Surfactants, many of which are used as detergents, can be found in many common household items, such as shampoos, conditioners, soaps, and cosmetics. One should recognize the multitude of surfactants that are used in today's products to identify any potential allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) or irritant contact dermatitis (ICD). Given their abundance in everyday products, it is understandable that many cases of occupational contact dermatitis that arise can be attributed to surfactants. The products most connected with ACD are cocamidopropyl betaine, oleamidopropyl dimethylamine, decyl glucoside, 3-dimethylaminopropylamine, amidoamine, and cocamide diethanolamine. Similarly, the most common surfactant-related causes of ICD are sodium lauryl sulfate and benzalkonium chloride. It is important for dermatologists to identify the causes and differentiate between the two, to adjust treatments and products accordingly. Here, the most frequently used surfactants, as well as their correlation between ACD and ICD, will be reviewed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
TadrosT. Surfactants. In: TadrosT, ed. Encyclopedia of Colloid and Interface Science. New York, NY: Springer; 2013:1242–1290.
2.
MyersD.An Overview of Surfactant Science and Technology. In: Surfactant Science and Technology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2005:1–28.
PanatiC.Extraordinary Origins of Everyday Things. New York, NY: William Morrow Paperbacks; 1989.
5.
ImSH, JeongYH, RyooJJ. Simultaneous analysis of anionic, amphoteric, nonionic and cationic surfactant mixtures in shampoo and hair conditioner by RP-HPLC/ELSD and LC/MS. Anal Chim Acta, 2008; 619(1):129–136.
6.
WeinhammerAP, SchemanA, ReederMJ. Prevalence of surfactant in the contact allergen management program. Dermatitis, 2019; 30(6):358–362.
7.
CorazzaM, LauriolaMM, BianchiA, et al.Irritant and sensitizing potential of eight surfactants commonly used in skin cleansers: an evaluation of 105 patients. Dermatitis, 2010; 21(5):262–268.
SomI, BhatiaK, YasirM. Status of surfactants as penetration enhancers in transdermal drug delivery. J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 2012; 4(1):2–9.
10.
DraelosZ, HornbyS, WaltersRM, et al.Hydrophobically modified polymers can minimize skin irritation potential caused by surfactant-based cleansers. J Cosmet Dermatol, 2013; 12(4):314–321.
11.
AnanthapadmanabhanKP, MooreDJ, SubramanyanK, et al.Cleansing without compromise: the impact of cleansers on the skin barrier and the technology of mild cleansing. Dermatol Ther, 2004; 17(suppl 1):16–25.
ThyssenJP, JohansenJD, LinnebergA, et al.The epidemiology of hand eczema in the general population—prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 62(2):75–87.
Van ScottEJ, LyonJB. A chemical measure of the effect of soaps and detergents on the skin. J Invest Dermatol, 1953; 21(3):199–203.
17.
PuttermanG, WolejszaNF, LadenK.The effect of detergents on swelling of stratum corneum. Published 1977. Available at: https://library.scconline.org/v028n09/39. Accessed October6, 2020.
18.
Del RossoJQ.Repair and maintenance of the epidermal barrier in patients diagnosed with atopic dermatitis. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol, 2011; 4(6):45–55.
19.
CorsiniE, GalliCL. Cytokines and irritant contact dermatitis. Toxicol Lett, 1998; 102–103:277–282.
20.
RundleCW, PresleyCL, MilitelloM, et al.Hand hygiene during COVID-19: recommendations from the American Contact Dermatitis Society. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2020; 83(6):1730–1737.
21.
MeyerJD, ChenY, HoltDL, et al.Occupational contact dermatitis in the UK: a surveillance report from EPIDERM and OPRA. Occup Med (Lond), 2000; 50(4):265–273.
22.
TurnerS, CarderM, van TongerenM, et al.The incidence of occupational skin disease as reported to The Health and Occupation Reporting (THOR) network between 2002 and 2005. Br J Dermatol, 2007; 157(4):713–722.
23.
SchalockPC, DunnickCA, NedorostS, et al.American Contact Dermatitis Society core allergen series: 2020 update. Dermatitis, 2020; 31(5):279–282.
24.
WarshawEM, GoodierMC, DeKovenJG, et al.Contact dermatitis associated with skin cleansers: retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis group data 2000–2014. Dermatitis, 2018; 29(1):32–42.
25.
DeKovenJG, WarshawEM, ZugKA, et al.North American Contact Dermatitis group patch test results: 2015–2016. Dermatitis, 2018; 29(6):297–309.
26.
WolfR, ParishLC. Effect of soaps and detergents on epidermal barrier function. Clin Dermatol, 2012; 30(3):297–300.
27.
Skin exposures & effects. Ongoing skin research. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published February 21, 2020. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/skin/skinresearch.html. Accessed October6, 2020.
28.
LampelHP, PowellHB. Occupational and hand dermatitis: a practical approach. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol, 2019; 56(1):60–71.
29.
CarøeTK, EbbehøjNE, AgnerT. Occupational dermatitis in hairdressers—influence of individual and environmental factors. Contact Dermatitis, 2017; 76(3):146–150.
30.
ForresterBG, RothVS. Hand dermatitis in intensive care units. J Occup Environ Med, 1998; 40(10):881–885.
31.
BauerA.Contact dermatitis in the cleaning industry. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol, 2013; 13(5):521–524.
32.
ZemtsovA, FettD. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis to sodium lauroyl sarcosinate in the liquid soap. Contact Dermatitis, 2005; 52(3):166–167.
