This study investigated patterns of cortical organization in adolescents who had sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI) during early childhood to determine ways in which early head injury may alter typical brain development. Increased gyrification in other patient populations is associated with polymicrogyria and aberrant development, but this has not been investigated in TBI. Seventeen adolescents (mean age = 14.1 ± 2.4) who sustained a TBI between 1–8 years of age, and 17 demographically-matched typically developing children (TDC) underwent a high-resolution, T1-weighted 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 6–15 years post-injury. Cortical white matter volume and organization was measured using FreeSurfer's Local Gyrification Index (LGI). Despite a lack of significant difference in white matter volume, participants with TBI demonstrated significantly increased LGI in several cortical regions that are among those latest to mature in normal development, including left parietal association areas, bilateral dorsolateral and medial frontal areas, and the right posterior temporal gyrus, relative to the TDC group. Additionally, there was no evidence of increased surface area in the regions that demonstrated increased LGI. Higher Vineland-II Socialization scores were associated with decreased LGI in right frontal and temporal regions. The present results suggest an altered pattern of expected development in cortical gyrification in the TBI group, with changes in late-developing frontal and parietal association areas. Such changes in brain structure may underlie cognitive and behavioral deficits associated with pediatric TBI. Alternatively, increased gyrification following TBI may represent a compensatory mechanism that allows for typical development of cortical surface area, despite reduced brain volume.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BorrellV. (2018). How cells fold the cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 38, 776–783.
2.
KroenkeC.D. and BaylyP.V. (2018). How forces fold the cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 38, 767–775.
3.
BlantonR.E., LevittJ.G., ThompsonP.M., NarrK.L., Capetillo-CunliffeL., NobelA., SingermanJ.D., McCrackenJ.T., and TogaA.W. (2001). Mapping cortical asymmetry and complexity patterns in normal children. Psychiatry Res. 107, 29–43.
4.
RakicP. (2000). Radial unit hypothesis of neocortical expansion. Novartis Found. Symp. 228, 30–42.
5.
PoirierK, LebrunN, BroixL, TianG., SaillourY., BoscheronC., ParriniE., ValenceS., PierreB.S., OgerM., LacombeD., GenevièveD., FontanaE., DarraF., CancesC., BarthM., BonneauD., BernadinaB.D., N'guyenS., GitiauxC., ParentP., des PortesV., PedespanJ.M., LegrezV., Castelnau-PtakineL., NitschkeP., HieuT., MassonC., ZelenikaD., AndrieuxA., FrancisF., GuerriniR., CowanN.J., Bahi-BuissonN., and ChellyJ. (2013). Mutations in TUBG1, DYNC1H1, KIF5C and KIF2A cause malformations of cortical development and microcephaly. Nat. Genet. 45, 639–647.
6.
WelkerW. (1990). Why does the cortex fissure and fold? A review of determinants of gyri and sulci, in: Cerebral Cortex, JonesE.G. and PetersA. (eds). Penum: New York, NY, pps. 3–136.
7.
JacksonT. and PlanteE. (1996). Gyral morphology in the posterior Sylvian region in families affected by developmental language disorder. Neuropsychol. Rev. 6, 81–94.
8.
KatesW.R., IkutaI., BurnetteC.P. (2009). Gyrification patterns in monozygotic twin pairs varying in discordance for autism. Autism Res. 2, 267–278.
9.
McIntoshA.M., MoorheadT.W., McKirdyJ., HallJ., SussmannJ.E.D., StanfieldA.C., HarrisJ.M., JohnstoneE.C., and LawrieS.M. (2009). Prefrontal gyral folding and its cognitive correlates in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 119, 192–198.
10.
ViolanteI.R., RibeiroM.J., SilvaE.D., and Castelo-BrancoM. (2013). Gyrification, cortical and subcortical morphometry in neurofibromatosis type 1: an uneven profile of developmental abnormalities. J. Neurodev. Disord. 5, 3.
