The epidemiology of nickel allergy in occupational settings is not well understood.
Objective
The aim of the study was to characterize occupationally related nickel allergy (ORNA).
Methods
This is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 44,378 patients patch tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group from 1998 to 2016. Characteristics of individuals with ORNA were compared with those with non-ORNA (NORNA).
Results
A total of 7928 (18.2%) individuals were positive to nickel sulfate 2.5%. Two hundred sixty-eight (3.4%) had ORNA. As compared with NORNA, ORNA was statistically associated with the male sex (41.0% vs 12.9%, P < 0.001), a diagnosis of irritant contact dermatitis (22.4% vs 12.0%, P < 0.001), and no history of eczema (81.7% vs 75.7%, P = 0.0217). The most common sites of ORNA dermatitis were hand (39.9%) and arm (18.1%), which were significantly more common than in NORNA (P < 0.0001). Sixteen industry categories and 22 occupation categories were identified for ORNA; the most common industries were durable goods manufacturing (24.6%) and personal services (15.7%), and the most frequent occupations were hairdressers/cosmetologists/barbers (14.3%), machine operators (9.3%), and health care workers (7.1%). Overall 30% of ORNA occupations were in metalworking. Of 215 ORNA sources identified, instruments/phones/other equipment (16.3%), vehicles/machinery (15.8%), and tools (15.3%) were the most common.
Conclusions
Occupational nickel allergy is distinct from nonoccupational nickel allergy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
US Department of Labor-Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2017. 2018. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/osh.toc.htm. Accessed January5, 2019.
2.
US Department of Labor-Bureau of Labor Statistics. Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities. 2018. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshsum.htm. Accessed January5, 2019.
3.
ZackB, ArrandaleVH, HolnessDL. Preventing occupational skin disease: a review of training programs. Dermatitis, 2017; 28(3):169–182.
4.
DeKovenJG, WarshawEM, ZugKA, et al.North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2015–2016. Dermatitis, 2018; 29(6):297–309.
5.
WarshawEM, ZhangAJ, DeKovenJG, et al.Epidemiology of nickel sensitivity: retrospective cross-sectional analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data 1994–2014. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2019; 80(3):701–713.
6.
LeiU, ZachariaeC, ThyssenJP. Occupational hazards in diagnosing pigmented lesions: nickel release from hand-held tools. Contact Dermatitis, 2015; 73(3):194.
7.
WhiteJML, du VivierAWP. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by nickel in embroidery needles. Contact Dermatitis, 2018; 79(3):181–182.
8.
GollhausenR, RingJ. Allergy to coined money: nickel contact dermatitis in cashiers. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1991; 25(2):365–369.
9.
LidénC, SkareL, NiseG, et al.Deposition of nickel, chromium, and cobalt on the skin in some occupations—assessment by acid wipe sampling. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 58(6):347–354.
10.
BregnbakD, MennéT, ThyssenJP. Allergic nickel dermatitis following an occupational accident involving a mechanical rodeo bull. Contact Dermatitis, 2015; 73(2):129–130.
11.
WallLM, CalnanCD. Occupational nickel dermatitis in the electroforming industry. Contact Dermatitis, 1980; 6(6):414–420.
12.
ThyssenJP, JensenP, LidénC, et al.Assessment of nickel and cobalt release from 200 unused hand-held work tools for sale in Denmark—sources of occupational metal contact dermatitis?. Sci Total Environ, 2011; 409(22):4663–4666.
13.
HamannD, SchemanAJ, JacobSE. Nickel exposure from keys: alternatives for protection and prevention. Dermatitis, 2013; 24(4):186–189.
14.
ChenYX, GaoBA, ChengHY, et al.Survey of occupational allergic contact dermatitis and patch test among clothing employees in Beijing. Biomed Res Int, 2017; 1–10.
15.
WallLM, GebauerKA. Occupational skin disease in Western Australia. Contact Dermatitis, 1991; 24(2):101–109.
16.
ShumKW, MeyerJD, ChenY, et al.Occupational contact dermatitis to nickel: experience of the British dermatologists (EPIDERM) and occupational physicians (OPRA) surveillance schemes. Occup Environ Med, 2003; 60(12):954–957.
17.
ShahM, LewisFM, GawkrodgerDJ. Nickel as an occupational allergen. A survey of 368 nickel-sensitive subjects. Arch Dermatol, 1998; 134(10):1231–1236.
18.
FranswayAF, ZugKA, BelsitoDV, et al.North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for 2007–2008. Dermatitis, 2013; 24(1):10–21.
19.
WarshawEM, BelsitoDV, TaylorJS, et al.North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2009 to 2010. Dermatitis, 2013; 24(2):50–59.
20.
WarshawEM, MaibachHI, TaylorJS, et al.North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2011–2012. Contact Dermatitis, 2015; 26(1):49–59.
21.
DeKovenJG, WarshawEM, BelsitoDV, et al.North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results 2013–2014. Dermatitis, 2017; 28(1):33–46.
22.
1990 Census Alphabetical Index of Industries and Occupation, US. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce, Government Printing Office; 1993.
US Department of Labor-Bureau of Labor Statistics. Labor force statistics from the current population survey. 2019. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11b.htm. Accessed February3, 2019.
DavisMD, WangMZ, YianniasJA, et al.Patch testing with a large series of metal allergens: findings from more than 1,000 patients in one decade at Mayo Clinic. Dermatitis, 2011; 22(5):256–271.
27.
UterW, Larese FilonF, RuiF, et al.ESSCA results with nickel, cobalt and chromium, 2009–2012. Contact Dermatitis, 2016; 75(2):117–121.
