Neuromodulation of spinal networks can improve motor control after spinal cord injury (SCI). The objectives of this study were to (1) determine whether individuals with chronic paralysis can stand with the aid of non-invasive electrical spinal stimulation with their knees and hips extended without trainer assistance, and (2) investigate whether postural control can be further improved following repeated sessions of stand training. Using a double-blind, balanced, within-subject cross-over, and sham-controlled study design, 15 individuals with SCI of various severity received transcutaneous electrical spinal stimulation to regain self-assisted standing. The primary outcomes included qualitative comparison of need of external assistance for knee and hip extension provided by trainers during standing without and in the presence of stimulation in the same participants, as well as quantitative measures, such as the level of knee assistance and amount of time spent standing without trainer assistance. None of the participants could stand unassisted without stimulation or in the presence of sham stimulation. With stimulation all participants could maintain upright standing with minimum and some (n = 7) without external assistance applied to the knees or hips, using their hands for upper body balance as needed. Quality of balance control was practice-dependent, and improved with subsequent training. During self-initiated body-weight displacements in standing enabled by spinal stimulation, high levels of leg muscle activity emerged, and depended on the amount of muscle loading. Our findings indicate that the lumbosacral spinal networks can be modulated transcutaneously using electrical spinal stimulation to facilitate self-assisted standing after chronic motor and sensory complete paralysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SnoekG.J., IJzemasM.J., HermensH.J., MaxwellD., and Biering-SorensenF. (2004). Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegic. Spinal Cord, 42, 526–532.
2.
AnnekenV., Hanssen-DooseA., HirschfeldS., ScheuerT., and ThietjeR. (2009). Influence of physical exercise on quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 48, 393–399.
3.
FernhallB., HeffernanK., JaeS.Y., and HedrickB. (2008). Health implications of physical activity in individuals with spinal cord injury: a literature review. J. Health Hum. Serv. Adm. 30, 468–502.
4.
WalterJ.S., SolaP.G., SacksJ., LuceroY., LangbeinE., and WeaverF. (1999). Indications for a home standing program for individuals with spinal cord injury. J. Spinal Cord Med. 22, 152–158.
5.
AgarwalS., TrioloR.J., KobeticR., MillerM., BieriC., KukkeS., RohdeL., and DavisJ.A.Jr. (2003). Long-term user perceptions of an implanted neuroprosthesis for exercise, standing, and transfers after spinal cord injury. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 40, 241–252.
6.
HarkemaS.J., FerreiraC.K., van den BrandR.J., and KrassioukovA.V. (2008). Improvements in orthostatic instability with stand locomotor training in individuals with spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 25, 1467–1475.
7.
Biering-SorensenF., HansenB., and LeeB.S. (2009). Non-pharmacological treatment and prevention of bone loss after spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord, 47, 508–518.
8.
FongA.J., RoyR.R., IchiyamaR.M., LavrovI., CourtineG., GerasimenkoY., TaiY.C., BurdickJ., and EdgertonV.R. (2009). Recovery of control of posture and locomotion after a spinal cord injury: solutions staring us in the face. Prog. Brain Res. 175, 393–418.
9.
DeliaginaT.G., ZeleninP.V., and OrlovskyG.N. (2012). Physiological and circuit mechanisms of postural control. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22, 646–652.
10.
CourtineG., GerasimenkoY., van den BrandR., YewA., MusienkoP., ZhongH., SongB., AoY., IchiyamaR.M., LavrovI., RoyR.R., SofroniewM.V., and EdgertonV.R. (2009). Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1333–1342.
11.
EarhartG.M. (2013). Dynamic control of posture across locomotor tasks. Mov. Disord. 28, 1501–1508.
12.
GrasmuckeD., ZieriacksA., JansenO., FisahnC., Sczesny-KaiserM., WesslingM., MeindlR.C., SchildhauerT.A., and AachM. (2017). Against the odds: what to expect in rehabilitation of chronic spinal cord injury with a neurologically controlled Hybrid Assistive Limb exoskeleton. A subgroup analysis of 55 patients according to age and lesion level. Neurosurg. Focus, 42, E15.
