Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is the most common form of brain injury. While most individuals recover from mTBI, roughly 20% experience persistent symptoms, potentially including reduced fine motor control. We investigate relationships between regional white matter organization and subcortical volumes associated with performance on the Grooved Pegboard (GPB) test in a large cohort of military Service Members and Veterans (SM&Vs) with and without a history of mTBI(s). Participants were enrolled in the Long-term Impact of Military-relevant Brain Injury Consortium-Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium. SM&Vs with a history of mTBI(s) (n = 847) and without mTBI (n = 190) underwent magnetic resonance imaging and the GPB test. We first examined between-group differences in GPB completion time. We then investigated associations between GPB performance and regional structural imaging measures (tractwise diffusivity, subcortical volumes, and cortical thickness) in SM&Vs with a history of mTBI(s). Lastly, we explored whether mTBI history moderated associations between imaging measures and GPB performance. SM&Vs with mTBI(s) performed worse than those without mTBI(s) on the non-dominant hand GPB test at a trend level (p < 0.1). Higher fractional anisotropy (FA) of tracts including the posterior corona radiata, superior longitudinal fasciculus, and uncinate fasciculus were associated with better GPB performance in the dominant hand in SM&Vs with mTBI(s). These findings support that the organization of several white matter bundles are associated with fine motor performance in SM&Vs. We did not observe that mTBI history moderated associations between regional FA and GPB test completion time, suggesting that chronic mTBI may not significantly influence fine motor control.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SkandsenT, NilsenTL, EinarsenC, et al.Incidence of mild traumatic brain injury: a prospective hospital, emergency room and general practitioner-based study. Front Neurol, 2019; 10:638; doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00638
2.
Department of Defense. DOD TBI Worldwide Numbers. 2021. Available from: https://health.mil/Reference-Center/Reports/2023/06/12/2021-DOD-Worldwide-Numbers-for-TBI [Last accessed October6, 2023].
3.
Department of Defense. DoD Numbers for Traumatic Brain InjuryWorldwide—Totals. 2016. Available from: https://www.biami.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/DoD-TBI-Worldwide-Totals_2016_Feb-17-2017_v1.0_2017-04-06.pdf [Last accessed September26, 2023].
AubryM, CantuR, DvorakJ, et al.Summary and agreement statement of the First International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Vienna 2001. Recommendations for the improvement of safety and health of athletes who may suffer concussive injuries. Br J Sports Med, 2002; 36(1):6–10; doi: 10.1136/bjsm.36.1.6
6.
DennisEL, WildeEA, NewsomeMR, et al.ENIGMA military brain injury: a coordinated meta-analysis of diffusion MRI from multiple cohorts. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging, 2018; 2018:1386–1389; doi: 10.1109/ISBI.2018.8363830
7.
NarayanaPA.White matter changes in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: MRI perspective. Concussion, 2017; 2(2):CNC35; doi: 10.2217/cnc-2016-0028
PatelJB, WilsonSH, OakesTR, et al.Structural and volumetric brain MRI findings in mild traumatic brain injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2020; 41(1):92–99; doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6346
10.
TateDF, WadeBSC, VelezCS, et al.Volumetric and shape analyses of subcortical structures in United States service members with mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurol, 2016; 263(10); doi: 10.1007/s00415-016-8236-7
11.
CavanaughJT, GuskiewiczKM, GiulianiC, et al.Detecting altered postural control after cerebral concussion in athletes with normal postural stability. Br J Sports Med, 2005; 39(11):805–811; doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.015909
12.
GuskiewiczKM, McCreaM, MarshallSW, et al.Cumulative effects associated with recurrent concussion in collegiate football players: the NCAA Concussion Study. JAMA, 2003; 290(19):2549–2555; doi: 10.1001/jama.290.19.2549
13.
McCreaM, GuskiewiczKM, MarshallSW, et al.Acute effects and recovery time following concussion in collegiate football players: the NCAA Concussion Study. JAMA, 2003; 290(19):2556–2563; doi: 10.1001/jama.290.19.2556
14.
TateDF, WadeBSC, VelezCS, et al. Subcortical shape and neuropsychological function among U.S. service members with mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav, 2018; doi: 10.1007/s11682-018-9854-8
15.
FischerBL, ParsonsM, DurgerianS, et al.Neural activation during response inhibition differentiates blast from mechanical causes of mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 2014; 31(2):169–179; doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2877
WalkerWC, CarneW, FrankeLM, et al.The Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium (CENC) multi-centre observational study: description of study and characteristics of early participants. Brain Inj, 2016; 30(12):1469–1480; doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1219061
18.
VogtD, SmithBN, KingLA, et al.Deployment risk and resilience inventory-2 (DRRI-2): an updated tool for assessing psychosocial risk and resilience factors among service members and veterans. J Trauma Stress, 2013; 26(6):710–717; doi: 10.1002/jts.21868
19.
CorriganJD, BognerJ. Initial Reliability and Validity of the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2007; 22(6) :318–329;doi: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000300227.67748.77
20.
WalkerWC, CifuDX, HudakAM, et al.Structured interview for mild traumatic brain injury after military blast: inter-rater agreement and development of diagnostic algorithm. J Neurotrauma, 2015; 32(7):464–473; doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3433
21.
HydeC, SciberrasE, EfronD, et al.Reduced fine motor competence in children with ADHD is associated with atypical microstructural organization within the superior longitudinal fasciculus. Brain Imaging Behav, 2021; 15(2):727–737; doi: 10.1007/s11682-020-00280-z
22.
GorgolewskiKJ, AuerT, CalhounVD, et al.The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Sci Data, 2016; 3(1):160044; doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.44
23.
TustisonNJ, AvantsBB, CookPA, et al.N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2010; 29(6):1310–1320; doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2046908
24.
