Abstract
Background:
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is common, yet physicians do not routinely screen patients for IPV. There are no clear recommendations for best educational practices for physician trainees that improve screening rates.
Materials and Methods:
We implemented an IPV curriculum combining didactics and communication skills training for internal medicine residents. Didactics included definitions, risk factors, screening recommendations, and documentation; communication skills training included developing unique screening and response phrases; and two simulated patient exercises. The primary outcome was screening documentation rates as measured through pre- and postcurriculum chart review. Secondary outcomes included knowledge, comfort, and attitudes measured through pre- and postcurriculum administration of an adapted Physician Readiness to Manage Intimate partner violence Survey (PREMIS). Postcurriculum semistructured interviews provided further details regarding behaviors and attitudes.
Results:
Forty residents completed the curriculum. 29/40 (73%) completed both pre- and postsurveys. Fifteen participated in semistructured interviews. Residents demonstrated increased screening documentation postcurriculum (p < 0.05). Residents showed improvement in 80% of objective knowledge questions, and in all perceived knowledge and comfort-based questions (p < 0.01). Statistically significant improvement was noted in many attitudinal domains, including reported screening rates (p < 0.05). In the semistructured interviews, participants reported experiencing both practice-based improvements and ongoing screening barriers. Practice-based improvements included increased screening comfort and frequency, and strengthening of the doctor–patient relationship. Ongoing screening barriers included time, resistance to practice change, competing medical needs, and personal discomfort.
Conclusions:
A multifaceted IPV curriculum for residents significantly improved documentation rates, knowledge, comfort, and attitudes. Residents reported increased comfort with screening and strengthened patient relationships but acknowledged ongoing barriers to screening.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
