Totalistic ideologies are breeding grounds for radicalization. Communities that adhere to such ideologies tend to rally when they feel threatened by powerful outsiders. Under such circumstances, community leaders become central. If they frame the situation as an existential threat to the community itself or to its most sacred values, they will accelerate the radicalization process and subsequently increase the prospects of violent actions by group members. The shift to violence takes place in the framework of close-knit social networks within the broader radicalized community. These networks consist of individuals who usually live in the same area and engage in continuous interaction among themselves. Such interactions bolster their communal commitment and develop a collective mindset that facilitates the slide of some of the individuals into violence. Those who eventually descend into terrorism usually exhibit strong identification with the community’s values and extreme alienation towards the outside world. They also enjoy high levels of biographical availability. These hypotheses are tested using the case study of Jewish terrorism in Israel between 1948 and 2006.
AlcortaC.SosisR. (2013) ‘Ritual, Religion and Violence: An Evolutionary Perspective’, in JuergensmeyerM.KittsM.JerrysonM. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 571–596.
2.
AlimiE. Y. (2007) ‘The Israeli Political Arena and Palestinian Contention: The Case of the “First” Intifada’, British Journal of Political Science, 37, 433–453.
3.
AlmondA. G.ApplebyR. S.SivanE. (2003) Strong Religion: The Rise of Fundamentalism around the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
AnthonyD.RobbinsT. (1997) ‘Religious Totalism, Exemplary Dualism and the Waco Tragedy’, in RobbinsT.PalmerS. J. (eds), Millennium, Messiahs and Mayhem: Contemporary Apocalyptic Movements. New York: Routledge, pp. 261–284.
6.
AtranS.GingesJ. (2012) ‘Religious and Sacred Imperatives in Human Conflict’, Science, 336 (6083), 855–857.
7.
AvalosH. (2005) Fighting Words: The Origins of Religious Violence. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
8.
BarkunM. (2007) ‘Appropriated Martyrs: The Branch Davidians and the Radical Right’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 19 (1), 117–124.
9.
BloomM. (2004) ‘Palestinian Suicide Bombing: Public Support, Market Share and Outbidding’, Political Science Quarterly, 119 (1), 61–68.
10.
CohenT. R.MontoyaR. M.InskoC. A. (2006) ‘Group Morality and Intergroup Relations: Cross-Cultural and Experimental Evidence’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1559–1572.
11.
CollinsR. (1988) Theoretical Sociology. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
12.
CookC. D. (2002) Contemporary Muslims Apocalyptic Literature. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
13.
Don YehiyeE. (1997) The Politics of the Arrangement: Settling Disputes in the Realm of Religion in Israel. Jerusalem: Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies (Hebrew).
14.
EarlJ.MartinA.McCarthyD. J. D.SouleS. (2004) ‘The Use of Newspaper Data in the Study of Collective Action’, Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 65–80.
15.
EndersW.SandlerT. (2006) The Political Economy of Terrorism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
EspositoJ. L. (2002) Unholy War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
EvanM. W. (1972) ‘An Organization-Set Model of Interorganizational Relations’, in TuiteM.ChisholmR.RadnorM. (eds), Interorganizational Decisionmaking. Chicago, IL: Aldine, pp. 181–200.
18.
FreemanL. C. (1977) ‘A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness’, Sociometry, 40, 35–41.
19.
FreemanL. C. (1979) ‘Centrality in Social Networks, I: Conceptual Clarification’, Social Networks, 1 (3), 215–239.
20.
FriedkinN. E. (1984) ‘Structural Cohesion and Equivalence Explanations of Social Homogeneity’, Sociological Methods and Research, 12, 235–261.
21.
GamsonA. W. (1992) Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
GamsonA. W.ModiglianiA. (1989) ‘Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach’, American Journal of Sociology, 95 (1), 1–37.
23.
GingesJ.AtranS.SachdevaS.MedinD. (2011) ‘Psychology Out of the Laboratory: The Challenge of Violent Extremism’, American Psychology, 66 (6), 507–519.
24.
