FritscheU, BrunoriG, ChiaramontiD, et al. Future transitions for the Bioeconomy towards Sustainable Development and a Climate-Neutral Economy - Knowledge Synthesis Final Report, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2020, ISBN 978-92-76-21518-9 (online), doi:10.2760/667966 (online), JRC121212
2.
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Timeline of ECDC's response to COVID-19 (2020). Brussels Available at: https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/timeline-ecdc-response
3.
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Threat Assessment Brief Wuhan Jan 9 2020.
4.
RowanN, GalanakisC. Unlocking challenges and opportunities presented by COVID-19 pandemic for cross-cutting disruption in agri-food and green deal innovations: Quo Vadis?. Science of the Total Environment, 2020; 748:141362 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141362
5.
ReidG, O'BeirneN, GibsonN. How companies can reshape results and plan for a COVID-19 recovery (2020). Ernst & Young, Available at: https://ey.com/en_ie/strategy-transactions/companies-can-reshape-results-and-plan-for-covid-19-recovery
6.
BIC Position paper: The bio-based industries - key to the EU's green recovery (2020). Bio-based Industries Consortium. Brussels Available at: https://biconsortium.eu/sites/biconsortium.eu/files/downloads/BIC_position_paper_on_Green_Recovery_June_2020.pdf
7.
EC. How the bioeconomy contributes to the European Green Deal (2020). European Commission. Brussels https://doi.org/10.2777/67636
8.
GBS. Global Bioeconomy Summit 2020 (2020). Recordings available at Available at: https://gbs2020.net/plenary-recordings/ and https://gbs2020.net/recordings/
9.
IACGB. Expanding the Sustainable Bioeconomy – Vision and Way Forward. Communiqué of the Global Bioeconomy Summit 2020. International Advisory Council on Global Bioeconomy. Berlin Available at: https://gbs2020.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GBS2020_IACGB-Communique.pdf
10.
Previous severe 'Black Swan' events, e.g., the Black Death that devastated the Byzantine Empire, the Cholera outbreak of the 1830s, the Spanish Flu of 1918–, and World War II all indicate that societies responded to these traumata by unleashing tremendous changes in creativity, culture, thinking, and ambition to prevail (Rowan & Galanakis 2020). A similar reaction to COVID-19 can be expected, fuelling the discovery of disruptive innovations beyond this pandemic and novel approaches for the EU bioeconomy.
11.
COVID-19 impacts point to a modest reduction of direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture of about 1% or 50 million t of CO2 equivalents in 2020 and 2021. Elleby C, et al. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Global Agricultural Markets. Environ Resour Econ 2020; 76:1067–1079https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00473-6
12.
HLPE. Impacts of COVID-19 on food security and nutrition: Developing effective policy responses to address the hunger and malnutrition pandemic (2020). High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security Issue Paper. Rome https://doi.org/10.4060/cb1000en
13.
Countryside and Community Research Institute. Covid-19 and sustainable food systems: a shared learning resource (2020). University of Gloucestershire, Royal Agricultural University and Hartpury College. Available at: http://ccri.ac.uk/covid-19-food-system/
14.
World Economic Forum. Why cooking at home during COVID-19 lockdown is reducing food waste. Available at: https://weforum.org/agenda/2020/11/covid19-coronavirus-lockdown-food-waste-sustainability/
15.
Marchant-FordeJ, BoyleL. COVID-19 effects on livestock production: A One Welfare issue. Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020; 7:734https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.585787
16.
GyekyeL. Post-corona: What would the bio-based industry look like (2020)? Available at: https://biomarketinsights.com/post-corona-what-would-the-bio-based-industry-look-like/
17.
International Energy Agency. Global Energy Review 2020 The impacts of the Covid-19 crisis on global energy demand and CO2 emissions. International Energy Agency (2020). Available at: https://webstore.iea.org/download/direct/2995
18.
