Applies the theoretical framework of
‘individualisation’ to political parties and policy
participation.
Suggests a new model of policy development in social democratic
parties where increased prominence is given to ordinary citizens and
supporters.
Presents illustrative case studies of new forms of policy
participation, including community consultations and online forums
in the UK Labour Party and the Australian Labor Party.
Assesses the implications of individualisation on political parties
as sites for policy-making, participation and representation.
This article examines the changing nature of the connection between citizens,
party members and elites in the creation of party policy through the theoretical
prism of individualisation. Using qualitative case studies of recent
policy-making initiatives in the Australian Labor Party and the UK Labour Party,
the article develops a new model of policy transferal that is not built upon the
mass-party model of parliamentary politics, but rather upon organisational
evolutions such as community consultations, online participation and
supporters' networks. These evolutions, or reforms, typically emphasise
the individuality of policy-making and accountability, promote new technologies
for facilitating decision-making, and attempt to engage with a new style of
politically active citizen. Each of these developments carries implications for
how political parties facilitate participation, accountability and
responsiveness in modern forms of representative democracy.
BangH.
(2003) ‘A new ruler makes a new citizen:
Cultural governance and everyday making’, in
BangH.
(ed.), Governance As Social and Political Communication
(Manchester: Manchester
University Press),
241–267.
6.
BangH.
(2009) ‘Political community: The blind
spot of modern democratic decision-making’,
British Politics, 4,
100–116.
7.
BangH.
(2011) ‘The politics of threats:
Late-modern politics in the shadow of neoliberalism’,
Critical Policy Studies,
5:4,
434–448.
8.
BartoliniS.MairP.
(2001) ‘Challenges to contemporary
political parties', in DiamondL.GuntherR.
(eds), Political Parties and Democracy
(Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins
University Press),
327–344.
9.
BennettW.
L. (2008)
‘Changing citizenship in the digital
age’, in BennettW.
L. (ed.), Civic Life Online:
Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth
(Cambridge, MA: The MIT
Press),
1–24.
10.
BennettW.
L.SegerbergA.
(2011) ‘Digital media and the
personalization of collective action’,
Information, Communication and Society,
14:6,
770–799.
11.
BlythM.KatzR.
(2005) ‘From catch-all politics to
cartelisation’, West European
Politics, 28:1,
33–60.
12.
BracksS.FaulknerJ.CarrR.
(2011) 2010 National Review: Report to the ALP National
Executive (Canberra:
Australian Labor Party).
13.
BruterM.HarrisonS.
(2009) The Future of Our Democracies: Young Party
Members in Europe (Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan).
14.
CainB.DaltonR.ScarrowS.
(eds) (2003) Democracy Transformed? The Expansion of
Citizen Access in Advanced Industrial Democracies
(Oxford: Oxford University
Press).
15.
AnaCardenal
S. (2013)
‘Why mobilise support online? The paradox of
party behaviour online’, Party
Politics, 19:1,
83–103.
16.
ChadwickA.
(2007) ‘Digital network repertoires and
organizational hybridity’, Political
Communication, 24:3,
283–301.
17.
ChenP.
(2013) Australian Politics in A Digital Age
(Canberra: ANU
EPress).
18.
ClarkA.
(2004) ‘The continued relevance of local
parties in representative democracies',
Politics, 24:1,
35–45.
19.
ColemanS.
(2004) ‘Whose conversation?
Engaging the public in authentic policy dialogue’,
Political Quarterly, 75:2,
112–120.
20.
CrossW.BlaisA.
(2012) Politics at the Centre: The Selection and
Removal of Party Leaders in the Anglo Parliamentary Democracies
(Oxford: Oxford University
Press).
21.
DaltonR.
(2008) ‘Citizenship norms and the
expansion of political participation’,
Political Studies, 56,
76–98.
22.
DelwitP.
(2011) ‘Still in decline? Party
membership in Europe’, in Van
HauteE.
(ed.), Party Membership in Europe: Exploration into the Anthills of
Party Politics (Brussels:
Editions de l'Universite de
Bruxelles),
25–42.
23.
EzrowL.VriesC. D.SteenbergenM.EdwardsE.
