Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-12
Comparative UHPLC-HRMS Profiling,Toxicological Assessment,and Protection Against H 2 O 2 -Induced Genotoxicity of Different Parts of Opuntia ficus indica
Opuntia ficus indica has been an important dietary source and a traditionally used medicinal plant. Given the promising health-promoting properties of this plant, a comparative toxicological assessment and antioxidant bioevaluation of extracts from different parts of the plant were carried out in relation to their chemical profile. Toxicity was examined at multiple endpoints using the 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT), Comet and the γH2AX In-Cell Western Assay, while hyphenated ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS) analysis was carried out to identify main constituents. None of the extracts showed any cytotoxic and genotoxic effect on cell lines used, apart from the flower extract in HepG2 cells at the highest concentration tested (2.5 mg/mL). Both fruit flesh and seed extracts demonstrated a prominent protective effect against H2O2-induced genotoxicity in almost all concentrations tested, while extracts originated from flowers and cladodes were effective only at the low non-cytotoxic (0.312 and 0.625 mg/mL) and high (1.25 and 2.5 mg/mL) concentrations, respectively. In total, 2 phenolic acids, 12 flavonoids, along with 3 feruloyl derivatives and the plant pigment indicaxanthin, were tentatively identified by UHPLC-HRMS analysis. Phenolic acids (compounds 1 and 2) were mainly distributed in cladodes (64.6%), while flavonoids (3–14) in the flowers (81.8%). Overall, the highest amount of total flavonoids (22.76 ± 0.015 mg of quercetin equivalent [QE]/g) and total phenolics (62.80 ± 0.009 mg gallic acid equivalents [GAE]/g) was found in the flower extract. Flavonoid glycosides have not been detected in the seeds and the flesh, while the fruit seed extract contained mainly feruloyl derivatives. Our data provide convincing evidences for the lack of cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of O. ficus indica aqueous extracts and, in parallel, support the potential for further exploitation of this plant in the food supplement or functional food sector.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FeugangJM, KonarskiP, ZouD, StintzingFC, ZouC: Nutritional and medicinal use of Cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) cladodes and fruits. Front Biosci, 2006; 11:2574–2589.
2.
El-MostafaK, El KharrassiY, BadreddineA, AndreolettiP, VamecqJ, El KebbajMS, et al.: Nopal cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) as a source of bioactive compounds for nutrition, health and disease. Molecules, 2014; 19:14879–14901.
3.
CruseRR: Desert plant chemurgy: A current review. Econ Bot, 1973; 27:210.
4.
JouadH, HalouiM, RhiouaniH, El HilalyJ, EddouksM: Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used for the treatment of diabetes, cardiac and renal diseases in the North centre region of Morocco (Fez-Boulemane). J Ethnopharmacol, 2001; 77:175–182.
Chavez-SantoscoyRA, Gutierrez-UribeJA, Serna-SaldívarSO: Phenolic composition, antioxidant capacity and in vitro cancer cell cytotoxicity of nine prickly pear (Opuntia spp.) juices. Plant Foods Hum Nutr, 2009; 64:146–152.
7.
DhaouadiK, RaboudiF, Funez-GomezL, PamiesD, EstevanC, HamdaouiM, et al.: Polyphenolic extract of Barbary-Fig (Opuntia ficus-indica) syrup: RP–HPLC–ESI–MS analysis and determination of antioxidant, antimicrobial and cancer-cells cytotoxic potentials. Food Anal Methods, 2013; 6:45–53.
8.
Fernández-LópezJA, AlmelaL, ObónJM, CastellarR: Determination of antioxidant constituents in cactus pear fruits. Plant Foods Hum Nutr, 2010; 65:253–259.
9.
YeddesN, ChérifJK, GuyotS, BaronA, Trabelsi-AyadiM: Phenolic profile of Tunisian Opuntia Ficus Indica thornless form flowers via chromatographic and spectral analysis by reversed phase-high performance liquid chromatography-UV-photodiode array and electrospray ionization-mass spectrometer. Int J Food Prop, 2014; 17:741–751.
10.
