Return to living at home is an important patient-reported outcome following traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). Specialized inpatient rehabilitation assists such patients in maximizing function and independence. Our project aim was to describe those patients receiving specialized rehabilitation after tSCI in Canada, and to determine if such rehabilitation improved the likelihood of returning home. This cohort study utilized data from the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR) to identify patients with tSCI discharged from 1 of 18 participating acute specialized spine facilities between 2011 and 2015 to either 1 of 13 participating specialized rehabilitation facilities, or to another discharge destination. To determine if specialized rehabilitation affected likelihood of returning home, multiple logistic regressions and propensity score matchings were performed to account for age at injury, gender, neurological severity and level, acute length of stay (LOS), and region of residence. The χ2 test was used to compare rate of return home between matched groups. Of the 1599 patients included, 71% received specialized rehabilitation. Receiving specialized rehabilitation was a significant and strong predictor of return to home after controlling for covariates (adjusted odds ratio = 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6–5.9). The rate of return to home was significantly higher in the matched rehabilitation group than the no rehabilitation group (98% vs. 87%, p = 0.0004). For the matched patients, an extra 11 patients returned home for every 100 patients receiving specialized rehabilitation. However, effect of age on returning home requires further investigation. Improving access to specialized rehabilitation could potentially reduce discharges to nursing homes or other non-home destinations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DeVivoM.J., and RichardsJ.S. (1992). Community reintegration and quality of life following spinal cord injury. Paraplegia, 30, 108–112.
2.
LindsayP., BayleyM., HellingsC., HillM., WoodburyE., and PhillipsS. (2008). Canadian best practice recommendations for stroke care (updated 2008). Can. Med. Assoc. J., 179, S1–S25.
3.
CravenC., VerrierM., BalioussisC., WolfeD., HsiehJ., NoonanV., RasheedA., and CherbanE. (2012). Rehabilitation Environmental Scan Atlas: Capturing Capacity in Canadian SCI Rehabilitation. Rick Hansen Institute: Vancouver.
4.
Turner-StokesL., WilliamsH., BillA., BassettP., and SephtonK. (2016). Cost-efficiency of specialist inpatient rehabilitation for working-aged adults with complex neurological disabilities: a multicentre cohort analysis of a national clinical data set. BMJ Open, 6, e010238.
5.
World Health Organization. (2013). International Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury. BickenbackJ., OfficerA., ShakespeareT., and von GrooteP. (eds.). WHO, Malta.
6.
LiJ., LiuG., ZhengY., HaoC., ZhangY., WeiB., ZhouH., and WangD. (2011). The epidemiological survey of acute traumatic spinal cord injury (ATSCI) of 2002 in Beijing municipality. Spinal Cord, 49, 777–782.
7.
CourisC., GuilcherS., MunceS., FungK., CravenB., VerrierM., and JaglalS. (2010). Characteristics of adults with incident traumatic spinal cord injury in Ontario, Canada. Spinal Cord, 48, 39–44.
8.
JaglalS.B., MunceS.E., GuilcherS.J., CourisC.M., FungK., CravenB.C., and VerrierM. (2009). Health system factors associated with rehospitalizations after traumatic spinal cord injury: a population-based study. Spinal Cord, 47, 604–609.
9.
MunceS., WodchisW., GuilcherS., CourisC., VerrierM., FungK., CravenB., and JaglalS. (2013). Direct costs of adult traumatic spinal cord injury in Ontario. Spinal Cord, 51, 64–69.
DevivoM.J. (2012). Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury: trends and future implications. Spinal Cord, 50, 365–372.
12.
DonaldI.P., and BulpittC.J. (1999). The prognosis of falls in elderly people living at home. Age Ageing, 28, 121–125.
13.
GulatiA., YeoC.J., CooneyA.D., McLeanA.N., FraserM.H., and AllanD.B. (2011). Functional outcome and discharge destination in elderly patients with spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord, 49, 215–218.
14.
ToothL., McKennaK., and GeraghtyT. (2003). Rehabilitation outcomes in traumatic spinal cord injury in Australia: functional status, length of stay and discharge setting. Spinal Cord, 41, 220–230.
15.
WhiteneckG., GassawayJ., DijkersM.P., HeinemannA.W., and KreiderS.E. (2012). Relationship of patient characteristics and rehabilitation services to outcomes following spinal cord injury: the SCIRehab project. J. Spinal Cord Med., 35, 484–502.
16.
AnzaiK., YoungJ., McCallumJ., MillerB., and JongbloedL. (2006). Factors influencing discharge location following high lesion spinal cord injury rehabilitation in British Columbia, Canada. Spinal Cord, 44, 11–18.
17.
SmithB., and CaddickN. (2015). The impact of living in a care home on the health and wellbeing of spinal cord injured people. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 12, 4185–4202.
18.
Young People in Nursing Homes National Alliance. (2012). Statistics: estimated numbers of young people in nursing homes. Available at: http://www.ypinh.org.au/statistics. Accessed January7, 2016.
19.
PutzkeJ.D., and RichardsJ.S. (2001). Nursing home residence: quality of life among individuals with spinal cord injury. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 80, 404–409.
20.
SilverJ., LjungbergI., LibinA., and GroahS. (2012). Barriers for individuals with spinal cord injury returning to the community: a preliminary classification. Disabil. Health J., 5, 190–196.
21.
ParentS., BarchiS., LeBretonM., CashaS., and FehlingsM.G. (2011). The impact of specialized centers of care for spinal cord injury on length of stay, complications, and mortality: a systematic review of the literature. J. Neurotrauma, 28, 1363–1370.
22.