Eurelectric. Impact of COVID 19 on customers and society – Recommendations from the European Power sector (2020). Brussels Available at: https://cdn.eurelectric.org/media/4313/impact_of_covid_19_on_customers_and_society-2020-030-0216-01-e-h-E7E407BA.pdf
19.
IEA (2020g) Renewable Energy Market Uptake. Outlook for 2020 and 2021. International Energy Agency. Paris
20.
WBA. COVID19 and Bioenergy: Impacts and future outlook. Results from Survey on Impacts of COVID 19 on Bioenergy Sector (2020). World Bioenergy Association. Stockholm Available at: https://worldbioenergy.org/uploads/200612%20WBA%20COVID%20Survey%20Report%20Final.pdf
21.
ChiaramontiD, ManiatisK. Security of supply, strategic storage and Covid19: Which lessons learnt for renewable and recycled carbon fuels, and their future role in decarbonizing transport?. Appl Energ, 2020; 271:115216 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115216
22.
EC. The European Green Deal. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The European Council, the Council of the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (2019). COM(2019) 640 final. Brussels Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/european-green-deal-communication_en.pdf
23.
IAP. Global Green Recovery After COVID-19: Using scientific advice to ensure social equity, planetary and human health, and economic benefits (2020). InterAcademy Partnership Available at: https://interacademies.org/sites/default/files/2020-07/IAP_Green_Recovery.pdf
24.
International Energy Agency. Sustainable Recovery - World Energy Outlook Special Report (2020). Paris Available at: https://webstore.iea.org/download/direct/3008
25.
IEA. World Energy Outlook 2020. International Energy Agency. Paris https://doi.org/10.1787/557a761b-en
26.
IEA. Energy Technology Perspectives 2020. International Energy Agency. Paris Available at: https://webstore.iea.org/download/direct/4022?fileName=Energy_Technology_Perspectives_2020_-_Special_Report_on_Clean_Energy_Innovation.pdf
27.
IEA (2020). Oil market report. International Energy Agency. Paris Available at: https://iea.org/reports/oil-market-report-april-2020
28.
IEA (2020). COVID19 - Exploring the impacts of the COVID19 pandemic on global energy markets, energy resilience, and climate change. International Energy Agency. Paris https://www.iea.org/topics/Covid19
29.
EC. The long-term EU budget. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/eu-budget/long-term-eu-budget_en
30.
EC. Just Transition Platform. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/actions-being-taken-eu/just-transition-mechanism/just-transition-platform_en
31.
Sustainable Markets Initiative. Available at: https://sustainable-markets.org/
32.
BurgerA, KristofK, MattheyA. The Green New Consensus: Study Shows Broad Consensus on Green Recovery Programmes and Structural Reforms (2020). German Federal Environment Agency. Dessau. Available at: https://umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/376/publikationen/thenewgreenconsensus_englisch_bf.pdf
33.
Which should follow the Pan-European Guidelines for Afforestation and Reforestation. Available at: https://foresteurope.org/pan-europeanafforestationreforestationguidelines
34.
Asian Development Bank. COVID-19 Recovery: A pathway to a low-carbon and resilient future (2020). Available at: https://adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/625476/covid-19-recovery-low-carbon-resilient-future.pdf
35.
Asian Development Bank. An Updated Assessment of the Economic Impact of COVID-19 (2020). Available at: https://adb.org/publications/updated-assessment-economic-impact-covid-19
36.
HepburnC, et al. Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change? Smith School Working Paper 20-02 (2020) Oxford, UK Available at: https://smithschool.ox.ac.uk/publications/wpapers/workingpaper20-02.pdf
37.
NCIPBL & IIASA (2020) Overview of recently adopted mitigation policies and climate-relevant policy responses to COVID-19 – 2020 Update. NewClimate Institute, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency & International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. The Hague Available at: https://newclimate.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/NewClimate_PBL-CLIMA_2020OctUpdate.pdf
38.
