Interventions to optimize spinal cord perfusion via support of mean arterial pressure (MAP) or spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) are thought to play a critical role in the management of patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injuries, but there is ongoing controversy about efficacy and safety. We aimed to determine the effects of optimizing spinal cord perfusion on neurological recovery and risks for adverse events. We searched multiple databases for published and unpublished reports. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. We synthesized data and evaluated confidence in anticipated treatment effects according to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We identified 20 eligible observational studies and 1 eligible randomized controlled trial. According to low or very low quality evidence, the effect of MAP support on neurological recovery after acute traumatic spinal cord injury is uncertain, and the use of vasopressors to support MAP may be associated with increased rates of predominantly cardiac adverse events. Increased SCPP appears likely to be associated with improved neurological recovery, but SCPP monitoring via intradural catheters at the anatomical site of injury may involve increased risks of cerebrospinal fluid leakage requiring revision surgery or pseudomeningocele. No study directly compared the effects of specific MAP goal ranges, SCPP ranges, SCPP monitoring techniques, or durations of treatment. Very low quality evidence suggests that norepinephrine may have less risk of adverse events than dopamine. The current literature is insufficient to make strong recommendations about interventions to support spinal cord perfusion via MAP or SCPP goals in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injuries. Data are compatible with a variety of treatment decisions, and individualized approaches may be optimal. Further investigation to clarify the risks, benefits, and alternatives to MAP or SCPP support in this population is warranted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
NoonanV.K., FallahN., ParkS.E., DumontF.S., LeblondJ., CobbJ., and NoreauL. (2014). Health care utilization in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury: the importance of multimorbidity and the impact on patient outcomes. Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil. 20, 289–301.
2.
SinghA., TetreaultL., Kalsi-RyanS., NouriA., and FehlingsM.G. (2014). Global prevalence and incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury. Clin. Epidemiol. 6, 309–31.
3.
SekhonL.H., and FehlingsM.G. (2001). Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine, 26, S2–12.
4.
KruegerH., NoonanV.K., TrenamanL.M., JoshiP., and RiversC.S. (2013). The economic burden of traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada. Chronic Dis. Inj. Can. 33, 113–22.
5.
WhiteB.A.B., DeaN., StreetJ.T., ChengC.L., RiversC.S., AttabibN., KwonB.K., FisherC.G., and DvorakM.F. (2017). The economic burden of urinary tract infection and pressure ulceration in acute traumatic spinal cord injury admissions: evidence for comparative economics and decision analytics from a matched case-control study. J. Neurotrauma, 34, 2892–2900.
6.
KwonB.K., CurtA., BelangerL.M., BernardoA., ChanD., MarkezJ.A., GorelikS., SlobogeanG.P., UmedalyH., GiffinM., NikolakisM.A., StreetJ., BoydM.C., PaquetteS., FisherC.G., and DvorakM.F. (2009). Intrathecal pressure monitoring and cerebrospinal fluid drainage in acute spinal cord injury: a prospective randomized trial. J. Neurosurg. Spine, 10, 181–93.
7.
PloumisA., YadlapalliN., FehlingsM.G., KwonB.K., and VaccaroA.R. (2010). A systematic review of the evidence supporting a role for vasopressor support in acute SCI. Spinal Cord, 48, 356–362.
8.
SaadehY.S., SmithB.W., JosephJ.R., JafferS.Y., BuckinghamM.J., OppenlanderM.E., SzerlipN.J., and ParkP. (2017). The impact of blood pressure management after spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg. Focus, 43, E20.
9.
RykenT.C., HurlbertR.J., HadleyM.N., AarabiB., DhallS.S., GelbD.E., RozzelleC.J., TheodoreN., and WaltersB.C. (2013). The acute cardiopulmonary management of patients with cervical spinal cord injuries. Neurosurgery, 72, Suppl. 2, 84–92.
10.
WerndleM.C., ZoumprouliA., SedgwickP., and PapadopoulosM.C. (2012). Variability in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury in the United Kingdom: results of a national survey. J. Neurotrauma, 29, 880–888.
11.
