Millions of North Americans sustain a concussion or a mild traumatic brain injury annually, and are at risk of cognitive, emotional, and physical sequelae. Although functional MRI (fMRI) studies have provided an initial framework for examining functional deficits induced by concussion, particularly working memory and attention, the temporal dynamics underlying these deficits are not well understood. We used magnetoencephalography (MEG), a modality with millisecond temporal resolution, in conjunction with a 1-back visual working memory (VWM) paradigm using scenes from everyday life to characterize spatiotemporal functional differences at specific VWM stages, in adults had had or had not had a recent concussion. MEG source-level differences between groups were determined by whole-brain analyses during encoding and recognition phases. Despite comparable behavioral performance, abnormal hypo- and hyperactivation patterns were found in brain areas involving frontoparietal, ventral occipitotemporal, temporal, and subcortical areas in concussed patients. These patterns and their timing varied as a function of VWM stagewise processing, linked to early attentional control, visuoperceptual scene processing, and VWM maintenance and retrieval processes. Parietal hypoactivation, starting at 60 ms during encoding, was correlated with symptom severity, possibly linked to impaired top-down attentional processing. Hyperactivation in the scene-selective occipitotemporal areas, the medial temporal complex, specifically the right hippocampus and orbitofrontal areas during encoding and/or recognition, lead us to posit inefficient but compensatory visuoperceptual, relational, and retrieval processing. Although injuries sustained after the concussion were considered “mild,” these data suggest that they can have prolonged effects on early attentional and VWM processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LevineZ. (2010). Mild traumatic brain injury: Part 1: determining the need to scan. Can. Fam. Physician, 56, 346–349.
2.
KinsellaG.J., OlverJ., OngB., GruenR., and HammersleyE. (2014). Mild traumatic brain injury in older adults: early cognitive outcome. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc., 20, 663–671.
3.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010). Percent distributions of TBI–related hospitalizations by age group and injury mechanism – United States, 2006–2010. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/data/dist_hosp.html (last accessed January2017).
4.
BroglioS.P., PontifexM.B., O'ConnorP., and HillmanC. H. (2009). The persistent effects of concussion on neuroelectric indices of attention. J. Neurotrauma, 26, 1463–1470.
5.
BernsteinD.M. (1999). Recovery from mild head injury. Brain Inj. 13, 151–172.
6.
RuffR. (2005). Two decades of advances in understanding of mild traumatic brain injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil., 20, 5–18.
7.
BohnenN., TwijnstraA., and JollesJ. (1992). Post-traumatic and emotional symptoms in different subgroups of patients with mild head injury. Brain Inj. 6, 481–487.
8.
ChanR.C. (2002). Attentional deficits in patients with persisting postconcussive complaints: a general deficit or specific component deficit?. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol., 24, 1081–1093.
9.
CiceroneK.D. and AzulayJ. (2002). Diagnostic utility of attention measures in postconcussion syndrome. Clin. Neuropsychol., 16, 280–289.
10.
GhajarJ., IvryR.B., Cognitive and Neurobiological Research Consortium, (2008). The predictive brain state: timing deficiency in traumatic brain injury?. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair, 22, 217–227.
11.
SmitsM., DippelD.W., HoustonG.C., WielopolskiP.A., KoudstaalP.J., HuninkM.G., and van der LugtA. (2009). Postconcussion syndrome after minor head injury: brain activation of working memory and attention. Hum. Brain Mapp., 30, 2789–2803.
12.
TerryD.P., AdamsT.E., FerraraM.S., and MillerL.S. (2015). FMRI hypoactivation during verbal learning and memory in former high school football players with multiple concussions. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol., 30, 341–355.
13.
ArciniegasD.B., AndersonC.A., TopkoffJ., and McAllisterT.W. (2005). Mild traumatic brain injury: a neuropsychiatric approach to diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat., 1, 311–327.
14.
Barker-ColloS., JonesA., JonesK., TheadomA., DowellA., StarkeyN., and FeiginV.L. (2015). Prevalence, natural course and predictors of depression 1 year following traumatic brain injury from a population-based study in New Zealand. Brain Inj. 29, 859–865.
15.
