Determination of Fracture Toughness,GC of Graphite/Epoxy Composites from a Cracked Lap Shear (CLS) Specimen

Abstract

Previously, the work factor approach was applied to determine fracture toughness, G_c of unidirectional graphite/epoxy CLS specimen, and it is required to apply the approach to determine G_c of multi-directional CLS specimen. In this work, the elastic work factor, η _el form of multi-directional CLS specimen was calculated numerically as a function of delamination length in order to investigate stacking sequence effect on η _el . The calculated η _el was applied experimentally to determine fracture toughness, G _c of multi-directional ([0/±45/0] _s /[0₂/±45₂/0₂] _s , [0/±45/0] _s /[0₂±45₂/90₂] _s , and [90₂/0₂] _s /[0₄/90₄] _s for the lap and the strap) graphite/epoxy composites. For each case, the G_c values determined from the η _el approach were compared with those determined from the compliance method. Numerical results show that η _el is not affected by the fiber angles of plies, and η _el is linearly related to delamination length. It was found from the experimental results that G_c determined from the η _el approach is in a maximum 15% range of difference with that determined from the compliance method for each case. It was also found from the SEM examination that delamination propagated irregularly through interfaces of lap and strap (8th and 9th plies) for [90₂/0₂] _s /[0₄/90₄] _s case while no delamination transfer was observed for [0/±45/0] _s /[0₂/±45₂/0₂] _s and [0/±45/0] _s /[0₂/±45₂/90₂] _s cases.

Keywords

delamination CLS specimen fracture toughness elastic work factor fracture morphology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Rao, B. N. and Acharya, A. R. 1995. “Evaluation of fracture energy GIc using a double cantilever beam fiber composite specimen”, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 51, pp. 317–322.

2. Wang, H. , Vukhahn, T. and Le, V. N. , 1995, “Effects of large deflection on mode II fracture test of compsotie materials”, J. of Composite Materials, pp. 833–849.

3. Benzeggaph, M. L. and Kenane, M. , 1996, “Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus,” Composite Science and Technology, Vol. 56, pp. 439–449.

4. Alif, N. , Carlsson, L. A. and Gillespie, Jr., J. W. , 1997, “Mode, I, mode II and mixed mode interlaminar fracture of woven fabric carbon/epoxy,” ASTM STP 1242, pp. 82–106.

5. Mangalgiri, P. D. and Johnson, W. S. , 1986, “Preliminary design of cracked lap shear specimen thickness for delamination of interlaminar fracture toughness,” J. of Composite Technology and Research, Vol. 8, pp. 58–60.

6. Dattaguru, B. , Everett, R. A. Jr. , Whitcomb, J. D. and Johnson, W. S. , “Geometrically nonlinear analysis of adhesively bonded joints,” J. of Engineering Materials and Technology, Vol. 106, pp. 59–65.

7. Johnson, W. S. , 1987, “Stress analysis of the cracked-lap-shear specimen: An ASTM round-robin,” J. Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 15, pp. 303–324.

8. Gustafson, C. G. , Hojo, M. and Holm, D. , 1989, “Nonlinear analysis of the CLS specimen,” J. of Composite Materials, Vol. 23, pp. 146–162.

9. Poursartip, A. and Chinatambi, N. , 1990, “Fatigue growth, deflection, and crack opening displacement in cracked lap shear specimens,” ASTM STP 1905, pp. 301–323.

10.

10. Hwu, C. , Kao, C. J. and Chang, L. E. , 1995, “Delamination fracture criteria for composite laminates,” J. Composite Materials, Vol. 29, pp. 1962–1987.

11.

11. Rhee, K. Y. and Ernst, H. A. , 1993, “A study on the application of work factor approach to composites laminates,” J. of Composite Materials, Vol. 27, pp. 962–972.

12.

12. Griffith, A. A. , 1920, “The phenomena of rupture and flaw in Solids,” Transactions, Royal Society of London, A-221.

13.

13. Rice, J. R. , Paris, P. C. and Merkle, J. G. , 1973, “Some further results of J-integral analysis and estimates,” ASTM STP 536, pp. 231–235.

14.

14. Rybicki, E. F. and Kanninen, M. F. , 1977, “A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by modified crack closure integral,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 9, pp. 931–938.

15.

15. O’Brien, K. R. and Martin, R. H. 1993, “Round robin testing for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of composite materials,” J. of Composites Technology & Research, Vol. 15, pp. 269–281.

16.

16. Charalambides, M. N. and Williams, J. G. , 1994, “Fracture toughness characterization of phenolic resin and its composites,” Polymer Composites, Vol. 16, pp. 17–28.

17.

17. Chou, I. , Kimpara, I. , Kageyama, K. , and Ohsawa, I. , 1995, “Mode I and mode II fracture toughness measured between differently oriented plies in graphite/epoxy composites,” ASTM STP 1230, pp. 132–151.