehringT. (1995), ‘Integration Theory: Neo-Functionalism and International Régimes’, Working PaperRSC/35, Florence, European University Institute.
16.
GohlerG. (1996), ‘Institutions in Political Theory: Lessons From European Integration’ in, RometschD.WesselsW. (eds) The European Union and Member States: Towards Institutional Fusion?Manchester: Manchester University Press.
17.
HaasP.M. (1992), ‘Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization, 46(1), pp. 187–224.
18.
HecloH. (1978), ‘Issue Networks and the Executive Establishments’ in, KingA. (ed) The New American Political System. Washington DC: American Enterprize Institute.
19.
HillC. (ed) (1996), The Actor's in European Foreign Policy. London, Routledge.
20.
HixS. (1994), ‘The Study of the European Community: The Challenge of Comparative Politics’, West European Politics, 17(1), pp. 1–30.
21.
HixS. (1996), ‘CP, IR, and the EU! A Response to Hurrell and Menon’, West European Politics, 19, pp. 802–804.
22.
HixS. (1997), ‘The Study of the European Union II: The ‘New Governance’ Agenda and its Rival’, Paper prepared for presentation to the British International Studies Association Annual Conference, Leeds, 15–17 December.
23.
HoffmannS. (1966), ‘Obstinate or Obsolete: The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe’ in, Daedalus, 95(3), pp. 862–915.
24.
HofstedeG. (1996), ‘An American in Paris: The Influence of Nationality on Organization Studies’, Organization Studies, 17(3), pp. 525–537.
25.
HollandM. (ed) (1997), Common Foreign and Security Policy: The Record of Reforms. London: Cassell.
26.
HurrellA.MenonA. (1996), ‘Politics Like Any Other? Comparative Politics, IR and the Study of the EU’, West European Politics, 19(2), pp. 386–402.
27.
JacobsenJ.K. (1995), ‘Much Ado About Ideas. The Cognitive Factor in Economic Policy’World Politics, 47, pp. 283–310.
28.
JordanG.RichardsonJ. (1982), ‘The British Style or the Logic of Negotiation?’ in, RichardsonJ. (ed) Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: George Allen and Unwyn.
29.
JosselinD. (1996), ‘Domestic Policy Networks and European Negotiations: Evidence From British and French Financial Systems’, Journal of European Public Policy, 3(3), pp. 297–317.
30.
KingdonJ.W. (1984), Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policy. Glenville, Ill: Harper Collins, First edition.
31.
KingdonJ.W. (1995), Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policy. Glenville, Ill: Harper Collins, Second edition.
32.
Kohler-KochB. (1996), ‘Catching up With Change: The Transformation of Goverance in the European Union, Journal of European Publc Policy, 3(3), pp. 359–380.
33.
LaffanB. (1997), ‘From Policy Entrepreneur to Policy Manager: The Challenge Facing the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4(3), pp. 422–438.
34.
LequesneC. (1996), ‘La Commission européenne entre autonomie et dépendance’, Revue Francaise des Science Politique, 46(3), pp. 389–408.
35.
LowndesV. (1996), ‘Varieties of New Institutionalism: A Critical Appraisal’, Public Administration, 74(2), pp. 181–197.
36.
MajoneG. (1989), Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
MarchJ.G. (1996), ‘Institutional Perspectives on Political Institutions, Governance, 9(3), pp. 247–264.
38.
MarksG.HoogheL.BlankK. (1996), ‘European Integration from the 1980s: State Centric v. Multi-Level Governance’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), pp. 341–378.
39.
MarshD.RhodesR.A.W. (eds) (1992), Policy Networks in British GovernmentOxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
MazeySRichardsonJ. (1997), ‘Policy Framing: Interest Groups and the Lead up to the 1996 Inter-Governmental Conference’, West European Politics, 20(3), pp. 111–113.
41.
MayntzR. (1994), ‘Modernization and the Logic of Interorganizational Networks’, MIPGF Working Paper No.4, Cologne: Max-Planck-Institut fur Gesellschaftsforschung.
42.
MonarJ. (1997), ‘The Finance's of the Union's Intergovernmental Pillars: Tortuous Experiments with the Community Budget’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 35(1), pp. 57–88.
43.
MonarJ. (1995), The Third Pillar. Justice and Home Affairs. Brussels: European Interuniversity Press.
44.
MoravcsikA. (1994), ‘Why the European Community Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation’, Working Paper No.52, Center for European Studies, Harvard University.
45.
NeunreitherK. (1997), ‘The Democratic Dimension of the European Union’, Government and Opposition, 32(3), pp. 435–442.
46.
NorthD. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
OhrgaardJ.C. (1997), ‘Less Than Supranational, More Than Intergovernmental’: European Political Cooperation and the Dynamics of Intergovernmental Integration’, Millennium, 26(1), pp. 1–29.
