Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) causes long-term disability with limited functional recovery linked to the extent of axonal connectivity. Quantitative diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of axonal integrity has been suggested as a potential biomarker for prognostic and therapeutic evaluation after trauma, but its correlation with functional outcomes has not been clearly defined. To examine this application, female Sprague-Dawley rats underwent midthoracic laminectomy followed by traumatic spinal cord contusion of differing severities or laminectomy without contusion. Locomotor scores and hindlimb kinematic data were collected for 4 weeks post-injury. Ex vivo DTI was then performed to assess axonal integrity using tractography and fractional anisotropy (FA), a numerical measure of relative white matter integrity, at the injury epicenter and at specific intervals rostral and caudal to the injury site. Immunohistochemistry for tissue sparing was also performed. Statistical correlation between imaging data and functional performance was assessed as the primary outcome. All injured animals showed some recovery of locomotor function, while hindlimb kinematics revealed graded deficits consistent with injury severity. Standard T2 magnetic resonance sequences illustrated conventional spinal cord morphology adjacent to contusions while corresponding FA maps indicated graded white matter pathology within these adjacent regions. Positive correlations between locomotor (Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan score and gait kinematics) and imaging (FA values) parameters were also observed within these adjacent regions, most strongly within caudal segments beyond the lesion. Evaluation of axonal injury by DTI provides a mechanism for functional recovery assessment in a rodent SCI model. These findings suggest that focused DTI analysis of caudal spinal cord should be studied in human cases in relationship to motor outcome to augment outcome biomarkers for clinical cases.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
NSCISC. (2013). Spinal Cord Injury Facts and Figures at a Glance. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center: Birmingham, AL.
2.
CaffertyW.B., and StrittmatterS.M. (2006). The Nogo-Nogo receptor pathway limits a spectrum of adult CNS axonal growth. J. Neurosci., 26, 12242–12250.
3.
WangX., DuffyP., McGeeA.W., HasanO., GouldG., TuN., HarelN.Y., HuangY., CarsonR.E., WeinzimmerD., RopchanJ., BenowitzL.I., CaffertyW.B., and StrittmatterS.M. (2011). Recovery from chronic spinal cord contusion after Nogo receptor intervention. Ann. Neurol., 70, 805–821.
4.
KimJ.H., SongS.K., BurkeD.A., and MagnusonD.S. (2012). Comprehensive locomotor outcomes correlate to hyperacute diffusion tensor measures after spinal cord injury in the adult rat. Exp. Neurol., 235, 188–196.
5.
Cohen-AdadJ., LeblondH., Delivet-MongrainH., MartinezM., BenaliH., and RossignolS. (2011). Wallerian degeneration after spinal cord lesions in cats detected with diffusion tensor imaging. NeuroImage, 57, 1068–1076.
6.
RajasekaranS., KannaR.M., KarunanithiR., and ShettyA.P. (2010). Diffusion tensor tractography demonstration of partially injured spinal cord tracts in a patient with posttraumatic Brown Sequard syndrome. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 32, 978–981.
7.
KimJ.H., LoyD.N., WangQ., BuddeM.D., SchmidtR.E., TrinkausK., and SongS.K. (2010). Diffusion tensor imaging at 3 hours after traumatic spinal cord injury predicts long-term locomotor recovery. J. Neurotrauma, 27, 587–598.
8.
ChangY., JungT.D., YooD.S., and HyunJ.K. (2010). Diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography of patients with cervical spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 27, 2033–2040.
9.
ShanmuganathanK., GullapalliR.P., ZhuoJ. and MirvisS.E. (2008). Diffusion tensor MR imaging in cervical spine trauma. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., 29, 655–659.
10.
EllingsonB.M., UlmerJ.L., KurpadS.N., and SchmitB.D. (2008). Diffusion tensor MR imaging in chronic spinal cord injury. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., 29, 1976–1982.
MiyanjiF., FurlanJ.C., AarabiB., ArnoldP.M., and FehlingsM.G. (2007). Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome—prospective study with 100 consecutive patients. Radiology, 243, 820–827.
13.
ScholtesF., AdriaensensP., StormeL., BussA., KakulasB.A., GelanJ., BeulsE., SchoenenJ., BrookG.A., and MartinD. (2006). Correlation of postmortem 9.4 tesla magnetic resonance imaging and immunohistopathology of the human thoracic spinal cord 7 months after traumatic cervical spine injury. Neurosurgery, 59, 671–678.
14.
PotterK., and SaifuddinA. (2003). Pictorial review: MRI of chronic spinal cord injury. Br. J. Radiol., 76, 347–352.
15.
