Insect population biocontrol methods, such as the sterile insect technique (SIT), offer promising alternatives to traditional pesticide-based approaches for managing pest populations. Effective use of these strategies requires scalable sex separation techniques, which are currently nonexistent for Drosophila suzukii, a prominent crop pest species. SEPARATOR (Sexing Element Produced by Alternative RNA-splicing of A Transgenic Observable Reporter) is a fluorescence-based sex-sorting technology previously developed for other pest species that enables the identification of females and males based on sex-specific fluorescence. In this study, we investigate the applicability of SEPARATOR to D. suzukii by engineering several strains encoding SEPARATOR constructs that facilitate efficient sex selection in early larval stages. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of using SEPARATOR in D. suzukii by incorporating transformer introns from three different species: D. suzukii, D. melanogaster, and Ceratitis capitata. This study provides an initial basis for further optimization of SEPARATOR in D. suzukii and indicates that it could be a helpful tool for SIT-based biocontrol strategies.
BabuA, Rodriguez-SaonaC, SialAA. Factors influencing the efficacy of novel attract-and-kill (ACTTRA SWD) formulations against Drosophila suzukii. J Econ Entomol, 2022; 115(4):981–989; doi: 10.1093/jee/toab273
3.
LittlerA, PandeyP, O’DellKL, et al.Chemical ecology of oviposition dynamics in drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J Econ Entomol, 2022; 115(4):1029–1035; doi: 10.1093/jee/toac028
4.
HauserM. A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification. Pest Manag Sci, 2011; 67(11):1352–1357; doi: 10.1002/ps.2265
5.
AsplenMK, AnforaG, BiondiA, et al.Invasion biology of spotted wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii): A global perspective and future priorities. J Pest Sci, 2015; 88(3):469–494; doi: 10.1007/s10340-015-0681-z
6.
WalshDB, BoldaMP, GoodhueRE, et al.Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae): Invasive pest of ripening soft fruit expanding its geographic range and damage potential. J Integr Pest Manag, 2011; 2(1):G1–G7; doi: 10.1603/IPM10010
LangilleAB, ArtecaEM, NewmanJA. The impacts of climate change on the abundance and distribution of the Spotted Wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) in the United States and Canada. PeerJ, 2017; 5:e3192; doi: 10.7717/peerj.3192
9.
AtallahJ, TeixeiraL, SalazarR, et al.The making of a pest: The evolution of a fruit-penetrating ovipositor in Drosophila suzukii and related species. Proc Biol Sci, 2014; 281(1781):20132840; doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2840
10.
IoriattiC, WaltonV, DaltonD, et al.Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) and its potential impact to wine grapes during harvest in two cool climate wine grape production regions. J Econ Entomol, 2015; 108(3):1148–1155; doi: 10.1093/jee/tov042
11.
KnappL, MazziD, FingerR. The economic impact of Drosophila suzukii: Perceived costs and revenue losses of Swiss cherry, plum and grape growers. Pest Manag Sci, 2021; 77(2):978–1000; doi: 10.1002/ps.6110
12.
LeeJC, BruckDJ, DrevesAJ, et al.In Focus: Spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii, across perspectives. Pest Manag Sci, 2011; 67(11):1349–1351; doi: 10.1002/ps.2271
13.
FarnsworthD, HambyKA, BoldaM, et al.Economic analysis of revenue losses and control costs associated with the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura), in the California raspberry industry. Pest Manag Sci, 2017; 73(6):1083–1090; doi: 10.1002/ps.4497
14.
ScheteligMF, LeeK-Z, OttoS, et al.Environmentally sustainable pest control options for Drosophila suzukii. J Applied Entomology, 2018; 142(1–2):3–17; doi: 10.1111/jen.12469
15.
DurmazD. Predicted economic impact of adopting a growing degree day model to manage Spotted Wing Drosophila (SWD) in. Tart Cherry Production in Michigan, 2023.
16.
DrummondF, BallmanE, CollinsJ. Population dynamics of spotted wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura)) in Maine wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton). Insects, 2019; 10(7):205; doi: 10.3390/insects10070205
17.