BenayadZ, Martinez-VillaluengaC, FriasJ, Gomez-CordovesC, Es-SafiNE: Phenolic composition, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of extracts from Moroccan Opuntia ficus-indica flowers obtained by different extraction methods. Ind Crops Prod, 2014; 62:412–420.
11.
KutiJO: Antioxidant compounds from four Opuntia cactus pear fruit varieties. Food Chem, 2004; 85:527–533.
12.
Moussa-AyoubTE, El-SamahySK, KrohLW, RohnS: Identification and quantification of flavonol aglycons in cactus pear (Opuntia ficus indica) fruit using a commercial pectinase and cellulase preparation. Food Chem, 2011; 124:1177–1184.
13.
ChouguiN, TamendjariA, HamidjW, HallalS, BarrasA, RichardT, et al.: Oil composition and characterisation of phenolic compounds of Opuntia ficus-indica seeds. Food Chem, 2013; 139:796–803.
14.
Abdel-HameedE-SS, NagatyMA, SalmanMS, BazaidSA: Phytochemicals, nutritionals and antioxidant properties of two prickly pear cactus cultivars (Opuntia ficus indica Mill.) growing in Taif, KSA. Food Chem, 2014; 160:31–38.
15.
GinestraG, ParkerML, BennettRN, RobertsonJ, MandalariG, NarbadA, et al.: Anatomical, chemical, and biochemical characterization of cladodes from prickly pear [Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.]. J Agric Food Chem, 2009; 57:10323–10330.
16.
TesoriereL, FazzariM, AllegraM, LivreaMA: Biothiols, taurine, and lipid-soluble antioxidants in the edible pulp of Sicilian cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) fruits and changes of bioactive juice components upon industrial processing. J Agric Food Chem, 2005; 53:7851–7855.
17.
ButeraD, TesoriereL, Di GaudioF, BongiornoA, AllegraM, PintaudiAM, et al.: Antioxidant activities of sicilian prickly pear (Opuntia ficus indica) fruit extracts and reducing properties of its betalains: Betanin and indicaxanthin. J Agric Food Chem, 2002; 50:6895–6901.
18.
El KossoriRL, VillaumeC, El BoustaniE, SauvaireY, MéjeanL: Composition of pulp, skin and seeds of prickly pears fruit (Opuntia ficus indica sp.). Plant Foods Hum Nutr, 1998; 52:263–270.
19.
ZourguiL, GolliEE, BouazizC, BachaH, HassenW: Cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) cladodes prevent oxidative damage induced by the mycotoxin zearalenone in Balb/C mice. Food Chem Toxicol, 2008; 46:1817–1824.
GalatiEM, MondelloMR, GiuffridaD, DugoG, MiceliN, PergolizziS, et al.: Chemical characterization and biological effects of Sicilian Opuntia ficus indica (L.) mill. Fruit juice: Antioxidant and antiulcerogenic activity. J Agric Food Chem, 2003; 51:4903–4908.
22.
TesoriereL, ButeraD, PintaudiAM, AllegraM, LivreaMA: Supplementation with cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) fruit decreases oxidative stress in healthy humans: A comparative study with vitamin C. Am J Clin Nutr, 2004; 80:391–395.
23.
Dok-GoH, LeeKH, KimHJ, LeeEH, LeeJ, SongYS, et al.: Neuroprotective effects of antioxidative flavonoids, quercetin, (+)-dihydroquercetin and quercetin 3-methyl ether, isolated from Opuntia ficus-indica var. saboten. Brain Res, 2003; 965:130–136.
24.
GalatiEM, TripodoMM, TrovatoA, d'AquinoA, MonforteMT: Biological activity of Opuntia ficus indica cladodes II: Effect on experimental hypercholesterolemia in rats. Pharm Biol, 2003; 41:175–179.
25.
ZouD, BrewerM, GarciaF, FeugangJM, WangJ, ZangR, et al.: Cactus pear: A natural product in cancer chemoprevention. Nutr J, 2005; 4:25.
26.
ButterweckV, SemlinL, FeistelB, PischelI, BauerK, VerspohlEJ: Comparative evaluation of two different Opuntia ficus-indica extracts for blood sugar lowering effects in rats. Phytother Res, 2011; 25:370–375.