SchwartzE.D., and HackneyD.B. (2003). Diffusion-weighted MRI and the evaluation of spinal cord axonal integrity following injury and treatment. Exp. Neurol., 184, 570–589.
16.
MoriS., and ZhangJ. (2006). Principles of diffusion tensor imaging and its applications to basic neuroscience research. Neuron, 51, 527–539.
17.
BosmaR., and StromanP.W. (2012). Diffusion tensor imaging in the human spinal cord: development, limitations, and clinical applications. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 40, 1–20.
18.
SasiadekM.J., SzewczykP. and BladowskaJ. (2012). Application of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in pathological changes of the spinal cord. Med. Sci. Monit., 18, RA73–RA79.
19.
LeclercqD., DelmaireC., de ChampfleurN.M., ChirasJ. and LehericyS. (2011). Diffusion tractography: methods, validation and applications in patients with neurosurgical lesions. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am., 22, 253–268, ix.
20.
DucreuxD., FillardP., FaconD., OzanneA., LepeintreJ.F., RenouxJ., TadieM., and LasjauniasP. (2007). Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging and fiber tracking in spinal cord lesions: current and future indications. Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am., 17, 137–147.
21.
KonomiT., FujiyoshiK., HikishimaK., KomakiY., TsujiO., OkanoH.J., ToyamaY., OkanoH., and NakamuraM. (2012). Conditions for quantitative evaluation of injured spinal cord by in vivo diffusion tensor imaging and tractography: preclinical longitudinal study in common marmosets. NeuroImage, 63, 1841–1853.
22.
FujiyoshiK., KonomiT., YamadaM., HikishimaK., TsujiO., KomakiY., MomoshimaS., ToyamaY., NakamuraM., and OkanoH. (2013). Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of the spinal cord: from experimental studies to clinical application. Exp. Neurol., 242, 74–82.
23.
ZhangJ., JonesM., DeBoyC.A., ReichD.S., FarrellJ.A., HoffmanP.N., GriffinJ.W., SheikhK.A., MillerM.I., MoriS., and CalabresiP.A. (2009). Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of Wallerian degeneration in rat spinal cord after dorsal root axotomy. J. Neurosci., 29, 3160–3171.
24.
KozlowskiP., RajD., LiuJ., LamC., YungA.C., and TetzlaffW. (2008). Characterizing white matter damage in rat spinal cord with quantitative MRI and histology. J. Neurotrauma, 25, 653–676.
25.
FujiyoshiK., YamadaM., NakamuraM., YamaneJ., KatohH., KitamuraK., KawaiK., OkadaS., MomoshimaS., ToyamaY., and OkanoH. (2007). In vivo tracing of neural tracts in the intact and injured spinal cord of marmosets by diffusion tensor tractography. J. Neurosci, 27, 11991–11998.
26.
SchwartzE.D., DudaJ., ShumskyJ.S., CooperE.T., and GeeJ. (2005). Spinal cord diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking can identify white matter tract disruption and glial scar orientation following lateral funiculotomy. J. Neurotrauma, 22, 1388–1398.
27.
CheungM.M., LiD.T., HuiE.S., FanS., DingA.Y., HuY., and WuE.X. (2009). In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of chronic spinal cord compression in rat model. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 2009, 2715–2718.
28.
GaviriaM., BonnyJ.M., HatonH., JeanB., TeigellM., RenouJ.P., and PrivatA. (2006). Time course of acute phase in mouse spinal cord injury monitored by ex vivo quantitative MRI. Neurobiol. Dis., 22, 694–701.
29.
EllingsonB.M., SchmitB.D., and KurpadS.N. (2010). Lesion growth and degeneration patterns measured using diffusion tensor 9.4-T magnetic resonance imaging in rat spinal cord injury. J. Neurosurg. Spine, 13, 181–192.
30.
EllingsonB.M., KurpadS.N., and SchmitB.D. (2008). Ex vivo diffusion tensor imaging and quantitative tractography of the rat spinal cord during long-term recovery from moderate spinal contusion. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 28, 1068–1079.
31.
HerreraJ.J., ChackoT., and NarayanaP.A. (2008). Histological correlation of diffusion tensor imaging metrics in experimental spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. Res., 86, 443–447.
32.
KimJ.H., LoyD.N., LiangH.F., TrinkausK., SchmidtR.E., and SongS.K. (2007). Noninvasive diffusion tensor imaging of evolving white matter pathology in a mouse model of acute spinal cord injury. Magn. Reson. Med., 58, 253–260.
33.
DeoA.A., GrillR.J., HasanK.M., and NarayanaP.A. (2006). In vivo serial diffusion tensor imaging of experimental spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. Res., 83, 801–810.
34.
