Rapid technology advances have led to diverse assistive technology (AT) options for use in memory rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of electronic AT for supporting phases of memory in daily life after TBI. A secondary aim was to examine user perspectives on the utility of AT and factors influencing uptake or use. A systematic search of PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica database (Embase), Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted from database inception to June 13, 2022, to identify eligible studies. Methodological quality was assessed by two independent reviewers. Nineteen eligible articles involving a total of 311 participants included four randomized controlled trials (RCTs; Class I), five single-case experimental designs (Class II), and 10 pre-post group (n> 10) or single-case studies without experimental control (Class III). Three Class I studies, two Class II studies and eight Class III studies supported the efficacy of AT for supporting memory functioning. Treatment fidelity was not examined in any study. There was the most empirical support for the efficacy of AT for facilitating retrieval and execution phases of memory (i.e., supported by 6/9 studies) with external support to encode memory intentions or pre-programmed reminders. Further controlled studies are needed to determine whether outcomes vary according to individuals' level of independence with use (e.g., self-initiated vs. pre-programmed reminders) and to examine user characteristics and design features influencing uptake and effectiveness. Greater involvement of end-users with brain injury in the design and evaluation of AT features is also recommended to enhance usability and uptake in daily life.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
World Health Organization. 2020. Asssitive Technology. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology [Last accessed: May13, 2022].
2.
OwnsworthT, ArnautovskaU, BeadleE, et al.Efficacy of telerehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2018; 33(4):E33–E46; doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000350
3.
JamiesonM, CullenB, McGee-LennonM, et al.The efficacy of cognitive prosthetic technology for people with memory impairments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2014; 24(3-4):419–44; doi: 10.1080/09602011.2013.825632
4.
TulvingE, CraikFI (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Memory. Oxford University Press: 2000.
5.
das NairR, LincolnNB. Evaluation of rehabilitation of memory in neurological disabilities (ReMiND): a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil, 2012; 26(10):894–903; doi: 10.1177/0269215511435424
6.
ParkerG, HaslamC, FlemingJ, et al.Rehabilitation of memory disorders in adults and children. In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. (WilsonBA, WinegardnerJ, van HeugtenCM, et al. eds.) Routledge: 2017; pp. 196–206.
7.
SchacterDL, AddisDR. Constructive memory: the ghosts of past and future. Nature, 2007; 445(7123):27; doi: 10.1038/445027a
8.
OwnsworthT.Self-Identity after Brain Injury. Psychology Press: London; 2014.
9.
Fernandez LopezR, AntoliA. Computer-based cognitive interventions in acquired brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One, 2020; 15(7):e0235510; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235510
10.
VelikonjaD, TateR, PonsfordJ, et al.INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part V: memory. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2014; 29(4):369–386; doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000069
11.
SpreijLA, Visser-MeilyJM, van HeugtenCM, et al.Novel insights into the rehabilitation of memory post acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Front Hum Neurosci, 2014; 8:993; doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00993
12.
CiceroneKD, GoldinY, GanciK, et al.Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: systematic review of the literature from 2009 through 2014. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2019; 100(8):1515–1533; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.02.011
13.
JamiesonM, CullenB, McGee-LennonM, et al.Technological memory aid use by people with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2017; 27(6):919–936; doi: 10.1080/09602011.2015.1103760
14.
AbdiS, KitsaraI, HawleyMS, et al.Emerging technologies and their potential for generating new assistive technologies. Assist Technol, 2021; 33(sup1):17–26; doi: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1945704
15.
PinardS, BottariC, LaliberteC, et al.Design and usability evaluation of COOK, an assistive technology for meal preparation for persons with severe TBI. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, 2021; 16(7):687–701; doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1696898
16.
FickasS, SohlbergM, HungP-F. Route-following assistance for travelers with cognitive impairments: a comparison of four prompt modes. Int J Human-Comput Stud, 2008; 66(12):876–888; doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.07.006
17.
DowdsMM, LeePH, SheerJB, et al.Electronic reminding technology following traumatic brain injury: effects on timely task completion. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2011; 26(5):339–347; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181f2bf1d
18.
EllisJ.Prospective memory or the realization of delayed intentions: a conceptual framework for research. In: Prospective Memory: Theory and Applications. (BrandimonteMA, EinsteinGO, McDanielMA. eds.) 1996; pp. 1–22.
19.
GillespieA, BestC, O'NeillB. Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: a systematic review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 2012; 18(1):1–19; doi: 10.1017/S1355617711001548
20.
ChartersE, GillettL, SimpsonGK. Efficacy of electronic portable assistive devices for people with acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2015; 25(1):82–121; doi: 10.1080/09602011.2014.942672
21.
KettlewellJ, das NairR, RadfordK. A systematic review of personal smart technologies used to improve outcomes in adults with acquired brain injuries. Clin Rehabil, 2019; 33(11):1705–1712; doi: 10.1177/0269215519865774
22.