13.
GadP., GerasimenkoY., ZdunowskiS., TurnerA., SayenkoD., LuD.C., and EdgertonV.R. (2017). Weight bearing over-ground stepping in an exoskeleton with non-invasive spinal cord neuromodulation after motor complete paraplegia. Front. Neurosci. 11, 333.
14.
IllisL.S. (2012). Central nervous system regeneration does not occur. Spinal Cord, 50, 259–263.
15.
BrownJ.M., DerisoD.M., and TanseyK.E. (2012). From contemporary rehabilitation to restorative neurology. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 114, 471–474.
16.
MinassianK., and HofstoetterU.S. (2016). Spinal cord stimulation and augmentative control strategies for leg movement after spinal paralysis in humans. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 22, 262–270.
17.
EdgertonV.R., and HarkemaS. (2011). Epidural stimulation of the spinal cord in spinal cord injury: current status and future challenges. Expert Rev. Neurother. 11, 1351–1353.
18.
HarkemaS., GerasimenkoY., HodesJ., BurdickJ., AngeliC., ChenY., FerreiraC., WillhiteA., RejcE., GrossmanR.G., and EdgertonV.R. (2011). Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study. Lancet, 377, 1938–1947.
19.
AngeliC.A., EdgertonV.R., GerasimenkoY.P., and HarkemaS.J. (2014). Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain, 137, 1394–1409.
20.
GrahnP.J., LavrovI.A., SayenkoD.G., Van StraatenM.G., GillM.L., StrommenJ.A., CalvertJ.S., DrubachD.I., BeckL.A., LindeM.B., ThoresonA.R., LopezC., MendezA.A., GadP.N., GerasimenkoY.P., EdgertonV.R., ZhaoK.D., and LeeK.H. (2017). Enabling task-specific volitional motor functions via spinal cord neuromodulation in a human with paraplegia. Mayo Clin. Proc. 92, 544–554.
21.
GillM.L., GrahnP.J., CalvertJ.S., LindeM.B., LavrovI.A., StrommenJ.A., BeckL.A., SayenkoD.G., Van StraatenM.G., DrubachD.I., VeithD.D., ThoresonA.R., LopezC., GerasimenkoY.P., EdgertonV.R., LeeK.H., and ZhaoK.D. (2018). Neuromodulation of lumbosacral spinal networks enables independent stepping after complete paraplegia. Nature Med. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0248-7. [Epub ahead of print.]
22.
HofstoetterU.S., HoferC., KernH., DannerS.M., MayrW., DimitrijevicM.R., and MinassianK. (2013). Effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on voluntary locomotor activity in an incomplete spinal cord injured individual. Biomed. Tech. (Berl.) doi: 10.1515/bmt-2013-4014. [Epub ahead of print.]
23.
HofstoetterU.S., McKayW.B., TanseyK.E., MayrW., KernH., and MinassianK. (2014). Modification of spasticity by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. J. Spinal Cord Med. 37, 202–211.
24.
HofstoetterU.S., KrennM., DannerS.M., HoferC., KernH., McKayW.B., MayrW., and MinassianK. (2015). Augmentation of voluntary locomotor activity by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in motor-incomplete spinal cord-injured individuals. Artif. Organs. 39, E176–E186.
25.
MinassianK., HofstoetterU.S., DannerS.M., MayrW., BruceJ.A., McKayW.B., and TanseyK.E. (2016). Spinal rhythm generation by step-induced feedback and transcutaneous posterior root stimulation in complete spinal cord-injured individuals. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair, 30, 233–243.
26.
GerasimenkoY., GorodnichevR., MoshonkinaT., SayenkoD., GadP., and Reggie EdgertonV. (2015). Transcutaneous electrical spinal-cord stimulation in humans. Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 58, 225–231.
27.
GerasimenkoY., GorodnichevR., PuhovA., MoshonkinaT., SavochinA., SelionovV., RoyR.R., LuD.C., and EdgertonV.R. (2015). Initiation and modulation of locomotor circuitry output with multisite transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the spinal cord in noninjured humans. J. Neurophysiol. 113, 834–842.
28.
