Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-12
Integrating Chiropractic Care and Tai Chi Training for the Treatment of Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain in Nurses: A Single-Arm Mixed-Methods Pilot Trial
Chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNNP) is prevalent among health care workers, with particularly high rates among nurses. Nurses experiencing CNNP often report decreased job satisfaction, increased absenteeism, and reduced productivity. In recent years, nonpharmacologic approaches have gained attention as effective treatments for the management of CNNP, with exercise and manual therapies representing two of the most common. Early evidence shows that multimodal treatments may be more effective than unimodal strategies. The purpose of this current study was to assess the feasibility and observe the clinical outcomes of combined multimodal chiropractic care (MCC) and Tai Chi (TC) for CNNP in nurses.
Methods:
A single-arm mixed-methods pilot trial was conducted including 16 weeks of MCC and TC in nurses with self-reported CNNP. Feasibility outcomes were recruitment, retention, and adherence to the interventions. Clinical outcomes of interest included neck pain and related disabilities. Secondary outcomes of interest were functional, affective, and work-related performance. Qualitative interviews were also conducted.
Results:
Of the 59 screened, 36 met the eligibility criteria, and 21 were enrolled. The retention rate was 71.4%, and adherence rates were 85.3% for MCC and 62.5% for TC classes. Multiple pain and disability-related outcomes exhibited modest improvement from baseline to 16-week follow-up. Qualitative analysis identified six emergent themes: (1) neck pain being an inherent part of nursing, (2) nurses push through their pain, (3) MCC relieves pain and is instructive for preventing pain, (4) TC provides overall relaxation, (5) both interventions increased body awareness and improved posture, and (6) scheduling difficulties were a key obstacle for participating.
Conclusions:
Observed reductions in neck pain and disability suggest the potential utility of combined MCC and TC interventions for managing CNNP. Along with qualitative feedback regarding facilitators and barriers to participation, the findings support and inform a future randomized trial evaluating the combined benefits of MCC and TC for CNNP in nurses.
Clinical Trial Registration #NCT06523036.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CôtéP, CassidyJD, CarrollL. The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey. The prevalence of neck pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1998; 23(15):1689–1698; doi: 10.1097/00007632-199808010-00015
2.
CôtéP, van der VeldeG, CassidyJD, et al.The burden and determinants of neck pain in workers: Results of the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008; 33(Suppl 4):S60–S74; doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181643ee4
3.
CôtéP, Hogg-JohnsonS, CassidyJD, et al.The association between neck pain intensity, physical functioning, depressive symptomatology and time-to-claim-closure after whiplash. J Clin Epidemiol, 2001; 54(3):275–286; doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00319-x
4.
KazeminasabS, NejadghaderiSA, AmiriP, et al.Neck pain: Global epidemiology, trends and risk factors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2022; 23(1):26; doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04957-4
5.
LongMH, BogossianFE, JohnstonV. The prevalence of work-related neck, shoulder, and upper back musculoskeletal disorders among midwives, nurses, and physicians: A systematic review. Workplace Health Saf, 2013; 61(5):223–229;quiz 230; doi: 10.1177/216507991306100506
6.
NegriniS. The neck is not the back: Obvious, but he research gap should be reduced. Eura MEDICOPHYS, 2007; 43:75–77.
7.
SmedleyJ, InskipH, TrevelyanF, et al.Risk factors for incident neck and shoulder pain in hospital nurses. Occup Environ Med, 2003; 60(11):864–869; doi: 10.1136/oem.60.11.864
8.
LuimeJJ, KuiperJI, KoesBW, et al.Work-related risk factors for the incidence and recurrence of shoulder and neck complaints among nursing-home and elderly-care workers. Scand J Work Environ Health, 2004; 30(4):279–286; doi: 10.5271/sjweh.795
9.
JoslinLE, DavisCR, DolanP, ClarkEM. Quality of life and neck pain in nurses. Int J Occup Med Environ Health, 2014; 27(2):236–242; doi: 10.2478/s13382-014-0267-7
10.