HallJ. R. (2013) ‘Religion and Violence from Sociological Perspective’, in JuergensmeyerM.KittsM.JerrysonM. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 363–374.
25.
HallJ. R.SchuylerP.TrinhS. (2000) Apocalypse Observed. New York: Routledge.
26.
HannemanR. A.RiddleM. (2005) Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside, CA: University of California-Riverside.
27.
HasencleverA.RittbergerV. (2000) ‘Does Religion Make a Difference? Theoretical Approaches to the Impact of Faith on Political Conflict’, Millennium, 29, 641–674.
28.
HelfsteinS.AbdullahN.al-ObaidiM. (2009) ‘Deadly Vanguards: A Study of al-Qa ‘ida’s Violence against Muslims,’ CTC Report.
29.
HoffmanB. (2006) Inside Terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.
30.
JonesM. D.SmithL. M.WeedingM. (2003) ‘Looking for the Pattern: Al Qaeda in Southeast Asia – the Genealogy of a Terror Network’, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 26, 443–457.
31.
JuergensmeyerM. (2001) Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
32.
KapelioukA. (1996) Rabin: Political Murder. Tel Aviv: Sifriat Poalim (Hebrew).
33.
KarpinM.FriedmanI. (1999) Murder in the Name of God. Tel Aviv: Zmora Bitan (Hebrew).
34.
KellnerD. (2002) ‘Theorizing September 11: Social Theory, History and Globalization’, Social Thought and Research, 25 (1–2), 2–3.
35.
KepelG. (1991) Die Rache Gottes: Radikale Moslems, Christen, Und Juden auf dem Vormarsch. München: Piper.
36.
LaceyA. (2005) ‘Networked Communities: Social Centres and Activists Spaces in Contemporary Britain’, Space and Culture, 8 (5), 286–301.
37.
LaqueurW. (1999) The New Terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
LeeA. (2011) ‘Who Becomes a Terrorist?: Poverty, Education and the Origins of Political Violence’, World Politics, 63 (203), 203–245.
39.
MartinezT.McMullinS. (2004) ‘Factors Affecting Decisions to Volunteer in Nongovernmental Organizations’, Environment and Behaviour, 36, 112–126.
40.
McAdamD. (1986) ‘Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer’, American Journal of Sociology, 92, 64–90.
41.
McCarthyD. J.McPhailC.SmithJ. (1996) ‘Images of Protest: Dimensions of Selection Bias in Media Coverage of Washington Demonstrations, 1982 and 1991’, American Sociological Review, 61 (3), 478–499.
42.
McDermottT. (2005) Perfect Soldiers. New York: HarperCollins.
43.
NeubergerB. (1997) Religion and Democracy in Israel. Jerusalem: Florceheimer Institute of Political Research (Hebrew).
44.
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2002) ‘Islamic Culture and Democracy: Testing the “Clash of Civilizations” Thesis’, Comparative Sociology, 1 (3–4), 235–263.
45.
OliverE. P.MyersJ. D. (1999) ‘How Events Enter the Public Sphere’, American Journal of Sociology, 105 (1), 38–87.
46.
PapeR. A. (2003) ‘The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism’, American Political Science Review, 97 (3), 344–361.
47.
PedahzurA.PerligerA. (2006) ‘The Changing Nature of Suicide Attacks: A Social Network Perspective’, Social Forces, 94 (4), 1983–2004.
48.
PhilpotD. (2013) ‘Religion and Violence from Political Science Perspectives’, in JuergensmeyerM.KittsM.JerrysonM. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 397–409.
49.
PostM. J. (1990) ‘Terrorist Psycho-Logic: Terrorist Behaviour as a Product of Psychological Forces’, in ReichW. (ed.), The Origins of Terrorism. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, pp. 25–41.
50.
QureshiE.SellsA. M. (2003) ‘Constructing the Muslim Enemy’, in SellsA. M.QureshiE. (eds), The New Crusades. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 1–50.
ReeveS. (1999) The New Jackals. London: Northeastern University Press.
53.
RenardJ. (2012) Fighting Words. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
54.
RoszakT. (1968) The Making of a Counter-Culture. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
55.
