Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is one of the most frequent neurological disorders. Diagnostic criteria for mTBI are based on cognitive or neurological symptoms without fully understanding the neuropathological basis for explaining behaviors. From the neuropathological perspective of mTBI, recent neuroimaging studies have focused on structural or functional differences in motor-related cortical regions but did not compare topological network properties between the post-concussion days in the brainstem. We investigated temporal changes in functional connectivity and evaluated network properties of functional networks in the mouse brainstem. We observed a significantly decreased functional connectivity and global and local network properties on post-concussion day 7, which normalized on post-concussion day 14. Functional connectivity and local network properties on post-concussion day 2 were also significantly decreased compared with those on post-concussion day 14, but there were no significant group differences in global network properties between days 2 and 14. We also observed that the local efficiency and clustering coefficient of the brainstem network were significantly correlated with anxiety-like behaviors on post-concussion days 7 and 14. This study suggests that functional connectivity in the mouse brainstem provides vital recovery signs from concussion through functional reorganization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ShawNA.The neurophysiology of concussion. Prog Neurobiol, 2002; 67(4):281–344; doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(02)00018-7
2.
CassidyJD, CarrollL, PelosoP, et al.Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med, 2004;(43 Suppl):28–60; doi: 10.1080/16501960410023732
3.
JamesSL, TheadomA, EllenbogenRG, et al.Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol, 2019; 18(1):56–87; doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30415-0
4.
MilesL, GrossmanRI, JohnsonG, et al.Short-term DTI predictors of cognitive dysfunction in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj, 2008; 22(2):115–122; doi: 10.1080/02699050801888816
5.
VenturaRE, BalcerLJ, GalettaSL, et al.Ocular motor assessment in concussion: current status and future directions. J Neurol Sci, 2016; 361:79–86; doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.12.010
6.
TeasdaleG, JennettB. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet, 1974; 2(7872):81–84; doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0
7.
SorgSF, Delano-WoodL, LucN, et al.White matter integrity in veterans with mild traumatic brain injury: associations with executive function and loss of consciousness. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2014; 29(1):21–32; doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31828a1aa4
8.
LevinHS, Diaz-ArrastiaRR. Diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management of mild traumatic brain injury. Lancet Neurol, 2015; 14(5):506–517; doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00002-2
9.
EakinK, MillerJP. Mild traumatic brain injury is associated with impaired hippocampal spatiotemporal representation in the absence of histological changes. J Neurotrauma, 2012; 29(6):1180–1187; doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2192
10.
LuoY, ZouH, WuY, et al.Mild traumatic brain injury induces memory deficits with alteration of gene expression profile. Sci Rep, 2017; 7(1):10846; doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11458-9
11.
LeungA, YangE, LimM, et al.Pain-related white matter tract abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury patients with persistent headache. Mol Pain, 2018; 14:1744806918810297; doi: 10.1177/1744806918810297
12.
IshiiR, SchwedtTJ, TrivediM, et al.Mild traumatic brain injury affects the features of migraine. J Headache Pain, 2021; 22(1):80; doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01291-x
13.
Barker-ColloS, TheadomA, JonesK, et al.Depression and anxiety across the first 4 years after mild traumatic brain injury: findings from a community-based study. Brain Inj, 2018; 32(13-14):1651–1658; doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1540797
14.
MooreEL, Terryberry-SpohrL, HopeDA. Mild traumatic brain injury and anxiety sequelae: a review of the literature. Brain Inj, 2006; 20(2):117–132; doi: 10.1080/02699050500443558
15.
LevinHS, McCauleySR, JosicCP, et al.Predicting depression following mild traumatic brain injury. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2005; 62(5):523–528; doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.5.523
16.
CarrollL, CassidyJD, PelosoP, et al.Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med, 2004;(43)(Suppl):84–105; doi: 10.1080/16501960410023859
17.
DaneshvarDH, RileyDO, NowinskiCJ, et al.Long-term consequences: effects on normal development profile after concussion. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, 2011; 22(4):683–700, ix; doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2011.08.009
18.