TaitG, MermerS, StocktonD, et al.Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae): A decade of research towards a sustainable integrated pest management program. J Econ Entomol, 2021; 114(5):1950–1974; doi: 10.1093/jee/toab158
18.
NikolouliK, SassùF, MoutonL, et al.Combining sterile and incompatible insect techniques for the population suppression of Drosophila suzukii. J Pest Sci (2004), 2020; 93(2):647–661; doi: 10.1007/s10340-020-01199-6
19.
LutratC, GiesbrechtD, MaroisE, et al.Sex sorting for pest control: It’s raining men!. Trends Parasitol, 2019; 35(8):649–662; doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2019.06.001
20.
PapathanosPA, BossinHC, BenedictMQ, et al.Sex separation strategies: Past experience and new approaches. Malar J, 2009; 8(Suppl 2):S5; doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-S2-S5
21.
CaceresC. Mass rearing of temperature sensitive genetic sexing strains in the Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata). Genetica, 2002; 116(1):107–116; doi: 10.1023/a:1020967810703
22.
FranzG, GenchevaE, KerremansP. Improved stability of genetic sex-separation strains for the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. Genome, 1994; 37(1):72–82; doi: 10.1139/g94-009
23.
BeebeNW, PagendamD, TrewinBJ, et al.Releasing incompatible males drives strong suppression across populations of wild and Wolbachia-carrying Aedes aegypti in Australia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2021; 118(41):e2106828118; doi: 10.1073/pnas.2106828118
24.
AsadiR, ElainiR, LacroixR, et al.Preventative releases of self-limiting Ceratitis capitata provide pest suppression and protect fruit quality in outdoor netted cages. Int J Pest Manage, 2020; 66(2):182–193; doi: 10.1080/09670874.2019.1601293
25.
McInnisDO, TamS, GraceC, et al.Population suppression and sterility rates induced by variable sex ratio, sterile insect releases of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii. Ann Entomol Soc Am, 1994; 87(2):231–240; doi: 10.1093/aesa/87.2.231
26.
CayolJP, CausseR, LouisC, et al.Medfly Ceratitis capitata Wiedemann (Dipt., Trypetidae) as a rot vector in laboratory conditions. J Applied Entomology, 1994; 117(1–5):338–343; doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1994.tb00744.x
27.
NguyenTNM, ChooA, BaxterSW. Lessons from Drosophila: Engineering genetic sexing strains with temperature-sensitive lethality for sterile insect technique applications. Insects, 2021; 12(3):243; doi: 10.3390/insects12030243
28.
PapathanosPA, BourtzisK, TripetF, et al.A perspective on the need and current status of efficient sex separation methods for mosquito genetic control. Parasit Vectors, 2018; 11(Suppl 2):654; doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3222-9
29.
CrawfordJE, ClarkeDW, CriswellV, et al.Efficient production of male Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes enables large-scale suppression of wild populations. Nat Biotechnol, 2020; 38(4):482–492; doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0471-x
30.
KandulNP, LiuJ, BuchmanA, et al.Precision guided sterile males suppress populations of an invasive crop pest. GEN Biotechnology, 2022; 1(4):372–385; doi: 10.1089/genbio.2022.0019
31.
McCombsSD, SaulSH. Translocation-based genetic sexing system for the oriental fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on pupal color dimorphism. Ann Entomol Soc Am, 1995; 88(5):695–698; doi: 10.1093/aesa/88.5.695
32.
McInnisDO, TamS, LimR, et al.Development of a pupal color-based genetic sexing strain of the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae). an, 2004; 97(5):1026–1033; doi: 10.1603/0013-8746(2004)097[1026:doapcg]2.0.co;2
33.
MezaJS, BourtzisK, ZacharopoulouA, et al.Development and characterization of a pupal-colour based genetic sexing strain of Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 (Diptera: Tephritidae). BMC Genet, 2020; 21(Suppl 2):134; doi: 10.1186/s12863-020-00932-5
34.