GerasimenkoY., GadP., SayenkoD., McKinneyZ., GorodnichevR., PuhovA., MoshonkinaT., SavochinA., SelionovV., ShiguevaT., TomilovskayaE., KozlovskayaI., and EdgertonV.R. (2016). Integration of sensory, spinal, and volitional descending inputs in regulation of human locomotion. J. Neurophysiol. 116, 98–105.
29.
RathM., VetteA.H., RamasubramaniamS., LiK., BurdickJ., EdgertonV.R., GerasimenkoY.P., and SayenkoD.G. (2018). Trunk stability enabled by noninvasive spinal electrical stimulation after spinal cord injury. J, Neurotrauma, 35, 2540–2553.
30.
DyC.J., GerasimenkoY.P., EdgertonV.R., Dyhre-PoulsenP., CourtineG., and HarkemaS.J. (2010). Phase-dependent modulation of percutaneously elicited multisegmental muscle responses after spinal cord injury. J. Neurophysiol. 103, 2808–2820.
31.
GorodnichevR.M., PivovarovaE.A., PukhovA., MoiseevS.A., SavokhinA.A., MoshonkinaT.R., ShcherbakovaN.A., KilimnikV.A., SelionovV.A., KozlovskaiaI.B., EdgertonV.R., and Gerasimenko IuP. (2012). [Transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the spinal cord: non-invasive tool for activation of locomotor circuitry in human]. Fiziol Cheloveka, 38, 46–56.
32.
HorakF.B. (2006). Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls?. Age Ageing, 35(Suppl. 2), ii7–ii11.
33.
SayenkoD.G., AlekhinaM.I., MasaniK., VetteA., ObataH., PopovicM., and NakazawaK. (2010). Positive effect of balance training with visual feedback on standing balance abilities in people with incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 48, 886–893.
34.
SayenkoD.G., AtkinsonD.A., FloydT.C., GorodnichevR.M., MoshonkinaT.R., HarkemaS.J., EdgertonV.R., and GerasimenkoY.P. (2015). Effects of paired transcutaneous electrical stimulation delivered at single and dual sites over lumbosacral spinal cord. Neurosci. Lett. 609, 229–234.
35.
ClaydonV.E., SteevesJ.D., and KrassioukovA. (2006). Orthostatic hypotension following spinal cord injury: understanding clinical pathophysiology. Spinal Cord, 44, 341–351.
36.
LaughlinM.H., and SchrageW.G. (1999). Effects of muscle contraction on skeletal muscle blood flow: when is there a muscle pump?. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 31, 1027–1035.
37.
KrassioukovA., WarburtonD.E., TeasellR., EngJ.J.; Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Research Team. (2009). A systematic review of the management of autonomic dysreflexia after spinal cord injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 90, 682–695.
38.
RejcE., AngeliC., and HarkemaS. (2015). Effects of lumbosacral spinal cord epidural stimulation for standing after chronic complete paralysis in humans. PLoS One, 10, e0133998.
39.
HunterJ.P., and AshbyP. (1994). Segmental effects of epidural spinal cord stimulation in humans. J. Physiol. 474, 407–419.
40.
Maertens de NoordhoutA., RothwellJ.C., ThompsonP.D., DayB.L., and MarsdenC.D. (1988). Percutaneous electrical stimulation of lumbosacral roots in man. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 51, 174–181.
41.
MinassianK., JilgeB., RattayF., PinterM.M., BinderH., GerstenbrandF., and DimitrijevicM.R. (2004). Stepping-like movements in humans with complete spinal cord injury induced by epidural stimulation of the lumbar cord: electromyographic study of compound muscle action potentials. Spinal Cord, 42, 401–416.
42.
MurgM., BinderH., and DimitrijevicM.R. (2000). Epidural electric stimulation of posterior structures of the human lumbar spinal cord: 1. muscle twitches - a functional method to define the site of stimulation. Spinal Cord, 38, 394–402.
43.
RattayF., MinassianK., and DimitrijevicM.R. (2000). Epidural electrical stimulation of posterior structures of the human lumbosacral cord: 2. quantitative analysis by computer modeling. Spinal Cord, 38, 473–489.
