Body weight–supported treadmill training (BWSTT) developed from animal studies of spinal cord injury (SCI). Evidence that spinal cats (i.e., cats that have a complete surgical transection of the cord) could regain the ability to step on a moving treadmill indicated a vast potential for spinal circuits to generate walking without the brain. BWSTT represented a means to unlock that potential. As the technique was adapted as a rehabilitation intervention for humans with SCI, shortcomings in the translation to walking in the real world were exposed. Evidence that BWSTT has not been as successful for humans with SCI leads us to revisit key animal studies. In this short review, we describe the task-specific nature of BWSTT and discuss how this specificity may pose limits on the recovery of overground walking. Also discussed are more recent studies that have introduced new strategies and tools that adapt BWSTT ideas to more functionally-relevant tasks. We introduce a new device for weight-supported overground walking in rats called Circular BART (Body weight supported Ambulatory Rat Trainer) and demonstrate that it is relatively easy and inexpensive to produce. Future animal studies will benefit from the development of simple tools that facilitate training and testing of overground walking.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MorawietzC. and MoffatF. (2013). Effects of locomotor training after incomplete spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 94, 2297–2308.
2.
MehrholzJ., KuglerJ., and PohlM. (2012). Locomotor training for walking after spinal cord injury. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 11, CD006676.
3.
WesselsM., LucasC., EriksI., and de GrootS. (2010). Body weight-supported gait training for restoration of walking in people with an incomplete spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J. Rehabil. Med., 42, 513–519.
4.
HarkemaS.J., HillyerJ., Schmidt-ReadM., ArdolinoE., SistoS.A., and BehrmanA.L. (2012). Locomotor training: as a treatment of spinal cord injury and in the progression of neurologic rehabilitation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 93, 1588–1597.
5.
DobkinB.H. and DuncanP.W. (2012). Should body weight-supported treadmill training and robotic-assistive steppers for locomotor training trot back to the starting gate?. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair, 26, 308–317.
6.
HubliM. and DietzV. (2013). The physiological basis of neurorehabilitation–locomotor training after spinal cord injury. J. Neuroengineering Rehabil., 10, 5.
7.
BattistuzzoC.R., CallisterR.J., CallisterR., and GaleaM.P. (2012). A systematic review of exercise training to promote locomotor recovery in animal models of spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 29, 1600–1613.
8.
RoyR.R., HarkemaS.J., and EdgertonV.R. (2012). Basic concepts of activity-based interventions for improved recovery of motor function after spinal cord injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 93, 1487–1497.
9.
RossignolS., MartinezM., EscalonaM., KunduA., Delivet-MongrainH., AlluinO., and GossardJ.-P. (2015). The “beneficial” effects of locomotor training after various types of spinal lesions in cats and rats. Prog. Brain Res., 218, 173–198.
10.
GrillnerS. (1975). Locomotion in vertebrates: central mechanisms and reflex interaction. Physiol. Rev., 55, 247–304.
11.
ForssbergH. and GrillnerS. (1973). The locomotion of the acute spinal cat injected with clonidine i.v. Brain Res. 50, 184–186.
12.
ForssbergH., GrillnerS., HalbertsmaJ., and RossignolS. (1980). The locomotion of the low spinal cat. II. Interlimb coordination. Acta Physiol. Scand., 108, 283–295.
13.
BarbeauH. and RossignolS. (1987). Recovery of locomotion after chronic spinalization in the adult cat. Brain Res. 412, 84–95.
14.
BarbeauH., JulienC., and RossignolS. (1987). The effects of clonidine and yohimbine on locomotion and cutaneous reflexes in the adult chronic spinal cat. Brain Res. 437, 83–96.
15.
LovelyR.G., GregorR.J., RoyR.R., and EdgertonV.R. (1986). Effects of training on the recovery of full-weight-bearing stepping in the adult spinal cat. Exp. Neurol., 92, 421–435.
16.
RobinsonG.A. and GoldbergerM.E. (1986). The development and recovery of motor function in spinal cats. I. The infant lesion effect. Exp. Brain Res., 62, 373–386.
17.
RobinsonG.A. and GoldbergerM.E. (1986). The development and recovery of motor function in spinal cats. II. Pharmacological enhancement of recovery. Exp. Brain Res., 62, 387–400.
18.
GrillnerS. and RossignolS. (1978). On the initiation of the swing phase of locomotion in chronic spinal cats. Brain Res. 146, 269–277.
19.
WernigA., MüllerS., NanassyA., and CagolE. (1995). Laufband therapy based on “rules of spinal locomotion” is effective in spinal cord injured persons. Eur. J. Neurosci., 7, 823–829.