28.
UterW, PfahlbergA, GefellerO, et al.Risk factors for contact allergy to nickel—results of a multifactorial analysis. Contact Dermatitis, 2003; 48(1):33–38.
29.
ChengTY, TsengYH, SunCC, et al.Contact sensitization to metals in Taiwan. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 59(6):353–360.
30.
StatonI, MaR, EvansN, et al.Dermal nickel exposure associated with coin handling and in various occupational settings: assessment using a newly developed finger immersion method. Br J Dermatol, 2006; 154(4):658–664.
31.
AhlströmMG, MidanderK, MennéT, et al.Nickel deposition and penetration into the stratum corneum after short metallic nickel contact: an experimental study. Contact Dermatitis, 2019; 80(2):86–93.
32.
Conde-SalazarL, BazaM, GuimaraensaD, et al.Contact dermatitis in hairdressers: patch test results in 379 hairdressers (1980–1993). Am J Contact Dermat, 1995; 6(1):19–23.
33.
ValksR, Conde-SalazarL, MalfeitoJ, et al.Contact dermatitis in hairdressers, 10 years later: patch-test results in 300 hairdressers (1994 to 2003) and comparison with previous study. Dermatitis, 2005; 16(1):28–31.
34.
WarshawEM, WangMZ, MathiasCG. Occupational contact dermatitis in hairdressers/cosmetologists: retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 1994 to 2010. Dermatitis, 2012; 23(6):258–268.
35.
KatsarouA, KoufouB, TakouK, et al.Patch test results in hairdressers with contact dermatitis in Greece (1985–1994). Contact Dermatitis, 1995; 33(5):347–348.
36.
Van der WalleHB, BrunsveldVM. Dermatitis in hairdressers. (I). The experience of the past 4 years. Contact Dermatitis, 1994; 30(4):217–221.
37.
GuoYL, WangBJ, LeeJY, et al.Occupational hand dermatoses of hairdressers in Tainan City. Occup Environ Med, 1994; 51(10):689–692.
38.
LyndeCW, MitchellJC. Patch test results in 66 hairdressers 1973–81. Contact Dermatitis, 1982; 8(5):302–307.
39.
ParkJ, RoY. Occupational skin disease in hairdressers: results of patch test. Korean J Dermatol, 2006; 44(6):669–674.
40.
HolnessDL, NethercottJR. Dermatitis in hairdressers. Dermatol Clin, 1990; 8(1):119–126.
ThyssenJP, MiltingK, BregnhøjA, et al.Nickel allergy in patch-tested female hairdressers and assessment of nickel release from hairdressers' scissors and crochet hooks. Contact Dermatitis, 2009; 61(5):281–286.
43.
WarshawEM, KwonGP, MathiasCG, et al.Occupationally related contact dermatitis in North American food service workers referred for patch testing, 1994 to 2010. Dermatitis, 2013; 24(1):22–28.
44.
ChristensenOB, MöllerH. Release of nickel from cooking utensils. Contact Dermatitis, 1978; 4(6):343–346.
45.
KanervaL, EstlanderT, JolankiR. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from nickel in bartender's metallic measuring cup. Am J Contact Dermat, 1993; 4(1):39–41.
46.
AcciaiMC, BrusiC, FrancalanciS, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis in caterers. Contact Dermatitis, 1993; 29(1):48.
47.
ThyssenJP, GawkrodgerDJ, WhiteIR, et al.Coin exposure may cause allergic nickel dermatitis: a review. Contact Dermatitis, 2013; 68(1):3–14.
48.
Van KetelWG. Occupational contact with coins in nickel-allergic patients. Contact Dermatitis, 1985; 12(2):108.
49.
WarshawEM, HagenSL, SassevilleD, et al.Occupational contact dermatitis in mechanics and repairers referred for patch testing: retrospective analysis from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 1998–2014. Dermatitis, 2017; 28(1):47–57.
50.
DonovanJC, KudlaI, HolnessDL. Hand dermatitis in auto mechanics and machinists. Dermatitis, 2007; 18(3):143–149.
51.
WarshawEM, HagenSL, DeKovenJG, et al.Occupational contact dermatitis in North American production workers referred for patch testing: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 1998 to 2014. Dermatitis, 2017; 28(3):183–194.
52.
LorangerC, MoreauL, SassevilleD. Occupational contact dermatitis in the Canadian aircraft industry. Dermatitis, 2018; 29(3):139–150.
53.
StocksSJ, TurnerS, McNameeR, et al.Occupation and work-related ill-health in UK construction workers. Occup Med, 2011; 61(6):407–415.
54.
WarshawEM, SchramSE, MaibachHI, et al.Occupation-related contact dermatitis in North American health care workers referred for patch testing: cross-sectional data, 1998 to 2004. Dermatitis, 2008; 19(5):261–274.
55.
KettelarijJA, LidénC, AxénE, et al.Cobalt, nickel and chromium release from dental tools and alloys. Contact Dermatitis, 2014; 70(1):3–10.
56.
BoydAH, HylwaSA. Nickel release from surgical instruments and operating room equipment. Dermatol Online J, 2018; 24(4).
57.
UterW, ViganM, SpiewakR, et al.The EU Nickel Directive revisited—future steps towards better protection against nickel allergy. Contact Dermatitis, 2011; 64(3):121–125.
58.
European Union. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the Eurpopean Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Official Journal of the European Union. December18, 2006. L396/1-19.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Nickel Metal and Other Compounds (as Ni). Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgd0445.html. Accessed April16, 2019.