KochunovP, JahanshadN, SprootenE, et al.Multi-site study of additive genetic effects on fractional anisotropy of cerebral white matter: comparing meta and megaanalytical approaches for data pooling. Neuroimage, 2014; 95:136–150; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.033
25.
MoriS, OishiK, JiangH, et al.Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template. Neuroimage, 2008; 40(2):570–582; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.035
26.
SmithSM, JenkinsonM, Johansen-BergH, et al.Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage, 2006; 31(4):1487–1505; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024
27.
SmithSM, Johansen-BergH, JenkinsonM, et al.Acquisition and voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data with tract-based spatial statistics. Nat Protoc, 2007; 2(3):499–503; doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.45
28.
TakaoH, HayashiN, KabasawaH, et al.Effect of scanner in longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp, 2012; 33(2):466–477; doi: 10.1002/hbm.21225
29.
HanX, JovicichJ, SalatD, et al.Reliability of MRI-derived measurements of human cerebral cortical thickness: the effects of field strength, scanner upgrade and manufacturer. Neuroimage, 2006; 32(1):180–194; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.051
30.
FortinJP, ParkerD, TunçB, et al.Harmonization of multi-site diffusion tensor imaging data. Neuroimage, 2017; 161(March):149–170; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.047
31.
FortinJ-P, CullenN, ShelineYI, et al.Harmonization of cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites. Neuroimage, 2018; 167:104–120; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.024
32.
BudisavljevicS, CastielloU, BegliominiC. Handedness and white matter networks. Neuroscientist, 2021; 27(1):88–103; doi: 10.1177/1073858420937657
33.
HoltropJL, LoucksTM, SosnoffJJ, et al.Investigating age-related changes in fine motor control across different effectors and the impact of white matter integrity. Neuroimage, 2014; 96:81–87; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.045
34.
BaeznerH, BlahakC, PoggesiA, et al.Association of gait and balance disorders with age-related white matter changes: the LADIS study. Neurology, 2008; 70(12):935–942; doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000305959.46197.e6
35.
BlahakC, BaeznerH, PantoniL, et al.Deep frontal and periventricular age related white matter changes but not basal ganglia and infratentorial hyperintensities are associated with falls: cross sectional results from the LADIS study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2009; 80(6):608–613; doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.154633
36.
NyquistPA, YanekLR, BilgelM, et al.Effect of white matter lesions on manual dexterity in healthy middle-aged persons. Neurology, 2015; 84(19):1920–1926; doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001557
37.
MoultonE, Amor-SahliM, PerlbargV, et al.Axial diffusivity of the corona radiata at 24 hours post-stroke: a new biomarker for motor and global outcome. PLoS One, 2015; 10(11):e0142910; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142910
38.
KoyamaT, MarumotoK, MiyakeH, et al.Relationship between diffusion tensor fractional anisotropy and motor outcome in patients with hemiparesis after corona radiata infarct. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2013; 22(8):1355–1360; doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.02.017
39.
KamaliA, FlandersAE, BrodyJ, et al.Tracing superior longitudinal fasciculus connectivity in the human brain using high resolution diffusion tensor tractography. Brain Struct Funct, 2014; 219(1):269–281; doi: 10.1007/s00429-012-0498-y
40.
SchmahmannJD, SmithEE, EichlerFS, et al.Cerebral white matter: neuroanatomy, clinical neurology, and neurobehavioral correlates. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2008; 1142:266–309; doi: 10.1196/annals.1444.017
41.
ChangEF, RaygorKP, BergerMS. Contemporary model of language organization: an overview for neurosurgeons. J Neurosurg, 2015; 122(2):250–261; doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS132647
42.
BudisavljevicS, Dell'AcquaF, ZanattoD, et al.Asymmetry and structure of the fronto-parietal networks underlie visuomotor processing in humans. Cereb Cortex, 2017; 27(2):1532–1544; doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv348
43.
HowellsH, Thiebaut de SchottenM, Dell'AcquaF, et al.Frontoparietal tracts linked to lateralized hand preference and manual specialization. Cereb Cortex, 2018; 28(7):2482–2494; doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy040
44.
CataniM, HowardRJ, PajevicS, et al.Virtual in vivo interactive dissection of white matter fasciculi in the human brain. Neuroimage, 2002; 17(1):77–94; doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1136
45.
PapagnoC.Naming and the role of the uncinate fasciculus in language function. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2011; 11(6):553–559; doi: 10.1007/s11910-011-0219-6
46.
PapagnoC, MiracapilloC, CasarottiA, et al.What is the role of the uncinate fasciculus? Surgical removal and proper name retrieval. Brain, 2011; 134(Pt 2):405–414; doi: 10.1093/brain/awq283
47.
FliersE, VermeulenS, RijsdijkF, et al.ADHD and poor motor performance from a family genetic perspective. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2009; 48(1):25–34; doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31818b1ca2
48.
RommelseNNJ, AltinkME, OosterlaanJ, et al.Motor control in children with ADHD and non-affected siblings: deficits most pronounced using the left hand. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2007; 48(11):1071–1079; doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01781.x
49.
BendlinBB, RiesML, LazarM, et al.Longitudinal changes in patients with traumatic brain injury assessed with diffusion-tensor and volumetric imaging. Neuroimage, 2008; 42(2):503–514; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.254
50.
AokiY, InokuchiR. A voxel-based meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging in mild traumatic brain injury. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2016; 66:119–126; doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.04.021
51.
HellstrømT, WestlyeLT, KaufmannT, et al.White matter microstructure is associated with functional, cognitive and emotional symptoms 12 months after mild traumatic brain injury. Sci Rep, 2017; 7(1):13795; doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13628-1
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