20.
de LeonR.D., HodgsonJ.A., RoyR.R., and EdgertonV.R. (1998). Locomotor capacity attributable to step training versus spontaneous recovery after spinalization in adult cats. J. Neurophysiol., 79, 1329–1340.
21.
BarbeauH., WainbergM., and FinchL. (1987). Description and application of a system for locomotor rehabilitation. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 25, 341–344.
22.
DietzV., ColomboG., JensenL., and BaumgartnerL. (1995). Locomotor capacity of spinal cord in paraplegic patients. Ann. Neurol., 37, 574–582.
23.
DobkinB.H., HarkemaS., RequejoP., and EdgertonV.R. (1995). Modulation of locomotor-like EMG activity in subjects with complete and incomplete spinal cord injury. J. Neurol. Rehabil., 9, 183–190.
24.
WernigA. and MüllerS. (1992). Laufband locomotion with body weight support improved walking in persons with severe spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia, 30, 229–238.
25.
BehrmanA.L. and HarkemaS.J. (2000). Locomotor training after human spinal cord injury: a series of case studies. Phys. Ther., 80, 688–700.
26.
HodgsonJ.A., RoyR.R., de LeonR., DobkinB., and EdgertonV.R. (1994). Can the mammalian lumbar spinal cord learn a motor task?. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 26, 1491–1497.
27.
OzaC.S. and GiszterS.F. (2015). Trunk robot rehabilitation training with active stepping reorganizes and enriches trunk motor cortex representations in spinal transected rats. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci., 35, 7174–7189.
28.
SławińskaU., MajczyńskiH., DaiY., and JordanL.M. (2012). The upright posture improves plantar stepping and alters responses to serotonergic drugs in spinal rats. J. Physiol., 590, 1721–1736.
29.
HiebertG.W., WhelanP.J., ProchazkaA., and PearsonK.G. (1996). Contribution of hind limb flexor muscle afferents to the timing of phase transitions in the cat step cycle. J. Neurophysiol., 75, 1126–1137.
30.
WhelanP.J., HiebertG.W., and PearsonK.G. (1995). Stimulation of the group I extensor afferents prolongs the stance phase in walking cats. Exp. Brain Res., 103, 20–30.
31.
ShahP.K., Garcia-AliasG., ChoeJ., GadP., GerasimenkoY., TillakaratneN., ZhongH., RoyR.R., and EdgertonV.R. (2013). Use of quadrupedal step training to re-engage spinal interneuronal networks and improve locomotor function after spinal cord injury. Brain J. Neurol., 136, 3362–3377.
32.
SinghA., BalasubramanianS., MurrayM., LemayM., and HouleJ. (2011). Role of spared pathways in locomotor recovery after body-weight-supported treadmill training in contused rats. J. Neurotrauma, 28, 2405–2416.
33.
van den BrandR., HeutschiJ., BarraudQ., DiGiovannaJ., BartholdiK., HuerlimannM., FriedliL., VollenweiderI., MoraudE.M., DuisS., DominiciN., MiceraS., MusienkoP., and CourtineG. (2012). Restoring voluntary control of locomotion after paralyzing spinal cord injury. Science, 336, 1182–1185.
34.
KuerziJ., BrownE.H., Shum-SiuA., SiuA., BurkeD., MorehouseJ., SmithR.R., and MagnusonD.S.K. (2010). Task-specificity vs. ceiling effect: step-training in shallow water after spinal cord injury. Exp. Neurol., 224, 178–187.
35.
TillakaratneN.J.K., de LeonR.D., HoangT.X., RoyR.R., EdgertonV.R., and TobinA.J. (2002). Use-dependent modulation of inhibitory capacity in the feline lumbar spinal cord. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci., 22, 3130–3143.
36.
de LeonR.D., TamakiH., HodgsonJ.A., RoyR.R., and EdgertonV.R. (1999). Hindlimb locomotor and postural training modulates glycinergic inhibition in the spinal cord of the adult spinal cat. J. Neurophysiol., 82, 359–369.
37.
HamlinM., TraughberT., ReinkensmeyerD.J., and de LeonR.D. (2015). A novel device for studying weight supported, quadrupedal overground locomotion in spinal cord injured rats. J. Neurosci. Methods, 246, 134–141.
38.
HamersF.P.T., KoopmansG.C., and JoostenE.A.J. (2006). CatWalk-assisted gait analysis in the assessment of spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 23, 537–548.
39.
WardP.J., HerrityA.N., SmithR.R., WillhiteA., HarrisonB.J., PetruskaJ.C., HarkemaS.J., and HubscherC.H. (2014). Novel multi-system functional gains via task specific training in spinal cord injured male rats. J. Neurotrauma, 31, 819–833.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