NoonanV.K., ChanE., SantosA., SorilL., LewisR., SinghA., ChengC.L., O'ConnellC., TruchonC., PaquetJ., ChristieS., EthansK., TsaiE., FordM., DrewB., LinassiA.G., BaileyC.S., FehlingsM.G., and RHSCIR Network. (2017). Traumatic spinal cord injury care in Canada: A survey of Canadian centres. J. NeurotraumaApr1. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4928 [Epub ahead of print].
23.
Rick Hansen Institute. (2015). Accreditation Standards. Rick Hansen Institute. Available at: http://www.rickhanseninstitute.org/work/our-projects-initiatives/accreditation-standards#status. Accessed March13, 2017.
24.
NoonanV.K., KwonB.K., SorilL., FehlingsM.G., HurlbertR.J., TownsonA., JohnsonM., and DvorakM.F. (2012). The Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR): a national patient-registry. Spinal Cord, 50, 22–27.
25.
NoreauL., CobbJ., BélangerL.M., DvorakM.F., LeblondJ., and NoonanV.K. (2013). Development and assessment of a community follow-up questionnaire for the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 94, 1753–1765.
26.
KirshblumS.C., WaringW., Biering-SorensenF., BurnsS.P., JohansenM., Schmidt-ReadM., DonovanW., GravesD., JhaA., JonesL., MulcaheyM.J., and KrassioukovA. (2011). Reference for the 2011 revision of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. J. Spinal Cord Med., 34, 547–554.
27.
CharlsonM.E., PompeiP., AlesK.L., MacKenzieC.R., and MacKenzieR. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J. Chronic Dis., 40, 373–383.
28.
StreetJ.T., ThorogoodN.P., CheungA., NoonanV.K., ChenJ., FisherC.G., and DvorakM.F. (2013). Use of the Spine Adverse Events Severity System (SAVES) in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. A comparison with institutional ICD-10 coding for the identification of acute care adverse events. Spinal Cord, 51, 472–476.
29.
World Health Organization. (1992). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision. (ICD-10). Geneva.
30.
ParsonL. (2004). Performing a 1:N case-control match on propensity score, in: Proceedings of the 29th SAS Users Group International. QC: Montreal, pps. 165–29.
31.
Canadian Institute for Health Information. (2006). Life after traumatic spinal cord injury: from inpatient rehabilitation back to the community. Ottawa, ON.
32.
GrangerC.V, KarmarkarA.M., GrahamJ.E., DeutschA., NiewczykP., DivitaM.A., and OttenbacherK.J. (2012). The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury discharged from rehabilitation programs in 2002–2010. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 91, 289–299.
33.
NewP.W., SimmondsF., and StevermuerT. (2011). Comparison of patients managed in specialised spinal rehabilitation units with those managed in non-specialised rehabilitation units. Spinal Cord, 49, 909–916.
34.
ScivolettoG., MorgantiB., DitunnoP., DitunnoJ.F., and MolinariM. (2003). Effects on age on spinal cord lesion patients' rehabilitation. Spinal Cord, 41, 457–464.
35.
HammondF.M., GassawayJ., AbeytaN., FreemanE.S., PrimackD., KreiderS.E., and WhiteneckG. (2012). Outcomes of social work and case management services during inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation: the SCIRehab project. J. Spinal Cord Med., 35, 611–623.
36.
RobisonJ., PorterM., ShugrueN., KleppingerA., and LambertD. (2015). Connecticut's “money follows the person” yields positive results for transitioning people out of institutions. Health Aff., 34, 1628–1636.
37.
RiaziA., BradshawS.A., and PlayfordE.D. (2012). Quality of life in the care home: a qualitative study of the perspectives of residents with multiple sclerosis. Disabil. Rehabil., 34, 2095–2102.
38.
HallS., OpioD., DoddR.H., and HigginsonI.J. (2011). Assessing quality-of-life in older people in care homes. Age Ageing, 40, 507–512.
39.
PorterM., and TeisbergE. (2006). Redefining Health Care: Creating Value-based Competition on Results. Harvard Business Press: Boston.
40.
BackusD., GassawayJ., SmoutR.J., HsiehC.-H., HeinemannA.W., DeJongG., and HornS.D. (2013). Relation between inpatient and postdischarge services and outcomes 1 year postinjury in people with traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 94, S165–S174.
41.
NoreauL., NoonanV.K., CobbJ., LeblondJ., and DumontF.S. (2014). Spinal cord injury community survey: a national, comprehensive study to portray the lives of Canadians with spinal cord injury. Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil., 20, 249–264.
42.
NoonanV.K., SorilL., AtkinsD., LewisR., SantosA., FehlingsM.G., BurnsA.S., SinghA., and DvorakM.F. (2012). The application of operations research methodologies to the delivery of care model for traumatic spinal cord injury: the access to care and timing project. J. Neurotrauma, 29, 2272–2282.
43.
SantosA., GurlingJ., DvorakM.F., NoonanV.K., FehlingsM.G., BurnsA.S., LewisR., SorilL., FallahN., StreetJ.T., BélangerL., TownsonA., LiangL., and AtkinsD. (2013). Modeling the patient journey from injury to community reintegration for persons with acute traumatic spinal cord injury in a Canadian centre. PLoS One, 8, e72552.
44.
BluvshteinV., FrontL., ItzkovichM., AidinoffE., GelernterI., HartJ., Biering-SoerensenF., WeeksC., LarameeM.T., CravenC., HitzigS.L., GlaserE., ZeiligG., AitoS., ScivolettoG., MecciM., ChadwickR.J., El MasryW.S., OsmanA., GlassC.A., SilvaP., SoniB.M., GardnerB.P., SavicG., BergströmE.M., and CatzA. (2011). SCIM III is reliable and valid in a separate analysis for traumatic spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord, 49, 292–296.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