FranzG, KerremansP. Requirements and strategies for the development of genetic sex separation systems with special reference to the mediterranean fruit fly ceratitis capitata. In: Fruit Flies and the Sterile Insect Technique. CRC Press; 2019; pp. 113–122; doi: 10.1201/9781351072168-9
35.
WillhoeftU, FranzG, McInnisDO. Towards the application of genetic sexing in Tephritid fruit fly SIT programs. In: Fruit Fly Pests. CRC Press;. 2020; pp. 179–184; doi: 10.1201/9780367812430-29
36.
FranzG, BourtzisK, CáceresC. Practical and operational genetic sexing systems based on classical genetic approaches in fruit flies, an example for other species amenable to large-scale rearing for the sterile insect technique. In: Sterile Insect Technique. CRC Press: Boca Raton; 2021; pp. 575–604; doi: 10.1201/9781003035572-17
37.
MezaJS, ScheteligMF, Zepeda-CisnerosCS, et al.Male-specific Y-linked transgene markers to enhance biologically-based control of the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens(Diptera: Tephritidae). BMC Genet, 2014; 15(Suppl 2):S4–S7; doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-S2-S4
38.
CondonKC, CondonGC, Dafa’allaTH, et al.Genetic sexing through the use of Y-linked transgenes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2007; 37(11):1168–1176; doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.07.006
39.
WardCM, AumannRA, WhiteheadMA, et al.White pupae phenotype of tephritids is caused by parallel mutations of a MFS transporter. Nat Commun, 2021; 12(1):491; doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20680-5
40.
Anonymous. Current Control Methods for the Mediterranean Fruit Fly, Ceratitis Capitata, and Their Application in the USA. n.d.
41.
AugustinosAA, TargovskaA, Cancio-MartinezE, et al.Ceratitis capitata genetic sexing strains: Laboratory evaluation of strains from mass‐rearing facilities worldwide. Entomologia Exp Applicata, 2017; 164(3):305–317; doi: 10.1111/eea.12612
42.
FocksDA. An improved separator for the developmental stages, sexes, and species of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol, 1980; 17(6):567–568; doi: 10.1093/jmedent/17.6.567
43.
YamadaH, BenedictMQ, MalcolmCA, et al.Genetic sex separation of the malaria vector, Anopheles arabiensis, by exposing eggs to dieldrin. Malar J, 2012; 11(1):208; doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-208
44.
FranzG. Recombination between homologous autosomes in medfly (Ceratitis capitata) males: Type-1 recombination and the implications for the stability of genetic sexing strains. Genetica, 2002; 116(1):73–84; doi: 10.1023/a:1020911725724
45.
FuG, CondonKC, EptonMJ, et al.Female-specific insect lethality engineered using alternative splicing. Nat Biotechnol, 2007; 25(3):353–357; doi: 10.1038/nbt1283
46.
HeinrichJC, ScottMJ. A repressible female-specific lethal genetic system for making transgenic insect strains suitable for a sterile-release program. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2000; 97(15):8229–8232; doi: 10.1073/pnas.140142697
47.
KandulNP, LiuJ, HsuAD, et al.A drug-inducible sex-separation technique for insects. Nat Commun, 2020; 11(1):2106; doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16020-2
48.
OgaugwuCE, ScheteligMF, WimmerEA. Transgenic sexing system for Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on female-specific embryonic lethality. Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2013; 43(1):1–8; doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2012.10.010
49.
ScheteligMF, SchwirzJ, YanY. A transgenic female killing system for the genetic control of Drosophila suzukii. Sci Rep, 2021; 11(1):12938; doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91938-1
50.
LiF, YamamotoA, BelikoffEJ, et al.A conditional female lethal system for genetic suppression of the global fruit crop pest Drosophila suzukii. Pest Manag Sci, 2021; 77(11):4915–4922; doi: 10.1002/ps.6530
51.
ScheteligMF, HandlerAM. A transgenic embryonic sexing system for Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2012; 42(10):790–795; doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2012.07.007
52.
YanY, ScottMJ. A transgenic embryonic sexing system for the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina. Sci Rep, 2015; 5(1):16090; doi: 10.1038/srep16090
53.