HoeVCW, KelsallHL, UrquhartDM, SimMR. Risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms of the neck or shoulder alone or neck and shoulder among hospital nurses. Occup Environ Med, 2012; 69(3):198–204; doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100302
11.
DielemanJL, CaoJ, ChapinA, et al.US health care spending by payer and health condition, 1996–2016. JAMA, 2020; 323(9):863–884; doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0734
12.
FochsenG, JosephsonM, HagbergM, et al.Predictors of leaving nursing care: A longitudinal study among Swedish nursing personnel. Occup Environ Med, 2006; 63(3):198–201; doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.021956
WaddellG. Biopsychosocial analysis of low back pain. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol, 1992; 6(3):523–557; doi: 10.1016/s0950-3579(05)80126-8
15.
VlaeyenJWS, LintonSJ. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: A state of the art. Pain, 2000; 85(3):317–332; doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00242-0
16.
Effectiveness, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness of Nonpharmacological and Nonsurgical Therapies for Chronic Pain. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Global Health; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Global Forum on Innovation in Health Professional Education; Forum on Neuroscience and Nervous System Disorders; 2019. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK541698/
17.
SchroederJ, KaplanL, FischerDJ, SkellyAC. The outcomes of manipulation or mobilization therapy compared with physical therapy or exercise for neck pain: A systematic review. Evid Based Spine Care J, 2013; 4(1):30–41; doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1341605
18.
LaucheR, StumpeC, FehrJ, et al.The effects of Tai Chi and neck exercises in the treatment of chronic nonspecific neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Pain, 2016; 17(9):1013–1027; doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.06.004
19.
BussièresAE, StewartG, Al-ZoubiF, et al.The treatment of neck pain-associated disorders and whiplash-associated disorders: A clinical practice guideline. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 2016; 39(8):523–564.e27; doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.08.007
20.
WaynePM, KaptchukTJ. Challenges inherent to T’ai Chi research: Part I–T’ai Chi as a complex multicomponent intervention. J Altern Complement Med, 2008; 14(1):95–102; doi: 10.1089/acm.2007.7170a
21.
WaynePM, KaptchukTJ. Challenges inherent to T’ai Chi research: Part II-defining the intervention and optimal study design. J Altern Complement Med, 2008; 14(2):191–197; doi: 10.1089/acm.2007.7170b
22.
HallA, CopseyB, RichmondH, et al.Effectiveness of Tai Chi for chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther, 2017; 97(2):227–238; doi: 10.2522/ptj.20160246
23.
HallAM, KamperSJ, EmsleyR, et al.Does pain-catastrophising mediate the effect of Tai Chi on treatment outcomes for people with low back pain? Complement Ther Med, 2016; 25:61–66; doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2015.12.013
24.
YehGY, ChanCW, WaynePM, et al.The impact of Tai Chi exercise on self-efficacy, social support, and empowerment in heart failure: Insights from a qualitative sub-study from a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One, 2016; 11(5):e0154678; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154678
25.
MurleyB, HaasB, HermannsM, et al.Influence of Tai Chi on self-efficacy, quality of life, and fatigue among patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy: A pilot study brief. J Holist Nurs, 2019; 37(4):354–363; doi: 10.1177/0898010119867557
26.
RistPM, BernsteinC, KowalskiM, et al.Multimodal chiropractic care for migraine: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Cephalalgia, 2021; 41(3):318–328; doi: 10.1177/0333102420963844
27.
GuzmanJ, HaldemanS, CarrollLJ, et al.Clinical practice implications of the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders: From concepts and findings to recommendations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008; 33(Suppl 4):S199–S213; doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181644641
28.
HarrisPA, TaylorR, MinorBL, et al.The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform, 2019; 95:103208; doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
29.
HarrisPA, TaylorR, ThielkeR, et al.Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform, 2009; 42(2):377–381; doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
30.
LancasterGA, ThabaneL. Guidelines for reporting non-randomised pilot and feasibility studies. Pilot Feasibility Stud, 2019; 5(1):114; doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0499-1
31.
WaynePM, BernsteinC, KowalskiM, et al.The Integrative Migraine Pain Alleviation through Chiropractic Therapy (IMPACT) trial: Study rationale, design and intervention validation. Contemp Clin Trials Commun, 2020; 17:100531; doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100531
32.
