This research responds to the need to study trust in the national government (national trust) and in local government (local trust) simultaneously and investigates how decentralization reshapes political attitudes toward different layers of government. The argument is that decentralization contributes to variant patterns of political trust, defined by the relative strength of national trust and local trust, across countries. A multilevel analysis of East Asian countries shows that decentralization nurtures local trust in democracies, but decreases local trust in autocracies. Further, decentralization boosts national trust in autocracies, but not in democracies. Such a variant effect of decentralization sheds light on regime stability and viability in democratic and authoritarian countries.
AndersonC. J.GuilloryC. (1997) ‘Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems’, American Political Science Review, 91 (1), 66–81.
2.
BardhanP.MookherjeeD. (2000) ‘Capture and Governance at Local and National Levels’, American Economic Review, 90 (2), 135–39.
3.
BlairH. (2000) ‘Participation and Accountability at the Periphery: Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries’, World Development, 28 (1), 21–39.
4.
BoothJ. A.SeligsonM. A. (2009) The Legitimacy Puzzle in Latin America: Political Support and Democracy in Eight Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BotanC. H.TaylorM. (2005) ‘The Role of Trust in Channels of Strategic Communication for Building Civil Society’, Journal of Communication, 55 (4), 685–702.
6.
BrennanG.BuchananJ. M. (1980) The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CaiY. (2008) ‘Power Structure and Regime Resilience: Contentious Politics in China’, British Journal of Political Science, 38, 411–32.
8.
CampbellT. (2003) Quiet Revolution: Decentralization and the Rise of Political Participation. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
9.
ChanleyV. A.RudolphT. J.RahnW. M. (2000) ‘The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government: A Time Series Analysis’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 64 (3), 239–56.
10.
ChenJ. (2004) Popular Political Support in Urban China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
CitrinJ. (1974) ‘The Political Relevance of Trust in Government’, American Political Science Review, 68 (3), 973–88.
12.
CuiE.TaoR.WarnerT. J.YangD. L. (2014) ‘How Do Land Takings Affect Political Trust in China?’, Political Studies, doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12151.
13.
CuriniL.JouW.MemoliV. (2012) ‘Satisfaction with Democracy and the Winner/Loser Debate: The Role of Policy Preferences and Past Experience’, British Journal of Political Science, 42 (2), 241–61.
14.
DahlR. A.TufteE. R. (1973) Size and Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
DaltonR. J. (2004) Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
De MelloL. (2004) ‘Can Fiscal Decentralization Strengthen Social Capital?’, Public Finance Review, 32 (1), 4–35.
17.
DentersB. (2002) ‘Size and Political Trust: Evidence from Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 20 (6), 793–812.
DincerO. (2010) ‘Fiscal Decentralization and Trust’, Public Finance Review, 38 (2), 178–92.
20.
EgorovG.GurievS.SoninK. (2009) ‘Why Resource-Poor Dictators Allow Freer Media? A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data’, American Political Science Review, 103 (4), 645–68.
21.
Escobar-LemmonM.RossA. D. (2014) ‘Does Decentralization Improve Perceptions of Accountability? Attitudinal Evidence from Colombia’, American Journal of Political Science, 58 (1), 175–88.
22.
FalletiT. G. (2005) ‘A Sequential Theory of Decentralization: Latin American Cases in Comparative Perspective’, American Political Science Review, 99 (03), 327–46.
23.
FinkelS. E.SabatiniC.BevisG. G. (2000) ‘Civic Education, Civil Society and Political Mistrust in a Developing Democracy: The Case of the Dominican Republic’, World Development, 28 (11), 1851–74.
24.
FismanR.GattiR. (2002a) ‘Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence from US Federal Transfer Programs’, Public Choice, 113 (1–2), 25–35.
25.
FismanR.GattiR. (2002b) ‘Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence across Countries’, Journal of Public Economics, 83 (3), 325–45.
26.
GeddesB.ZallerJ. (1989) ‘Sources of Popular Support for Authoritarian Regimes’, American Journal of Political Science, 33 (2), 319–47.
27.
GerringJ.ThackerS. (2004) ‘Political Institutions and Corruption: The Role of Unitarism and Parliamentarism’, British Journal of Political Science, 34 (2), 295–330.
28.
GershtensonJ.PlaneD. (2009) ‘Political Trust: The Levels of Government, Institutions and Types of Trust’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago, IL.
29.
HessS. (2013) ‘From the Arab Spring to the Chinese Winter: The Institutional Sources of Authoritarian Vulnerability and Resilience in Egypt, Tunisia and China’, International Political Science Review, 34 (3), 254–72.
30.
HetheringtonM. (2005) Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
HibbingJ. R.LarimerC. W. (2005) ‘What the American Public Wants Congress to Be’, in DoddL. C.OppenheimerB. I. (eds), Congress Reconsidered. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 55–76.
32.
HibbingJ. R.Theiss-MorseE. (2002) Stealth Democracy: American’s Beliefs about How Government Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
HiskeyJ.SeligsonM. (2003) ‘Pitfalls of Power to the People: Decentralization, Local Government Performance and System Support in Bolivia’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 37 (4), 64–88.
34.
JenningsK. (1998) ‘Political Trust and the Roots of Devolution’, in BraithwaiteV.LeviM. (eds), Trust and Governance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 218–44.
