Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) accounts for more than 1 million emergency visits each year. Most of the injured stay in the emergency department for a few hours and are discharged home without a specific follow-up plan because of their negative clinical structural imaging. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), particularly functional MRI (fMRI), has been reported as being sensitive to functional disturbances after brain injury. In this study, a cohort of 12 patients with mTBI were prospectively recruited from the emergency department of our local Level-1 trauma center for an advanced MRI scan at the acute stage. Sixteen age- and sex-matched controls were also recruited for comparison. Both group-based and individual-based independent component analysis of resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI) demonstrated reduced functional connectivity in both posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and precuneus regions in comparison with controls, which is part of the default mode network (DMN). Further seed-based analysis confirmed reduced functional connectivity in these two regions and also demonstrated increased connectivity between these regions and other regions of the brain in mTBI. Seed-based analysis using the thalamus, hippocampus, and amygdala regions further demonstrated increased functional connectivity between these regions and other regions of the brain, particularly in the frontal lobe, in mTBI. Our data demonstrate alterations of multiple brain networks at the resting state, particularly increased functional connectivity in the frontal lobe, in response to brain concussion at the acute stage. Resting-state functional connectivity of the DMN could serve as a potential biomarker for improved detection of mTBI in the acute setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KayT. (1993). Neuropsychological treatment of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil., 8, 74–85.
2.
National Institutes of Health (1999). Rehabilitation of personswith traumatic brain injury. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Rehabilitation of Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury. JAMA, 282, 974–983.
3.
CDC (2003). Report to Congress on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Steps to Prevent a Serious Public Health Problem. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control: Atlanta, GA.
4.
BazarianJ.J., McClungJ., ChengY.T., FlesherW., and SchneiderS.M. (2005). Emergency department management of mild traumatic brain injury in the USA. Emerg. Med. J., 22, 473–477.
5.
BazarianJ.J., McClungJ., ShahM.N., ChengY.T., FlesherW., and KrausJ. (2005). Mild traumatic brain injury in the United States, 1998–2000. Brain Inj., 19, 85–91.
6.
RuffR. (2005). Two decades of advances in understanding of mild traumatic brain injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil., 20, 5–18.
7.
JagodaA.S., BazarianJ.J., BrunsJ.J.Jr., CantrillS.V., GeanA.D., HowardP.K., GhajarJ., RiggioS., WrightD.W., WearsR.L., BakshyA., BurgessP., WaldM.M., and WhitsonR.R. (2008). Clinical policy: neuroimaging and decisionmaking in adult mild traumatic brain injury in the acute setting. Ann. Emerg. Med., 52, 714–748.
8.
KouZ., WuZ., TongK.A., HolshouserB., BensonR.R., HuJ., and HaackeE.M. (2010). The role of advanced MR imaging findings as biomarkers of traumatic brain injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil., 25, 267–282.
9.
KouZ., BensonR.R., and HaackeE. M. (2012). Magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers of mild traumatic brain injury, in: Biomarkers for Traumatic Brain Injury. DambinovaS.A., HayesR.L., WangK.K. (eds). Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK.
10.
ShimonyJ.S., McKinstryR.C., AkbudakE., AronovitzJ.A., SnyderA.Z., LoriN.F., CullT.S., and ConturoT.E. (1999). Quantitative diffusion-tensor anisotropy brain MR imaging: normative human data and anatomic analysis. Radiology, 212, 770–784.
11.
ConturoT.E., McKinstryR.C., AkbudakE., and RobinsonB.H. (1996). Encoding of anisotropic diffusion with tetrahedral gradients: a general mathematical diffusion formalism and experimental results. Magn. Res. Med., 35, 399–412.
12.
Mac DonaldC.L., DikranianK., SongS.K., BaylyP.V., HoltzmanD.M. and BrodyD.L. (2007). Detection of traumatic axonal injury with diffusion tensor imaging in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol., 205, 116–131.
13.
KouZ., ShenY., ZakariaN., KallakuriS., CavanaughJ.M., YuY., HuJ., and EMH. (2007). Correlation of fractional anisotropy with histology for diffuse axonal injury in a rat model. Proceedings of the Joint Annual Meeting ISMRM-ESMRMB: Berlin, Germany.
14.
