We investigated whether humans could sustain high head rotational velocities without brain injury. Rotational velocity has long been implicated for predicting concussion risk, and has recently been used to develop the rotational velocity-based Brain Injury Criterion (BrIC). To assess the efficacy of rotational velocity and BrIC for predicting concussion risk, we instrumented 9 male subjects with sensor-laden mouthguards and measured six-degree-of-freedom head accelerations for 27 rapid voluntary head rotations. The fastest rotations produced peak rotational velocities of 12.6, 17.4, and 25.0 rad/s in the coronal, sagittal, and horizontal planes, respectively. All of these exceeded the corresponding medians from padded sports impacts (8.9, 10.7, and 8.4 rad/s, respectively) and, in the case of sagittal and horizontal rotation, were within 1 standard deviation of published concussion averages. In the horizontal plane, four voluntary rotations exceeded the concussive impact median BrIC. The area under the precision-recall curve was lower in BrIC (0.49) than just using horizontal rotational acceleration (0.8), which distinguished concussive and subconcussive motions better. Voluntary motions produced less than 4% max principal strain (MPS) in finite element simulation, 5 times below predictions from dummy impacts used to develop BrIC. Despite having the highest critical velocity in BrIC, coronal rotation produced more tract-oriented strain in the corpus callosum than other planes. Baseline and post-experiment neurological testing revealed no significant deficits. We find that the head can tolerate high-velocity, low-acceleration rotational inputs too slow to produce substantial brain deformation. These findings suggest that the time regime over which angular velocities occur must be carefully considered for concussion prediction.
BabikianT., and AsarnowR. (2009). Neurocognitive outcomes and recovery after pediatric TBI: meta-analytic review of the literature. Neuropsychology, 23, 283–296.
3.
CoronadoV.G., McGuireL.C., SarmientoK., BellJ., LionbargerM.R., JonesC.D., GellerA.I., KhouryN., and XuL. (2012). Trends in traumatic brain injury in the U.S. and the public health response: 1995–2009. J. Safety Res. 43, 299–307.
4.
GaddC.W. (1966). Use of a weighted impulse criterion for estimating injury hazard. In Proceedings of the 10th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper No. 660793, pp. 164–174.
5.
VersaceJ. (1971). A review of the Severity Index. In Proceedings of the 15th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper No. 710881, pp. 771–796.
6.
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS). (2014). 571.202a. Section 571, Standard 202a - Head restraints.
7.
National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE). (2012). Standard test method and equipment used in evaluating the performance characteristics of protective headgear/equipment, Paper No. ND001-11m12, pp. 1–30.
8.
LincolnA.E., CaswellS.V., AlmquistJ.L., DunnR.E., NorrisJ.B., and HintonR.Y. (2011). Trends in concussion incidence in high school sports: a prospective 11-year study. Am. J. Sports Med. 39, 958–963.
9.
RosenthalJ.A., ForakerR.E., CollinsC.L., and ComstockR.D. (2014). National high school athlete concussion rates from 2005–2006 to 2011–2012. Am. J. Sports Med. 42, 1710–1715.
10.
CameronK.L., MarshallS.W., SturdivantR.X., and LincolnA.E. (2012). Trends in the incidence of physician-diagnosed mild traumatic brain injury among active duty U.S. military personnel between 1997 and 2007. J. Neurotrauma, 29, 1313–1321.
11.
IvinsB.J. (2010). Hospitalization associated with traumatic brain injury in the active duty US Army: 2000–2006. NeuroRehabilitation, 26, 199–212.
12.
HolbournA.H.S. (1943). Mechanics of head injuries. Lancet, 242, 438–441.
13.
HernandezF., WuL.C., YipM.C., LaksariK., HoffmanA.R., LopezJ.R., GrantG., KleivenS., and CamarilloD.B. (2015). Six degree-of-freedom measurements of human mild traumatic brain injury. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 43, 1918–1934.
14.
PellmanE.J., VianoD.C., TuckerA.M., and CassonI.R. (2003). Concussion in professional football, part 1: reconstruction of game impacts and injuries. Neurosurgery, 53, 799–812.
15.
RowsonS., DumaS.M., BeckwithJ.G., ChuJ.J., GreenwaldR.M., CriscoJ.J., BrolinsonP.G., DuhaimeA.-C., McAllisterT.W., and MaerlenderA.C. (2012). Rotational head kinematics in football impacts: an injury risk function for concussion. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40, 1–13.
16.
FunkJ.R., CormierJ.M., BainC.E., GuzmanH., BonugliE., and ManoogianS.J. (2011). Head and neck loading in everyday and vigorous activities. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39, 766–776.