BottariC., GosselinN., ChenJ.K., and PtitoA. (2015). The impact of symptomatic mild traumatic brain injury on complex everyday activities and the link with alterations in cerebral functioning: exploratory case studies. Neuropsychol. Rehabil., 27, 1–20.
16.
HaltermanC.I., LanganJ., DrewA., RodriguezE., OsternigL.R., ChouL.S., and van DonkelaarP. (2006). Tracking the recovery of visuospatial attention deficits in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain, 129, 747–753.
17.
SchiehserD.M., DelisD.C., FiloteoJ.V., Delano-WoodL., HanS.D., JakA.J., DrakeA.I., and BondiM.W. (2011). Are self-reported symptoms of executive dysfunction associated with objective executive function performance following mild to moderate traumatic brain injury?. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol., 33, 704–714.
18.
BarthJ.T., FreemanJ.R., BroshekD.K., and VarneyR.N. (2001). Acceleration-deceleration sport-related concussion: the gravity of it all. J. Athl. Train., 36, 253–256.
19.
SmithD.H., MeaneyD.F., and ShullW.H. (2003). Diffuse axonal injury in head trauma. J. Head Trauma Rehabil., 18, 307–316.
20.
JohnsonV.E., StewartW., and SmithD.H. (2013). Axonal pathology in traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol., 246, 35–43.
McAllisterT.W., SparlingM.B., FlashmanL.A., GuerinS.J., MamourianA.C., and SaykinA.J. (2001). Differential working memory load effects after mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage, 14, 1004–1012.
23.
PtitoA., ChenJ.K., and JohnstonK. M. (2007). Contributions of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to sport concussion evaluation. NeuroRehabilitation, 22, 217–227.
24.
GosselinN., BottariC., ChenJ.K., HuntgeburthS.C., De BeaumontL., PetridesM., CheungB., and PtitoA. (2012). Evaluating the cognitive consequences of mild traumatic brain injury and concussion by using electrophysiology. Neurosurg. Focus, 33, E7:1–7.
25.
LachapelleJ., Bolduc-TeasdaleJ., PtitoA., and McKerralM. (2008). Deficits in complex visual information processing after mild TBI: electrophysiological markers and vocational outcome prognosis. Brain Inj. 22, 265–274.
26.
da CostaL., RobertsonA., BethuneA., MacDonaldM.J., ShekP.N., TaylorM.J. and PangE. W. (2015). Delayed and disorganised brain activation detected with magnetoencephalography after mild traumatic brain injury. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 86, 1008–1015.
27.
DunkleyB.T., Da CostaL., BethuneA., JetlyR., PangE.W., TaylorM.J., and DoesburgS.M. (2015). Low-frequency connectivity is associated with mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage Clin. 7, 611–621.
28.
PangE.W., DunkleyB.T., DoesburgS.M., da CostaL., and TaylorM.J. (2016). Reduced brain connectivity and mental flexibility in mild traumatic brain injury. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol., 3, 124–131.
29.
GaetzM., and BernsteinD.M. (2001). The current status of electrophysiologic procedures for the assessment of mild traumatic brain injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil., 16, 386–405.
30.
McDonaldB.C., FlashmanL.A., and SaykinA.J. (2002). Executive dysfunction following traumatic brain injury: neural substrates and treatment strategies. NeuroRehabilitation, 17, 333–344.
31.
ChenC.J., WuC.H., LiaoY.P., HsuH.L., TsengY.C., LiuH.L., and ChiuW.T. (2012). Working memory in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: functional MR imaging analysis. Radiology, 264, 844–851.
32.
ChenJ.K., JohnstonK.M., FreyS., PetridesM., WorsleyK., and PtitoA. (2004). Functional abnormalities in symptomatic concussed athletes: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 22, 68–82.
33.
McAllisterT.W., SaykinA.J., FlashmanL.A., SparlingM.B., JohnsonS.C., GuerinS.J., MamourianA.C., WeaverJ.B., and YanofskyN. (1999). Brain activation during working memory 1 month after mild traumatic brain injury: a functional MRI study. Neurology, 53, 1300–1308.
34.