NevoU., HaubenE., YolesE., AgranovE., AkselrodS., SchwartzM., and NeemanM. (2001). Diffusion anisotropy MRI for quantitative assessment of recovery in injured rat spinal cord. Magn. Reson. Med., 45, 1–9.
35.
BassoD.M., FisherL.C., AndersonA.J., JakemanL.B., McTigueD.M., and PopovichP.G. (2006). Basso Mouse Scale for locomotion detects differences in recovery after spinal cord injury in five common mouse strains. J. Neurotrauma, 23, 635–659.
36.
BassoD.M., BeattieM.S., and BresnahanJ.C. (1995). A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. J. Neurotrauma, 12, 1–21.
37.
BassoD.M., BeattieM.S., and BresnahanJ.C. (1996). Graded histological and locomotor outcomes after spinal cord contusion using the NYU weight-drop device versus transection. Exp. Neurol., 139, 244–256.
38.
ChahbouneH., MentL.R., StewartW.B., MaX., RothmanD.L., and HyderF. (2007). Neurodevelopment of C57B/L6 mouse brain assessed by in vivo diffusion tensor imaging. NMR Biomed., 20, 375–382.
39.
HoH.P., WangF., PapademetrisX., BlumbergH.P., and StaibL.H. (2011). Integrated parcellation and normalization using DTI fasciculography. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist., 14, 33–41.
WangX., BaughmanK.W., BassoD.M., and StrittmatterS.M. (2006). Delayed Nogo receptor therapy improves recovery from spinal cord contusion. Ann. Neurol., 60, 540–549.
42.
ParkE., VelumianA.A., and FehlingsM.G. (2004). The role of excitotoxicity in secondary mechanisms of spinal cord injury: a review with an emphasis on the implications for white matter degeneration. J. Neurotrauma, 21, 754–774.
43.
BeattieM.S., HermannG.E., RogersR.C., and BresnahanJ.C. (2002). Cell death in models of spinal cord injury. Prog. Brain Res., 137, 37–47.
44.
KwonB.K., OxlandT.R., and TetzlaffW. (2002). Animal models used in spinal cord regeneration research. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27, 1504–1510.
45.
BeattieM.S., FarooquiA.A., and BresnahanJ.C. (2000). Review of current evidence for apoptosis after spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 17, 915–925.
WilsonJ.R., CadotteD.W., and FehlingsM.G. (2012). Clinical predictors of neurological outcome, functional status, and survival after traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J. Neurosurg. Spine, 17, Suppl 1, 11–26.
48.
MetzG.A., CurtA., van de MeentH., KlusmanI., SchwabM.E., and DietzV. (2000). Validation of the weight-drop contusion model in rats: a comparative study of human spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 17, 1–17.
49.
ByrnesK.R., FrickeS.T., and FadenA.I. (2010). Neuropathological differences between rats and mice after spinal cord injury. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 32, 836–846.
50.
CoutoP.A., FilipeV.M., MagalhaesL.G., PereiraJ.E., CostaL.M., Melo-PintoP., Bulas-CruzJ., MauricioA.C., GeunaS., and VarejaoA.S. (2008). A comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional techniques for the determination of hindlimb kinematics during treadmill locomotion in rats following spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. Methods, 173, 193–200.
51.
AlluinO., Karimi-AbdolrezaeeS., Delivet-MongrainH., LeblondH., FehlingsM.G., and RossignolS. (2011). Kinematic study of locomotor recovery after spinal cord clip compression injury in rats. J. Neurotrauma, 28, 1963–1981.
52.
NishiR.A., LiuH., ChuY., HamamuraM., SuM.Y., NalciogluO., and AndersonA.J. (2007). Behavioral, histological, and ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging assessment of graded contusion spinal cord injury in mice. J. Neurotrauma, 24, 674–689.
53.
MaM., BassoD.M., WaltersP., StokesB.T., and JakemanL.B. (2001). Behavioral and histological outcomes following graded spinal cord contusion injury in the C57Bl/6 mouse. Exp. Neurol., 169, 239–254.
54.
JakemanL.B., GuanZ., WeiP., PonnappanR., DzwonczykR., PopovichP.G., and StokesB.T. (2000). Traumatic spinal cord injury produced by controlled contusion in mouse. J. Neurotrauma, 17, 299–319.
55.
SekiT., HidaK., TadaM., KoyanagiI., and IwasakiY. (2002). Graded contusion model of the mouse spinal cord using a pneumatic impact device. Neurosurgery, 50, 1075–1082.
56.
CadotteD.W., WilsonJ.R., MikulisD., StromanP.W., BradyS., and FehlingsM.G. (2011). Conventional MRI as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in spinal cord injury: a systemic review of its application to date and an overview on emerging MRI methods. Expert Opin. Med. Diagn, 5, 121–133.