HallRC, HallRC, ChapmanMJ. Definition, diagnosis, and forensic implications of postconcussional syndrome. Psychosomatics, 2005; 46(3):195–202; doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.46.3.195
19.
BarnesDE, ByersAL, GardnerRC, et al.Association of mild traumatic brain injury with and without loss of consciousness with dementia in US military veterans. JAMA Neurol, 2018; 75(9):1055–1061; doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0815
20.
GardnerRC, YaffeK. Epidemiology of mild traumatic brain injury and neurodegenerative disease. Mol Cell Neurosci, 2015; 66(B):75–80; doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2015.03.001
21.
RabinowitzAR, LevinHS. Cognitive sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Psychiatr Clin North Am, 2014; 37(1):1–11; doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2013.11.004
22.
McKeeAC, CantuRC, NowinskiCJ, et al.Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in athletes: progressive tauopathy after repetitive head injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 2009; 68(7):709–735; doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181a9d503
23.
McCroryP, MeeuwisseWH, KutcherJS, et al.What is the evidence for chronic concussion-related changes in retired athletes: behavioural, pathological and clinical outcomes?. Br J Sports Med, 2013; 47(5):327–330; doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092248
24.
SteinTD, AlvarezVE, McKeeAC. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy: a spectrum of neuropathological changes following repetitive brain trauma in athletes and military personnel. Alzheimers Res Ther, 2014; 6(1):4; doi: 10.1186/alzrt234
25.
HarrisNG, VerleyDR, GutmanBA, et al.Disconnection and hyper-connectivity underlie reorganization after TBI: a rodent functional connectomic analysis. Exp Neurol, 2016; 277:124–138; doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.12.020
26.
ManleyGT, MaasAI. Traumatic brain injury: an international knowledge-based approach. JAMA, 2013; 310(5):473–474; doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.169158
27.
BrodyDL, ChanL, CizzaG. How do you treat traumatic brain injury? One symptom at a time. Ann Neurol, 2019; 86(3):329–331; doi: 10.1002/ana.25529
28.
DuhaimeAC, GeanAD, HaackeEM, et al.Common data elements in radiologic imaging of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2010; 91(11):1661–1666; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.238
29.
MachamerJ, TemkinNR, ManleyGT, et al.Functional status examination in patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injuries. J Neurotrauma, 2018; 35(10):1132–1137; doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5460
30.
WiegersEJ, TrapaniT, GabbeBJ, et al.Characteristics, management and outcomes of patients with severe traumatic brain injury in Victoria, Australia compared to United Kingdom and Europe: a comparison between two harmonised prospective cohort studies. Injury, 2021; 52(9):2576–2587; doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.033
31.
GalimbertiS, GrazianoF, MaasAIR, et al.Effect of frailty on 6-month outcome after traumatic brain injury: a multicentre cohort study with external validation. Lancet Neurol, 2022; 21(2):153–162; doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00374-4
32.
GaoG, WuX, FengJ, et al.Clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in China: a prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, observational study. Lancet Neurol, 2020; 19(8):670–677; doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30182-4
33.
SiB, DumkriegerG, WuT, et al.Sub-classifying patients with mild traumatic brain injury: a clustering approach based on baseline clinical characteristics and 90-day and 180-day outcomes. PLoS One, 2018; 13(7):e0198741; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198741
34.
SteyerbergEW, WiegersE, SewaltC, et al.Case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in CENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, cohort study. Lancet Neurol, 2019; 18(10):923–934; doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30232-7
35.
MachamerJ, TemkinN, DikmenS, et al.Symptom frequency and persistence in the first year after traumatic brain injury: a TRACK-TBI study. J Neurotrauma, 2022; 39(5-6):358–370; doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0348
36.
NelsonLD, TemkinNR, DikmenS, et al.Recovery after mild traumatic brain injury in patients presenting to US level I trauma centers: a transforming research and clinical knowledge in traumatic brain injury (TRACK-TBI) study. JAMA Neurol, 2019; 76:1049–1059; doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1313
37.
WilsonL, HortonL, PolinderS, et al.Tailoring multi-dimensional outcomes to level of functional recovery after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 2022. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0013
38.