SlobounovS.M., ZhangK., PennellD., RayW., JohnsonB., and SebastianelliW. (2010). Functional abnormalities in normally appearing athletes following mild traumatic brain injury: a functional MRI study. Exp. Brain Res., 202, 341–354.
35.
ReinvangI., NordbyH., and NielsenC.S. (2000). Information processing deficits in head injury assessed with ERPs reflecting early and late processing stages. Neuropsychologia, 38, 995–1005.
36.
JantzenK.J., AndersonB., SteinbergF.L., and KelsoJ.A. (2004). A prospective functional MR imaging study of mild traumatic brain injury in college football players. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., 25, 738–745.
37.
BaddeleyA. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 63, 1–29.
38.
ChunM.M. (2011). Visual working memory as visual attention sustained internally over time. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1407–1409.
39.
ToddJ.J., and MaroisR. (2004). Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 428, 751–754.
40.
LuckS.J., WoodmanG.F., and VogelE.K. (2000). Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends Cogn. Sci., 4, 432–440.
41.
PlompG., Hervais-AdelmanA., AstolfiL., and MichelC.M. (2015). Early recurrence and ongoing parietal driving during elementary visual processing. Sci. Rep., 5, 18733.
42.
PoghosyanV., ShibataT., and IoannidesA. A. (2005). Effects of attention and arousal on early responses in striate cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci., 22, 225–234.
43.
LavoieM.E., DupuisF., JohnstonK.M., LeclercS., and LassondeM. (2004). Visual p300 effects beyond symptoms in concussed college athletes. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol., 26, 55–73.
44.
LewH.L., LeeE.H., PanS.S., and DateE. S. (2004). Electrophysiologic abnormalities of auditory and visual information processing in patients with traumatic brain injury. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 83, 428–433.
45.
OzenL.J., ItierR.J., PrestonF.F., and FernandesM.A. (2013). Long-term working memory deficits after concussion: electrophysiological evidence. Brain Inj. 27, 1244–1255.
46.
DupuisF., JohnstonK.M., LavoieM., LeporeF., and LassondeM. (2000). Concussions in athletes produce brain dysfunction as revealed by event-related potentials. Neuroreport, 11, 4087–4092.
47.
HariR., and SalmelinR. (2012). Magnetoencephalography: From SQUIDs to neuroscience. Neuroimage 20th anniversary special edition. Neuroimage, 61, 386–396.
48.
HopfJ.M., LuckS.J., GirelliM., HagnerT., MangunG.R., ScheichH., and HeinzeH. J. (2000). Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. Cereb. Cortex, 10, 1233–1241.
49.
BertiS., and RoeberU. (2013). Encoding into visual working memory: event-related brain potentials reflect automatic processing of seemingly redundant information. Neurosci. J., 2013, 172614.
50.
HungY., SmithM.L., and TaylorM.J. (2013). Functional dissociations in prefrontal-hippocampal working memory systems. Cortex, 49, 961–967.
51.
AgamY., and SekulerR. (2007). Interactions between working memory and visual perception: an ERP/EEG study. Neuroimage, 36, 933–942.
52.
ParkD.C., WelshR.C., MarshuetzC., GutchessA.H., MikelsJ., PolkT.A., NollD.C., and TaylorS. F. (2003). Working memory for complex scenes: age differences in frontal and hippocampal activations. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 15, 1122–1134.
53.
SCAT (2001). SCAT2. Br. J. Sports Med. 43, 85–88.
54.
WechslerD. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). The Psychological Corporation: New York.
55.
SaundersJ.B., AaslandO.G., BaborT.F., De La FuenteJ., and GrantM. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification TestL (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption - II. Addiction, 88, 791–804.
56.
ConnersC. K. (2001). Conners' Rating Scales – Revised. Multi-Health Systems: North Tonawanda, NY.
57.
SpitzerR.L., KroenkeK., WilliamsJ., and LoweB. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder. Arch. Intern. Med., 166, 1092–1097.
58.
HancockP., and LarnerA. J. (2009). Clinical utility of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in memory clinics. Int. J. Psychiatry Clin. Pract., 13, 188–191.
59.
SpitzerR.L., KroenkeK., WilliamsJ.B. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ Primary Care Study. JAMA, 282, 1737–1744.
60.