WaynePM, ManorB, NovakV, et al.A systems biology approach to studying Tai Chi, physiological complexity and healthy aging: Design and rationale of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials, 2013; 34(1):21–34; doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.09.006
33.
FischerM, Fugate-WoodsN, WaynePM. Use of pragmatic community-based interventions to enhance recruitment and adherence in a randomized trial of Tai Chi for women with osteopenia: Insights from a qualitative substudy. Menopause, 2014; 21(11):1181–1189; doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000257
34.
WaynePM, BuringJE, DavisRB, et al.Tai Chi for osteopenic women: Design and rationale of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2010; 11:40; doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-40
35.
RoseM, BjornerJB, GandekB, et al.The PROMIS physical function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol, 2014; 67(5):516–526; doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.024
36.
LaiJS, CellaD, ChoiS, et al.How item banks and their application can influence measurement practice in rehabilitation medicine: A PROMIS fatigue item bank example. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2011; 92(Suppl 10):S20–S27; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.033
37.
AmtmannD, CookKF, JensenMP, et al.Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain, 2010; 150(1):173–182; doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.025
38.
PilkonisPA, ChoiSW, ReiseSP, et al.Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment, 2011; 18(3):263–283; doi: 10.1177/1073191111411667
39.
HahnEA, DeWaltDA, BodeRK, et al.New English and Spanish social health measures will facilitate evaluating health determinants. Health Psychol, 2014; 33(5):490–499; doi: 10.1037/hea0000055
40.
BuysseDJ, YuL, MoulDE, et al.Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. Sleep, 2010; 33(6):781–792; doi: 10.1093/sleep/33.6.781
41.
VernonH, MiorS. The neck disability index: A study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 1991; 14(7):409–415.
42.
LaucheR, CramerH, LanghorstJ, et al.Reliability and validity of the Pain On Movement questionnaire (POM) in chronic neck pain. Pain Med, 2014; 15(11):1850–1856; doi: 10.1111/pme.12534
43.
CherkinDC, ShermanKJ, BaldersonBH, et al.Effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction vs cognitive behavioral therapy or usual care on back pain and functional limitations in adults with chronic low back pain: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2016; 315(12):1240–1249; doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2323
44.
MaslachC, JacksonSE, LeiterMP. Maslach burnout inventory3rd edition. In: Eval Stress Book Resour. The Scarecrow Press; 1997;pp. 191–218.
45.
ChenC, MeierST. Burnout and depression in nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud, 2021; 124:104099; doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104099
46.
RomppelM, Herrmann-LingenC, WachterR, et al.A short form of the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE-6): Development, psychometric properties and validity in an intercultural non-clinical sample and a sample of patients at risk for heart failure. Psychosoc Med, 2013; 10:Doc01; doi: 10.3205/psm000091
47.
SchwarzerR, JerusalemM. Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs. (WeinmanJ., WrightS., & JohnstonM..) APA; 1995: pp. 35–37.
48.
CorbinJM, StraussA. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol, 1990; 13(1):3–21; doi: 10.1007/BF00988593
49.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
50.
LakensD. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol, 2013; 4:863; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
51.
TerweeCB, PeipertJD, ChapmanR, et al.Minimal Important Change (MIC): A conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures. Qual Life Res, 2021; 30(10):2729–2754; doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02925-y
52.
ZigmondAS, SnaithRP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 1983; 67(6):361–370; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
53.
MehlingWE, PriceC, DaubenmierJJ, et al.The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). PLoS One, 2012; 7(11):e48230; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048230
54.
LundbergMKE, StyfJ, CarlssonSG. A psychometric evaluation of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia—from a physiotherapeutic perspective. Physiother Theory Pract, 2004; 20(2):121–133; doi: 10.1080/09593980490453002
55.
KoopmanC, PelletierKR, MurrayJF, et al.Stanford Presenteeism Scale: Health status and employee productivity. J Occup Environ Med, 2002; 44(1):14–20; doi: 10.1097/00043764-200201000-00004
56.