OECD (2020). Building Back Better: A Sustainable, Resilient Recovery after COVID-19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Paris Available at: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=133_133639-s08q2ridhf&title=Building-back-better-_A-sustainable-resilient-recovery-after-Covid-19
39.
TWI (2020). Innovations for Sustainability. Pathways to an efficient and post-pandemic future. Report prepared by The World in 2050 initiative. IIASA. Laxenburg Available at: http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/16533/1/TWI2050-web.pdf
40.
OECD (2020) Strengthening Agricultural Resilience in the Face of Multiple Risks. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Paris https://doi.org/10.1787/2250453e-en
41.
SCAR (2020). Resilience and transformation. Report of the 5th SCAR Foresight Exercise Expert Group Natural resources and food systems: Transitions towards a ‘safe and just’ operating space. EC Standing Committee on Agricultural Research. Luxembourg https://doi.org/10.2777/717705
42.
EC. Analysis of links between CAP Reform and Green Deal. European Commission Staff Working Document SWD(2020) 93 final. Brussels Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/food-farming-fisheries/sustainability_and_natural_resources/documents/analysis-of-links-between-cap-and-green-deal_en.pdf
43.
EC. Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2020) 381 final. Brussels Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/communication-annex-farm-fork-green-deal_en.pdf
44.
EC. EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 - Bringing nature back into our lives. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (2020). COM(2020) 380 final. Brussels Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/communication-annex-eu-biodiversity-strategy-2030_en.pdf
45.
TittonellP.Assessing Resilience and Adaptability in Agroecological Transitions. Agricultural Systems, 2020; 184:102862 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102862
46.
van ZantenHet al.The Role of Farm Animals in a Circular Food System. Global Food Security, 2019; 21:18-22https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.06.003
47.
ZinsstagJ, et al.From “one medicine” to “one health” and systemic approaches to health and well-being. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2011; 101(3–4):148–15610.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.07.003
48.
World Health Organization. One Health (2017). Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/one-health
49.
MottetA, et al.Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate. Global Food Security, 2017; 14:1–8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.01.001
50.
MaréchalA, et al. Aligning the post-2020 Common Agricultural Policy with the European Green Deal. Institute for European Environmental Policy, Ecologic Institute & IDDRI (2020). Available at: https://ieep.eu/uploads/articles/attachments/34ac0c06-a1f4-4a72-87bb-7d548956b107/Aligning%20the%20post-2020%20CAP%20with%20the%20Green%20Deal.pdf
51.
MatthewsA.The new CAP must be linked more closely to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Agricultural and Food Economics, 2020; 8:19https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-020-00163-3
52.
EC. The Blue Economy report 2020. European Commission. Luxembourg https://doi.org/10.2771/363293
53.
FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020 - Sustainability in action. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2020). Rome Available at: https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229en
54.
ReischL, et al.Mitigating climate change via food consumption and food waste: A systematic map of behavioral interventions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021; 279:123717 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123717
55.
GalanakisC, et al.Food Ingredients and Active Compounds against the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Comprehensive Review. Foods, 2020; 9(11):1701https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111701
56.
As addressed in presentations during EFIB in October 2020. Available at: https://efibforum.com/programme-overview
57.
AbubakarI. The future of migration, human populations, and global health in the Anthropocene (2020). The Lancet Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31523-3
58.
FearsR, et al.Post-pandemic recovery: Use of scientific advice to achieve social equity, planetary health, and economic benefits. The Lancet Planetary Health, 2020; 4(9):E383-E384https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30176-5
59.
RizouM, et al.Safety of Foods, Surfaces, Food Supply Chain and Environment within the COVID-19 Pandemic. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2020; 102:293–299https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.06.008
60.
GalanakisC.The Food Systems in the Era of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Crisis. Foods, 2020; 9:523https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9040523
61.
NakicenovicN, et al. (2020) Innovations for sustainability: pathways to an efficient and sufficient post-pandemic future. The World in 2050 Initiative & International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Laxenburg https://doi.org/10.22022/TNT/07-2020.16533
62.