SagemanM. (2004) Understanding Terror Networks. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
56.
SagemanM. (2008) Leaderless Jihad. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
57.
SchmidA. P.YongmanA. J. (2005) Political Terrorism: A New Guide to Actors, Authors, Concepts, Data Bases, Theories, and Literature, 2nd Edition. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
58.
SchussmanA.SouleA. S. (2005) ‘Process and Protest: Accounting for Individual Protest Participation’, Social Forces, 84 (2), 1083–1108.
59.
SegalH. (1987) Dear Brothers: The Story of the Jewish Underground. Jerusalem: Keter (Hebrew).
60.
ShindlerC. (2002) The Land beyond Promise: Israel, Likud and the Zionist Dream. New York: I.B. Tauris.
61.
SosisR. (2009) ‘The Adaptationist–By Product Debate on the Evolution of Religion: Five Misunderstanding of the Adaptionist Program’, Journal of Cognition and Culture, 9, 315–332.
62.
SosisR.AlcortaC. (2003) ‘Signalins, Solidarity and the Sacred: The Evolution of Religious Behaviour’, Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 264–274.
63.
SprinzakE. (1987) ‘From Messianic Pioneering to Vigilant Terrorism: The Case of Gush Emunim Underground’, in RapoportD. (ed.), Inside Terrorist Organization. London: Frank Cass, p. 187.
64.
SprinzakE. (1999) Brother against Brother: Violence and Extremism in Israeli Politics from Altalena to the Rabin Assassination. New York: Free Press.
65.
SternJ. (2003) Terror in the Name of God. New York: HarperCollins.
66.
SwannW. B.Jr. (2012) ‘When Group Membership Gets Personal: A Theory of Identity Fusion’, Psychological Review, 119, 441–456.
67.
SwannW. B.Jr. (2014) ‘What Makes a Group Worth Dying For? Identity Fusion Fosters Perception of Familial Ties, Promoting Self-Sacrifice’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106 (6), 912–926.
68.
TariqA. (2002) The Clash of Fundamentalisms. London: Verso.
69.
TesslerR. (2003) ‘Religious Radicalism between/in the Defensive Democracy, Defensive Politics and Defensive Citizenship’, State and Society, 1 (3), 585–619 (Hebrew).
70.
TibiB. (1999) Krieg der Zivilisationen. Hamburg: Hoffmann + Campe.
71.
ToftM. D. (2007) ‘Getting Religion? The Puzzling Case of Islam and Civil War’, International Security, 31 (4), 97–131.
72.
VictoroffJ. (2005) ‘The Mind of the Terrorist: A Review and Critique of Psychological Approaches’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49 (1): 3–42.
73.
VidinoL. (2007) ‘The Hofstad Group: The New Face of Terrorist Networks in Europe’, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 30 (7), 579–592.
74.
WattsD.StrogatzH. S. (1998) ‘Collective Dynamics of “Small-World” Networks’, Nature, 393, 4404–4442.
75.
WessingerC. (2009) ‘Deaths in the Fire at the Branch Davidians ’ Mount Carmel: Who Bears Responsibility?’ Nova Religio, 13 (2), 25–60.
76.
WhitehouseH. (1992) ‘Memorable Religions: Transmission, Codification and Change in Divergent Melanesian Contexts’, Man (N.S.), 27, 77–97.
77.
WhitehouseH. (2013) ‘Religion, Cohesion and Hostility’, in ClarkeS.PowellR.SavulescuJ. (eds), Religion, Intolerance and Conflict: A Scientific and Conceptual Investigation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 36–47.
78.
WiltfangG.McAdamD. (1991) ‘Distinguishing Cost and Risk in Sanctuary Activism’, Social Forces, 69, 987–1010.
79.
WolfsfeldG. (1997) Media and Political Conflict: News from the Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80.
ZertalI.EldarA. (2004) Lords of the Land. Tel-Aviv: Kinneret Zmora-bitan, Dvir.
81.
ZisserB.CohenA. (2003) From Reconciliation to Escalation. The Religious-Secular Division at the Start of the 21st Century. Jerusalem: Schoken (Hebrew).