44.
LadenbauerJ., MinassianK., HofstoetterU.S., DimitrijevicM.R., and RattayF. (2010). Stimulation of the human lumbar spinal cord with implanted and surface electrodes: a computer simulation study. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 18, 637–645.
45.
DannerS.M., HofstoetterU.S., LadenbauerJ., RattayF., and MinassianK. (2011). Can the human lumbar posterior columns be stimulated by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation?. A modeling study. Artif. Organs, 35, 257–262.
46.
JilgeB., MinassianK., RattayF., and DimitrijevicM.R. (2004). Frequency-dependent selection of alternative spinal pathways with common periodic sensory input. Biol. Cybern. 91, 359–376.
47.
MinassianK., PersyI., RattayF., PinterM.M., KernH., and DimitrijevicM.R. (2007). Human lumbar cord circuitries can be activated by extrinsic tonic input to generate locomotor-like activity. Hum. Mov. Sci. 26, 275–295.
48.
GerasimenkoY.P., LuD.C., ModaberM., ZdunowskiS., GadP., SayenkoD.G., MorikawaE., HaakanaP., FergusonA.R., RoyR.R., and EdgertonV.R. (2015). Noninvasive reactivation of motor descending control after paralysis. J. Neurotrauma, 32, 1968–1980.
49.
DannerS.M., HofstoetterU.S., and MinassianK. (2013). Finite element models of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation. In: JaegerD., JungR.(eds.), Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience, New York, NY: Springer New York, pp. 1–6.
50.
MinassianK., McKayW.B., BinderH., and HofstoetterU.S. (2016). Targeting lumbar spinal neural circuitry by epidural stimulation to restore motor function after spinal cord injury. Neurotherapeutics, 13, 284–294.
51.
MinassianK., HofstoetterU.S., DannerS.M., MayrW., McKayW.B., TanseyK., and DimitrijevicM.R. (2013). Mechanisms of rhythm generation of the human lumbar spinal cord in response to tonic stimulation without and with step-related sensory feedback. Biomed. Tech. (Berl.) doi: 10.1515/bmt-2013-4013.
52.
JilgeB., MinassianK., RattayF., PinterM.M., GerstenbrandF., BinderH., and DimitrijevicM.R. (2004). Initiating extension of the lower limbs in subjects with complete spinal cord injury by epidural lumbar cord stimulation. Exp. Brain Res. 154, 308–326.
53.
HofstoetterU.S., DannerS.M., FreundlB., BinderH., MayrW., RattayF., and MinassianK. (2015). Periodic modulation of repetitively elicited monosynaptic reflexes of the human lumbosacral spinal cord. J. Neurophysiol. 114, 400–410.
54.
HsuL.J., ZeleninP.V., OrlovskyG.N., and DeliaginaT.G. (2012). Effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on postural limb reflexes and neurons of spinal postural network. J. Neurophysiol. 108, 300–313.
55.
MusienkoP.E., ZeleninP.V., OrlovskyG.N., and DeliaginaT.G. (2010). Facilitation of postural limb reflexes with epidural stimulation in spinal rabbits. J. Neurophysiol. 103, 1080–1092.
56.
DeliaginaT.G., BeloozerovaI.N., OrlovskyG.N., and ZeleninP.V. (2014). Contribution of supraspinal systems to generation of automatic postural responses. Front. Integrat. Neurosci. 8, 76.
57.
LavrovI., GerasimenkoY., BurdickJ., ZhongH., RoyR.R., and EdgertonV.R. (2015). Integrating multiple sensory systems to modulate neural networks controlling posture. J. Neurophysiol. 114, 3306–3314.
58.
RangerM.R., IrwinG.J., BunburyK.M., and PeutrellJ.M. (2008). Changing body position alters the location of the spinal cord within the vertebral canal: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Br. J. Anaesth. 101, 804–809.
59.
DannerS.M., KrennM., HofstoetterU.S., TothA., MayrW., and MinassianK. (2016). Body position influences which neural structures are recruited by lumbar transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation. PLoS One, 11, e0147479.
60.
