The present study was designed to tackle two notorious features of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)—heterogeneity and invisibility—by characterizing the full scope of mTBI symptoms. Mice were exposed to brain injuries of different intensities utilizing a weight-drop model (10, 30, 50, and 70 g) and subsequently subjected to a comprehensive battery of behavioral tests at different time points and immunohistochemical examination of cortical slices. Whereas the physiological, neurological, emotional, and motor function of mTBI mice (i.e., their well-being) remained largely intact, cognitive deficits were identified by the y-maze and novel object recognition. Results from these two cognitive tests were combined and a dose-response relationship was established between injury intensity and cognitive impairment, ranging from an 85% decline after a 70-g impact (p < 0.001) to a 20% decline after a 10-g impact (essentially no effect). In addition, higher intensities of injury were accompanied by decreased expression of axonal and synaptic markers. Thus, our mTBI mice showed a clear discrepancy between performance (poor cognitive function) and appearance (healthy demeanor). This is of major concern given that diagnosis of mTBI is established on the presence of clinical symptoms and emphasizes the need for an alternative diagnostic modality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
OlesenJ., GustavssonA., SvenssonM., WittchenH.-U., and JönssonB.; on behalf of the CDBE2010 study group, and the European Brain Council. (2012). The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur. J. Neurol., 19, 155–162.
2.
NIH Categorical Spending. (2016). Estimates of Funding for Various Research, Condition, and Disease Categories (RCDC). Available at: https://report.nih.gov/categorical_spending.aspx. (Last accessed July26, 2016.)
3.
MenonD.K., SchwabK., WrightD.W., and MaasA.I. (2010). Position Statement: Definition of Traumatic Brain Injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 91, 1637–1640.
4.
RubovitchV., ZilbersteinY., ChapmanJ., SchreiberS., and PickC.G. (2017). Restoring GM1 ganglioside expression ameliorates axonal outgrowth inhibition and cognitive impairments induced by blast traumatic brain injury. Sci. Rep., 7, 41269.
5.
SmithD.H., JohnsonV.E., and StewartW. (2013). Chronic neuropathologies of single and repetitive TBI: substrates of dementia?. Nat. Rev. Neurol., 9, 211–221.
6.
TeresaL.S., and WilsonL.S. (2001). Misconceptions about brain injury among the general public and non-expert health professionals: an exploratory study. Brain Inj. 15, 149–165.
7.
RoozenbeekB., MaasA.I., and MenonD.K. (2013). Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Nat. Rev. Neurol., 9, 231–236.
8.
SteinS.C., GeorgoffP., MeghanS., MizraK., and SonnadS.S. (2010). 150 Years of treating severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of progress in mortality. J. Neurotrauma, 27, 1343–1353.
9.
RosenfeldJ.V., MaasA.I., BraggeP., Morganti-KossmannM.C., ManleyG.T., and GruenR.L. (2012). Early management of severe traumatic brain injury. Lancet, 380, 1088–1098.
10.
KleinF.C. (1982). Silent epidemic: head injuries difficult to diagnose, get rising attention. Wall Str. J. November 24, 1, 12.
11.
XiongY., MahmoodA., and ChoppM. (2013). Animal models of traumatic brain injury. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 14, 128–142.
12.
PappiusH.M. (1981). Local cerebral glucose utilization in thermally traumatized rat brain. Ann. Neurol., 9, 484–491.
13.
MathewP., BullockR., GrahamD.I., MaxwellW.L., TeasdaleG.M., and McCullochJ. (1996). A new experimental model of contusion in the rat. Histopathological analysis and temporal patterns of cerebral blood flow disturbances. J. Neurosurg., 85, 860–870.
14.
McIntoshT.K., NobleL., AndrewsB., and FadenA.I. (1987). Traumatic brain injury in the rat: characterization of a midline fluid-percussion model. Cent. Nerv. Syst. Trauma J. Am. Paralys. Assoc., 4, 119–134.
15.
ShapiraY., ShohamiE., SidiA., SofferD., FreemanS., and CotevS. (1988). Experimental closed head injury in rats: Mechanical, pathophysiologic, and neurologic properties. Crit. Care Med., 16, 258–265.
16.
FeeneyD.M., BoyesonM.G., LinnR.T., MurrayH.M., and DailW.G. (1981). Responses to cortical injury: I. Methodology and local effects of contusions in the rat. Brain Res., 211, 67–77.
17.
