Repair of the spinal cord and improvement of mobility after injury has been a matter of basic and clinical research for several decades. A number of repair approaches were performed in animals, mainly rodent models of spinal cord injury (SCI). Some of these experimental therapies resulted in significant regeneration of tract fibers, formation of new connections and circuits, and associated improvement of mobility. Some clinical trials aiming at translating these approaches to the human condition of an SCI are currently on-going. The present therapy, however, remains rehabiliation: Mobility of patients with an SCI can be improved to a limited extent by the exploition of neuroplasticity. In this article the present state of the art in the field of SCI research will be discussed. Studies dealing with the promotion of spinal cord repair and those directed to improve mobility by exploition of neuroplasticity will be summarized. The promises and challenges of translational basic research in rodent SCI models will be presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SchwabM.E. (2010). Functions of Nogo proteins and their receptors in the nervous system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 11, 799–811.
2.
SchwabM.E., and StrittmatterS.M. (2014). Nogo limits neural plasticity and recovery from injury. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 27, 53–60.
3.
FawcettJ.W. (2009). Recovery from spinal cord injury: regeneration, plasticity and rehabilitation. Brain, 132, 1417–1418.
4.
MarF.M., BonniA., and SousaM.M. (2014). Cell intrinsic control of axon regeneration. EMBO Rep. 15, 254–263.
5.
YangP., and YangZ. (2012). Enhancing intrinsic growth capacity promotes adult CNS regeneration. J. Neurol. Sci., 312, 1–6.
6.
de LimaS., KoriyamaY., KurimotoT., OliveiraJ.T., YinY., LiY., GilbertH.-Y., FagioliniM., MartinezA.M.B., and BenowitzL. (2012). Full-length axon regeneration in the adult mouse optic nerve and partial recovery of simple visual behaviors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109, 9149–9154.
7.
RuschelJ., HellalF., FlynnK.C., DuprazS., ElliottD.A., TedeschiA., BatesM., SliwinskiC., BrookG., DobrindtK., PeitzM., BrüstleO., NorenbergM.D., BleschA., WeidnerN., BungeM.B., BixbyJ.L., and BradkeF. (2015). Systemic administration of epothilone B promotes axon regeneration after spinal cord injury. Science, 348, 347–352.
8.
HellalF., HurtadoA., RuschelJ., FlynnK.C., LaskowskiC.J., UmlaufM., KapiteinL.C., StrikisD., LemmonV., BixbyJ., HoogenraadC.C., and BradkeF. (2011). Microtubule stabilization reduces scarring and causes axon regeneration after spinal cord injury. Science, 331, 928–931.
9.
BungeM.B., and PearseD.D. (2003). Transplantation strategies to promote repair of the injured spinal cord. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 40, 55–62.
10.
ChengH., CaoY., and OlsonL. (1996). Spinal cord repair in adult paraplegic rats: partial restoration of hind limb function. Science, 273, 510–513.
11.
RaismanG., BarnettS.C., and Ramón–CuetoA. (2012). Chapter 33: Repair of central nervous system lesions by transplantation of olfactory ensheathing cells, in: Handbook of Clinical Neurology. JoostV., JohnW.M. (eds.). Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pps. 541–549.
12.
Mackay–SimA., FeronF., CochraneJ., BassingthwaighteL., BaylissC., DaviesW., FronekP., GrayC., KerrG., LicinaP., NowitzkeA., PerryC., SilburnP.A., UrquhartS., and GeraghtyT. (2008). Autologous olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation in human paraplegia: a 3-year clinical trial. Brain, 131, 2376–2386.
13.
DobkinB.H., CurtA., and GuestJ. (2006). Cellular transplants in China: observational study from the largest human experiment in chronic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair, 20, 5–13.
14.
TabakowP., RaismanG., FortunaW., CzyzM., HuberJ., LiD., SzewczykP., OkurowskiS., MiedzybrodzkiR., CzapigaB., SalomonB., HalonA., LiY., LipiecJ., KulczykA., and JarmundowiczW. (2014). Functional regeneration of supraspinal connections in a patient with transected spinal cord following transplantation of bulbar olfactory ensheathing cells with peripheral nerve bridging. Cell Transplant. 23, 1631–1655.
15.
LuP., WangY., GrahamL., McHaleK., GaoM., WuD., BrockJ., BleschA., Rosenzweig, EphronS., Havton, LeifA., ZhengB., Conner, JamesM., MarsalaM., and Tuszynski, MarkH. (2012). Long-Distance growth and connectivity of neural stem cells after severe spinal cord injury. Cell, 150, 1264–1273.
16.
CummingsB.J., UchidaN., TamakiS.J., SalazarD.L., HooshmandM., SummersR., GageF.H., and AndersonA.J. (2005). Human neural stem cells differentiate and promote locomotor recovery in spinal cord-injured mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 14, 069–14,074.
17.
LuP., WoodruffG., WangY., GrahamL., HuntM., WuD., BoehleE., AhmadR., PoplawskiG., BrockJ., Goldstein, LawrenceS.B., and Tuszynski, MarkH. (2014). Long-distance axonal growth from human induced pluripotent stem cells after spinal cord injury. Neuron, 83, 789–796.
18.
BarbeauH., and RossignolS. (1994). Enhancement of locomotor recovery following spinal cord injury. Curr. Opin. Neurol., 7, 517–524.
19.
LovelyR.G., GregorR.J., RoyR.R., and EdgertonV.R. (1990). Weight-bearing hindlimb stepping in treadmill-exercised adult spinal cats. Brain Res. 514, 206–218.
20.