DasO, et al.The need for fully bio-based facemasks to counter coronavirus outbreaks: A perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 2020; 736:139611 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139611
63.
PortanguenStéphane et al. (2019) Toward the design of functional foods and biobased products by 3D printing: a review. Trends in Food Science & Technology 86: 188–198 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.023
64.
AragonésM, et al.Digital innovation hubs as a tool for boosting biomass valorisation in regional bioeconomies: Andalusian and South-East Irish case studies. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex, 2020; 6(4):115https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040115
65.
PetetinL.The COVID-19 Crisis: An Opportunity to Integrate Food Democracy into Post-Pandemic Food Systems. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2020; 11(2):326–336https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.40
66.
Blay-PalmerA.et al. Post COVID 19 and food pathways to sustainable transformation. Agriculture and Human Values 2020; 37:517–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10051-7
67.
Only 12% of the materials globally come from recycling (Palahì et al. 2020), non-metallic minerals such as sand or gravel account for about 50% of all resources extracted (IRP 2019).
68.
PalahíM, et al.Investing in nature to transform the post COVID-19 economy - A 10-point Action Plan to create a circular bioeconomy devoted to sustainable wellbeing. Solutions Journal, 2020; 11:2 Available at: https://thesolutionsjournal.com/article/investing-nature-transform-post-covid-19-economy-10-point-action-plan-create-circular-bioeconomy-devoted-sustainable-wellbeing/
69.
ChurkinaG, et al.Buildings as a global carbon sink. Nature Sustainability, 2020; 3:269–276https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0462-4
70.
HetemäkiL, et al. European Forest Institute. Leading the way to a European circular bioeconomy strategy. From Science to Policy 5 (2017). Joensuu https://doi.org/10.36333/fs05
71.
IPCC (2019) Climate Change and Land: anIPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. Shukla, P. et al. (eds.). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva Available at: https://ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2019/08/Fullreport-1.pdf
72.
RoeS, et al.Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5°C world. Nature Climate Change, 2019; 9:817–828https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0591-9
73.
WurmJ. Living and bio-based building materials for regenerative cities. Presentation at the European Forum for Industrial Biotechnology & the Bioeconomy Digital Conference 5–9 Oct. 2020 Available at: https://efibforum.com/app/uploads/2020/10/EFIB2020_Day5_1330_Wurm_tobeshared.pdf
74.
ChiappinelliO, et al. A Green COVID-19 Recovery of the EU Basic Materials Sector: Identifying Potentials, Barriers and Policy Solutions (2020). German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin). Berlin Available at: https://diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.805933.de/dp1921.pdf
75.
EC. Critical Raw Materials Resilience: Charting a Path towards greater Security and Sustainability. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(2020) 474 final. Brussels Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0474&from=EN
76.
CasiniD, et al. Production and characterization of co-composted biochar and digestate from biomass anaerobic digestion (2019). Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00482-6
77.
MiliottiE, et al.Lignocellulosic Ethanol Biorefinery: Valorization of Lignin-Rich Stream through Hydrothermal Liquefaction. Energies, 2019; 12(4):723https://doi.org/10.3390/en12040723
78.
TamburiniG, et al.Agricultural diversification promotes multiple ecosystem services without compromising yield. Science Advances, 2020; 6(45):eaba1715 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba1715
79.
ChiaramontiD, PanoutsouC. Policy measures for sustainable sunflower cropping in EU-MED marginal lands amended by biochar: Case study in Tuscany, Italy. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2019; 126:199–210https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.04.021
80.
YangYi et al.Restoring Abandoned Farmland to Mitigate Climate Change on a Full Earth. One Earth, 2020; 3(2):176–186https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.019
81.
JefferyL, et al. Options for supporting Carbon Dioxide Removal (2020). Discussion paper. NewClimate Institute Available at: https://newclimate.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Options-for-supporting-Carbon-Dioxide-Removal_July_2020.pdf
82.
