Fentichlor elicits high rates of positive photopatch test reactions despite its currently unknown clinical relevance.
Objectives
The aims of this study were to provide a comprehensive review of fentichlor, to investigate the characteristics of patients with photosensitivity to fentichlor, and to explore the current uses of fentichlor.
Methods
A review of photopatch test studies involving fentichlor was performed. A retrospective chart review was conducted in patients with positive photopatch test reactions to fentichlor at our institution. Product inquiries were placed to manufacturers of fentichlor to elicit the current uses of fentichlor.
Results
In selected photopatch test studies, positive reactions to fentichlor occurred in 0.0% to 11.8% of subjects. We found that 25 companies distribute or manufacture fentichlor worldwide, which includes 2 companies that sell 25-kg drums of fentichlor. The most common current uses of fentichlor are in research, in high throughput screening, and in antibacterial and antifungal creams.
Conclusions
Our review of selected photopatch test studies demonstrates that fentichlor remains a potent photosensitizing allergen worldwide. The bulk quantities of fentichlor available for sale and the current uses of fentichlor suggest that fentichlor may be currently incorporated into consumer products. We recommend that fentichlor remain in the standard series of photopatch test allergens.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RichterR. Zur chemotherapie der pilzinfektionen. Arch Dermatol Res, 1950; 190: 563–578.
2.
JungHD. Zur fungistatischen Wirksamkeit einiger Diphenyldisulfid-Abkömmlinge. Z Arztl Fortbild, 1954; 48: 191–198.
3.
StrideRD. An antiseptic and fungicide for external otitis: bis-(2-hydroxy-5-chlorophenyl) sulphide. J Laryngol Otol, 1962; 76: 22–27.
4.
HugoWB, BloomfieldSF. Studies on the mode of action of the phenolic antibacterial agent fentichlor against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. 3. The effect of fentichlor on the metabolic activities of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. J Appl Bacteriol, 1971; 34: 579–591.
5.
LimHW, HönigsmannH, HawkJLM. Photodermatology. New York: Informa Healthcare;. 2007.
6.
BurryJN. Photoallergies to fenticlor and Multifungin. Arch Dermatol, 1967; 95: 287–291.
7.
BurryJN. Cross sensitivity between fenticlor and bithionol. Arch Dermatol, 1968; 97: 497–502.
8.
ClaytonR. From fentichlor sensitivity to actinic reticuloid?. Proc R Soc Med, 1976; 69: 379–380.
9.
RamsayCA. Skin responses to ultraviolet radiation in contact photodermatitis due to Fentichlor. J Invest Dermatol, 1979; 72: 99–102.
JeanmouginM, MancietJR, DubertretL. Contact fentichlor photoallergy from soap for handwashing. Ann Dermatol Venereol, 1992; 119: 983–985.
12.
RickwoodDM, BarrattMD. Photochemical reactions of fentichlor with soluble proteins. Chem Biol Interact, 1984; 52: 213–222.
13.
LiASW, ChignellCF. Spectroscopic studies of cutaneous photosensitizing agents—XII. Spin trapping study of the free radicals generated during the photolysis of photoallergens bithionol and fentichlor. Photochem Photobiol, 1987; 46: 445–452.
14.
LiASW, ChignellCF. Spectroscopic studies of cutaneous photosensitizing agents—XIII. pH dependence of the photochemistry of the photoallergens bithionol and fentichlor: an electron spin resonance study of the free radical photoproducts. Photochem Photobiol, 1989; 49: 25–32.
15.
DelahantyJN, EvansJC, RowlandsCC, et al.Radicals involved in photoallergen/protein interactions. Free Radic Biol Med, 1989; 7: 231–236.
16.
BarrattMD, EvansJC, LewisCA, et al.Comparison of the photodynamic action of Rose Bengal and tetrachlorosalicylanilide on isolated porcine erythrocyte membranes. Chem Biol Interact, 1982; 38: 215–230.
17.
GritiyarangsanP. A three-year photopatch study in Thailand. J Dermatol Sci, 1991; 2: 371–375.