27.
López-RomeroP, Pichardo-OntiverosE, Avila-NavaA, Vázquez-ManjarrezN, TovarAR, Pedraza-ChaverriJ, et al.: The effect of Nopal (Opuntia Ficus Indica) on postprandial blood glucose, incretins, and antioxidant activity in mexican patients with type 2 diabetes after consumption of two different composition breakfasts. J Acad Nutr Diet, 2014; 114:1811–1818.
28.
MamouchaS, TsafantakisN, FokialakisN, ChristodoulakisNS: A two-season impact study on Globularia alypum: Adaptive leaf structures and secondary metabolite variations. Plant Biosyst, 2018; 152:1118–1127.
29.
SingletonVL, OrthoferR, Lamuela-RaventósRM: [14] Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol, 1999; 299:152–178.
30.
ChangCC, YangMH, WenHM, ChernJC: Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J Food Drug Anal, 2002; 10:178–182.
31.
MosmannT: Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods, 1983; 65:55–63.
32.
SinghNP, McCoyMT, TiceRR, SchneiderEL: A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res, 1988; 175:184–191.
33.
SinghNP, StephensRE, SchneiderEL: Modifications of alkaline microgel electrophoresis for sensitive detection of DNA damage. Int J Radiat Biol, 1994; 66:23–28.
34.
TiceRR, AgurellE, AndersonD, BurlinsonB, HartmannA, KobayashiH, et al.: Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ Mol Mutagen, 2000; 35:206–221.
35.
KhouryL, ZalkoD, AudebertM: Validation of high-throughput genotoxicity assay screening using γH2AX in-cell western assay on HepG2 cells. Environ Mol Mutagen, 2013; 54:737–746.
36.
KhouryL, ZalkoD, AudebertM: Evaluation of four human cell lines with distinct biotransformation properties for genotoxic screening. Mutagenesis, 2016; 31:83–96.
37.
UhlM, HelmaC, KnasmüllerS: Single-cell gel electrophoresis assays with human-derived hepatoma (Hep G2) cells. Mutat Res, 1999; 441:215–224.
38.
KnasmüllerS, Mersch-SundermannV, KevekordesS, DarroudiF, HuberWW, HoelzlC, et al.: Use of human-derived liver cell lines for the detection of environmental and dietary genotoxicants; current state of knowledge. Toxicology, 2004; 198:315–328.
39.
MajerBJ, Mersch-SundermannV, DarroudiF, LakyB, de WitK, KnasmüllerS: Genotoxic effects of dietary and lifestyle related carcinogens in human derived hepatoma (HepG2, Hep3B) cells. Mutat Res, 2004; 551:153–166.
40.
AudebertM, RiuA, JacquesC, HillenweckA, JaminEL, ZalkoD, et al.: Use of the γH2AX assay for assessing the genotoxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in human cell lines. Toxicol Lett, 2010; 199:182–192.
41.
WesterinkWMA, StevensonJCR, HorbachGJ, SchoonenWGEJ: The development of RAD51C, Cystatin A, p53 and Nrf2 luciferase-reporter assays in metabolically competent HepG2 cells for the assessment of mechanism-based genotoxicity and of oxidative stress in the early research phase of drug development. Mutat Res, 2010; 696:21–40.
42.
WesterinkWMA, SchirrisTJJ, HorbachGJ, SchoonenWGEJ: Development and validation of a high-content screening in vitro micronucleus assay in CHO-k1 and HepG2 cells. Mutat Res, 2011; 724:7–21.
43.
TsamouM, JennenDGJ, ClaessenSMH, MagkoufopoulouC, KleinjansJCS, van DelftJHM: Performance of in vitro γH2AX assay in HepG2 cells to predict in vivo genotoxicity. Mutagenesis, 2012; 27:645–652.
44.
BressacB, GalvinKM, LiangTJ, IsselbacherKJ, WandsJR, OzturkM: Abnormal structure and expression of p53 gene in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 1990; 87:1973–1977.
45.