17.
WuL.C., NangiaV., BuiK., HammoorB., KurtM., HernandezF., KuoC., and CamarilloD.B. (2016). In vivo evaluation of wearable head impact sensors. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 44, 1234–1245.
18.
KleinbergerM., SunE., EppingerR., KuppaS., and SaulR. (1998). Head injury criteria, in: Development of Improved Injury Criteria for the Assessment of Advanced Automotive Restraint Systems. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Washington, DC, pps. 12–17.
19.
MarguliesS.S., and ThibaultL.E. (1992). A proposed tolerance criterion for diffuse axonal injury in man. J. Biomech. 25, 917–923.
20.
OmmayaA.K., and HirschA.E. (1971). Tolerances for cerebral concussion from head impact and whiplash in primates. J. Biomech. 4, 13–21.
21.
OmmayaA.K. (1985). Biomechanics of head injury: experimental aspects, in: The Biomechanics of Trauma. Appleton & Lange: Norwalk, CT, pps. 245–258 Appleton & Lange.
22.
YoganandanN., LiJ., ZhangJ., PintarF.A., and GennarelliT.A. (2008). Influence of angular acceleration-deceleration pulse shapes on regional brain strains. J. Biomech. 41, 2253–2262.
23.
KornhauserM. (1954). Prediction and evaluation of sensitivity to transient accelerations. J. Appl. Mech. 21, 371–380.
24.
BussoneW.R., MooreT.L.A., RichardsD., BoveR.T., ScherI., and PrangeM.T. (2009). Measurements of non-injurious head accelerations of a pediatric population. SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars – Mech. Syst. 2, 565–586.
25.
AllenM.E., Weir-JonesI., MotiukD.R., FlewinK.R., GoringR.D., KobetitchR., and BroadhurstA. (1994). Acceleration perturbations of daily living. A comparison to “whiplash.” Spine, 19, 1285–1290.
26.
EwingC.L., ThomasD.J., LustickL., BeckerE., WillemsG., and MuzzyW.H. (1975). Effect of initial position on the human head and neck response to -Gx impact acceleration. In Proceedings of 19th Stapp Car Crash Conference, November. 17–19, 1975, San Diego, CA.
27.
EwingC., ThomasD., LustickL., MuzzyW.H., WillemsG., and MajewskiP. (1978). Effect of initial position on the human head and neck response to +Y impact acceleration. SAE Technical Paper 780888, pps. 3151–3165.
28.
SiegmundG.P., SandersonD.J., MyersB.S., and InglisJ.T. (2003). Awareness affects the response of human subjects exposed to a single whiplash-like perturbation. Spine, 28, 671–679.
29.
ArbogastK.B., BalasubramanianS., SeacristT., MalteseM.R., García-EspañaJ.F., HopelyT., ConstansE., Lopez-ValdesF.J., KentR.W., TanjiH., and HiguchiK. (2009). Comparison of kinematic responses of the head and spine for children and adults in low-speed frontal sled tests. Stapp Car Crash J. 53, 329–372.
30.
KingD.L., ArnoldA.S., and SmithS.L. (1994). A kinematic comparison of single, double, and triple axels. J. Appl. Biomech. 10, 51–60.
31.
TakhountsE.G., CraigM.J., MoorhouseK., McFaddenJ., and HasijaV. (2013). Development of brain injury criteria (BrIC). Stapp Car Crash J. 57, 243–266.
32.
CamarilloD.B., ShullP.B., MattsonJ., ShultzR., and GarzaD. (2013). An instrumented mouthguard for measuring linear and angular head impact kinematics in American football. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41, 1939–1949.
33.
KuoC., WuL.C., HammoorB.T., LuckJ.F., CutcliffeH.C., LynallR.C., KaitJ.R., CampbellK.R., MihalikJ.P., BassC.R., and CamarilloD.B. (2016). Effect of the mandible on mouthguard measurements of head kinematics. J. Biomech. 49, 1845–1853.
34.
LaksariK., WuL.C., KurtM., KuoC., and CamarilloD.C. (2015). Resonance of human brain under head acceleration. J. R. Soc. Interface, 12, 20150331.
35.
MarguliesS.S., and ThibaultL.E. (1989). An analytical model of traumatic diffuse brain injury. J. Biomech. Eng. 111, 241–249.
36.
KleivenS. (2007). Predictors for traumatic brain injuries evaluated through accident reconstructions. Stapp Car Crash J. 51, 81–114.
37.
HardyW.N. (2001). Investigation of head injury mechanisms using neutral density technology and high-speed biplanar x-ray. Stapp Car Crash J. 45, 337–368.
38.