35.
KelleherC. A.WolakJ. (2007) ‘Explaining Public Confidence in the Branches of State Government’, Political Research Quarterly, 60 (4), 707–21.
36.
KunicováJ.Rose-AckermanS. (2005) ‘Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption’, British Journal of Political Science, 35 (4), 573–606.
37.
LandryP. F. (2008) Decentralized Authoritarianism in China: The Communist Party’s Control of Local Elites in the Post-Mao Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
LeviM.StokerL. (2000) ‘Political Trust and Trustworthiness’, Annual Review of Political Science, 3 (1), 475–507.
39.
LiL. (2004) ‘Political Trust in Rural China’, Modern China, 30 (2), 228–58.
40.
LiL.O’BrienK. J. (1996) ‘Villagers and Popular Resistance in Contemporary China’, Modern China, 2 (1), 28–61.
41.
MatsubayashiT. (2007) ‘Population Size, Local Autonomy and Support for the Political System’, Social Science Quarterly, 88 (3), 830–49.
42.
MillerW. L.DicksonM.StokerG. (2001) Models of Local Governance: Public Opinion and Political Theory in Britain. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
43.
MishlerW.RoseR. (2001) ‘What are the Origins of Political Trust?’, Comparative Political Studies, 34 (1), 30–62.
44.
MoustafaT. (2002) ‘The Dilemmas of Decentralization and Community Development in Authoritarian Contexts’, Journal of Public and International Affairs, 13 (1), 123–44.
45.
NewtonK. (2006) ‘Political Support: Social Capital, Civil Society, and Political and Economic Performance’, Political Studies, 54 (4), 846–64.
46.
NorrisP. (1999) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
O’BrienK. J.LiL. (2006) Rightful Resistance in Rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
OatesW. (1972) Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace.
49.
OatesW. (1999) ‘An Essay on Fiscal Federalism’, Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1120–49.
50.
OlsonM.Jr (1969) ‘The Principle of Fiscal Equivalence: The Division of Responsibilities among Different Levels of Government’, American Economic Review, 59 (2), 479–87.
51.
PattersonT. E. (1996) ‘Bad News, Bad Governance’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546 (1), 97–108.
52.
PharrS. (1997) ‘Public Trust and Democracy in Japan’, in NyeJ.ZelikowP. (eds), Why People Don’t Trust Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 237–52.
53.
PharrS. J.PutnamR. D.DaltonR. J. (2000) ‘A Quarter-Century of Declining Confidence’, Journal of Democracy, 11, 5–25.
54.
PutnamR. D. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55.
QianY.WeingastB. R. (1997) ‘Federalism as a Commitment to Preserving Market Incentives’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11 (4), 83–92.
56.
RahnW.RudolphT. (2005) ‘A Tale of Political Trust in American Cities’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 69 (4), 530–60.
57.
RobinsonM. J. (1976) ‘Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise: The Case of “The Selling of the Pentagon”’, American Political Science Review, 70 (2), 409–32.
58.
RondinelliD. A. (1980) ‘Government Decentralization in Comparative Perspective: Theory and Practice in Developing Countries’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 47 (2), 133–45.
59.
SchneiderA. (2003) ‘Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement’, Studies in Comparative International Develop-ment, 38 (3), 32–56.
60.
SeligsonM. A.CarriónJ. F. (2002) ‘Political Support, Political Skepticism and Political Stability in New Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 35 (1), 58–82.
61.
ShiT. (2001) ‘Cultural Values and Political Trust: A Comparison of the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan’, Comparative Politics, 33 (4), 401–19.
62.
ShirkS. (2010) Changing Media, Changing China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63.
ShleiferA.VishnyR. (1993) ‘Corruption’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (3), 599–618.
64.
SmithG. (2009) Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
SolnickS. L. (1996) ‘The Breakdown of Hierarchies in the Soviet Union and China: A Neoinstitutional Perspective’, World Politics, 48 (2), 209–38.
66.
TangM.HuheN. (2014) ‘Alternative Framing: The Effect of the Internet on Political Support in Authoritarian China’, International Political Science Review, 35 (5), 559–76.
67.
TangW. (2005) Public Opinion and Political Change in China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
68.
TangW.IyengarS. (2011) ‘The Emerging Media System in China: Implications for Regime Change’, Political Communication, 28 (3), 263–67.
69.
TieboutC. (1956) ‘A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures’, Journal of Political Economy, 64 (4), 416–24.
TreismanD. (2007a) ‘What Have We Learned about the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research?’, Annual Review of Political Science, 10 (1), 211–44.
72.
TreismanD. (2007b) The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73.
Van AsscheD.DierickxG. (2007) ‘The Decentralisation of City Government and the Restoration of Political Trust’, Local Government Studies, 33 (1), 25–47.
74.
Weitz-ShapiroR. (2008) ‘The Local Connection’, Comparative Political Studies, 41 (3), 285–308.
75.
WolakJ.KelleherC. (2010) ‘The Dynamics of Public Confidence in US State and Local Government’, State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 10 (4), 421–45.
76.
YangY.TangM.ZhouW.HuheN. (2014) ‘The Effect of Media Use on Institutional Trust in China’, Problems of Post-Communism, 61 (3), 45–56.