48.
OjanenH. (1997), ‘The Plurality of Truth: A Critique of Research and the State of European Integration’, Unpunished Ph.D. Thesis, European University Institute, Florence.
49.
PetersB.G. (1992), ‘Bureaucratic Politics and the Institutions of the EC’ in, SbragiaA. (ed) Euro-Politics: Institutions and Policy-Making in the New European Community. Washington DC: Brookings Institute.
50.
PetersB.G. (1994), ‘Agenda Setting in the European Community’, Journal of European Public Policy, 1(1), pp. 9–26.
51.
PetersB.G. (1997), ‘Escaping the Joint-Decision Trap: Repetition and Sectoral Politics in the EU’, West European Politics, 20(2), pp. 22–36.
52.
PetersonJ. (1995), ‘Decision-Making in the EU: Towards a Framework for Analysis’, Journal of European Public Policy, 2(1), pp. 69–93.
53.
PiersonP. (1996), ‘The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutional Analysis’, Comparative Political Studies, 29(2), pp. 123–163.
54.
PontussonJ. (1995), ‘From Comparative Public Policy to Political Economy: Putting Institutions in Their Place and Taking Interests Seriously’, Comparative Political Studies, 28(1), pp. 117–147.
55.
PutnamR.D. (1988), ‘The Logic of Two-Level Games’, International Organization, 42(3), pp. 427–469.
56.
RhodesR.A.W. (1990), ‘Policy Networks: A British Perspective’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2, pp. 293–317.
57.
RichardsonJ. (1996), ‘Policy-Making in the EU: Interests, Ideas and Garbage Cans of Primeval Soups’ in, RichardsonJ. (ed) European Union: Power and Policy- Making. London: Routledge.
58.
Risse-KappenT. (1996), ‘Exploring the Nature of the Beast: IR and Comparative Political Analysis Meet the EU’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(1), pp. 53–80.
59.
SabatierP.A. (1988), ‘An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Orientated Learning Therein’ in, Policy Sciences, 21, pp. 128–168.
60.
SabatierP.A.JenkinsH.C. (eds) (1993) Policy Change and learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, Col: Westview Press.
61.
SandholtzW. (1996), ‘Membership Matters: Limits of the Functional Approach to European Institutions’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), pp. 403–429.
62.
ScharpfF. (1988), ‘The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessons From German Federalism and European Integration’, Public Administration, 66(3), pp. 239–278.
63.
ScharpfF. (1994), ‘Community and Autonomy: Multi-Level Policy-Making in the EU’, Working PaperRSC 94/1, Florence, European University Institute.
64.
SebeniusJ. K. (1992), ‘Challenging Conventional Explanations of International Cooperation: Negotiation Analysis and the Case of Epistemic Communities’, International Organization, 46(1), pp. 323–365.
65.
ShawJ. (1996), ‘EU Legal Studies in Crisis? Towards a New Legal Dynamic?’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 16(2).
66.
StokerG.PyperR. (eds) (1997), ‘Understanding Governance’, Special edition of Public Policy and Administration, 12(2), 95pp.
67.
SweetA. StoneSandholtzW. (1997), ‘European Integration and Supranational Government’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4(3), pp. 297–317.
68.
TaylorP. (1983), The Limits of European Integration. London: Croom-Helm.
69.
TsebelisG. (1990), Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley, Cal: University of California Press.
70.
WallaceW. (1982), ‘Europe as a Confederation: The Community and the Nation State’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 21–22.
71.
WallaceW. (1994), Regional Integration: The West European Experience. Washington DC: Brookings Institute.
72.
WallaceW.SmithJ. (1995), ‘Democracy or Technocracy? European Integration and the Problem of Popular Consent’, West European Politics, 18(3), pp. 137–157.
73.
WeilerJ. (1993), ‘Neither Unity Nor Three Pillars: The Trinity Structure of the EU’ in, MonarJ., The Maastricht Treaty and the European Union. Brussels: European Interuniversity Press.
74.
WeilerJ. (1995), ‘European Democracy and its Critics’, West European Politics, 18(3), pp. 4–39.
75.
WinnN. (1996), ‘The Future Development of External Europe: From Maastricht I to Maastricht II’, National Security Studies Quarterly, 2(3), pp. 67–88.
76.
WinnN.LordC. (1997), ‘Garbage Cans or Rational Decision? Member Governments, Supranational Actors and the Shaping of the Agenda for the IGC’, Paper presented to the British International Studies Association Annual Conference, Leeds, 15–17 December.
77.
WinnN.LordC.(forthcoming), Pillarization in the European Union: The Politics of Agenda-Setting. London/New York: Macmillan/St. Martins Press.