PuisieuxA, GalvinK, TroalenF, BressacB, MarcaisC, GalunE, et al.: Retinoblastoma and p53 tumor suppressor genes in human hepatoma cell lines. FASEB J, 1993; 7:1407–1413.
46.
PfuhlerS, FellowsM, van BenthemJ, CorviR, CurrenR, DearfieldK, et al.: In vitro genotoxicity test approaches with better predictivity: Summary of an IWGT workshop. Mutat Res, 2011; 723:101–107.
47.
FowlerP, SmithK, YoungJ, JeffreyL, KirklandD, PfuhlerS, et al.: Reduction of misleading (“false”) positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity assays. I. Choice of cell type. Mutat Res, 2012; 742:11–25.
48.
DertingerSD, KraynakAR, WheeldonRP, BernackiDT, BryceSM, HallN, et al.: Predictions of genotoxic potential, mode of action, molecular targets, and potency via a tiered multiflow® assay data analysis strategy. Environ Mol Mutagen, 2019; DOI: 10.1002/em.22274.
49.
GraillotV, TakakuraN, HegaratLL, FessardV, AudebertM, CravediJ-P: Genotoxicity of pesticide mixtures present in the diet of the French population. Environ Mol Mutagen, 2012; 53:173–184.
50.
ProcházkováD, BoušováI, WilhelmováN: Antioxidant and prooxidant properties of flavonoids. Fitoterapia, 2011; 82:513–523.
51.
Moussa-AyoubTE, Abd El-HadyE-SA, OmranHT, El-SamahySK, KrohLW, RohnS: Influence of cultivar and origin on the flavonol profile of fruits and cladodes from cactus Opuntia ficus-indica. Food Res Int, 2014; 64:864–872.
52.
Guevara-FigueroaT, Jiménez-IslasH, Reyes-EscogidoML, MortensenAG, LaursenBB, LinL-W, et al.: Proximate composition, phenolic acids, and flavonoids characterization of commercial and wild nopal (Opuntia spp.). J Food Compost Anal, 2010; 23:525–532.
53.
MusondaC, HelsbyN, ChipmanJ: Effects of quercetin on drug metabolizing enzymes and oxidation of 2′,7-dichlorofluorescin in HepG2 cells. Hum Exp Toxicol, 1997; 16:700–708.
54.
AlíaM, MateosR, RamosS, LecumberriE, BravoL, GoyaL: Influence of quercetin and rutin on growth and antioxidant defense system of a human hepatoma cell line (HepG2). Eur J Nutr, 2006; 45:19–28.
55.
BarcelosGRM, GrottoD, AngeliJPF, SerpeloniJM, RochaBA, BastosJK, et al.: Evaluation of antigenotoxic effects of plant flavonoids quercetin and rutin on HepG2 cells. Phytother Res, 2011; 25:1381–1388.
56.
ZhaoP, MaoJ-M, ZhangS-Y, ZhouZ-Q, TanY, ZhangY: Quercetin induces HepG2 cell apoptosis by inhibiting fatty acid biosynthesis. Oncol Lett, 2014; 8:765–769.
57.
GuoH, RenF, ZhangL, ZhangX, YangR, XieB, et al.: Kaempferol induces apoptosis in HepG2 cells via activation of the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway. Mol Med Rep, 2016; 13:2791–2800.
58.
NikolovaT, MariniF, KainaB: Genotoxicity testing: Comparison of the γH2AX focus assay with the alkaline and neutral comet assays. Mutat Res, 2017; 822:10–18.
59.
IwanariM, NakajimaM, KizuR, HayakawaK, YokoiT: Induction of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1 mRNAs by nitropolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in various human tissue-derived cells: Chemical-, cytochrome P450 isoform-, and cell-specific differences. Arch Toxicol, 2002; 76:287–298.
60.
TsuchiyaY, NakajimaM, ItohS, IwanariM, YokoiT: Expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor in normal human tissues and inducibility by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in human tumor-derived cell lines. Toxicol Sci, 2003; 72:253–259.
61.