PanW., KastinA.J., RigaiT., McLayR., and PickC.G. (2003). Increased hippocampal uptake of tumor necrosis factor alpha and behavioral changes in mice. Exp. Brain Res., 149, 195–199.
MassonF., ThicoipeM., AyeP., MokniT., SenjeanP., SchmittV., DessallesP.H., CazaugadeM., andLabadensP.; Aquitaine Group for Severe Brain Injuries Study. (2001). Epidemiology of severe brain injuries: a prospective population-based study. J. Trauma, 51, 481–489.
20.
MyburghJ.A., CooperD.J., FinferS.R., VenkateshB., JonesD., HigginsA., BishopN., andHiglettT.; Australasian Traumatic Brain Injury Study (ATBIS) Investigators for the Australian, and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. (2008). Epidemiology and 12-month outcomes from traumatic brain injury in australia and new zealand. J. Trauma, 64, 854–862.
21.
National Research Council (US) Committee. (2011). Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th ed. National Academies Press: Washington, DC.
22.
TeasdaleG., and JennettB. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. Lancet, 304, 81–84.
23.
ChenY., ConstantiniS., TrembovlerV., WeinstockM., and ShohamiE. (1996). An experimental model of closed head injury in mice: pathophysiology, histopathology, and cognitive deficits. J. Neurotrauma, 13, 557–568.
24.
Beni-AdaniL., GozesI., CohenY., AssafY., SteingartR.A., BrennemanD.E., EizenbergO., TrembolverV., and ShohamiE. (2001). A peptide derived from activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) ameliorates injury response in closed head injury in mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 296, 57–63.
25.
SchreiberS., BaderM., RubovitchV., and PickC.G. (2015). Interaction between methylphenidate, methadone and different antidepressant drugs on antinociception in mice, and possible clinical implications. World J. Biol. Psychiatry, 18, 300–307.
26.
EdutS., RubovitchV., SchreiberS., and PickC.G. (2011). The intriguing effects of ecstasy (MDMA) on cognitive function in mice subjected to a minimal traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 214, 877–889.
27.
JonesB.J., and RobertsD.J. (1968). The quantitative measurement of motor inco-ordination in naive mice using an accelerating rotarod. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 20, 302–304.
28.
ZoharO., RubovitchV., MilmanA., SchreiberS., and PickC.G. (2011). Behavioral consequences of minimal traumatic brain injury in mice. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Warsz.) 71, 36–45.
29.
SchreiberS., LinR., HaimL., Baratz-GoldstienR., RubovitchV., VaismanN., and PickC.G. (2014). Enriched environment improves the cognitive effects from traumatic brain injury in mice. Behav. Brain Res., 271, 59–64.
30.
Baratz-GoldsteinR., DeselmsH., HeimL.R., KhomskiL., HofferB.J., AtlasD., and PickC.G. (2016). Thioredoxin-mimetic-peptides protect cognitive function after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). PLoS One, 11, e0157064.
31.
AggletonJ.P., KeenS., WarburtonE.C., and BusseyT.J. (1997). Extensive cytotoxic lesions involving both the rhinal cortices and area TE impair recognition but spare spatial alternation in the rat. Brain Res. Bull., 43, 279–287.
32.
FlierlM.A., StahelP.F., BeauchampK.M., MorganS.J., SmithW.R., and ShohamiE. (2009). Mouse closed head injury model induced by a weight-drop device. Nat. Protoc., 4, 1328–1337.
33.
SchwarzboldM.L., RialD., De BemT., MachadoD.G., CunhaM.P., dos SantosA.A., dos SantosD.B., FigueiredoC.P., FarinaM., GoldfederE.M., RodriguesA.L., PredigerR.D., and WalzR. (2010). Effects of traumatic brain injury of different severities on emotional, cognitive, and oxidative stress-related parameters in mice. J. Neurotrauma, 27, 1883–1893.
34.
TsenterJ., Beni-AdaniL., AssafY., AlexandrovichA.G., TrembovlerV., and ShohamiE. (2008). Dynamic changes in the recovery after traumatic brain injury in mice: effect of injury severity on T2-weighted MRI abnormalities, and motor and cognitive functions. J. Neurotrauma, 25, 324–333.
35.
YangS.H., GustafsonJ., GangidineM., StepienD., SchusterR., PrittsT.A., GoodmanM.D., RemickD.G., and LentschA.B. (2013). A murine model of mild traumatic brain injury exhibiting cognitive and motor deficits. J. Surg. Res., 184, 981–988.
36.