11.
SchmittJ.E., WattsK., EliezS., BellugiU., GalaburdaA.M., and ReissA.L. (2002). Increased gyrification in Williams syndrome: evidence using 3D MRI methods. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 44, 292–295.
12.
OyegbileT., HansenR., MagnottaV., O'LearyD., BellB., SeidenbergM., and HermannB.P. (2004). Quantitative measurement of cortical surface features in localization-related temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuropsychology, 18, 729–737.
13.
ThrelkeldS.W., McClureM.M., RosenG.D., and FitchR.H. (2006). Developmental timeframes for induction of microgyria and rapid auditory processing deficits in the rat. Brain Res. 1109, 22–31.
14.
RosenG.D., BursteinD., and GalaburdaA.M. (2000). Changes in efferent and afferent connectivity in rats with induced cerebrocortical microgyria. J. Comp. Neurol, 418, 423–440.
15.
SchaerM., CuadraM.B., TamaritL., LazeyrasF., EliezS., and ThiranJ.P. (2008). A surface-based approach to quantify local cortical gyrification. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 27, 161–170.
16.
GarelC., ChantrelE., BrisseH., ElmalehM., LutonD., OuryJ.F., SebagG., and HassanM. (2001). Fetal cerebral cortex: normal gestational landmarks identified using prenatal MR imaging. A.J.N.R. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 22, 184–189.
17.
BabikianT., MerkleyT., SavageR.C., GizaC.C., and LevinH. (2015). Chronic aspects of pediatric traumatic brain injury: review of the literature. J. Neurotrauma, 32, 1849–1860.
18.
BiglerE.D. (2007). Anterior and middle cranial fossa in traumatic brain injury: relevant neuroanatomy and neuropathology in the study of neuropsychological outcome. Neuropsychology, 21, 515–531.
19.
PorcelliS, Van Der WeeN., van der WerffS., AghajaniM., GlennonJ.C., van HeukelumS., MogaveroF., LoboA., OliveraF.J., LoboE., PosadasM., DukartJ., KozakR., ArceE., IkramA., VorstmanJ., BilderbeckA., SarisI., KasM.J., and SerrettiA. (2019). Social brain, social dysfunction and social withdrawal. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 97, 10–33.
20.
YeatesK.O., BiglerE.D., DennisM., GerhardtC.A., RubinK.H., StancinT., TaylorH.G., VannattaK. (2007). Social outcomes in childhood brain disorder: a heuristic integration of social neuroscience and developmental psychology. Psychol. Bull. 133, 535–556.
21.
TeasdaleG. and JennettB. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. a practical scale. Lancet, 2, 81–84.
22.
YeatesK.O., TaylorH.G., DrotarD., WadeS.L., KleinS., StancinT., and SchatschneiderC. (1997). Preinjury family environment as a determinant of recovery from traumatic brain injuries in school-age children. J. Intl. Neuropsychol. Soc. 3, 617–630.
23.
OldfieldR.C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
24.
SparrowS., CicchettiD., and BallaD. (2005). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second edition. AGS Publishing: Circle Pines, MN.
25.
LindseyH.M., LalaniS.J., MietchenJ, GaleS.D., WildeE.A., Faber, MacLeodM.C., HunterJ.V., ChuZ.D., AitkenM.E., Ewing-CobbsL., and LevinH.S. (2019). Acute pediatric traumatic brain injury severity predicts long-term verbal memory performance through suppression by white matter integrity on diffusion tensor imaging. Brain Imaging Behav. 2019 May 27; Epub ahead of. print.
26.
FaberJ., WildeE.A., HantenG., Ewing-CobbsL., AitkenM.E., YallampalliR., MacLeodM.C., MullinsS.H., ChuD., LiX., HunterJ.V., Noble-HaeussleinL., and LevinH.S. (2016). Ten-year outcome of early childhood traumatic brain injury: diffusion tensor imaging of the ventral striatum in relation to executive functioning. Brain Inj. 30, 1635–1641.