DaksonA., BrandmanD., Thibault-HalmanG., and ChristieS.D. (2017). Optimization of the mean arterial pressure and timing of surgical decompression in traumatic spinal cord injury: a retrospective study. Spinal Cord, 55, 1033–1038.
12.
TeeJ.W., AltafF., BelangerL., AilonT., StreetJ., PaquetteS., BoydM., FisherC.G., DvorakM.F., and KwonB.K. (2017). Mean arterial blood pressure management of acute traumatic spinal cord injured patients during the pre-hospital and early admission period. J. Neurotrauma, 34, 1271–1277.
13.
KongC.Y., HosseiniA.M., BelangerL.M., RoncoJ.J., PaquetteS.J., BoydM.C., DeaN., StreetJ., FisherC.G., DvorakM.F., and KwonB.K. (2013). A prospective evaluation of hemodynamic management in acute spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord, 51, 466–471.
14.
SabitB., ZeilerF.A., and BerringtonN. (2018). The impact of mean arterial pressure on functional outcome post trauma-related acute spinal cord injury: a scoping systematic review of the human literature. J. Intensive Care Med. 33, 3–15.
15.
BallJ., SharwoodL., and MiddletonJ. (2018). Haemodynamic management in early spinal cord injury care: Findings from a prospective study and clinician survey. J. Neurotrauma, 35, A54.
16.
InoueT., ManleyG.T., PatelN., and WhetstoneW.D. (2014). Medical and surgical management after spinal cord injury: vasopressor usage, early surgerys, and complications. J. Neurotrauma, 31, 284–291.
17.
ReaddyW.J., WhetstoneW.D., FergusonA.R., TalbottJ.F., InoueT., SaigalR., BresnahanJ.C., BeattieM.S., PanJ.Z., ManleyG.T., and DhallS.S. (2015). Complications and outcomes of vasopressor usage in acute traumatic central cord syndrome. J. Neurosurg. Spine, 23, 574–580.
ChenS., SmielewskiP., CzosnykaM., PapadopoulosM.C., and SaadounS. (2017). Continuous monitoring and visualization of optimum spinal cord perfusion pressure in patients with acute cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 34, 2941–2949.
20.
EvaniewN., van der WattL., BhandariM., GhertM., AleemI., DrewB., and GuyattG. (2015). Strategies to improve the credibility of meta-analyses in spine surgery: a systematic survey. Spine J. 15, 2066–76.
21.
MuradM.H., MontoriV.M., IoannidisJ.P., JaeschkeR., DevereauxP.J., PrasadK., NeumannI., Carrasco-LabraA., AgoritsasT., HatalaR., MeadeM.O., WyerP., CookD.J., and GuyattG. (2014). How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: users' guides to the medical literature. JAMA, 312, 171–179.
22.
MoherD., LiberatiA., TetzlaffJ., and AltmanD.G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 62, 1006–1012.
23.
HigginsJ.P., and GreenS. (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. www.cochrane-handbook.org (last accessed June7, 2015).
24.
EvaniewN., Belley-CôtéE.P., FallahN., NoonanV.K., RiversC.S., and DvorakM.F. (2016). Methylprednisolone for the treatment of patients with acute spinal cord injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurotrauma, 33, 468–481.
25.
EvaniewN., KhanM., DrewB., PetersonD., BhandariM., and GhertM. (2015). Intrawound vancomycin to prevent infections after spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Spine J. 24, 533–542.
26.
LandisJ.R., and KochG.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
27.
SlimK., NiniE., ForestierD., KwiatkowskiF., PanisY., and ChipponiJ. (2003). Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J. Surg. 73, 712–716.
28.
GuyattG.H., OxmanA.D., KunzR., AtkinsD., BrozekJ., VistG., AldersonP., GlasziouP., Falck-YtterY., and SchünemannH.J. (2011). GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 64, 395–400.
29.
DvorakM.F., NoonanV.K., FallahN., FisherC.G., RiversC.S., AhnH., TsaiE.C., LinassiA.G., ChristieS.D., AttabibN., HurlbertR.J., FourneyD.R., JohnsonM.G., FehlingsM.G., DrewB., BaileyC.S., PaquetJ., ParentS., TownsonA., HoC., CravenB.C., GagnonD., TsuiD., FoxR., Mac-ThiongJ.M., and KwonB.K. (2014). Minimizing errors in acute traumatic spinal cord injury trials by acknowledging the heterogeneity of spinal cord anatomy and injury severity: an observational Canadian cohort analysis. J. Neurotrauma, 31, 1540–1547.
