Early surgical intervention to decompress the spinal cord and stabilize the spinal column in patients with acute traumatic thoracolumbar spinal cord injury (TLSCI) may lessen the risk of developing complications and improve outcomes. However, there has yet to be agreement on what constitutes “early” surgery; reported thresholds range from 8 to 72 h. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted an observational cohort study using data from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) from 2010 to 2016. The association between time from hospital arrival to surgical intervention and risk of major complications was assessed using restricted cubic splines. Propensity score matching was then used to assess the association between delayed surgery and risk of complications. Across 354 trauma centers 4108 adult TLSCI patients who underwent surgery were included. Median time-to-surgery was 18.8 h (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.4–40.9 h). The spline model suggests the risk of major complication rises consistently after a 12-h surgical wait-time. After propensity score matching, the odds of major complication were significantly lower for those receiving surgery within 12 h (odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64 to 0.94). This was also true for immobility-related complications (OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.97). Patients in the early group spent 1.5 fewer days in the critical care unit on average (95% CI: −2.09 to −0.88). Although surgery within 12 h may not always be feasible, these data suggest that whenever possible surgeons should strive to reduce the amount of time between hospital arrival and surgical intervention, and health care systems should support this endeavor.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WilsonJ.R., JajaB.N.R., KwonB.K., GuestJ.D., HarropJ.S., AarabiB., ShaffreyC.I., BadhiwalaJ.H., ToupsE.G., GrossmanR.G., and FehlingsM.G. (2018). Natural history, predictors of outcome, and effects of treatment in thoracic spinal cord injury: a multi-center cohort study from the North American Clinical Trials Network. J. Neurotrauma, 35, 2554–6250.
2.
WitiwC.D., and FehlingsM.G. (2015). Acute spinal cord injury. J. Spinal Disord. Tech. 28, 202–210.
3.
EichholzK.M., RabbC.H., AndersonP.A., ArnoldP.M., ChiJ.H., DaileyA.T., DhallS.S., HarropJ.S., HohD.J., QureshiS., RaksinP.B., KaiserM.G., and O'TooleJ.E. (2019). Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Timing of Surgical Intervention. Neurosurgery, 84, E53–E55.
4.
Ter WengelP.V., MartinE., De Witt HamerP.C., FellerR.E., van OortmerssenJ.A.E., van der GaagN.A., OnerF.C., and VandertopW.P. (2019). Impact of early (<24 h) surgical decompression on neurological recovery in thoracic spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis. J. Neurotrauma, 36, 2609–2617.
5.
Ter WengelP.V., De HaanY., FellerR.E., OnerF.C., and VandertopW.P. (2020). Complete traumatic spinal cord injury: current insights regarding timing of surgery and level of injury. Global Spine J. 10, 324–331.
6.
CengizS.L., KalkanE., BayirA., IlikK., and BaseferA. (2008). Timing of thoracolomber spine stabilization in trauma patients; impact on neurological outcome and clinical course. A real prospective (rct) randomized controlled study. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 128, 959–966.
7.
GaeblerC., MaierR., Kutscha-LissbergF., MrkonjicL., and VecseiV. (1999). Results of spinal cord decompression and thoracolumbar pedicle stabilisation in relation to the time of operation. Spinal Cord, 37, 33–39.
8.
Rahimi-MovagharV., NiakanA., HaghnegahdarA., ShahlaeeA., SaadatS., and BarzidehE. (2014). Early versus late surgical decompression for traumatic thoracic/thoracolumbar (T1-L1) spinal cord injured patients. Primary results of a randomized controlled trial at one year follow-up. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 19, 183–191.
9.
DvorakM.F., NoonanV.K., FallahN., FisherC.G., FinkelsteinJ., KwonB.K., RiversC.S., AhnH., PaquetJ., TsaiE.C., TownsonA., AttabibN., BaileyC.S., ChristieS.D., DrewB., FourneyD.R., FoxR., HurlbertR.J., JohnsonM.G., LinassiA.G., ParentS., and FehlingsM.G. (2015). The influence of time from injury to surgery on motor recovery and length of hospital stay in acute traumatic spinal cord injury: an observational Canadian cohort study. J. Neurotrauma, 32, 645–654.
10.
BoakyeM., ArrigoR.T., Hayden GephartM.G., ZygourakisC.C., and LadS. (2012). Retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study examining timing of fracture fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. J. Neurotrauma, 29, 2220–2225.
11.
ShafiS., NathensA.B., CryerH.G., HemmilaM.R., PasqualeM.D., ClarkD.E., NealM., GobleS., MeredithJ.W., and FildesJ.J. (2009). The Trauma Quality Improvement Program of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 209, 521.e1–53030.e1.
12.
NewgardC.D., FildesJ.J., WuL., HemmilaM.R., BurdR.S., NealM., MannN.C., ShafiS., ClarkD.E., GobleS., and NathensA.B. (2013). Methodology and analytic rationale for the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 216, 147–157.
13.
HemmilaM.R., NathensA.B., ShafiS., CallandJ.F., ClarkD.E., CryerH.G., GobleS., HoeftC.J., MeredithJ.W., and NealM.L. (2010). The Trauma Quality Improvement Program: pilot study and initial demonstration of feasibility. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 68, 253–262.