18.
MenzJ, MullerSA, ConnollySM. Photopatch testing: a six-year experience. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1988; 18: 1044–1047.
19.
ScalfLA, DavisMDP, RohlingerAL, et al.Photopatch testing of 182 patients: a 6-year experience at the Mayo Clinic. Dermatitis, 2009; 20: 44–52.
20.
HölzleE, NeumannN, HausenB, et al.Photopatch testing: the 5-year experience of the German, Austrian, and Swiss Photopatch Test Group. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1991; 25: 59–68.
21.
NeumannNJ, HölzleE, PlewigG, et al.Photopatch testing: the 12-year experience of the German, Austrian, and Swiss Photopatch Test Group. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2000; 42: 183–192.
22.
VictorFC, CohenDE, SoterNA. A 20-year analysis of previous and emerging allergens that elicit photoallergic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2010; 62: 605–610.
23.
DurieuC, MargueryMC, Giordano-LabadieF, et al.Photoaggravated contact allergy and contact photoallergy caused by ketoprofen: 19 cases. Ann Dermatol Venereol, 2001; 128: 1020–1024.
24.
ViganM, GirardinP, DesprezP, et al.Photocontact dermatitis due to ketoprofen and photosensitization to tetrachlorosalicylanide and to fenticlor. Ann Dermatol Venereol, 2002; 129: 1125–1127.
25.
DurbizeE, ViganM, PuzenatE, et al.Spectrum of cross-photosensitization in 18 consecutive patients with contact photoallergy to ketoprofen: associated photoallergies to non-benzophenone-containing molecules. Contact Dermatitis, 2003; 48: 144–149.
26.
HindsénM, ZimersonE, BruzeM. Photoallergic contact dermatitis from ketoprofen in southern Sweden. Contact Dermatitis, 2006; 54: 150–157.
27.
FotiC, BonamonteD, ConservaA, et al.Allergic and photoallergic contact dermatitis from ketoprofen: evaluation of cross-reactivities by a combination of photopatch testing and computerized conformational analysis. Curr Pharm Des, 2008; 14: 2833–2839.
28.
de la Cuadra-OyangurenJ, Perez-FerriolsA, Lecha-CarreleroM, et al.Results and assessment of photopatch testing in Spain: towards a new standard set of photoallergens. Actas Dermosifiliogr, 2007; 98: 96–101.
29.
NeumannNJ, LehmannP. The photopatch test procedure of the German, Austrian, and Swiss Photopatch Test Group. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed, 2003; 19: 8–10.
30.
European Multicentre Photopatch Test Study (EMCPPTS) Taskforce. A European multicentre photopatch test study. Br J Dermatol, 2012; 166: 1002–1009.
31.
IbbotsonSH, FarrPM, BeckMH, et al.Workshop report: photopatch testing—methods and indications. British Photodermatology Group. Br J Dermatol, 1997; 136: 371–376.
32.
ThuneP, JansénC, WennerstenG, et al.The Scandinavian multicenter photopatch study 1980–1985: final report. Photodermatol, 1988; 5: 261–269.
33.
DeleoVA, SuarezSM, MasoMJ. Photoallergic contact dermatitis: results of photopatch testing in New York, 1985 to 1990. Arch Dermatol, 1992; 128: 1513–1518.
34.
BakkumRS, HeuleF. Results of photopatch testing in Rotterdam during a 10-year period. Br J Dermatol, 2002; 146: 275–279.
35.
LeonardF, AdamskiH, BonnevalleA, et al.Prospective multicenter study on standard photopatch tests by the French Society of Photodermatology from 1991–2001. Ann Dermatol Venereol, 2005; 132: 313–320.
36.
CardosoJC, CanelasMM, GoncaloM, et al.Photopatch testing with an extended series of photoallergens: a 5-year study. Contact Dermatitis, 2009; 60: 325–329.
37.
PigattoPD, GuzziG, SchenaD, et al.Photopatch tests: an Italian multicentre study from 2004 to 2006. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 59: 103–108.