30.
BalshemH., HelfandM., SchunemannH.J., OxmanA.D., KunzR., BrozekJ., VistG.E., Falck-YtterY., MeerpohlJ., NorrisS., and GuyattG.H. (2011). GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 64, 401–406.
31.
GuyattG.H., OxmanA.D., VistG.E., KunzR., Falck-YtterY., Alonso-CoelloP., SchünemannH.J., and GRADE WorkingGroup. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336, 924–926.
32.
AndrewsJ.C., SchünemannH.J., OxmanA.D., PottieK., MeerpohlJ.J., CoelloP.A., RindD., MontoriV.M., BritoJ.P., NorrisS., ElbarbaryM., PostP., NasserM., ShuklaV., JaeschkeR., BrozekJ., DjulbegovicB., and GuyattG. (2013). GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 66, 726–735.
33.
CatapanoJ.S., John HawrylukG.W., WhetstoneW., SaigalR., FergusonA., TalbottJ., BresnahanJ., DhallS., PanJ., BeattieM., and ManleyG. (2016). Higher mean arterial pressure values correlate with neurologic improvement in patients with initially complete spinal cord injuries. World Neurosurg. 96, 72–79.
34.
ChenS., GallagherM.J., PapadopoulosM.C., and SaadounS. (2018). Non-linear dynamical analysis of intraspinal pressure signal predicts outcome after spinal cord injury. Front. Neurol. 9, 493.
35.
CohnJ., WrightJ., McKennaS., and BushnikT. (2010). Impact of mean arterial blood pressure during the first seven days post spinal cord injury. Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil. 15, 96–106.
36.
HawrylukG., WhetstoneW., SaigalR., FergusonA., TalbottJ., BresnahanJ., DhallS., PanJ., BeattieM., and ManleyG. (2015). Mean arterial blood pressure correlates with neurological recovery after human spinal cord injury: analysis of high frequency physiologic data. J. Neurotrauma, 32, 1958–1967.
37.
HiattL., TheissS., SwainT., and McGwinG. (2017). A193: Adverse effects of vasopressor support for the maintenance of mean arterial pressure in acute spinal cord injuries [abstract]. Presented at the Global Spine Congress,, 2017, Glob. Spine J. 7, 102S-103S.
38.
LepakM., MillerA., and ClarkK. (2011). Hemodynamic targets and vasopressor use in neurogenic shock [abstract]. Presented at American College of Clinical Pharmacy Annual Meeting, 2011. Pharmacother. 31, 421e–422e. Pharmacother. Proc. 2011 Am. Coll. Clin. Pharm. Annu. Meet. 31, 421e–422e.
39.
LeviL., WolfA., and BelzbergH. (1993). Hemodynamic parameters in patients with acute cervical cord trauma: description, intervention, and prediction of outcome. Neurosurgery, 33, 1007–1017.
40.
MartinN.D., KeplerC., ZubairM., SayadipourA., CohenM., and WeinsteinM. (2015). Increased mean arterial pressure goals after spinal cord injury and functional outcome. J. Emerg. Trauma Shock, 8, 94–98.
41.
ParkJ.H., KimJ.H., RohS.W., RhimS.C., and JeonS.R. (2017). Prognostic factor analysis after surgical decompression and stabilization for cervical spinal-cord injury. Br. J. Neurosurg. 31, 194–198.
42.
PhangI., ZoumprouliA., SaadounS., and PapadopoulosM.C. (2016). Safety profile and probe placement accuracy of intraspinal pressure monitoring for traumatic spinal cord injury: Injured Spinal Cord Pressure Evaluation Study. J. Neurosurg. Spine, 25, 398–405.
43.
ReaddyW.J., SaigalR., WhetstoneW.D., MeffordA.N., FergusonA.R., TalbottJ.F., InoueT., BresnahanJ.C., BeattieM.S., PanJ., ManleyG.T., and DhallS.S. (2016). Failure of mean arterial pressure goals to improve outcomes following penetrating spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery, 79, 708–714.