HerbertR, MoseleyA, SherringtonC. PEDro: a database of randomised controlled trials in physiotherapy. Health Inf Manag, 1998; 28(4):186–188; doi: 10.1177/183335839902800410
23.
OwnsworthT, TheodorosD, CahillL, et al.Perceived usability and acceptability of videoconferencing for delivering community-based rehabilitation to individuals with acquired brain injury: a qualitative investigation. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 2020; 26(1):47–57; doi: 10.1017/S135561771900078X
24.
VaezipourA, WhelanBM, WallK, et al.Acceptance of rehabilitation technology in adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, their caregivers, and healthcare professionals: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2019; 34(4):E67–E82; doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000462
25.
HowardJ, FisherZ, KempAH, et al.Exploring the barriers to using assistive technology for individuals with chronic conditions: a meta-synthesis review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, 2022; 17(4):390–408; doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1788181
26.
PageMJ, McKenzieJE, BossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev, 2021; 10(1):89; doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
27.
SchardtC, AdamsMB, OwensT, et al.Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 2007; 7:16; doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-7-16
28.
Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software. Available from: https://www.covidence.org/?_gl=1%2A1d5it2u%2A_ga%2ANDY4MTQ0MDYuMTY4MjcyNDQ1OA..%2A_ga_HXKEQPTFLR%2AMTY4MjcyNDQ1OC4xLjEuMTY4MjcyNDUxNS4zLjAuMA. Melbourne, Australia. [Last accessed: June 19, 2022].
29.
BergquistT, GehlC, MandrekarJ, et al.The effect of Internet-based cognitive rehabilitation in persons with memory impairments after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 2009; 23(10):790–799; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699050903196688
30.
PowellLE, GlangA, EttelD, et al.Systematic instruction for individuals with acquired brain injury: results of a randomised controlled trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2012; 22(1):85–112; doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.640466
31.
Gagnon-RoyM, PinardS, BottariC, et al.Smart assistive technology for cooking for people with cognitive impairments following a traumatic brain injury: user experience study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol, 2022; 9(1):e28701; doi: 10.2196/28701
32.
TateRL, PerdicesM.N-of-1 trials in the behavioral sciences. In: The Essential Guide to N-of-1 Trials in Health. (NiklesJ, MitchellG. eds.) Springer, Dordrecht: 2015; pp. 19–41.
33.
CherneyLR, Simmons-MackieN, RaymerA, et al.Systematic review of communication partner training in aphasia: methodological quality. Int J Speech Lang Pathol, 2013; 15(5):535–545; doi: 10.3109/17549507.2013.763289
34.
AvramovicP, RietdijkR, AttardM, et al.Cognitive and behavioral digital health interventions for people with traumatic brain injury and their caregivers: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma, 2023; 40(3-4):159–194; doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0473
35.
TateRL, PerdicesM, RosenkoetterU, et al.Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs and N-of-1 trials: the 15-item Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2013; 23(5):619–638; doi: 10.1080/09602011.2013.824383
36.
WrightP, RogersN, HallC, et al.Comparison of pocket-computer memory aids for people with brain injury. Brain Injury, 2001; 15(9):787–800; doi: 10.1080/02699050110045161
37.
WrightP, RogersN, HallC, et al.Enhancing an appointment diary on a pocket computer for use by people after brain injury. Int J Rehabil Res, 2001; 24(4):299–308; doi: 10.1097/00004356-200112000-00006
38.
IshidaJ, MuraiT, UedaK, et al.Utility of a novel tablet computer software for memory impairment in participants with brain injuries: a randomized control trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2023; 33(1):85–102; doi: 10.1080/09602011.2021.1987276
39.
LanninN, CarrB, AllaousJ, et al.A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of handheld computers for improving everyday memory functioning in patients with memory impairments after acquired brain injury. Clin Rehabil, 2014; 28(5):470–481; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215513512216
40.
LemoncelloR, SohlbergMM, FickasS, et al.A randomised controlled crossover trial evaluating Television Assisted Prompting (TAP) for adults with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2011; 21(6):825–846; doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.618661
41.
CruzG, PetrieS, GoudieN, et al.Text messages reduce memory failures in adults with brain injury: a single-case experimental design. Br J Occup Ther, 2016; 79(10):598–606; doi: 10.1177/0308022616640299
42.
KirschNL, ShentonM, RowanJ. A generic, ‘in-house,’ alphanumeric paging system for prospective activity impairments after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj, 2004; 18(7):725–734; doi: 10.1080/02699050310001646161
43.
StapletonS, AdamsM, AttertonL. A mobile phone as a memory aid for individuals with traumatic brain injury: a preliminary investigation. Brain Inj, 2007; 21(4):401–411; doi: 10.1080/02699050701252030
44.