KovacevicN., and McIntoshA.R. (2007). Groupwise independent component decomposition of EEG data and partial least square analysis. Neuroimage, 35, 1103–1112.
61.
OostenveldR., FriesP., MarisE., and SchoffelenJ.M. (2011). FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 2011, 156869.
62.
PerryG., and SinghK.D. (2014). Localizing evoked and induced responses to faces using magnetoencephalography. Eur. J. Neurosci., 39, 1517–1527.
63.
BeckeA., MullerN., VellageA., SchoenfeldM.A., and HopfJ.M. (2015). Neural sources of visual working memory maintenance in human parietal and ventral extrastriate visual cortex. Neuroimage, 110, 78–86.
64.
PalvaS., KulashekharS., HamalainenM., and PalvaJ.M. (2011). Localization of cortical phase and amplitude dynamics during visual working memory encoding and retention. J. Neurosci., 31, 5013–5025.
65.
van de NieuwenhuijzenM.E., van den BorneE.W., JensenO., and van GervenM.A. (2016). Spatiotemporal dynamics of cortical representations during and after stimulus presentation. Front. Syst. Neurosci., 10, 42.
66.
NolteG. (2003). The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors. Phys. Med. Biol., 48, 3637–3652.
67.
Van VeenB.D., van DrongelenW., YuchtmanM., and SuzukiA. (1997). Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 44, 867–880.
68.
RordenC., KarnathH.O., and BonilhaL. (2007). Improving lesion-symptom mapping. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 19, 1081–1088.
69.
RahmB., KaiserJ., UnterrainerJ.M., SimonJ., and BledowskiC. (2014). fMRI characterization of visual working memory recognition. Neuroimage, 90, 413–422.
70.
HungJ., DriverJ., and WalshV. (2005). Visual selection and posterior parietal cortex: effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on partial report analyzed by Bundesen's theory of visual attention. J. Neurosci., 25, 9602–9612.
71.
ShomsteinS. (2012). Cognitive functions of the posterior parietal cortex: top-down and bottom-up attentional control. Front. Integr. Neurosci., 6, 38.
72.
CantJ.S., and GoodaleM.A. (2007). Attention to form or surface properties modulates different regions of human occipitotemporal cortex. Cereb. Cortex, 17, 713–731.
73.
EpsteinR., and KanwisherN. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598–601.
74.
ZeidmanP., MullallyS.L., and MaguireE.A. (2015). Constructing, perceiving, and maintaining scenes: hippocampal activity and connectivity. Cereb. Cortex, 25, 3836–3855.
75.
MartinV.C., SchacterD.L., CorballisM.C., and AddisD.R. (2011). A role for the hippocampus in encoding simulations of future events. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 108, 13,858–13,863.
76.
SewardsT.V. (2011). Neural structures and mechanisms involved in scene recognition: a review and interpretation. Neuropsychologia, 49, 277–298.
77.
CohenN.J., RyanJ., HuntC., RomineL., WszalekT., and NashC. (1999). Hippocampal system and declarative (relational) memory: summarizing the data from functional neuroimaging studies. Hippocampus, 9, 83–98.
78.
LeeA.C., and RudebeckS.R. (2010). Investigating the interaction between spatial perception and working memory in the human medial temporal lobe. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 22, 2823–2835.
79.
RanganathC., and D'EspositoM. (2001). Medial temporal lobe activity associated with active maintenance of novel information. Neuron, 31, 865–873.
80.
PihlajamakiM., TanilaH., HanninenT., KononenM., MikkonenM., JalkanenV., PartanenK., AronenH.J., and SoininenH. (2003). Encoding of novel picture pairs activates the perirhinal cortex: an fMRI study. Hippocampus, 13, 67–80.
81.
VigneauM., BeaucousinV., HerveP.Y., DuffauH., CrivelloF., HoudeO., MazoyerB., and Tzourio-MazoyerN. (2006). Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage, 30, 1414–1432.
82.
FristonK.J. (2011). Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connect. 1, 13–36.
83.
GirgisF., PaceJ., SweetJ., and MillerJ.P. (2016). Hippocampal neurophysiologic changes after mild traumatic brain injury and potential neuromodulation treatment approaches. Front. Syst. Neurosci., 10, 8.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