27.
BiglerE.D., AbildskovT.J., WildeE.A., McCauleyS.R., LiX., MerkleyT.L, FearingMA., NewsomeM.R., ScheibelR.S., HunterJ.V., ChuZ., and LevinH.S. (2010). Diffuse damage in pediatric traumatic brain injury: a comparison of automated versus operator-controlled quantification methods. Neuroimage, 50, 1017–1026.
28.
McCauleyS.R., WildeE.A., MerkleyT.L., SchnelleK.P., BiglerE.D., HunterJ.V., ChuZ., VásquezA.C., and LevinH.S. (2010). Patterns of cortical thinning in relation to event-based prospective memory performance three months after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in children. Dev. Neuropsychol. 35, 318–332.
29.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, N.J.
30.
HaglerD.J.Jr., SayginA.P., and SerenoM.I. (2006). Smoothing and cluster thresholding for cortical surface-based group analysis of fMRI data. Neuroimage, 33, 1093–1103.
31.
CourchesneE., ChisumH.J., TownsendJ., CowlesA., CovingtonJ., EgaasB., HarwoodM., HindsS., and PressG.A. (2000). Normal brain development and aging: quantitative analysis at in vivo MR imaging in healthy volunteers. Radiology, 216, 672–682.
32.
JohanssonBB. (2004). Brain plasticity in health and disease. Keio J. Med. 53, 231–246.
33.
FitchR.H., BreslawskiH., RosenG.D., and ChrobakJ.J. (2008). Persistent spatial working memory deficits in rats with bilateral cortical microgyria. Behav. Brain Funct. 4, 45.
34.
HermanA.E., GalaburdaA.M., FitchR.H., CarterA.R., and RosenG.D. (1997). Cerebral microgyria, thalamic cell size and auditory temporal processing in male and female rats. Cereb. Cortex, 7, 453–464.
35.
ThrelkeldS.W., HillC.A., SzalkowskiC.E., TruongD.T., RosenG.D., and FitchR.H. (2012). Effects of test experience and neocortical microgyria on spatial and non-spatial learning in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 235, 130–135.
36.
HiserJ. and KoenigsM. (2018). The multifaceted role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in emotion, decision making, social cognition, and psychopathology. Biol. Psychiatry, 83, 638–647.
37.
HughesB.L. and BeerJ.S. (2012). Orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex are modulated by motivated social cognition. Cereb. Cortex, 22, 1372–1381.
38.
JenkinsL.M., AndrewesD.G., NicholasC.L., DrummondK.J., MoffatB.A., PhalP., DesmondP., and KesselsR.P. (2014). Social cognition in patients following surgery to the prefrontal cortex. Psychiatry Res. 224, 192–203.
39.
XiC, ZhuY, NiuC, ZhuC., LeeT.M.C., TianY., and WangK. (2011). Contributions of subregions of the prefrontal cortex to the theory of mind and decision making. Behav. Brain Res. 221, 587–593.
40.
BeauchampM.H. (2017). Neuropsychology's social landscape: common ground with social neuroscience. Neuropsychology, 31, 981–1002.
41.
RyanN.P., van BijnenL., CatroppaC., BeauchampM.H., CrossleyL., HearpsS., and AndersonV. 3 (2016). Longitudinal outcome and recovery of social problems after pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI): Contribution of brain insult and family environment. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 49, 23–30.
42.
BeauchampM.H. and AndersonV. (2010). SOCIAL: an integrative framework for the development of social skills. Psychol. Bull. 136, 39–64.
43.
CataniM., HowardR.J., PajevicS., and JonesD.K. (2002). Virtual in vivo interactive dissection of white matter fasciculi in the human brain. Neuroimage, 17, 77–94.
44.