AcutoM, et al.Seeing COVID-19 through an urban lens. Nature Sustainability, 2020; 3:977–978https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00620-3
83.
For more details see e.g., AlexandraJ, NormanB. The city as forest - Integrating living infrastructure, climate conditioning and urban forestry in Canberra, Australia. Sustainable Earth 2020;3:10 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-020-00032-3; Cabanek A, Zingoni de Baro M, Newman P. Biophilic streets: A design framework for creating multiple urban benefits. Sustainable Earth, 2020; 3:7https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-020-00027-0; Daniels P, et al. Evaluating net community benefits of integrating nature within cities. Sustainable Earth 2020;3:12 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-020-00025-2; WBGU. Rethinking Land in the Anthropocene: from Separation to Integration - Summary. Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen. Berlin. Available at: https://wbgu.de/fileadmin/user_upload/wbgu/publikationen/hauptgutachten/hg2020/pdf/WBGU_HG2020_ZF_en.pdf; Wurm J. Living and bio-based building materials for regenerative cities (2020). Presentation at the European Forum for Industrial Biotechnology & the Bioeconomy Digital Conference 5–9 Oct. 2020 Available at: https://efibforum.com/app/uploads/2020/10/EFIB2020_Day5_1330_Wurm_tobeshared.pdf
84.
ChateauJ, MavroeidiE. The jobs potential of a transition towards a resource efficient and circular economy (2020). OECD Environment Working Papers No. 167. Paris https://doi.org/10.1787/28e768df-en
85.
BBI-JU & SCAR-BSW. Lessons learnt and recommendations for developing clusters in the bioeconomy (2019). Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking & EC Standing Committee on Agricultural Research, Bioeconomy Strategic Working Group Available at: http://biomonitor.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Findings-Clusters-for-Bioeconomy_Workshop_25.03.19.pdf
86.
EC. A Renovation Wave for Europe - greening our buildings, creating jobs, improving lives. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(2020) 662 final. Brussels Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/eu_renovation_wave_strategy.pdf
87.
PrideauxB, ThompsonM, PabelA. Lessons from COVID-19 can prepare global tourism for the economic transformation needed to combat climate change. Tourism Geographies, 2020; 22(3):667–678https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1762117
88.
RousseauS, DeschachtN. Public Awareness of Nature and the Environment During the COVID-19 Crisis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2020; 76:1149–1159https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00445-w
89.
IBEC. Reboot & Reimagine - Government July Stimulus Plan (2020). IBEC- for Irish Business. Dublin Available at: https://ibec.ie/-/media/documents/ibec-campaigns/reboot-and-reimagine/ibec-july-stimulus-submission.pdf
90.
EC. EU taxonomy for sustainable activities. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/sustainable-finance/eu-taxonomy-sustainable-activities_en
91.
HanspachJ, et al. Biocultural approaches to sustainability: A systematic review of the scientific literature (2020). People and Nature. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10120
92.
GalanakisC, et al.Innovations and Technology Disruptions in the Food Sector within the COVID-19 Pandemic and Post-lockdown Era. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2021; 110:193–200https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.002
93.
MoroneP, ImbertE. Food waste and social acceptance of a circular bioeconomy: The role of stakeholders. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2020; 23:55–60.
94.
Sanchez LopezJ, et al. Brief on food waste in the European Union (2020). EC Joint Research Centre for the European Commission's Knowledge Centre for Bioeconomy. Report JRC121196 Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/kcb-food_waste_brief_print_hq.pdf
95.
AldacoR, et al.Food waste management during the COVID-19 outbreak: A holistic climate, economic and nutritional approach. Science of the Total Environment, 2020; 742:140524 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140524
96.
Global Alliance for the Future of Food. Systemic Solutions for Healthy Food Systems: A Guide to Government Action (2020). Available at: https://futureoffood.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/GA_SystemicSolutions-HealthyFoodSystems_GovtGuide_Oct2020.pdf
97.