PtakT., SheridanR.L., RheaJ.T., GervasiniA.A., YunJ.H., CurranM.A., BorszukP., PetrovickL., and NovellineR.A (2003). Cerebral fractional anisotropy score in trauma patients: a new indicator of white matter injury after trauma. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol., 181, 1401–1407.
15.
HuismanT.A., SchwammL.H., SchaeferP.W., KoroshetzW.J., Shetty-AlvaN., OzsunarY., WuO., and SorensonA.G. (2004). Diffusion tensor imaging as potential biomarker of white matter injury in diffuse axonal injury. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., 25, 370–376.
16.
ArfanakisK., HaughtonV.M., CarewJ.D., RogersB.P., DempseyR.J., and MeyerandM.E. (2002). Diffusion tensor MR imaging in diffuse axonal injury. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., 23, 794–802.
17.
IngleseM., MakaniS., JohnsonG., CohenB.A., SilverJ.A., GonenO., and GrossmanR.I. (2005). Diffuse axonal injury in mild traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study. J. Neurosurg., 103, 298–303.
18.
BensonR.R., MedaS.A., VasudevanS., KouZ., GovindarajanK.A., HanksR.A., MillisS.R., MakkiM., LatifZ., CoplinW., MeythalerJ., and HaackeE.M. (2007). Global white matter analysis of diffusion tensor images is predictive of injury severity in traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma, 24, 446–459.
19.
Mac DonaldC.L., JohnsonA.M., CooperD., NelsonE.C., WernerN.J., ShimonyJ.S., SnyderA.Z., RaichleM.E., WitherowJ.R., FangR., FlahertyS.F., and BrodyD.L. (2011). Detection of blast-related traumatic brain injury in U.S. military personnel. N. Engl. J. Med., 364, 2091–2100.
PaterakisK., KarantanasA.H., KomnosA., and VolikasZ. (2000). Outcome of patients with diffuse axonal injury: the significance and prognostic value of MRI in the acute phase. J Trauma, 49, 1071–1075.
22.
ReichenbachJ.R., VenkatesanR., SchillingerD.J., KidoD.K., and HaackeE.M. (1997). Small vessels in the human brain: MR venography with deoxyhemoglobin as an intrinsic contrast agent. Radiology, 204, 272–277.
23.
McAllisterT.W., FlashmanL.A., McDonaldB.C., and SaykinA.J. (2006). Mechanisms of working memory dysfunction after mild and moderate TBI: evidence from functional MRI and neurogenetics. J Neurotrauma, 23, 1450–1467.
24.
YangZ., YeoR.A., PenaA., LingJ.M., KlimajS., CampbellR., DoezemaD, and MayerA.R. (2012). An FMRI study of auditory orienting and inhibition of return in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma, 29, 2124–2136.
25.
KeightleyM.L., SalujaR.S., ChenJ.K., GagnonI., LeonardG., PetridesM., and PtitoA. (2014). A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of working memory in youth after sports-related concussion: is it still working?. J. Neurotrauma, 31, 437–451.
26.
DettwilerA., MurugavelM., PutukianM., CubonV., FurtadoJ., and OshersonD. (2014). Persistent differences in patterns of brain activation after sports-related concussion: a longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurotrauma, 31, 180-–88.
27.
MayerA.R., MannellM.V., LingJ., GasparovicC., and YeoR.A. (2011). Functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury. Hum Brain Mapp, 32, 1825–1835.
28.
JohnsonB., ZhangK., GayM., HorovitzS., HallettM., SebastianelliW., and SlobounovS. (2012). Alteration of brain default network in subacute phase of injury in concussed individuals: resting-state fMRI study. Neuroimage, 59, 511–518.
29.
WangL., ZangY.F., HeY., LiangM., ZhangX.Q., TianL.X., WuT., JiangT.Z. and LiK.C. (2006). Changes in hippocampal connectivity in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease: evidence from resting state fMRI. Neuroimage, 31, 496–504.
30.
ZhouY., LiangM., TianL.X., WangK., HaoY.H., LiuH.H., LiuZ.N., and JiangT.Z. (2007). Functional disintegration in paranoid schizophrenia using resting-state fMRI. Schizophr. Res., 97, 194–205.
31.