Van HulleA, HuxK. Improvement patterns among survivors of brain injury: three case examples documenting the effectiveness of memory compensation strategies. Brain Inj, 2006; 20(1):101–109; doi: 10.1080/02699050500309684
45.
WilsonBA, EvansJJ, EmslieH, et al.Evaluation of NeuroPage: a new memory aid. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1997; 63(1):113–115; doi: 10.1136/jnnp.63.1.113
46.
BaldwinVN, PowellT. Google Calendar: a single case experimental design study of a man with severe memory problems. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2015; 25(4):617–636; doi: 10.1080/09602011.2014.956764
47.
BosHR, BabbageDR, LeathemJM. Efficacy of memory aids after traumatic brain injury: a single case series. NeuroRehabilitation, 2017; 41(2):463–481; doi: 10.3233/NRE-151528
48.
CulleyC, EvansJJ. SMS text messaging as a means of increasing recall of therapy goals in brain injury rehabilitation: a single-blind within-subjects trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2010; 20(1):103–119; doi: 10.1080/09602010902906926
49.
EvaldL.Prospective memory rehabilitation using smartphones in patients with TBI. Disabil Rehabil, 2018; 40(19):2250–2259; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1333633
50.
GentryT, WallaceJ, KvarfordtC, et al.Personal digital assistants as cognitive aids for individuals with severe traumatic brain injury: a community-based trial. Brain Inj, 2008; 22(1):19–24; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699050701810688
51.
HartT, HawkeyK, WhyteJ. Use of a portable voice organizer to remember therapy goals in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a within-subjects trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2002; 17(6):556–570; doi: 10.1097/00001199-200212000-00007
52.
Thöne-OttoAIT, WaltherK. How to design an electronic memory aid for brain-injured patients: considerations on the basis of a model of prospective memory. Int J Psychol, 2003; 38(4):236–244; doi: 10.1080/00207590344000169
53.
WaldronB, GrimsonJ, CartonS, et al.Effectiveness of an unmodified personal digital assistant as a compensatory strategy for prospective memory failures in adults with an ABI. Irish J Psychol, 2012; 33(1):29–42; doi: 10.1080/03033910.2012.659044
54.
MasinaF, OrsoV, PluchinoP, et al.Investigating the accessibility of voice assistants with impaired users: mixed methods study. J Med Internet Res, 2020; 22(9):e18431; doi: 10.2196/18431
55.
McDanielMA, EinsteinGO. Prospective Memory: An overview and Synthesis of an Emerging Field. Sage Publications, Inc.; 2007.
56.
AnderssonS, BergedalenA-M. Cognitive correlates of apathy in traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol, 2002; 15(3):184–191.
57.
BaldwinVN.Factors influencing the uptake of memory compensations following acquired brain injury [PhD thesis]. University of Birmingham; 2012.
58.
JamiesonM, CullenB, LennonM, et al.Designing ApplTree: usable scheduling software for people with cognitive impairments. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, 2022; 17(3):338–348; doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1785560
59.
HershNA, TreadgoldLG. NeuroPage: The rehabilitation of memory dysfunction by prosthetic memory and cueing. NeuroRehabilitation, 1994; 4(3):187–197; doi: 10.3233/NRE-1994-4309
60.
AldrichFK.Pager messages as self reminders: a case study of their use in memory impairment. Personal Technol, 1998; 2(1):1–10; doi: 10.1007/bf01581841
61.
WallaceT, MorrisJT, MiesenbergerK, et al.Development and testing of EyeRemember: a memory aid app for wearables for people with brain injury. In: Helping People with Special Needs. (MiesenbergerK, KouropetroglouG. eds.) ICCHP 2018, LNCS 10897; Springer International Publishing AG; 2018; pp. 493–500; doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94274-2_73
62.
JamiesonM, LennonM, CullenB, et al.Supporting people with acquired brain injury to use a reminding app; narrow-deep vs. broad-shallow user interfaces. ACM Trans Accessible Comput, 2022; 15(1):1–23; doi: 10.1145/3501275
63.
HowTV, HwangAS, GreenREA, et al.Envisioning future cognitive telerehabilitation technologies: a co-design process with clinicians. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, 2017; 12(3):244–261; doi: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1129457
64.
Ramirez-HernandezD, WongD, OwnsworthT, et al.Which training methods are effective for learning new smartphone memory apps after acquired brain injury? A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing trial and error, systematic instruction and error-based learning. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2021; 1–34; doi: 10.1080/09602011.2021.1993273
65.
OwnsworthT.Errors: Friend or foe? The theory and evidence base for error-based learning. In: Errorless Learning in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: Mechanisms, Efficacy and Application. (HaslamC, KesselsRPC. eds.) Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group: 2018; pp. 164–179.
66.
MorrisSB, DeShonRP. Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychol Methods, 2002; 7(1):105–125; doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.105
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
