Vibration Suppression of Structures Using Passive Shape Memory Alloy Energy Dissipation Devices

Abstract

The paper presents a preliminary study on feasibility using shape memory alloy (SMA) passive devices for vibration suppression of building structures. A one-story prototype-building model is used. The structure is subjected to a base excitation and is strengthened by SMA diagonal bracing wires. Constitutive behavior of SMA wires used in the study was experimentally characterized to properly model the SMA super- or pseudoelastic material properties and results were compared with the numerical simulation based on theoretical SMA constitutive models by Lexcellent and Bourbon ((1996). Thermodynamical model of cyclic behavior of Ti-Ni and Cu-Zn-Al shape memory alloys under isothermal undulated tensile tests. Mechanics of Materials, 24: 59-73) and Brinson ((1993). One-dimensional constitutive behavior of shape memory alloys: Thermomechanical derivation with non-constant material functions and redefined martensite internal variable. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 4: 229). The Single-degree-of-freedom structural system was also experimentally calibrated to determine the structural parameters. Both the experimentally calibrated structural model and SMA constitutive model were then employed in numerical simulation to predict dynamic response of the building structure with SMA bracing wires subjected to a base input and results showed a good agreement with experimental data. The results were also compared with both cases of conventional steel bracing wires and no bracing at all. The results showed that SMA passive devices maybe effectively used to suppress vibration by introducing additional stiffness to shift the system natural frequency away from the resonance and/or providing additional energy dissipation by its superelastic hysteresis. The SMA damping is adaptive and is especially attractive for the case when the loading is random in nature. When an unexpected excitation causes excessive vibration, more energy will be dissipated through larger SMA superelastic hysteretic loops and therefore, the vibration will eventually be mitigated. Numerical simulation also showed that the SMA device dissipated more energy than the viscous damping in the case studied.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken, I.D. et al. (1993). Testing of passive energy dissipation systems. Earthquake Spectra, 9: 3.

Attanasio, M. et al. (1996). Use of shape memory alloy for seismic isolation devices. Seventh International Conference on Adaptive Structures. Rome, Italy, September 23-25.

Baz, A. et al. (1990). Active vibration control on flexible beams using shape memory actuators. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 140: 3.

Brinson, L.C. (1993). One-dimensional constitutive behavior of shape memory alloys: Thermomechanical derivation with non-constant material functions and redefined martensite internal variable. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 4: 229.

Clark, P.W. , Aiken, I.D. , Kelly, J.M. (1995). Experimental and analytical studies of shape memory alloy dampers for structural control. In: Proceedings of the 1995 Conference on Smart Structures and Materials.

Delaey, L. et al. (1974). Review-thermoelasticity, pseudoelasticity and the memory effects associated with martensitic transformations - Part 2: The macroscopic mechanical behavior. J. Mat. Sci., 9: 1536-1544.

Funakubo, H. (1987). Shape Memory Alloys. Translated from the Japanese by J. B. Kennedy, New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.

Grasser, E.J. , Gozzarelli, F.A. (1991). Shape memory alloys as new materials for a seismic isolation. Journal of Engineering Materials, 117: 11.

Inaudi, J.A. and Kelly, J.M. (1994). Experiments on tuned mass dampers using viscoelastic, frictional, and shape memory alloy materials. In: Proceedings of the First World Conference on Structural Control, 2, pp. 127-136.

10.

Kelly, J.M. (1993). Application of shape memory materials for reduction of structural response to earthquake ground motion. In: Proceedings of a Workshop on Smart and High Performance Materials and Structures.

11.

Lexcellent, C. and Bourbon, G. (1996). Thermodynamical model of cyclic behavior of Ti-Ni and Cu-Zn-Al shape memory alloys under isothermal undulated tensile tests. Mechanics of Materials, 24: 59-73.

12.

Liang, C. and Rogers, C.A. (1992). A multidimensional constitutive model for shape memory alloys. J. of Engineering Mathematics, 26: 429-443.

13.

Muller, I. and Xu, H. (1991). On the pseudoelastic hysteresis. Acta Metall. Mater., 39: 263.

14.

Perkins, J. et al. (1976). Thermomechanical characteristics of alloys exhibiting martensitic thermoelasticity. In: Perkins J. (ed.), Shape Memory Effects in Alloys, NY: Plenum Press. pp. 273-301.

15.

Raniecki, B. and C. Lexcellent (1994). RL models of pseudoelasticity and their specification for some shape memory solids. Eur. J. Mech. A. Solids, 13: 21.

16.

Raniecki, B. et al. (1992). Thermodynamic models of pseudoelastic behavior of shape memory alloys. Arch. Mech., 44: 261.

17.

Sadek, F. , Mohraz, B , Taylor, A.W. and Chung, R.M. (1996). Passive energy dissipation devices for seismic applications. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NISTIR 5923.

18.

Shahin, A.R. , Meckl, P.H. and Jones, J.D. (1997). Modeling of SMA tendons for active control of structures. J. Intel. Mat. Syst. and Structures, 8: 51-70.

19.

Thompson, P. , Balas, G.J. and Nalbantoglu, V. (1996). Shape memory alloys for augmenting damping of flexible structures, AIAA-96-3760.

20.

Whittaker, A.S. et al. (1995). Structural control of building response using shape memory alloys. US Army Corps of Engineering Research Laboratories, Technical Report 95/22.

21.

Wilde, K. et al. (1998). Experimental and analytical study on shape memory alloy damper. SPIE, Vol. 3325.