HermanR., HeJ., D'LuzanskyS., WillisW., and DilliS. (2002). Spinal cord stimulation facilitates functional walking in a chronic, incomplete spinal cord injured. Spinal Cord, 40, 65–68.
61.
SayenkoD.G., AngeliC., HarkemaS.J., EdgertonV.R., and GerasimenkoY.P. (2014). Neuromodulation of evoked muscle potentials induced by epidural spinal-cord stimulation in paralyzed individuals. J. Neurophysiol. 111, 1088–1099.
62.
Field-FoteE.C. (2015). Exciting recovery: augmenting practice with stimulation to optimize outcomes after spinal cord injury. Prog. Brain Res. 218, 103–126.
63.
KwakkelG. (2006). Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil. Rehabil. 28, 823–830.
64.
ColomboG., WirzM., and DietzV. (1998). Effect of locomotor training related to clinical and electrophysiological examinations in spinal cord injured humans. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 860, 536–538.
65.
DietzV., ColomboG., JensenL., and BaumgartnerL. (1995). Locomotor capacity of spinal cord in paraplegic patients. Ann. Neurol. 37, 574–582.
66.
HarkemaS.J. (2008). Plasticity of interneuronal networks of the functionally isolated human spinal cord. Brain Res. Rev. 57, 255–264.
67.
LyalkaV.F., HsuL.J., KarayannidouA., ZeleninP.V., OrlovskyG.N., and DeliaginaT.G. (2011). Facilitation of postural limb reflexes in spinal rabbits by serotonergic agonist administration, epidural electrical stimulation, and postural training. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1341–1354.
68.
SherwoodA.M., DimitrijevicM.R., and McKayW.B. (1992). Evidence of subclinical brain influence in clinically complete spinal cord injury: discomplete SCI. J. Neurol. Sci. 110, 90–98.
69.
RaineteauO., and SchwabM.E. (2001). Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 263–273.
70.
KnikouM. (2014). Transpinal and transcortical stimulation alter corticospinal excitability and increase spinal output. PLoS One, 9, e102313.
71.
KnikouM., DixonL., SantoraD., and IbrahimM.M. (2015). Transspinal constant-current long-lasting stimulation: a new method to induce cortical and corticospinal plasticity. J. Neurophysiol. 114, 1486–1499.
72.
RoyF.D., BosgraD., and SteinR.B. (2014). Interaction of transcutaneous spinal stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation in human leg muscles. Exp. Brain Res. 232, 1717–1728.
73.
TopkaH., CohenL.G., ColeR.A., and HallettM. (1991). Reorganization of corticospinal pathways following spinal cord injury. Neurology, 41, 1276–1283.
74.
TaiC., ShenB., WangJ., ChancellorM.B., RoppoloJ.R., and de GroatW.C. (2008). Inhibitory and excitatory perigenital-to-bladder spinal reflexes in the cat. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 294, F591–F602.
75.
ShahP.K., SureddiS., AlamM., ZhongH., RoyR.R., EdgertonV.R., and GerasimenkoY. (2016). Unique spatiotemporal neuromodulation of the lumbosacral circuitry shapes locomotor success after spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 33, 1709–1723.
76.
DimitrijevicM.M., DimitrijevicM.R., IllisL.S., NakajimaK., SharkeyP.C., and SherwoodA.M. (1986). Spinal cord stimulation for the control of spasticity in patients with chronic spinal cord injury: I. Clinical observations. Cent. Nerv. Syst. Trauma, 3, 129–144.
77.
BarolatG., MyklebustJ.B., and WenningerW. (1986). Enhancement of voluntary motor function following spinal cord stimulation–case study. Appl. Neurophysiol. 49, 307–314.
78.
De LeonR.D., HodgsonJ.A., RoyR.R., and EdgertonV.R. (1998). Full weight-bearing hindlimb standing following stand training in the adult spinal cat. J. Neurophysiol. 80, 83–91.
79.
de LeonR.D., HodgsonJ.A., RoyR.R., and EdgertonV.R. (1998). Locomotor capacity attributable to step training versus spontaneous recovery after spinalization in adult cats. J. Neurophysiol. 79, 1329–1340.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