StoneC.J., and KooC.-Y.(Cha-Young). (1985). Additive splines in statistics. Proc. Stat. Computing, Section, Am. Stat. Assoc. 27, 45–48.
16.
MarrieR.A., DawsonN.V., and GarlandA. (2009). Quantile regression and restricted cubic splines are useful for exploring relationships between continuous variables. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 62, 511.31.e1–517.e1.
Harrell JrF.E. (2015). Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic and Ordinal Regression, and Survival Analysis. Springer.
19.
FoxJ., and WeisbergS. (2018). Visualizing fit and lack of fit in complex regression models with predictor effect plots and partial residuals. J. Stat. Software, 87, 1–27.
20.
AustinP.C. (2011). An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav. Res. 46, 399–424.
21.
AustinP.C. (2011). Comparing paired vs non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples. Stat. Med. 30, 1292–1301.
22.
AustinP.C. (2011). Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm. Stat. 10, 150–161.
23.
AustinP.C. (2009). Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat. Med. 28, 3083–4107.
24.
NguyenT.-L., CollinsG.S., SpenceJ., DaurèsJ.-P., DevereauxP., LandaisP., and Le ManachY. (2017). Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 17, 78.
25.
PincusD., RaviB., WassersteinD., HuangA., PatersonJ.M., NathensA.B., KrederH.J., JenkinsonR.J., and WodchisW.P. (2017). Association between wait time and 30-day mortality in adults undergoing hip fracture surgery. JAMA, 318, 1994–2003.
26.
StuartE.A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Stat. Sci. 25, 1.
27.
RobinsJ.M., HernanM.A., and BrumbackB. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11, 550–560.
28.
HainmuellerJ. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: a multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20, 25–46.
29.
FehlingsM.G., TetreaultL.A., WilsonJ.R., AarabiB., AndersonP., ArnoldP.M., BrodkeD.S., BurnsA.S., ChibaK., DettoriJ.R., FurlanJ.C., HawrylukG., HollyL.T., HowleyS., JejiT., Kalsi-RyanS., KotterM., KurpadS., MarinoR.J., MartinA.R., MassicotteE., MerliG., MiddletonJ.W., NakashimaH., NagoshiN., PalmieriK., SinghA., SkellyA.C., TsaiE.C., VaccaroA., YeeA., and HarropJ.S. (2017). A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with acute spinal cord injury and central cord syndrome: recommendations on the timing (</ = 24 hours versus >24 hours) of decompressive surgery. Global Spine J. 7, Suppl. 3, 195s–202s.
30.
KerwinA.J., FrykbergE.R., SchincoM.A., GriffenM.M., ArceC.A., NguyenT.Q., and TepasJ.J. 3rd. (2007). The effect of early surgical treatment of traumatic spine injuries on patient mortality. J. Trauma, 63, 1308–1313.
31.
PapeH.C., GiannoudisP., and KrettekC. (2002). The timing of fracture treatment in polytrauma patients: relevance of damage control orthopedic surgery. Am. J. Surg. 183, 622–629.
32.
ByrneJ.P., NathensA.B., GomezD., PincusD., and JenkinsonR.J. (2007). Timing of femoral shaft fracture fixation following major trauma: a retrospective cohort study of United States trauma centers. PLoS Med. 14, e1002336.
33.
KatsuuraY., OsbornJ.M., and CasonG.W. (2016). The epidemiology of thoracolumbar trauma: a meta-analysis. J. Orthop. 13, 383–388.
34.
WutteC., KleinB., BeckerJ., MachO., PanzerS., StrowitzkiM., MaierD., and GrassnerL. (2019). Earlier decompression (< 8 hours) results in better neurological and functional outcome after traumatic thoracolumbar spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 36, 2020–2027.
35.
WutteC., BeckerJ., KleinB., MachO., PanzerS., StubyF.M., StrowitzkiM., MaierD., ThomeC., and GrassnerL. (2020). Early decompression (<8 hours) improves functional bladder outcome and mobility after traumatic thoracic spinal cord injury. World Neurosurg. 134, e847–e854.
36.
KerwinA.J., GriffenM.M., TepasJ.J. 3rd, SchincoM.A., DevinT., and FrykbergE.R. (2008). Best practice determination of timing of spinal fracture fixation as defined by analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J. Trauma, 65, 824–830; discussion 830–831.
37.
ParkK.C., ParkY.S., SeoW.S., MoonJ.K., and KimB.H. (2014). Clinical results of early stabilization of spine fractures in polytrauma patients. J. Crit. Care, 29, 694.e7–699e.
38.
SchinkelC., FrangenT.M., KmeticA., AndressH.J., and MuhrG. (2006). Timing of thoracic spine stabilization in trauma patients: impact on clinical course and outcome. J. Trauma, 61, 156–160; discussion 60.
39.
BadhiwalaJ.H., AhujaC.S., and FehlingsM.G. Time is spine: a review of translational advances in spinal cord injury. J. Neurosurg. Spine 30, 1–18.
40.
HIP ATTACK Investigators. (2020). Accelerated surgery versus standard care in hip fracture (HIP ATTACK): an international, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet, 395, 698–708.
41.
AgostinelloJ., BattistuzzoC.R., SkeersP., BernardS., and BatchelorP.E. (2017). Early spinal surgery following thoracolumbar spinal cord injury: process of care from trauma to theater. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42, E617–E623.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