GuoL, DialS, ShiL, BranhamW, LiuJ, FangJ-L, et al.: Similarities and differences in the expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes between human hepatic cell lines and primary human hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos, 2011; 39:528–538.
62.
LinJ, SchyschkaL, Mühl-BenninghausR, NeumannJ, HaoL, NusslerN, et al.: Comparative analysis of phase I and II enzyme activities in 5 hepatic cell lines identifies Huh-7 and HCC-T cells with the highest potential to study drug metabolism. Arch Toxicol, 2012; 86:87–95.
63.
CzeczotH, TudekB, KusztelakJ, SzymczykT, DobrowolskaB, GlinkowskaG, et al.: Isolation and studies of the mutagenic activity in the Ames test of flavonoids naturally occurring in medical herbs. Mutat Res, 1990; 240:209–216.
64.
VrijsenR, MichotteY, BoeyéA: Metabolic activation of quercetin mutagenicity. Mutat Res, 1990; 232:243–248.
65.
PoppR, SchimmerO: Induction of sister-chromatid exchanges (SCE), polyploidy, and micronuclei by plant flavonoids in human lymphocyte cultures. A comparative study of 19 flavonoids. Mutat Res, 1991; 246:205–213.
66.
GasparJ, RodriguesA, LairesA, SilvaF, CostaS, MonteiroMJ, et al.: On the mechanisms of genotoxicity and metabolism of quercetin. Mutagenesis, 1994; 9:445–449.
67.
CariaH, ChavecaT, LairesA, RueffJ: Genotoxicity of quercetin in the micronucleus assay in mouse bone marrow erythrocytes, human lymphocytes, V79 cell line and identification of kinetochore-containing (CREST staining) micronuclei in human lymphocytes. Mutat Res, 1995; 343:85–94.
68.
SaitoA, SugisawaA, UmegakiK, SunagawaH: Protective effects of quercetin and its metabolites on H2O2-induced chromosomal damage to WIL2-NS cells. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 2004; 68:271–276.
69.
BrownJP, DietrichPS: Mutagenicity of plant flavonols in the Salmonella/mammalian microsome test: Activation of flavonol glycosides by mixed glycosidases from rat cecal bacteria and other sources. Mutat Res, 1979; 66:223–240.
70.
CarverJH, CarranoAV, MacGregorJT: Genetic effects of the flavonols quercetin, kaempferol, and galangin on Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro. Mutat Res, 1983; 113:45–60.
71.
SilvaID, RodriguesA, GasparJ, MalaR, LairesA, RueffJ: Mutagenicity of kaempferol in V79 cells: The role of cytochromes P450. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen, 1996; 16:229–241.
72.
SilvaID, RodriguesAS, GasparJ, MaiaR, LairesA, RueffJ: Involvement of rat cytochrome 1A1 in the biotransformation of kaempferol to quercetin: Relevance to the genotoxicity of kaempferol. Mutagenesis, 1997; 12:383–390.
73.
ZorguiL, Ayed-BoussemaI, AyedY, BachaH, HassenW: The antigenotoxic activities of cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) cladodes against the mycotoxin zearalenone in Balb/c mice: Prevention of micronuclei, chromosome aberrations and DNA fragmentation. Food Chem Toxicol, 2009; 47:662–667.
74.
TesoriereL, AllegraM, ButeraD, GentileC, LivreaMA: Cytoprotective effects of the antioxidant phytochemical indicaxanthin in β-thalassemia red blood cells. Free Radic Res, 2006; 40:753–761.
75.
GentileC, TesoriereL, AllegraM, LivreaMA, D'AlessioP: Antioxidant betalains from cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) inhibit endothelial ICAM-1 expression. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2004; 1028:481–486.
76.
NhiemNX, Van KiemP, Van MinhC, BanNK, CuongNX, TaiBH, et al.: Phenylpropanoid glycosides from Heterosmilax erythrantha and their antioxidant activity. Arch Pharm Res, 2009; 32:1373.
77.
Silva E deO, BatistaR: Ferulic acid and naturally occurring compounds bearing a feruloyl moiety: A review on their structures, occurrence, and potential health benefits. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf, 2017; 16:580–616.