ZehJA, BonillaMM, AdrianAJ, et al.From father to son: Transgenerational effect of tetracycline on sperm viability. Sci Rep, 2012; 2(1):375; doi: 10.1038/srep00375
54.
ChatzispyrouIA, HeldNM, MouchiroudL, et al.Tetracycline antibiotics impair mitochondrial function and its experimental use confounds research. Cancer Res, 2015; 75(21):4446–4449; doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1626
55.
WangX, RyuD, HoutkooperRH, et al.Antibiotic use and abuse: A threat to mitochondria and chloroplasts with impact on research, health, and environment. Bioessays, 2015; 37(10):1045–1053; doi: 10.1002/bies.201500071
56.
CatterucciaF, BentonJP, CrisantiA. An anopheles transgenic sexing strain for vector control. Nat Biotechnol, 2005; 23(11):1414–1417; doi: 10.1038/nbt1152
57.
ScheteligMF, HandlerAM. Y-Linked markers for improved population control of the tephritid fruit fly pest, anastrepha suspensa. In: Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/biotechnology Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg; 2013; pp. 123–133; doi: 10.1007/10_2013_209
58.
BernardiniF, GaliziR, MenichelliM, et al.Site-specific genetic engineering of the Anopheles gambiae Y chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014; 111(21):7600–7605; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404996111
59.
WengS-C, AntoshechkinI, MaroisE, et al.Efficient sex separation by exploiting differential alternative splicing of a dominant marker in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Genet, 2023; 19(11):e1011065; doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011065
60.
LiuJ, RayesD, AkbariOS. A fluorescent sex-sorting technique for insects with the demonstration in Drosophila melanogaster. GEN Biotechnol, 2024; 3(1):35–44; doi: 10.1089/genbio.2023.0041
61.
DavydovaS, LiuJ, KandulNP, et al.Next-generation genetic sexing strain establishment in the agricultural pest Ceratitis capitata. Sci Rep, 2023; 13(1):19866; doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47276-5
62.
WengS-C, ChenF, LiM, et al.Establishing a dominant early larval sex-selection strain in the Asian malaria vector Anopheles stephensi. Infect Dis Poverty, 2024; 13(1):83; doi: 10.1186/s40249-024-01256-7
63.
HandlerAM. Use of the piggyBac transposon for germ-line transformation of insects. Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2002; 32(10):1211–1220; doi: 10.1016/s0965-1748(02)00084-x
64.
HodgkinJ. Faculty opinions recommendation of the transformer gene in ceratitis capitata provides a genetic basis for selecting and remembering the sexual fate. Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature, 2002; doi: 10.3410/f.1001642.116658
65.
SalveminiM, RobertsonM, AronsonB, et al.Ceratitis capitata transformer-2 gene is required to establish and maintain the autoregulation of Cctra, the master gene for female sex determination. Int J Dev Biol, 2009; 53(1):109–120; doi: 10.1387/ijdb.082681ms
66.
BoppD, SacconeG, BeyeM. Sex determination in insects: Variations on a common theme. Sex Dev, 2014; 8(1–3):20–28; doi: 10.1159/000356458
67.
GilbertSF. Chromosomal Sex Determination in Drosophila. Sinauer Associates; 2000.
68.
RideoutEJ, NarsaiyaMS, GrewalSS. The sex determination gene transformer regulates male-female differences in drosophila body size. PLoS Genet, 2015; 11(12):e1005683; doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005683
69.
MeccarielloA, SalveminiM, PrimoP, et al.Maleness-on-the-Y (MoY) orchestrates male sex determination in major agricultural fruit fly pests. Science, 2019; 365(6460):1457–1460; doi: 10.1126/science.aax1318
70.
PaneA, SalveminiM, Delli BoviP, et al.The transformer gene in Ceratitis capitata provides a genetic basis for selecting and remembering the sexual fate. Development, 2002; 129(15):3715–3725; doi: 10.1242/dev.129.15.3715
71.
RuizMF, MilanoA, SalveminiM, et al.The gene transformer of anastrepha fruit flies (Diptera, tephritidae) and its evolution in insects. PLoS One, 2007; 2(11):e1239; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001239
72.