TianL.X., JiangT.Z., WangY.F., ZangY.F., HeY., LiangM., SuiM.Q., CaoQ.J., HuS.Y., PengM., and ZhuoY. (2006). Altered resting-state functional connectivity patterns of anterior cingulate cortex in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neurosci. Lett., 400, 39–43.
32.
StevensM.C., LovejoyD., KimJ., OakesH., KureshiI. and WittS.T. (2012). Multiple resting state network functional connectivity abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain imaging and behavior, 6, 293–318.
33.
ZhangK., JohnsonB., GayM., HorovitzS.G., HallettM., SebastianelliW., and SlobounovS. (2012). Default mode network in concussed individuals in response to the YMCA physical stress test. J. Neurotrauma, 25, 756–765.
34.
BroydS.J., DemanueleC., DebenerS., HelpsS.K., JamesC.J., and Sonuga-BarkeE.J. (2009). Default-mode brain dysfunction in mental disorders: a systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 33, 279–296.
35.
BinderJ.R., and DesaiR.H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends Cogn. Sci., 15, 527–536.
36.
GilbertS.J., DumontheilI., SimonsJ.S., FrithC.D., and BurgessP.W. (2007). Comment on “Wandering minds: The default network and stimulus-independent thought”. Science, 317, 43.
37.
TangL., GeY., SodicksonD.K., MilesL., ZhouY., ReaumeJ., and GrossmanR.I. (2011). Thalamic resting-state functional networks: disruption in patients with mild traumatic brain injury. Radiology, 260, 831–840.
38.
McCreaM.A. (2008). Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Postconcussion Syndrome. Oxford University Press: New York, NY.
39.
NaunheimR.S., MateroD, and FucetolaR. (2008). Assessment of patients with mild concussion in the emergency department. J. Head Trauma Rehabil., 23, 116–122.
40.
American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (1993). Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil., 8, 86–88.
41.
McCreaM., RandolphC., and KellyJ.P. (2000). Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC): Manual for Administration, Scoring and Interpretation, 2nd ed. CNS Inc.: Waukesha, WI.
42.
McCreaM., GuskiewiczK.M., MarshallS.W., BarrW., RandolphC., CantuR.C., OnateJ.A., YangJ., and KellyJ.P. (2003). Acute effects and recovery time following concussion in collegiate football players: the NCAA Concussion Study. JAMA, 290, 2556–2563.
43.
BeckmannC.F., MackayC.E., FilippiniN., and SmithS.M. (2009). Group comparison of resting-state FMRI data using multi-subject ICA and dual regression. Neuroimage, 47, S148.
44.
CalhounV.D., AdaliT., PearlsonG.D., and PekarJ.J. (2001). A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp., 14, 140–151.
LinQ.H., LiuJ., ZhengY.R., LiangH., and CalhounV.D. (2010). Semiblind spatial ICA of fMRI using spatial constraints. Hum. Brain Mapp., 31, 1076–1088.
47.
McCreaM., KellyJ.P., RandolphC., KlugeJ., BartolicE., FinnG., and BaxterB. (1998). Standardized assessment of concussion (SAC): on-site mental status evaluation of the athlete. J. Head Trauma Rehabil., 13, 27–35.
48.
PalaciosE.M., Sala-LlonchR., JunqueC., RoigT., TormosJ.M., BargalloN., and VendrellP. (2013). Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging activity and connectivity and cognitive outcome in traumatic brain injury. JAMA Neurol., 70, 845–851.
49.
LeechR., BragaR., and SharpD.J. (2012). Echoes of the brain within the posterior cingulate cortex. J. Neurosci., 32, 215–222.
50.
KoechlinE., OdyC., and KouneiherF. (2003). The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science, 302, 1181–1185.
51.
KoechlinE., and SummerfieldC. (2007). An information theoretical approach to prefrontal executive function. Trends Cogn. Sci., 11, 229–235.
52.
MaddockR.J., GarrettA.S., and BuonocoreM.H. (2003). Posterior cingulate cortex activation by emotional words: fMRI evidence from a valence decision task. Hum. Brain Mapp., 18, 30–41.
53.
MaratosE.J., DolanR.J., MorrisJ.S., HensonR.N., and RuggM.D. (2001). Neural activity associated with episodic memory for emotional context. Neuropsychologia, 39, 910–920.