57.
Cohen-AdadJ., BenaliH., HogeR.D., and RossignolS. (2008). In vivo DTI of the healthy and injured cat spinal cord at high spatial and angular resolution. NeuroImage, 40, 685–697.
58.
MetzG.A., MerklerD., DietzV., SchwabM.E., and FouadK. (2000). Efficient testing of motor function in spinal cord injured rats. Brain Res., 883, 165–177.
59.
FreundP., Wheeler-KingshottC.A., NagyZ., GorgoraptisN., WeiskopfN., FristonK., ThompsonA.J., and HuttonC. (2012). Axonal integrity predicts cortical reorganisation following cervical injury. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 83, 629–637.
60.
PetersenJ.A., WilmB.J., von MeyenburgJ., SchubertM., SeifertB., NajafiY., DietzV., and KolliasS. (2012). Chronic cervical spinal cord injury: DTI correlates with clinical and electrophysiological measures. J. Neurotrauma, 29, 1556–1566.
61.
KerkovskyM., BednarikJ., DusekL., Sprlakova-PukovaA., UrbanekI., MechlM., ValekV., and KadankaZ. (2012). Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in patients with cervical spondylotic spinal cord compression: correlations between clinical and electrophysiological findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37, 48–56.
62.
NakamuraM., FujiyoshiK., TsujiO., KonomiT., HosoganeN., WatanabeK., TsujiT., IshiiK., MomoshimaS., ToyamaY., ChibaK., and MatsumotoM. (2012). Clinical significance of diffusion tensor tractography as a predictor of functional recovery after laminoplasty in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy. J. Neurosurg. Spine, 17, 147–152.
63.
MulcaheyM.J., SamdaniA., GaughanJ., BarakatN., FaroS., BetzR.R., FinsterbuschJ., and MohamedF.B. (2012). Diffusion tensor imaging in pediatric spinal cord injury: preliminary examination of reliability and clinical correlation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37, E797–E803.
64.
CheranS., ShanmuganathanK., ZhuoJ., MirvisS.E., AarabiB., AlexanderM.T., and GullapalliR.P. (2011). Correlation of MR diffusion tensor imaging parameters with ASIA motor scores in hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic acute spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma, 28, 1881–1892.
65.
BudzikJ.F., BalbiV., Le ThucV., DuhamelA., AssakerR., and CottenA. (2011). Diffusion tensor imaging and fibre tracking in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur. Radiol., 21, 426–433.
66.
QianW., ChanQ., MakH., ZhangZ., AnthonyM.P., YauK.K., KhongP.L., ChanK.H., and KimM. (2011). Quantitative assessment of the cervical spinal cord damage in neuromyelitis optica using diffusion tensor imaging at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging, 33, 1312–1320.
67.
LeeJ.W., ParkK.S., KimJ.H., ChoiJ.Y., HongS.H., ParkS.H., and KangH.S. (2008). Diffusion tensor imaging in idiopathic acute transverse myelitis. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol., 191, W52–W57.
68.
OhgiyaY., OkaM., HiwatashiA., LiuX., KakimotoN., WestessonP.L., and EkholmS.E. (2007). Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the cervical spinal cord in patients with multiple sclerosis. Eur. Radiol., 17, 2499–2504.
69.
WangW., QinW., HaoN., WangY., and ZongG. (2012). Diffusion tensor imaging in spinal cord compression. Acta Radiol., 53, 921–928.
70.
VargasM.I., DelavelleJ., JlassiH., RillietB., ViallonM., BeckerC.D., and LovbladK.O. (2008). Clinical applications of diffusion tensor tractography of the spinal cord. Neuroradiology, 50, 25–29.
71.
JirjisM.B., KurpadS.N., and SchmitB.D. (2013). Ex vivo diffusion tensor imaging of spinal cord injury in rats of varying degrees of severity. J. Neurotrauma, 30, 1577–1586.
72.
FreundP., SchneiderT., NagyZ., HuttonC., WeiskopfN., FristonK., Wheeler-KingshottC.A., and ThompsonA.J. (2012). Degeneration of the injured cervical cord is associated with remote changes in corticospinal tract integrity and upper limb impairment. PLoS ONE, 7, e51729.
73.
VedantamA., JirjisM.B., SchmitB.D., WangM.C., UlmerJ.L., and KurpadS.N. (2014). Diffusion tensor imaging of the spinal cord: insights from animal and human studies. Neurosurgery, 74, 1–8.
74.
WatsonC., PaxinosG., and KayaliogluG. (2009). The Spinal Cord: A Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation Text and Atlas. Academic Press: London, UK.