YueJK, WinklerEA, PufferRC, et al.Temporal lobe contusions on computed tomography are associated with impaired 6-month functional recovery after mild traumatic brain injury: a TRACK-TBI study. Neurol Res, 2018; 40(11):972–981; doi: 10.1080/01616412.2018.1505416
39.
LuoJ, NguyenA, VilledaS, et al.Long-term cognitive impairments and pathological alterations in a mouse model of repetitive mild traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol, 2014; 5:12; doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00012
40.
MainBS, SloleySS, VillapolS, et al.A mouse model of single and repetitive mild traumatic brain injury. J Vis Exp, 2017;(124):55713; doi: 10.3791/55713
41.
MaynardME, UnderwoodEL, RedellJB, et al.Carnosic acid improves outcome after repetitive mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 2019; 36(13):2147–2152; doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6155
42.
MouzonB, ChaytowH, CrynenG, et al.Repetitive mild traumatic brain injury in a mouse model produces learning and memory deficits accompanied by histological changes. J Neurotrauma, 2012; 29(18):2761–2773; doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2498
GoddeyneC, NicholsJ, WuC, et al.Repetitive mild traumatic brain injury induces ventriculomegaly and cortical thinning in juvenile rats. J Neurophysiol, 2015; 113(9):3268–3280; doi: 10.1152/jn.00970.2014
45.
ZhuoJ, XuS, ProctorJL, et al.Diffusion kurtosis as an in vivo imaging marker for reactive astrogliosis in traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage, 2012; 59(1):467–477; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.050
SignorettiS, Di PietroV, VagnozziR, et al.Transient alterations of creatine, creatine phosphate, N-acetylaspartate and high-energy phosphates after mild traumatic brain injury in the rat. Mol Cell Biochem, 2010; 333(1-2):269–277; doi: 10.1007/s11010-009-0228-9
48.
SinghK, TrivediR, HaridasS, et al.Study of neurometabolic and behavioral alterations in rodent model of mild traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. NMR Biomed, 2016; 29(12):1748–1758; doi: 10.1002/nbm.3627
49.
TremblayS, De BeaumontL, HenryLC, et al.Sports concussions and aging: a neuroimaging investigation. Cereb Cortex, 2013; 23(5):1159–1166; doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs102
50.
ChurchillN, HutchisonM, RichardsD, et al.Brain structure and function associated with a history of sport concussion: a multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurotrauma, 2017; 34(4):765–771; doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4531
51.
JuneD, WilliamsOA, HuangCW, et al.Lasting consequences of concussion on the aging brain: findings from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Neuroimage, 2020; 221:117182; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117182
52.
KimE, SeoHG, LeeHH, et al.Reduced brainstem volume after mild traumatic brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2021; 100(5):473–482; doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001580
53.
HiradAA, BazarianJJ, Merchant-BornaK, et al.A common neural signature of brain injury in concussion and subconcussion. Sci Adv, 2019; 5(8):eaau3460; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau3460
54.
TangL, GeY, SodicksonDK, et al.Thalamic resting-state functional networks: disruption in patients with mild traumatic brain injury. Radiology, 2011; 260(3):831–840; doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110014
55.
LuL, LiF, WangP, et al.Altered hypothalamic functional connectivity in post-traumatic headache after mild traumatic brain injury. J Headache Pain, 2020; 21(1):93; doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01164-9
56.
ZhouY, MilhamMP, LuiYW, et al.Default-mode network disruption in mild traumatic brain injury. Radiology, 2012; 265(3):882–892; doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120748
57.
ToXV, NasrallahFA. A roadmap of brain recovery in a mouse model of concussion: insights from neuroimaging. Acta Neuropathol Commun, 2021; 9(1):2; doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-01098-y
58.
ParkHJ, FristonK. Structural and functional brain networks: from connections to cognition. Science, 2013; 342(6158):1238411; doi: 10.1126/science.1238411
59.