54.
BergmanK., and BayE. (2010). Mild traumatic brain injury/concussion: a review for ED nurses. J. Emerg. Nurs., 36, 221–230.
55.
AllisonT., PuceA., and McCarthyG. (2000). Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn. Sci., 4, 267–278.
56.
CarmichaelS.T., and PriceJ.L. (1995). Limbic connections of the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol., 363, 615–641.
57.
Goldman-RakicP.S., SelemonL.D. and SchwartzM.L. (1984). Dual pathways connecting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with the hippocampal formation and parahippocampal cortex in the rhesus monkey. Neuroscience, 12, 719–743.
58.
MorrisR., PandyaD.N., and PetridesM. (1999). Fiber system linking the mid-dorsolateral frontal cortex with the retrosplenial/presubicular region in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol., 407, 183–192.
59.
PandyaD.N., Van HoesenG.W. and MesulamM.M. (1981). Efferent connections of the cingulate gyrus in the rhesus monkey. Exp. Brain Res., 42, 319–330.
60.
HampshireA., MacDonaldA., and OwenA.M. (2013). Hypoconnectivity and hyperfrontality in retired American football players. Sci. Rep., 3, 2972.
61.
AronA.R., SchlagheckenF., FletcherP.C., BullmoreE.T., EimerM., BarkerR., SahakianB.J., and RobbinsT.W. (2003). Inhibition of subliminally primed responses is mediated by the caudate and thalamus: evidence from functional MRI and Huntington's disease. Brain, 126, 713–723.
MorrisJ.S., FrithC.D., PerrettD.I., RowlandD., YoungA.W., CalderA.J., and DolanR.J. (1996). A differential neural response in the human amygdala to fearful and happy facial expressions. Nature, 383, 812–815.
64.
BzdokD., LairdA.R., ZillesK., FoxP.T., and EickhoffS.B. (2013). An investigation of the structural, connectional, and functional subspecialization in the human amygdala. Hum. Brain Mapp., 34, 3247–3266.
65.
AdolphsR. (2008). Fear, faces, and the human amygdala. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 18, 166–172.
66.
AdolphsR. (2010). What does the amygdala contribute to social cognition?. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1191, 42–61.
67.
LeDouxJ.E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 23, 155–184.
68.
AmuntsK., KedoO., KindlerM., PieperhoffP., MohlbergH., ShahN.J., HabelU., SchneiderF., and ZillesK. (2005). Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human amygdala, hippocampal region and entorhinal cortex: intersubject variability and probability maps. Anat Embryol (Berl), 210, 343–352.
69.
SwansonL.W., and PetrovichG. (1998). What is the amygdala?. Trends Neurosci., 21, 323–331.
70.
KouZ., and VandeVordP.J. (2014). Traumatic white matter injury and glial activation: from basic science to clinics. Glia, 62, 1831–1855.
71.
KouZ., GattuR., KobeissyF., WelchR.D., O'NeilB., WoodardJ.L., AyazS.I., KulekA., Kas-ShamounR., MikaV., ZukC., HayesR.L., TomaselloF., and MondelloS. (2013). Combining biochemical and imaging markers to improve diagnosis and characterization of mild traumatic brain injury in the acute setting: results from a pilot study. PLoS One, 8, e80296.
72.
NiogiS.N., and MukherjeeP. (2010). Diffusion tensor imaging of mild traumatic brain injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil., 25, 241–255.
73.
NiogiS.N., MukherjeeP., GhajarJ., JohnsonC.E., KolsterR., LeeH., SuhM., ZimmermanR.D., ManleyG.T., and McCandlissB.D. (2008). Structural dissociation of attentional control and memory in adults with and without mild traumatic brain injury. Brain, 131, 3209–3221.
74.
KouZ., and IrajiA. (2014). Imaging brain plasticity after trauma. Neural Regen. Res., 9, 693–700.
75.
RaichleM.E., MacLeodA.M., SnyderA.Z., PowersW.J., GusnardD.A., and ShulmanG.L. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 98, 676–682.
76.
PearsonJ.M., HeilbronnerS.R., BarackD.L., HaydenB.Y., and PlattM.L. (2011). Posterior cingulate cortex: adapting behavior to a changing world. Trends Cogn. Sci., 15, 143–151.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