OnyszchukG., Al-HafezB., HeY.-Y., BilgenM., BermanN.E.J., and BrooksW.M. (2007). A mouse model of sensorimotor controlled cortical impact: characterization using longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging, behavioral assessments and histology. J. Neurosci. Methods, 160, 187–196.
37.
HammR.J., PikeB.R., O'DellD.M., LyethB.G., and JenkinsL.W. (1994). The rotarod test: an evaluation of its effectiveness in assessing motor deficits following traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma, 11, 187–196.
38.
MilmanA., RosenbergA., WeizmanR., and PickC.G. (2005). Mild traumatic brain injury induces persistent cognitive deficits and behavioral disturbances in mice. J. Neurotrauma, 22, 1003–1010.
39.
TweedieD., MilmanA., HollowayH.W., LiY., HarveyB.K., ShenH., PistellP.J., LahiriD.K., HofferB.J., WangY., PickC.G., and GreigN.H. (2007). Apoptotic and behavioral sequelae of mild brain trauma in mice. J. Neurosci. Res., 85, 805–815.
40.
FannJ.R., HartT., and SchomerK.G. (2009). Treatment for depression after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J. Neurotrauma, 26, 2383–2402.
41.
LiY., BaderM., TamargoI., RubovitchV., TweedieD., PickC.G., and GreigN.H. (2015). Liraglutide is neurotrophic and neuroprotective in neuronal cultures and mitigates mild traumatic brain injury in mice. J. Neurochem., 135, 1203–1217.
42.
RachmanyL., TweedieD., LiY., RubovitchV., HollowayH.W., MillerJ., HofferB.J., GreigN.H., and PickC.G. (2013). Exendin-4 induced glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor activation reverses behavioral impairments of mild traumatic brain injury in mice. Age (Dordr)., 35, 1621–1636.
43.
BaratzR., RubovitchV., FrenkH., and PickC.G. (2010). The influence of alcohol on behavioral recovery after mTBI in mice. J. Neurotrauma, 27, 555–563.
44.
PetragliaA.L., PlogB.A., DayawansaS., ChenM., DashnawM.L., CzernieckaK., WalkerC.T., ViteriseT., HyrienO., IliffJ.J., DeaneR., NedergaardM., and HuangJ.H. (2014). The spectrum of neurobehavioral sequelae after repetitive mild traumatic brain injury: a novel mouse model of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. J. Neurotrauma, 31, 1211–1224.
45.
WashingtonP.M., ForcelliP.A., WilkinsT., ZappleD.N., ParsadanianM., and BurnsM.P. (2012). The effect of injury severity on behavior: a phenotypic study of cognitive and emotional deficits after mild, moderate, and severe controlled cortical impact injury in mice. J. Neurotrauma, 29, 2283–2296.
46.
LeeS., and SheaT.B. (2014). The high molecular weight neurofilament subunit plays an essential role in axonal outgrowth and stabilization. Biol. Open, 3, 974–981.
47.
GaoX., DengP., XuZ.C., and ChenJ. (2011). Moderate traumatic brain injury causes acute dendritic and synaptic degeneration in the hippocampal dentate gyrus. PLoS One, 6, e24566.
48.
JamoraC.W., YoungA., and RuffR.M. (2012). Comparison of subjective cognitive complaints with neuropsychological tests in individuals with mild vs more severe traumatic brain injuries. Brain Inj. 26, 36–47.
49.
LevinH.S., HighW.M., GoetheK.E., SissonR.A., OverallJ.E., RhoadesH.M., EisenbergH.M., KaliskyZ., and GaryH.E. (1987). The neurobehavioural rating scale: assessment of the behavioural sequelae of head injury by the clinician. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 50, 183–193.
50.
RapoportM., McCauleyS., LevinH., SongJ., and FeinsteinA. (2002). The role of injury severity in neurobehavioral outcome 3 months after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol. Behav. Neurol., 15, 123–132.
51.
SatzP., ZauchaK., ForneyD.L., McClearyC., AsarnowR.F., LightR., LevinH., KellyD., BergsneiderM., HovdaD., MartinN., CaronM.J., NamerowN., and BeckerD. (1998). Neuropsychological, psychosocial and vocational correlates of the Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 months post-injury: a study of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury patients. Brain Inj. 12, 555–567.
52.
CernakI. (2005). Animal models of head trauma. NeuroRx, 2, 410–422.
53.