DecoG, TononiG, BolyM, et al.Rethinking segregation and integration: contributions of whole-brain modelling. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2015; 16(7):430–439; doi: 10.1038/nrn3963
60.
BärKJ, de la CruzF, SchumannA, et al.Functional connectivity and network analysis of midbrain and brainstem nuclei. Neuroimage, 2016; 134:53–63; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.071
61.
ToXV, NasrallahFA. Multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging in a mouse model of concussion. Sci Data, 2021; 8(1):207; doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00985-w
62.
FristonKJ, HolmesAP, WorsleyKJ, et al.Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp, 1994; 2(4):189–210; doi: 10.1002/hbm.460020402
63.
van den HeuvelMP, StamCJ, BoersmaM, et al.Small-world and scale-free organization of voxel-based resting-state functional connectivity in the human brain. Neuroimage, 2008; 43(3):528–539; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.010
64.
WangQ, DingSL, LiY, et al.The Allen Mouse Brain Common Coordinate Framework: A 3D reference atlas. Cell, 2020; 181(4):936–953.e20; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.007
65.
RubinovM, SpornsO.Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage, 2010; 52(3):1059–106;. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003
66.
KaushalM, EspañaLY, NenckaAS, et al.Resting-state functional connectivity after concussion is associated with clinical recovery. Hum Brain Mapp, 2019; 40(4):1211–1220; doi: 10.1002/hbm.24440
67.
CaiX, HardingIC, SadakaAH, et al.Mild repetitive head impacts alter perivascular flow in the midbrain dopaminergic system in awake rats. Brain Commun, 2021; 3(4):fcab265; doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab265
68.
HutsonCB, LazoCR, MortazaviF, et al.Traumatic brain injury in adult rats causes progressive nigrostriatal dopaminergic cell loss and enhanced vulnerability to the pesticide paraquat. J Neurotrauma, 2011; 28(9):1783–1801; doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1723
69.
LiuM, BachstetterAD, CassWA, et al.Pioglitazone attenuates neuroinflammation and promotes dopaminergic neuronal survival in the nigrostriatal system of rats after diffuse brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 2017; 34(2):414–422; doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4361
70.
KulkarniP, MorrisonTR, CaiX, et al.Neuroradiological changes following single or repetitive mild TBI. Front Syst Neurosci, 2019; 13:34; doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00034
71.
SimonP, DupuisR, CostentinJ. Thigmotaxis as an index of anxiety in mice. Influence of dopaminergic transmissions. Behav Brain Res, 1994; 61(1):59–64; doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(94)90008-6
72.
SauerbeckAD, FanizziC, KimJH, et al.modCHIMERA: a novel murine closed-head model of moderate traumatic brain injury. Sci Rep, 2018; 8(1):7677; doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25737-6
73.
BruceED, KondaS, DeanDD, et al.Neuroimaging and traumatic brain injury: state of the field and voids in translational knowledge. Mol Cell Neurosci, 2015; 66(B):103–113; doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2015.03.017
74.
WiegandTLT, SollmannN, BonkeEM, et al.Translational neuroimaging in mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Res, 2022; 100(5):1201–1217; doi: 10.1002/jnr.24840
75.
BorodaE, ArmstrongM, GilmoreCS, et al.Network topology changes in chronic mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). NeuroImage Clin, 2021; 31:102691; doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102691
76.
HierDB, Obafemi-AjayiT, ThimganMS, et al.Blood biomarkers for mild traumatic brain injury: a selective review of unresolved issues. Biomark Res, 2021; 9(1):70; doi: 10.1186/s40364-021-00325-5
77.
ZetterbergH, BlennowK. Fluid biomarkers for mild traumatic brain injury and related conditions. Nat Rev Neurol, 2016; 12(10):563–574; doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.127
78.
JenkinsonM, BeckmannCF, BehrensTE, et al.Fsl. Neuroimage, 2012; 62:782–790; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015
79.
SmithSM, JenkinsonM, WoolrichMW, et al.Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage, 2004; 23(Suppl 1):S208–219; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051
80.
AnderssonJL, SkareS, AshburnerJ, et al.How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage, 2003; 20:870–888; doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