CataniM. and Thiebaut de SchottenM. (2008). A diffusion tensor imaging tractography atlas for virtual in vivo dissections. Cortex, 44, 1105–1132.
45.
OishiK., FariaA.V., HsuJ., TippettD., MoriS., and HillisA.E. (2015). Critical role of the right uncinate fasciculus in emotional empathy. Ann. Neurol. 77, 68–74.
46.
FineJ.G. and SungC. (2014). Neuroscience of child and adolescent health development. J. Couns. Psychol. 61, 521–527.
47.
JohnsonM.H., GrossmannT., and Cohen KadoshK. (2009). Mapping functional brain development: Building a social brain through interactive specialization. Dev. Psychol. 45, 151–159.
48.
PaJ., PossinK.L., WilsonS.M., QuitaniaL.C., KramerJ.H., BoxerA.L., WeinerM.W., and JohnsonJ.K. (2010). Gray matter correlates of set-shifting among neurodegenerative disease, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy older adults. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 16, 640–650.
49.
HofmanM.A. (2014). Evolution of the human brain: when bigger is better. Front. Neuroanat. 8, 1–12.
50.
KleinD., Rotarska-JagielaA., GencE., SritharanS., MohrH., RouxF., HanC.E., KaiserM., SingerW., and UhlhaasP.J. (2014). Adolescent brain maturation and cortical folding: evidence for reductions in gyrification. PLoS One, 9, e84914.
51.
RaznahanA., ShawP., LalondeF., StockmanM., WallaceG.L., GreensteinD., ClasenL., GogtayN., and GieddJ.N. (2011). How does your cortex grow?. J. Neurosci. 31, 7174–7177.
52.
SuS., WhiteT., SchmidtM., KaoC.Y., and SapiroG. (2013). Geometric computation of human gyrification indexes from magnetic resonance images. Hum Brain Mapp, 34, 1230–1244.
53.
GogtayN., GieddJ.N., LuskL., HayashiK.M., GreensteinD., VaituzisA.C., NugentT.F., 3rd, HermanD.H., ClasenL.S., TogaA.W., RapoportJ.L., and ThompsonP.M. (2004). Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 8174–8179.
54.
KeenanH.T., PressonA.P., ClarkA.E., CoxC.S., and Ewing-CobbsL. (2019). Longitudinal developmental outcomes after traumatic brain injury in young children: are infants more vulnerable than toddlers?. J. Neurotrauma, 36, 282–292.
55.
KeenanH.T., ClarkA.E., HolubkovR., CoxC.S., and Ewing-CobbsL.Psychosocial and executive function recovery trajectories one year after pediatric traumatic brain injury: the influence of age and injury severity. J. Neurotrauma, 35, 286–296.
56.
KlineJ.E., IllapaniV.S.P., HeL., AltayeM., LoganJ.W., and ParikhN.A. (2019). Early cortical maturation predicts neurodevelopment in very preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Nov 8; Epub ahead of. print.
57.
ParkE., BellJ.D., SiddiqI.P., and BakerA.J. (2009). An analysis of regional microvascular loss and recovery following two grades of fluid percussion trauma: a role for hypoxia-inducible factors in traumatic brain injury. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 29, 575–584.
58.
RialD., XikotaJ.C., MiozzoA., CruzV.E., PredigerR.D., and WalzR. (2009). Differential gender-related susceptibility to learning and memory deficits in mice submitted to neonatal freezing microgyria model. Brain Res. Bull. 79, 177–181.
59.
AndersonV., CatroppaC., MorseS., HaritouF., and RosenfeldJ. (2005). Functional plasticity or vulnerability after early brain injury?. Pediatrics, 116, 1374–1382.
60.
AndersonV., GodfreyC., RosenfeldJ.V., and CatroppaC. (2012). Predictors of cognitive function and recovery 10 years after traumatic brain injury in young children. Pediatrics, 129, e254–e261.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