GrillnerS., and MatsushimaT. (1991). The neural network underlying locomotion in Lamprey-synaptic and cellular mechanisms. Neuron, 7, 1–15.
21.
DietzV., ColomboG., JensenL., and BaumgartnerL. (1995). Locomotor capacity of spinal cord in paraplegic patients. Ann. Neurol., 37, 574–582.
22.
WernigA., NanassyA., and MullerS. (1999). Laufband (treadmill) therapy in incomplete paraplegia and tetraplegia. J. Neurotrauma, 16, 719–726.
23.
DietzV., ColomboG., and JensenL. (1994). Locomotor activity in spinal man. Lancet, 344, 1260–1263.
24.
CourtineG., GerasimenkoY., van den BrandR., YewA., MusienkoP., ZhongH., SongB., AoY., IchiyamaR.M., LavrovI., RoyR.R., SofroniewM.V., and EdgertonV.R. (2009). Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input. Nat. Neurosci., 12, 1333–1342.
EdgertonV.R., TillakaratneN.J., BigbeeA.J., de LeonR.D., and RoyR.R. (2004). Plasticity of the spinal neural circuitry after injury. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 27, 145–167.
27.
ForssbergH., and GrillnerS. (1973). The locomotion of the acute spinal cat injected with clonidine i.v. Brain Res. 50, 184–186.
28.
Remy–NerisO., BarbeauH., DanielO., BoiteauF., and BusselB. (1999). Effects of intrathecal clonidine injection on spinal reflexes and human locomotion in incomplete paraplegic subjects. Exp. Brain Res., 129, 433–440.
29.
HarkemaS., GerasimenkoY., HodesJ., BurdickJ., AngeliC., ChenY., FerreiraC., WillhiteA., RejcE., GrossmanR.G., and EdgertonV.R. (2011). Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study. Lancet, 377, 1938–1947.
30.
AngeliC.A., EdgertonV.R., GerasimenkoY.P., and HarkemaS.J. (2014). Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain, 137, 1394–1409.
31.
AndersonK.D. (2004). Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J. Neurotrauma, 21, 1371–1383.
32.
SchneiderM.P., HughesF.M., EngmannA.K., PurvesJ.T., KasperH., TedaldiM., SpruillL.S., GulloM., SchwabM.E., and KesslerT.M. (2015). A novel urodynamic model for lower urinary tract assessment in awake rats. BJU Int. 115, 8–15.
33.
NoutY.S., SchmidtM.H., TovarC.A., CulpE., BeattieM.S., and BresnahanJ.C. (2005). Telemetric monitoring of corpus spongiosum penis pressure in conscious rats for assessment of micturition and sexual function following spinal cord contusion injury. J. Neurotrauma, 22, 429–441.
34.
LeeY.-S., LinC.-Y., JiangH.-H., DePaulM., LinV.W., and SilverJ. (2013). Nerve regeneration restores supraspinal control of bladder function after complete spinal cord injury. The J. Neurosci., 33, 10,591–10,606.
35.
ThomasC.K., ZaidnerE.Y., CalancieB., BrotonJ.G., and Bigland–RitchieB.R. (1997). Muscle weakness, paralysis, and atrophy after human cervical spinal cord injury. Exp. Neurol., 148, 414–423.
36.
DietzV., and FouadK. (2014). Restoration of sensorimotor functions after spinal cord injury. Brain, 137, 654–667.
37.
Cohen–AdadJ., and Wheeler–KingshottC. (2014). Quantitative MRI of the Spinal Cord. Academic Press, New York.
38.
GonzenbachR.R., GasserP., ZornerB., HochreutenerE., DietzV., and SchwabM.E. (2010). Nogo-A antibodies and training reduce muscle spasms in spinal cord-injured rats. Ann. Neurol., 68, 48–57.
39.
DietzV., GrillnerS., TreppA., HubliM., and BolligerM. (2009). Changes in spinal reflex and locomotor activity after a complete spinal cord injury: a common mechanism?. Brain, 132, 2196–2205.
40.
BeauparlantJ., van den BrandR., BarraudQ., FriedliL., MusienkoP., DietzV., and CourtineG. (2013). Undirected compensatory plasticity contributes to neuronal dysfunction after severe spinal cord injury. Brain, 136, 3347–3361.
41.
DietzV., MacaudaG., Schrafl–AltermattM., WirzM., KloterE., and MichelsL. (2015). Neural coupling of cooperative hand movements: a reflex and FMRI study. Cereb. Cortex, 25, 948–958.
42.
WydenkellerS., MaurizioS., DietzV., and HalderP. (2009). Neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury: Significance of clinical and electrophysiological measures. Eur. J. Neurosci., 30, 91–99.
43.
DietzV., MullerR., and ColomboG. (2002). Locomotor activity in spinal man: significance of afferent input from joint and load receptors. Brain, 125, 2626–2634.
44.
RienerR., LünenburgerL., MaierI.C., ColomboG., and DietzV. (2010). Locomotor training in subjects with sensori-motor deficits: an overview of the robotic gait orthosis Lokomat. J Healthcare Engin, 1, 197–216.
45.
WuM., and LandryJ.M. (2012). Lower extremity flexible assist devices for locomotion, in: Neurorehabilitation Technology. Springer: London, pps. 361–378.
46.
BrütschK., SchulerT., KoenigA., ZimmerliL., MérillatS., LünenburgerL., RienerR., JänckeL., and Meyer–HeimA. (2010). Influence of virtual reality soccer game on walking performance in robotic assisted gait training for children. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., 7, 15–15.
47.
Schrafl–AltermattM., and DietzV. (2016). Cooperative hand movements in stroke patients: Neural reorganization. Clin. Neurophysiol., 127, 748–754.