EC. 2020 Strategic Foresight Report - Charting the course towards a more resilient Europe. European Commission COM(2020) 493. Brussels Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/strategic_foresight_report_2020_1.pdf
98.
PuligheG, LupiaF. Food First: COVID-19 Outbreak and Cities Lockdown a Booster for a Wider Vision on Urban Agriculture. Sustainability, 2020; 12(12):5012https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125012
99.
BentonT.COVID-19 and disruptions to food systems. Agriculture and Human Values, 2020; 37:577–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10081-1
100.
KinleyR, et al.Mitigating the carbon footprint and improving productivity of ruminant livestock agriculture using a red seaweed. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020; 259:120836 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120836
101.
JonssonR, et al.Boosting the EU forest-based bioeconomy: Market, climate, and employment impacts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021; 163:120478 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120478
102.
ACSFI (2020) Webinar 2: The global forest sector and COVID-19: Navigating a sustainable future in an economically and socially constrained world -Synthesis of outcomes. FAO Advisory Committee on Sustainable Forest-based Industries. Rome Available at: http://fao.org/forestry/49818-08d2d46ecc1e277df5bbece00bae47081.pdf
103.
VerkerkH, et al.Climate-Smart Forestry: The missing link. Forest Policy and Economics, 2020; 115:102164 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102164
104.
JonesD, et al. Wood modification in Europe: a state-of-the-art about processes, products and applications (2019). Florence https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-6453-970-6
105.
IUCN. IUCN Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions. Available at: https://iucn.org/theme/ecosystem-management/our-work/iucn-global-standard-nature-based-solutions
106.
Classification suggested by Prof. Pete Smith, University of Aberdeen, UK (personal communication)
107.
HirstA, LazarusH. Supporting a Green Recovery: An initial assessment of nature-based jobs and skills. NatureScot Research ReportNo. 1257. Inverness (2020). Available at: https://nature.scot/sites/default/files/2020-12/Publication%202020%20-%20NatureScot%20Research%20Report%201257%20-%20Supporting%20a%20green%20recovery_%20an%20initial%20assessment%20of%20nature-%20based%20jobs%20and%20skills.pdf
108.
WBGU (2020) Rethinking Land in the Anthropocene: From Separation to Integration - Summary. Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen. Berlin Available at: https://wbgu.de/fileadmin/user_upload/wbgu/publikationen/hauptgutachten/hg2020/pdf/WBGU_HG2020_ZF_en.pdf
109.
BuffetL. Europe increasingly dependent on risky oil imports. Transport & Environment – Briefing. Brussels (2016). Available at: https://transportenvironment.org/sites/te/files/publications/2016_07_Briefing_Europe_increasingly_dependent_risky_oil_FINAL_0.pdf
110.
PanoutsouC, SinghA. A value chain approach to improve biomass policy formation. GCB Bioenergy, 2020; 12(7):464–475https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12685
111.
FeindtP, ProestouM, DaedlowK. Resilience and policy design in the emerging bioeconomy – The RPD framework and the changing role of energy crop systems in Germany. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2020; 22(5):636–652https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1814130
112.
ArastoA, et al. Bioenergy's role in balancing the electricity grid and providing storage options-an EU perspective (2017). IEA Bioenergy: Task 41P6 Available at: https://ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/IEA-Bioenergy-Bioenergy-in-balancing-the-grid_master_FINAL-Revised-16.02.17.pdf
113.
LehtveerM, FridahlM. Managing variable renewables with biomass in the European electricity system: Emission targets and investment preferences. Energy, 2020; 213:118786 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118786
114.
BacovskyD, et al. The Role of Renewable Transport Fuels in Decarbonizing Road Transport - Summary Report (2020). IEA Technology Collaboration Programmes Advanced Motor Fuels Annex 58 and IEA Bioenergy Task 41 Project 10 Available at: https://ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Summary-Report.pdf
115.