44.
SaadounS., ChenS., and PapadopoulosM.C. (2017). Intraspinal pressure and spinal cord perfusion pressure predict neurological outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 88, 452–453.
45.
ValeF.L., BurnsJ., JacksonA.B., and HadleyM.N. (1997). Combined medical and surgical treatment after acute spinal cord injury: results of a prospective pilot study to assess the merits of aggressive medical resuscitation and blood pressure management. J. Neurosurg. 87, 239–246.
46.
WerndleM.C., SaadounS., PhangI., CzosnykaM., VarsosG.V., CzosnykaZ.H., SmielewskiP., JamousA., BellB.A., ZoumprouliA., and PapadopoulosM.C. (2014). Monitoring of spinal cord perfusion pressure in acute spinal cord injury: initial findings of the injured spinal cord pressure evaluation study. Crit. Care Med. 42, 646–655.
47.
ZimeringJ.H., and MesfinA. (2018). Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome following elevated mean arterial pressures for cervical spinal cord injury. J. Spinal Cord Med. 41, 111–114.
48.
CashaS., and ChristieS. (2011). A systematic review of intensive cardiopulmonary management after spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 28, 1479–1495.
49.
DhallS.S., DaileyA.T., AndersonP.A., ArnoldP.M., ChiJ.H., EichholzK.M., HarropJ.S., HohD.J., QureshiS., RabbC.H., RaksinP.B., KaiserM.G., and O'TooleJ.E. (2019). Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Hemodynamic Management. Neurosurgery, 84, E43–E45.
50.
TykockiT., Poniatowski, Ł., CzyżM., KoziaraM., and Wynne-JonesG. (2017). Intraspinal pressure monitoring and extensive duroplasty in the acute phase of traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review. World Neurosurg. 105, 145–152.
51.
DevereauxP.J., and YusufS. (2003). The evolution of the randomized controlled trial and its role in evidence-based decision making. J. Intern. Med. 254, 105–113.
52.
IoannidisJ.P., HaidichA.B., PappaM., PantazisN., KokoriS.I., TektonidouM.G., Contopoulos-IoannidisD.G., and LauJ. (2001). Comparison of evidence of treatment effects in randomized and nonrandomized studies. JAMA, 286, 821–830.
53.
AltafF., GriesdaleD.E., BelangerL., RitchieL., MarkezJ., AilonT., BoydM.C., PaquetteS., FisherC.G., StreetJ., DvorakM.F., and KwonB.K. (2017). The differential effects of norepinephrine and dopamine on cerebrospinal fluid pressure and spinal cord perfusion pressure after acute human spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 55, 33–38.
54.
ReaddyW.J., and DhallS.S. (2016). Vasopressor administration in spinal cord injury: should we apply a universal standard to all injury patterns?. Neural Regen. Res. 11, 420–421.
55.
AlexanderP.E., GionfriddoM.R., LiS.-A., BeroL., StoltzfusR.J., NeumannI., BritoJ.P., DjulbegovicB., MontoriV.M., NorrisS.L., SchünemannH.J., ThabaneL., and GuyattG.H. (2016). A number of factors explain why WHO guideline developers make strong recommendations inconsistent with GRADE guidance. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 70, 111–122.
56.
AgoritsasT., MerglenA., HeenA.F., KristiansenA., NeumannI., BritoJ.P., Brignardello-PetersenR., AlexanderP.E., RindD.M., VandvikP.O., and GuyattG.H. (2017). UpToDate adherence to GRADE criteria for strong recommendations: an analytical survey. BMJ Open, 7, e018593.
57.
SackettD.L., RosenbergW.M., GrayJ.A., HaynesR.B., and RichardsonW.S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312, 71–72.
58.
DjulbegovicB., and GuyattG.H. (2017). Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on. Lancet, 390, 415–423.
59.
PhangI., WerndleM.C., SaadounS., VarsosG., CzosnykaM., ZoumprouliA., and PapadopoulosM.C. (2015). Expansion duroplasty improves intraspinal pressure, spinal cord perfusion pressure, and vascular pressure reactivity index in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: injured spinal cord pressure evaluation study. J. Neurotrauma, 32, 865–874.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
