Background
No data are available on the comparison between an absolute 10-year
risk of fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease
(CHD) morbidity using the risk assessments of the Systematic Coronary
Risk Evaluation (SCORE) project.
Design
Data from the prospective Reykjavik Study of 15 782 patients were used
to estimate the 10-year risk of fatal CVD and CHD morbidity in
Iceland.
Methods
Survival to fatal CVD event was defined as in the SCORE project.
Survival to CHD morbidity was defined as having a myocardial infarction,
coronary artery bypass graft, or angioplasty. The statistical
methodology of SCORE was used.
Results
Relative risk in Iceland was comparable with SCORE results but
baseline risk was similar to the low-risk version of SCORE, which
contradicted previous suggestions for the countries of northern Europe.
Correlation between absolute risk of CHD morbidity and risk for fatal
CVD was high (r = 0.96), resulting in
similar ranking of individuals by risk and discriminatory capacity. This
is the first published comparison between total fatal CVD risk and CHD
morbidity in a population-based cohort using the current risk assessment
guidelines of the European Societies on Coronary Prevention.
Conclusions Risk for fatal CVD in Iceland has the
same characteristics as those in a European nation with results varying
in accordance with the SCORE project. The risk estimate to be used, CHD
morbidity or fatal CVD, is a choice of clinical preference. The data,
however, suggest that 5% high-risk threshold of fatal CVD
corresponds to a 12% CH D-morbidity risk, which is a
significant change from the conventional reference value of
20%. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil
14: 761-768 © 2007 The European Society of
Cardiology