BoggsRT, GregorP, IdrissS, et al.Regulation of sexual differentiation in D. Melanogaster via alternative splicing of RNA from the transformer gene. Cell, 1987; 50(5):739–747; doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90332-1
73.
PenalvaLOF, SánchezL. RNA binding protein sex-lethal (Sxl) and control of Drosophila sex determination and dosage compensation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 2003; 67(3):343–359, table of contents; doi: 10.1128/MMBR.67.3.343-359.2003
74.
PrimoP, MeccarielloA, InghilterraMG, et al.Targeting the autosomal Ceratitis capitata transformer gene using Cas9 or dCas9 to masculinize XX individuals without inducing mutations. BMC Genet, 2020; 21(Suppl 2):150; doi: 10.1186/s12863-020-00941-4
75.
PaneA, De SimoneA, SacconeG, et al.Evolutionary conservation of Ceratitis capitata transformer gene function. Genetics, 2005; 171(2):615–624; doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.041004
76.
SacconeG, PelusoI, ArtiacoD, et al.The ceratitis capitata homologue of the drosophila sex-determining gene sex-lethal is structurally conserved, but not sex-specifically regulated. Development, 1998; 125(8):1495–1500; doi: 10.1242/dev.125.8.1495
77.
SilichevaM, GolovninA, PomerantsevaE, et al.Drosophila mini-white model system: New insights into positive position effects and the role of transcriptional terminators and gypsy insulator in transgene shielding. Nucleic Acids Res, 2010; 38(1):39–47; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp877
78.
PengW, ZhengW, HandlerAM, et al.The role of the transformer gene in sex determination and reproduction in the tephritid fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel). Genetica, 2015; 143(6):717–727; doi: 10.1007/s10709-015-9869-7
79.
AckermannR, BrackC. A strong ubiquitous promoter-enhancer for development and aging of Drosophila melanogaster. Nucleic Acids Res, 1996; 24(12):2452–2453; doi: 10.1093/nar/24.12.2452
80.
FurlongEE, ProfittD, ScottMP. Automated sorting of live transgenic embryos. Nat Biotechnol, 2001; 19(2):153–156; doi: 10.1038/84422
81.
FisherK, CaceresC. A Filter Rearing System for Mass Reared Genetic Sexing Strains of Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Springer: Malaysia; 2000.
82.
CaceresC. Filter rearing system for sterile insect technology. In: Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht; 2005; pp. 838–838; doi: 10.1007/0-306-48380-7_1619
83.
AketarawongN, IsasawinS, LaohakieatK, et al.Genetic stability, genetic variation, and fitness performance of the genetic sexing Salaya1 strain for Bactrocera dorsalis, under long-term mass rearing conditions. BMC Genet, 2020; 21(Suppl 2):131; doi: 10.1186/s12863-020-00933-4
PagendamDE, TrewinBJ, SnoadN, et al.Modelling the Wolbachia incompatible insect technique: Strategies for effective mosquito population elimination. BMC Biol, 2020; 18(1):161; doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00887-0
86.
DumontY, Yatat-DjeumenIV. Sterile insect technique with accidental releases of sterile females. Impact on mosquito-borne diseases control when viruses are circulating. Math Biosci, 2022; 343:108724; doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2021.108724
87.
MirieriCK, MutikaGN, BrunoJ, et al.A new automated chilled adult release system for the aerial distribution of sterile male tsetse flies. PLoS One, 2020; 15(9):e0232306; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232306
88.
LiM, YangT, BuiM, et al.Suppressing mosquito populations with precision guided sterile males. Nat Commun, 2021; 12(1):5374; doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25421-w
89.
ScheteligMF, TargovskaA, MezaJS, et al.Tetracycline-suppressible female lethality and sterility in the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens. Insect Mol Biol, 2016; 25(4):500–508; doi: 10.1111/imb.12238
90.
ChuF-C, KlobasaW, GrubbsN, et al.Development and use of a piggyBac-based jumpstarter system in Drosophila suzukii. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol, 2018; 97(3); doi: 10.1002/arch.21439
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