(2011) ‘Mean voter representation and
partisan constituency representation: Do parties respond to the mean voter
position or to their supporters?’,
Party Politics, 17:3,
275–301.
24.
Faucher-KingF.
(2005) Changing Parties: An Anthropology of British
Political Party Conferences
(Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan).
25.
Faucher-KingF.Le GalèsP.
L. (2010) The
New Labour Experiment: Change and Reform under Blair and Brown
(Stanford, CA: Stanford
University Press).
FisherJ.FieldhouseE.CuttsD.
(2013) ‘Members are not the only fruit:
Volunteer activity in British political parties at the 2010 General
Election’, British Journal of Politics and
International Relations (published online: DOI:
10.1111/1467-856X.12011).
28.
GaujaA.
(2012) ‘The “push” for
primaries: What drives party organisational reform in Australia and the
UK?’, Australian Journal of Political
Science, 47:4,
641–658.
29.
GibsonR.
(2013) ‘Party change, social media and
the rise of citizen-initiated campaigning’,
Party Politics (published online: doi:
10.1177/1354068812472575).
30.
GibsonR.GillanK.GreffetF.LeeB.WardS.
(2013) ‘Party organizational change and
ICTs: The growth of a virtual grassroots?’,
New Media and Society,
15:1,
31–51.
HainP.
(2004) The Future Party
(London:
Catalyst).
33.
HarmelR.
(2002) ‘Party organizational change:
Competing explanations?’, in LutherRichard
K.Muller-RommelF.
(eds), Political Parties in the New Europe: Political and Analytical
Challenges (Oxford:
Oxford University Press),
119–142.
34.
HayC.
(2007) Why We Hate Politics
(Cambridge: Polity
Press).
35.
HazanR.RahatG.
(2010) Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection
Methods and their Political Consequences
(Oxford: Oxford University
Press).
36.
HibbingJ.Theiss-MorseE.
(2002) Stealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs
about How Government Should Work (New
York: Cambridge University
Press).
37.
HopkinJ.
(2001) ‘Bringing the members back
in? Democratizing candidate selection in Britain and
Spain’, Party Politics,
7:3,
343–361.
38.
InglehartR.
(1997) Modernization and Postmodernization
(Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press).
39.
KatzR.
(2001) ‘The problem of candidate
selection and models of party democracy’,
Party Politics, 7:3,
277–296.
40.
KatzR.MairP.
(1995) ‘Changing models of party
organisation and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel
party’, Party Politics,
1:1,
5–28.
41.
KatzR.MairP.
(2009) ‘The cartel party thesis: A
restatement’, Perspectives on
Politics, 7:4,
753–766.
42.
KeaneJ.
(2010) ‘Farewell to social
democracy?’, Australian Literary
Review, 5:9,
3–4.
43.
LiY.MarshD.
(2008) ‘New forms of political
participation: Searching for expert citizens and everyday
makers', British Journal of Political
Science, 38,
247–272.
44.
MairP.
(2005) Democracy Beyond Parties
(Irvine, CA: UC Irvine Centre
for the Study of Democracy).
45.
MairP.Van
BiezenI.
(2001) ‘Party membership in twenty
European democracies, 1980–2000’,
Party Politics, 7:1,
5–21.
46.
NorrisP.
(2002) Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political
Activism (Cambridge:
Cambridge University
Press).
47.
NorrisP.
(2007) ‘Political activism: New
challenges, new opportunities', in BoixC.StokesS.
(eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics
(Oxford: Oxford University
Press),
628–649.
48.
OrrG.
(2010) The Law of Politics: Elections, Parties and
Money in Australia (Sydney:
The Federation Press).
49.
PattieC.SeydP.WhiteleyP.
(2004) Citizenship in Britain: Values, Participation
and Democracy (Cambridge:
Cambridge University
Press).
50.
PembertonH.Wickham-JonesM.
(2012) ‘Labour's lost grassroots:
The rise and fall of party membership’,
British Politics, 8,
181–206.
51.
PutnamR.
(2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Renewal of
American Community (New York:
Simon and Schuster).
52.
SawardM.