BacovskyD, et al. The Role of Renewable Transport Fuels in Decarbonizing Road Transport - Deployment Barriers and Policy Recommendations (2020). IEA Technology Collaboration Programmes Advanced Motor Fuels Annex 58 and IEA Bioenergy Task 41 Project 10 Available at: https://ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Deployment-Barriers-and-Policy-Recommendations.pdf
116.
LioutasE, Charatsari, ChrysanthiC. Enhancing the ability of agriculture to cope with major crises or disasters: What the experience of COVID-19 teaches us. Agricultural Systems, 2021; 187:103023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103023
117.
AltieriM, NichollsC. Agroecology and the reconstruction of a post-COVID-19 agriculture. J Peasant Stud, 2020; 47:881–898https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1782891
118.
JonesJ, et al.Toward a new generation of agricultural system data, models, and knowledge products: State of agricultural systems science. Agricultural Systems, 2017; 155:269–288https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.021
119.
IngramJ, MayeD. What are the implications of digitalisation for agricultural knowledge?. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2020; 4:66https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00066
120.
Ehlers M-H HuberR, FingerR. Agricultural policy in the era of digitalization (2021). Food Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.102019
121.
ParkS, HumphryJ. Exclusion by design: Intersections of social, digital and data exclusion. Information, Communication & Society, 2019; 22(7):934–953https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1606266
122.
PouxX, AubertP-M. An agroecological Europe in 2050: Multifunctional agriculture for healthy eating (2018). IDDRI. Paris https://www.iddri.org/sites/default/files/PDF/Publications/Catalogue%20Iddri/Etude/201809-ST0918EN-tyfa.pdf
123.
KerA.Risk management in Canada's agricultural sector in light of COVID-19. Can J Agric Econ Revue Canadienne D'agroeconomie, 2020; 68:139–142https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12232
124.
USDA. USDA Announces Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (2020). US Department of Agriculture Release No. 0222.20. Washington, DC Available at: https://usda.gov/media/press-releases/2020/04/17/usda-announces-coronavirus-food-assistance-program
125.
ThakurR.Community marketing: Serving the base of the economic pyramid sustainably. J Bus Strateg, 2015; 36:40–47https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-04-2014-0041
126.
RichardsT, RickardB. COVID-19 impact on fruit and vegetable markets. Can J Agric Econ/Revue Canadienne D'agroeconomie, 2020; 68:189–194https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12231
127.
VerhaegenI, van HuylenbroeckG. Costs and benefits for farmers participating in innovative marketing channels for quality food products J Rural Stud 2001;17:443–456 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00017-1
128.
SharmaM, et al (2020). Developing a framework for enhancing survivability of sustainable supply chains during and post-COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Logist Res Appl. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2020.1810213
129.
GuptaC, et al.Food policy councils and local governments: Creating effective collaboration for food systems change. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 2018; 8(B):11–28https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2018.08B.006
130.
JiangP, van FanY, KlemešJ. Impacts of COVID-19 on energy demand and consumption: Challenges, lessons and emerging opportunities. Applied Energy, 2021; 285:116441, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116441
131.
SchwarzM, et al.COVID-19 and the academy: It is time for going digital. Energy Res Social Sci, 2020; 68:101684 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101684
132.
SissonP. How the '15-Minute City' Could Help Post-Pandemic Recovery (2020). Available at: https://bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-15/mayors-tout-the-15-minute-city-as-covid-recovery
133.
LimJ. Clash of crises: How a climate-resilient electricity system can help us tackle climate change and Covid-19 (2020). Available at: https://iea.org/commentaries/clash-of-crises-how-a-climate-resilient-electricity-system-can-help-us-tackle-climate-change-and-covid-19
134.
CamiaA, et al. The use of woody biomass for energy production in the EU. Science for Policy report by the EC Joint Research Centre (2021). Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/831621