We discuss cross-reactions that can occur when a patient allergic to a specific allergen also reacts to a similar allergen. Currently, The American Contact Dermatitis Society Contact Allergy Management Program, which allows physicians to identify safe products for their patients, uses a 10% threshold to distinguish significant cross-reactors. New clinical data from a patch testing center along with previous data in the literature are analyzed to help determine whether current cross-reactor definitions are reasonable or should be altered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RustemeyerT, van HoogstratenIMW, von BlombergBME, et al. Mechanisms in allergic contact dermatitis. In: Frosch PJ, Menne T, Lepoittevin JP, eds. Contact Dermatitis. 4th ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2006:11–43.
2.
NatschA, HauptT. Utility of rat liver S9 fractions to study skin-sensitizing prohaptens in a modified KeratinoSens Assay. Toxicol Sci, 2013; 135:356–368.
3.
VocansonMN, NicolasJ, BasketterD. In vitro approaches to the identification and characterization of skin sensitizers. Expert Rev Dermatol, 2013; 8(4):395–405.
4.
CheungC, HotchkissSA, PeaseCK. Cinnamic compound metabolism in human skin and the role metabolism may play in determining relative sensitisation potency. J Dermatol Sci, 2003; 31:9–19.
ShafferKK, JaimesJP, HordinskyMK, et al.Allergenicity and cross-reactivity of coconut oil derivatives: a double-blind randomized controlled pilot study. Dermatitis, 2006; 17(2):71–76.
7.
de GrootAC, JagtmanBA, van der MeerenHL, et al.Cross-reaction pattern of the cationic emulsifier oleamidopropyl dimethylamine. Contact Dermatitis, 1988; 19:284–289.
8.
UterW, JohansenJD, BörjeA, et al.Categorization of fragrance contact allergens for prioritization of preventive measures: clinical and experimental data and consideration of structure-activity relationships. Contact Dermatitis, 2013; 69:196–230.
9.
de GrootAC, WhiteIR, FlyvholmMA, et al.Formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Part 1. Characterization, frequency and relevance of sensitization, and frequency of use in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 62(1):2–17.
de GrootA, WhiteIR, FlyvholmMA, et al.Formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Part 2. Patch test relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy, experimental provocation tests, amount of formaldehyde released, and assessment of risk to consumers allergic to formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 62(1):18–31.
12.
AndersonBE, TanTC, MarksJGJr. Patch-test reactions to formaldehydes, Bioban, and other formaldehyde releasers. Dermatitis, 2007; 18(2):92–95.
13.
FowlerJF Jr, SkinnerSM, BelsitoDV. Allergic contact dermatitis from formaldehyde resins in permanent press clothing: an underdiagnosed cause of generalized dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1992; 27(6 Pt 1):962–968.
14.
CarlsonRM, SmithMC, NedorostST. Diagnosis and treatment of dermatitis due to formaldehyde resins in clothing. Dermatitis, 2004; 15(4):169–175.
15.
SherertzEF. Clothing dermatitis: practical aspects for the clinician. Am J Contact Dermat, 1992; 3:55–64.
SchemanAJ, CarrollPA, BrownKH, et al.Formaldehyde-related textile allergy: an update. Contact Dermatitis, 1998; 38:332–336.
18.
SainioEL, EngströmK, Henriks-EckermanML, et al.Allergenic ingredients in nail polishes. Contact Dermatitis, 1997; 37:155–162.
19.
LaBergeL, PrattM, FongB, et al.A 10-year review of p-phenylenediamine allergy and related para-amino compounds at the Ottawa Patch Test Clinic. Dermatitis, 2011; 22(6):332–334.
20.
SeidenariS, MantovaniL, ManziniBM, et al.Cross-sensitizations between azo dyes and para-amino compound. A study of 236 azo-dye-sensitive subjects. Contact Dermatitis, 1997; 36:91–96.
21.
RybergK, AgnerT, AndersenKE, et al.Patch testing with a textile dye mix—a multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis, 2014; 71:215–223.
22.
TurchinI, MoreauL, WarshawE, et al.Cross-reactions among parabens, para-phenylenediamine, and benzocaine: a retrospective analysis of patch testing. Dermatitis, 2006; 17:192–195.
23.
FautzR, FuchsA, van der WalleH, et al.Hair dye-sensitized hairdressers: the cross-reaction pattern with new generation hair dyes. Contact Dermatitis, 2002; 46:319–324.
24.
WinhovenSM, RutterKJ, BeckMH. Toluene-2,5-diamine may be an isolated allergy in individuals sensitized by permanent hair dye. Contact Dermatitis, 2007; 57:193.
25.
SchemanA, ChaC, BhinderM. Alternative hair-dye products for persons allergic to para-phenylenediamine. Dermatitis, 2011; 22(4):189–192.
26.
WarshawEM, SchramSE, BelsitoDV, et al.Patch-test reactions to topical anesthetics: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data, 2001 to 2004. Dermatitis, 2008; 19:81–85.
27.
SulzbergerMB, LazarMP. A study of the allergenic constituents of lanolin (Wool Fat). J Invest Dermatol, 1950; 15(6):453–458.
28.
de GrootAC. Propolis: a review of properties, applications, chemical composition, contact allergy, and other adverse effects. Dermatitis, 2013; 24(6):263–282.
AsarchA, ScheinmanPL. Sorbitan sesquioleate, a common emulsifier in topical corticosteroids, is an important contact allergen. Dermatitis, 2008; 19(6):323–327.
36.
GijbelsD, TimmermansA, SerranoP, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis caused by alkyl glucosides. Contact Dermatitis, 2014; 70:175–182.
37.
DaoH Jr, FrickerC, NedorostST. Sensitization prevalence for benzalkonium chloride and benzethonium chloride. Dermatitis, 2012; 23(4):162–166.
38.
OliphantT, MitraA, WilkinsonM. Contact allergy to sodium sulfite and its relationship to sodium metabisulfite. Contact Dermatitis, 2012; 66(3):128–130.
39.
WarshawEM, RajuS, DeKovenJG, et al.Positive patch test reactions to carba mix and iodopropynyl butylcarbamate: data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998–2008. Dermatitis, 2013; 24(5):241–245.
40.
CaoLY, TaylorJS, SoodA, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber gloves: changing trends in patch test reactions to accelerators. Arch Dermatol, 2010; 146(9):1001–1007.
WangMZ, FarmerSA, RichardsonDM, et al.Patch-testing with hairdressing chemicals. Dermatitis, 2011; 22(1):16–26.
43.
Aalto-KorteK, Henriks-EckermanML, KuulialaO, et al.Occupational methacrylate and acrylate allergy—cross-reactions and possible screening allergens. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 63(6):301–312.
PirilaV, RouhunkoskiS. On cross-sensitization between neomycin, bacitracin, kanamycin and framycetin. Dermatologica, 1960; 121:335–342.
46.
ScheuerE, WarshawE. Allergy to corticosteroids: update and review of epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and structural cross-reactivity. Am J Contact Dermat, 2003; 14:179–187.
47.
BaeckM, ChemelleJA, RasseC, et al.C(16)-methyl corticosteroids are far less allergenic than the non-methylated molecules. Contact Dermatitis, 2011; 64(6):305–312.
48.
FowlerJ Jr, TaylorJ, StorrsF, et al.Gold allergy in North America. Am J Contact Dermat, 2001; 12(1):3–5.
49.
FilonFL, UderzoD, BagnatoE. Sensitization to palladium chloride: a 10-year evaluation. Am J Contact Dermat, 2003; 14(2):78–81.