LanJ, SongZ, MiaoX, et al.Skin damage among health care workers managing coronavirus disease-2019. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2020; 82:1215–1216.
35.
LevinJ, MillerR. A guide to the ingredients and potential benefits of over-the-counter cleansers and moisturizers for rosacea patients. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol, 2011; 4(8):31–49.
36.
VeverkaKK, HallMR, YianniasJA, et al.Trends in patch testing with the Mayo Clinic standard series, 2011–2015. Dermatitis, 2018; 29(6):310–315.
37.
BondiCA, MarksJL, WroblewskiLB, et al.Human and environmental toxicity of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS): evidence for safe use in household cleaning products. Environ Health Insight, 2015; 9:27–32.
7 Final report on the safety assessment of sodium lauryl sulfate and ammonium lauryl sulfate. J Am Coll Toxicol, 1983; 2(7):127–181. Published December 1, 1983.
40.
HeetfeldAB, SchillT, SchröderSS, et al.Challenging a paradigm: skin sensitivity to sodium lauryl sulfate is independent of atopic diathesis. Br J Dermatol, 2020; 183(1):139–145.
41.
JakasaI, ThyssenJP, KezicS. The role of skin barrier in occupational contact dermatitis. Exp Dermatol, 2018; 27(8):909–914.
42.
GeierJ, UterW, PirkerC, et al.Patch testing with the irritant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is useful in interpreting weak reactions to contact allergens as allergic or irritant. Contact Dermatitis, 2003; 48(2):99–107.
43.
LöfflerH, HappleR. Profile of irritant patch testing with detergents: sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium laureth sulfate and alkyl polyglucoside. Contact Dermatitis, 2003; 48(1):26–32.
44.
Cowan-EllsberryC, BelangerS, DornP, et al.Environmental safety of the use of major surfactant classes in North America. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol, 2014; 44(17):1893–1993.
45.
KatoK, IgawaK, NishizawaA, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis induced by the anionic surfactant, sodium N-methyl-N-(1-oxododecyl)-beta-alaninate, contained in a daily-use shampoo. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2016; 30(11):e123–e124.
SuuronenK, PesonenM, Aalto-KorteK. Occupational contact allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine and its impurities. Contact Dermatitis, 2012; 66(5):286–292.
48.
ShabanSM, AiadI, FetouhHA, et al.Amidoamine double tailed cationic surfactant based on dimethylaminopropylamine: synthesis, characterization and evaluation as biocide. J Mol Liq, 2015; 212:699–707.
FowlerJFJr., ZugKM, TaylorJS, et al.Allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine and amidoamine in North America. Dermatitis, 2004; 15(1):5–6.
51.
GreyKR, HansonJL, HagenSL, HylwaSA, WarshawEM. Epidemiology and co-reactivity of novel surfactant allergens: a double-blind randomized controlled study. Dermatitis, 2016; 27(6):348–354.
52.
de GrootAG, LiemDH. Contact allergy to oleamidopropyl dimethylamine. Contact Dermatitis, 1984; 11(5):298–301.
53.
KwonD, LimY-M, KwonJT, et al.Evaluation of pulmonary toxicity of benzalkonium chloride and triethylene glycol mixtures using in vitro and in vivo systems. Environ Toxicol, 2019; 34(5):561–572.
54.
BasketterDA, MarriottM, GilmourNJ, et al.Strong irritants masquerading as skin allergens: the case of benzalkonium chloride. Contact Dermatitis, 2004; 50(4):213–217.
55.
DattaS, BaudouinC, Brignole-BaudouinF, et al.The eye drop preservative benzalkonium chloride potently induces mitochondrial dysfunction and preferentially affects LHON mutant cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2017; 58(4):2406–2412.
56.
OisoN, FukaiK, IshiiM. Irritant contact dermatitis from benzalkonium chloride in shampoo. Contact Dermatitis, 2005; 52(1):54.
57.
RaudonisT, VankeviciuteRA, LideikaiteA, et al.Contact sensitization in patients with chronic leg ulcers: results of a 5-year retrospective analysis. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2019; 32(12):558–562.
58.
SawNK, HindmarshJR. Acute irritant reaction to an antiseptic bath emollient. Postgrad Med J, 2005; 81(952):131–132.
59.
EleftheriadisH, CheongM, SandemanS, et al.Corneal toxicity secondary to inadvertent use of benzalkonium chloride preserved viscoelastic material in cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol, 2002; 86(3):299–305.
60.
BaudouinC, LabbéA, LiangH, et al.Preservatives in eyedrops: the good, the bad and the ugly. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2010; 29(4):312–334.
de GrootAC, WhiteIR, FlyvholmMA, et al.Formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Part 1. Characterization, frequency and relevance of sensitization, and frequency of use in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 62(1):2–17.
63.
BelloA, QuinnMM, PerryMJ, et al.Characterization of occupational exposures to cleaning products used for common cleaning tasks—a pilot study of hospital cleaners. Environ Health, 2009; 8:11.
BoozalisE, PatelS. Allergen of the Year alkyl glucoside is an ingredient in top-selling sunscreens and facial moisturizers. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2018; 78(4):809–810.
66.
FiumeMM, HeldrethB, BergfeldWF, et al.Safety assessment of decyl glucoside and other alkyl glucosides as used in cosmetics. Int J Toxicol, 2013; 32(5Suppl):22S–48S.