Llinàs-ReglàJ, Vilalta-FranchJ, López-PousaS, et al.The trail making test. Assessment, 2017; 24(2):183–196; doi: 10.1177/1073191115602552
57.
RosenbergM, NoonanS, DeGutisJ, EstermanM. Sustaining visual attention in the face of distraction: A novel gradual-onset continuous performance task. Atten Percept Psychophys, 2013; 75(3):426–439; doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0413-x
CramerH, MehlingWE, SahaFJ, et al.Postural awareness and its relation to pain: Validation of an innovative instrument measuring awareness of body posture in patients with chronic pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2018; 19(1):109; doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2031-9
60.
SeidmanI. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. 3rd ed. Teachers college press; 2006.
61.
SmileyRA, AllgeyerRL, ShoboY, et al.The 2022 national nursing workforce survey. J Nurs Regul, 2023; 14(1):S1–S90; doi: 10.1016/S2155-8256(23)00047-9
62.
FlaubertJL, Le MenestrelS, WilliamsDR, et al. eds. The Role of Nurses in Improving Health Care Access and Quality. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; National Academy of Medicine; Committee on the Future of Nursing 2020–2030; 2021. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK573910/
63.
MalarkeyWB, JarjouraD, KlattM. Workplace based mindfulness practice and inflammation: A randomized trial. Brain Behav Immun, 2013; 27(1):145–154; doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.10.009
64.
KlattM, WestrickA, BawaR, et al.Sustained resiliency building and burnout reduction for healthcare professionals via organizational sponsored mindfulness programming. Explore (NY), 2022; 18(2):179–186; doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2021.04.004
65.
FleagleTR, PostAA, DaileyDL, et al.Establishing a minimally clinically important difference of movement-evoked pain in musculoskeletal pain. J Pain, 2023; 24(4):83–84; doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.02.241
66.
ClelandJA, ChildsJD, WhitmanJM. Psychometric properties of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2008; 89(1):69–74; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.126
67.
MacDermidJC, WaltonDM, AveryS, et al.Measurement properties of the neck disability index: A systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2009; 39(5):400–417; doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2930
68.
CoulterID, CrawfordC, VernonH, et al.Manipulation and mobilization for treating chronic nonspecific neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis for an appropriateness panel. Pain Physician, 2019; 22(2):E55–E70.
69.
FrutigerM, BorotkanicsR. Systematic review and meta-analysis suggest strength training and workplace modifications may reduce neck pain in office workers. Pain Pract, 2021; 21(1):100–131; doi: 10.1111/papr.12940
70.
MinnucciS, InnocentiT, SalvioliS, et al.Benefits and harms of spinal manipulative therapy for treating recent and persistent nonspecific neck pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2023; 53(9):510–528; doi: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11708
71.
MaiersM, HartvigsenJ, EvansR, et al.Short- or long-term treatment of spinal disability in older adults with manipulation and exercise. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2019; 71(11):1516–1524; doi: 10.1002/acr.23798
72.
Soler-FontM, RamadaJM, van ZonSKR, et al.Multifaceted intervention for the prevention and management of musculoskeletal pain in nursing staff: Results of a cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS One, 2019; 14(11):e0225198; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225198
73.
GeneenLJ, MooreRA, ClarkeC, et al.Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: An overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017; 4(4):CD011279; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011279.pub3
74.
ZhangXJ, SongY, JiangT, et al.Interventions to reduce burnout of physicians and nurses: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020; 99(26):e20992; doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020992
75.
ShinS, ParkJH, BaeSH. Nurse staffing and nurse outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurs Outlook, 2018; 66(3):273–282; doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.12.002
76.
KunzlerAM, ChmitorzA, RöthkeN, et al.Interventions to foster resilience in nursing staff: A systematic review and meta-analyses of pre-pandemic evidence. Int J Nurs Stud, 2022; 134:104312; doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104312
77.
DucheminAM, SteinbergBA, MarksDR, et al.A small randomized pilot study of a workplace mindfulness-based intervention for surgical intensive care unit personnel: Effects on salivary α-amylase levels. J Occup Environ Med, 2015; 57(4):393–399; doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000371
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