GiordanoC., ClootsR.J.H., van DommelenJ.A.W., and KleivenS. (2014). The influence of anisotropy on brain injury prediction. J. Biomech. 47, 1052–1059.
39.
SuscoT.M., McleodT.C.V., GansnederB.M., and ShultzS.J. (2004). Balance recovers within 20 minutes after scoring system. J. Athl. Train. 39, 241–246.
40.
HarmonK.G., DreznerJ.A., GammonsM., GuskiewiczK.M., HalsteadM., HerringS.A, KutcherJ.S., PanaA., PutukianM., and RobertsW.O. (2013). American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: concussion in sport. Br. J. Sports Med. 47, 15–26.
41.
OnateJ.A., BeckB.C., and van LunenB.L. (2007). On-field testing environment and balance error scoring system performance during preseason screening of healthy collegiate baseball players. J. Athl. Train. 42, 446–451.
42.
MurrayN., SalvatoreA., PowellD., and Reed-JonesR. (2014). Reliability and validity evidence of multiple balance assessments in athletes with a concussion. J. Athl. Train. 49, 540–549.
43.
KingL.A., HorakF.B., ManciniM., PierceD., PriestK.C., ChesnuttJ., SullivanP., and ChapmanJ.C. (2014). Instrumenting the Balance Error Scoring System for use with patients reporting persistent balance problems after mild traumatic brain injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 95, 353–359.
44.
KhannaN.K., BaumgartnerK., and LaBellaC.R. (2015). Balance Error Scoring System performance in children and adolescents with no history of concussion. Sports Health, 8, 244–249.
45.
HaranF.J., SlabodaJ.C., KingL.A., WrightW.G., HoulihanD., and NorrisJ.N. (2015). Sensitivity of the Balance Error Scoring System and the Sensory Organization Test in the combat environment. J. Neurotrauma, 33, 705–711.
46.
KingD., BrughelliM., HumeP., and GissaneC. (2013). Concussions in amateur rugby union identified with the use of a rapid visual screening tool. J. Neurol. Sci. 326, 59–63.
47.
GalettaK.M., BarrettJ., AllenM., MaddaF., DelicataD., TennantA.T., BranasC.C., MaguireM.G., MessnerL.V., DevickS., GalettaS.L., and BalcerL.J. (2011). The King-Devick test as a determinant of head trauma and concussion in boxers and MMA fighters. Neurology, 76, 1456–1462
48.
GalettaK.M., LiuM., LeongD.F., CenturaR.E., GalettaS.L., and BalcerL. J. (2015). The King-Devick test of rapid number naming for concussion detection: meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Concussion, 1, 1–15.
49.
McCreaM., KellyJ.P., KlugeJ., AckleyB., and RandolphC. (1997). Standardized assessment of concussion in football players. Neurology, 48, 586–588.
50.
McCreaM. (2001). Standardized mental status testing on the sideline after sport-related concussion. J. Athl. Train. 36, 274–279.
51.
HernandezF., GoubranM., GiordanoC., GrantG., LopezJ., KleivenS., ZeinehM., and CamarilloD.B. (2016). Mechanism and evidence of corpus callosum trauma in sports concussions. (in preparation).
52.
WeaverA.A., DanelsonK.A., and StitzelJ.D. (2012). Modeling brain injury response for rotational velocities of varying directions and magnitudes. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40, 2005–2018.
53.
GennarelliT.A., ThibaultL.E., AdamsJ.H., GrahamD.I., ThompsonC.J., and MarcincinR.P. (1982). Diffuse axonal injury and traumatic coma in the primate. Ann. Neurol. 12, 564–74.
54.
GennarelliT.A., ThibaultL.E., TomeiG., WiserR., GrahamD., and AdamsJ. (1987). Directional dependence of axonal brain injury due to centroidal and non-centroidal acceleration. SAE Technical Paper 872197, pps. 49–53.
55.
OmmayaA.K., HirschA.E., and MartinezJ.L. (1966). The role of whiplash in cerebral concussion. SAE Technical Paper. 660804.
56.
ShannonP., SmithC.R., DeckJ., AngL.C., HoM., and BeckerL. (1998). Axonal injury and the neuropathology of shaken baby syndrome. Acta Neuropathol. 95, 625–631.
57.
KleivenS. (2006). Evaluation of head injury criteria using a finite element model validated against experiments on localized brain motion, intracerebral acceleration, and intracranial pressure. Int. J. Crashworthiness, 11, 65–79.
58.
HernandezF., ShullP., and CamarilloD.B. (2015). Evaluation of a laboratory model of human head impact biomechanics. J. Biomech. 48, 3469–3477.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