CarrollL., CassidyJ.D., PelosoP., BorgJ., von HolstH., HolmL., PaniakC., and PépinM. (2004). Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the who collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. J. Rehabil. Med., 36, 84–105.
54.
AntunesM., and BialaG. (2012). The novel object recognition memory: neurobiology, test procedure, and its modifications. Cogn. Process., 13, 93–110.
55.
PatkiG., SolankiN., AtroozF., AllamF., and SalimS. (2013). Depression, anxiety-like behavior and memory impairment are associated with increased oxidative stress and inflammation in a rat model of social stress. Brain Res. 1539, 73–86.
56.
MaasA.I., StocchettiN., and BullockR. (2008). Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol. 7, 728–741.
57.
SchreiberS., and PickC.G. (2009). Physical activity, contact sports and quality of sleep: the good, the bad and the (possibly) ugly. Sleep Med. 10, 13–14.
58.
LeinhaseI., RozanskiM., HarhausenD., ThurmanJ.M., SchmidtO.I., HossiniA.M., TahaM.E., RittirschD., WardP.A., HolersV.M., ErtelW., and StahelP.F. (2007). Inhibition of the alternative complement activation pathway in traumatic brain injury by a monoclonal anti-factor B antibody: a randomized placebo-controlled study in mice. J. Neuroinflammation, 4, 13.
59.
SchmidtO.I., Morganti-KossmannM.C., HeydeC.E., PerezD., YatsivI., ShohamiE., ErtelW., and StahelP.F. (2004). Tumor necrosis factor-mediated inhibition of interleukin-18 in the brain: a clinical and experimental study in head-injured patients and in a murine model of closed head injury. J. Neuroinflammation, 1, 13.
60.
StahelP.F., ShohamiE., YounisF.M., KariyaK., OttoV.I., LenzlingerP.M., GrosjeanM.B., EugsterH.-P., TrentzO., KossmannT., and Morganti-KossmannM.C. (2000). Experimental closed head injury: analysis of neurological outcome, blood–brain barrier dysfunction, intracranial neutrophil infiltration, and neuronal cell death in mice deficient in genes for pro-inflammatory cytokines. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 20, 369–380.
61.
HiployleeC., DufortP.A., DavisH.S., WennbergR.A., TartagliaM.C., MikulisD., HazratiL.-N., and TatorC.H. (2016). Longitudinal study of postconcussion syndrome: not everyone recovers. J. Neurotrauma, 34, 1511–1523.
62.
MaselB.E., and DeWittD.S. (2010). Traumatic brain injury: a disease process, not an event. J. Neurotrauma, 27, 1529–1540.
63.
CassidyJ.D., CarrollL.J., PelosoP.M., BorgJ., von HolstH., HolmL., KrausJ., and CoronadoV.G.; WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. (2004). Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Rehabil. Med., 43Suppl., 28–60.
64.
KlonoffP.S., and DawsonL.K. (2004). Commentary—neuropsychological evaluation of patients with traumatic brain injury: polarization versus holistic integration. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol., 19, 1095–1101.
65.
KosakaB. (2006). Neuropsychological assessment in mild traumatic brain injury: a clinical overview. BCMJ, 48, 447–452.
66.
PodellK., GiffordK., BougakovD., and GoldbergE. (2010). Neuropsychological assessment in traumatic brain injury. Psychiatr. Clin. North Am., 33, 855–876.
67.
BodanapallyU.K., SoursC., ZhuoJ., and ShanmuganathanK. (2015). Imaging of traumatic brain injury. Radiol. Clin. North Am., 53, 695–715, viii.
68.
DavalosD.B., and BennettT.L. (2002). A review of the use of single-photon emission computerized tomography as a diagnostic tool in mild traumatic brain injury. Appl. Neuropsychol., 9, 92–105.
69.
BorgJ., HolmL., CassidyJ.D., PelosoP.M., CarrollL.J., von HolstH., andEricsonK.; WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. (2004). Diagnostic procedures in mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Rehabil. Med., 43Suppl., 61–75.
70.
KoerteI.K., HufschmidtJ., MuehlmannM., LinA.P., and ShentonM.E. (2016). Advanced neuroimaging of mild traumatic brain injury, in: LaskowitzD., and GrantG. (eds). Translational Research in Traumatic Brain Injury. CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL.
71.
MaddocksD.L., DickerG.D., and SalingM.M. (1995). The assessment of orientation following concussion in athletes. Clin. J. Sport Med. Off. J. Can. Acad. Sport Med., 5, 32–35.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