(2008) ‘Making representations: Modes and
strategies of political parties', European
Review, 16:3,
271–286.
53.
SawerM.AbjorensenN.LarkinP.
(2009) Australia: The State of Democracy
(Sydney: The Federation
Press).
54.
ScarrowS.
(2000) ‘Parties without members?
Party organization in a changing electoral
environment’, in DaltonR.WattenbergM.
(eds), Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced
Industrial Democracies (Oxford:
Oxford University Press),
79–101.
55.
ScarrowS.
(2013a) ‘New challenges of intra-party
democracy: Grassroots activists, instant members and
cyber-militants', in AvrilE.ZumelloC.
(eds), New Technology, Organizational Change and Governance
(Houndmills: Palgrave
Macmillan),
85–101.
56.
ScarrowS.
(2013b) ‘Beyond Party Membership:
Expanding Views of Partisan Participation’,
Paper prepared for the ‘Towards More Multifaceted
Understandings of Party Membership’ Conference held at CVAP (Centre
for Elections and Parties), Copenhagen
University).
57.
ScarrowS.GezgorB.
(2010) ‘Declining memberships, changing
members? European political party members in a new
era’, Party Politics,
16:6,
823–843.
58.
SeydP.
(1999) ‘New parties/new politics: A case
study of the British Labour Party’, Party
Politics, 5:3,
383–405.
59.
SeydP.WhiteleyP.
(2002) New Labour's Grassroots: The
Transformation of the Labour Party Membership
(Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan).
60.
StolleD.HoogheM.MichelettiM.
(2005) ‘Politics in the supermarket:
Political consumerism as a form of political
participation’, International Political
Science Review, 26:3,
245–270.
61.
UK Labour Party
(2003) A Future Fair for All: Big Issues Need A Big
Conversation (London:
Labour Party).
62.
UK Labour Party
(2006) Making Policy—Partnership in
Power (London:
Labour Party).
63.
UK Labour Party
(2011a) Refounding Labour: A Party for the New
Generation (London:
The Labour Party).
64.
UK Labour Party
(2011b) A Better Future for Britain
(London: The Labour
Party).
65.
UK Labour Party
(2011c) Refounding Labour to Win: A Party for the New
Generation (London:
The Labour Party).
66.
UK Labour Party
(2011d) Refounding our Place in the
Community—Building a Network of Labour Supporters,
Information Pamphlet
(London: The Labour
Party).
Van
BiezenI.MairP.PoguntkeT.
(2012) ‘Going, going…gone?
The decline of party membership in contemporary
Europe’, European Journal of Political
Research, 51:1,
24–56.
69.
Van
BiezenI.PiccioD.
R. (2013)
‘Shaping intra-party democracy: On the legal
regulation of internal party organization’, in
CrossW.KatzR.
(eds), The Challenges of Intra-Party Democracy
(Oxford: Oxford University
Press),
27–48.
70.
Van
HauteE. (ed.)
(2011) Party Membership in Europe: Exploration into the
Anthills of Party Politics
(Brussels: Editions de
l'Universite de Bruxelles).
71.
VoermanG.Van
SchuurW.
(2011) ‘Dutch political parties and their
members', in Van
HauteE.
(ed.), Party Membership in Europe: Exploration into the Anthills of
Party Politics (Brussels:
Editions de l'Universite de
Bruxelles),
77–94.
72.
WhiteleyP.
(2007) ‘Are groups replacing
parties? A multi-level analysis of party and group membership in the
European democracies', Paper presented at the
ECPR Joint Sessions, Helsinki.
73.
WhiteleyP.
(2011) ‘Is the party over? The
decline of political activism and membership across the democratic
world’, Party Politics,
17:1,
21–44.
74.
WhiteleyP.
(2012) Political Participation in Britain: The Decline
and Revival of Civic Culture
(Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan).
75.
WhiteleyP.SeydP.BillinghurstA.
(2006) Third Force Politics: Liberal Democrats at the
Grassroots (Oxford:
Oxford University Press).
76.
YoungL.CrossW.
(2002) ‘The rise of plebiscitary
democracy in Canadian political parties',
Party Politics, 8:6,
673–699.
