Nondigital board games are being used to engage players and impact outcomes in health and medicine across diverse populations and contexts. This systematic review and meta-analysis describes and summarizes their impact based on randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials. An electronic search resulted in a review of n = 21 eligible studies. Sample sizes ranged from n = 17 to n = 3110 (n = 6554 total participants). A majority of the board game interventions focused on education to increase health-related knowledge and behaviors (76%, n = 16). Outcomes evaluated included self-efficacy, attitudes/beliefs, biological health indicators, social functioning, anxiety, and executive functioning, in addition to knowledge and behaviors. Using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing bias, most studies (52%, n = 11) had an unclear risk of bias (33% [n = 7] had a high risk and 14% [n = 3] had a low risk). Statistical tests of publication bias were not significant. A random-effects meta-analysis showed a large average effect of board games on health-related knowledge (d* = 0.82, 95% confidence interval; CI [0.15–1.48]), a small-to-moderate effect on behaviors (d* = 0.33, 95% CI [0.16–0.51]), and a small-to-moderate effect on biological health indicators (d* = 0.37, 95% CI [0.21–0.52]). The findings contribute to the literature on games and gamified approaches in healthcare. Future research efforts should aim for more consistent high scientific standards in their evaluation protocols and reporting methodologies to provide a stronger evidence base.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
annettaLA.“the ‘i's’ have it: a framework for serious educational game design”: correction to annetta (2010). rev gen psychol, 2010; 14:105–112.
2.
BaranowskiT, BudayR, ThompsonDI, BaranowskiJ. Playing for real. Video games and stories for health-related behavior change. Am J Prev Med, 2008; 34:74–82.e10.
3.
DeSmetA, Van CleemputK, BastiaensensS, et al.Bridging behavior science and gaming theory: Using the Intervention Mapping Protocol to design a serious game against cyberbullying. Comput Human Behav, 2016; 56:337–351.
4.
KatoPM.Video games in health care: Closing the gap. Rev Gen Psychol, 2010; 14:113–121.
5.
KhazaalY, ChattonA, DiebenK, et al.Reducing delusional conviction through a cognitive-based group training game: A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Front Psychiatry, 2015; 6:1–10.
6.
MerrySN, StasiakK, ShepherdM, et al.The effectiveness of SPARX, a computerised self help intervention for adolescents seeking help for depression: Randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. BMJ, 2012; 344:1–16.
7.
Cardoso-LeiteP, BavelierD. Video game play, attention, and learning. Curr Opin Neurol, 2014; 27:185–191.
8.
BoyleEA, ConnollyTM, HaineyT, BoyleJM. Engagement in digital entertainment games: A systematic review. Comput Human Behav, 2012; 28:771–780.
9.
KappKM.The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-Based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2012. 336 p.
10.
LuAS, BaranowskiT, ThompsonD, BudayR. Story immersion of videogames for youth health promotion: A review of literature. Games Health J, 2012; 1:199–204.
SardoneNB, Devlin-SchererR. Let the (board) games begin: Creative ways to enhance teaching and learning. Clear House A J Educ Strateg Issues Ideas, 2016; 89:215–222.
13.
BrattonSC, RayD, RhineT, JonesL. The efficacy of play therapy with children: A meta-analytic review of treatment outcomes. Prof Psychol Res Pract, 2005; 36:376–390.
14.
NickersonET, O'LaughlinKB. It's fun—But will it work?: The use of games as a therapeutic medium for children and adolescents. J Clin Child Psychol, 1980; 9:78–81.
15.
WildeJ.The effects of the Let's Get Rational board game on rational thinking, depression, and self-acceptance in adolescents. J Ration Cogn Ther, 1994; 12:189–196.
16.
BochennekK, WittekindtB, ZimmermannS-Y, KlingebielT. More than mere games: A review of card and board games for medical education. Med Teach, 2007; 29:941–948.
17.
AklEA, PretoriusRW, SackettK, et al.The effect of educational games on medical students' learning outcomes: A systematic review: BEME Guide No 14. Med Teach, 2010; 32:16–27.
18.
BlakelyG, SkirtonH, CooperS, et al.Educational gaming in the health sciences: Systematic review. J Adv Nurs, 2009; 65:259–269.
19.
WanyamaJN, CastelnuovoB, RobertsonG, et al.A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a board game on patients' knowledge uptake of HIV and sexually transmitted diseases at the Infectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 2012; 59:253–258.
20.
ViggianoA, ViggianoE, Di CostanzoA, et al.Kaledo, a board game for nutrition education of children and adolescents at school: Cluster randomized controlled trial of healthy lifestyle promotion. Eur J Pediatr, 2015; 174:217–228.
21.
CrawfordP, WiltzS. Participation in the journey to life conversation map improves control of hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia. J Am Board Fam Med, 2015; 28:767–771.
22.
LiberatiA, AltmanDG, TetzlaffJ, et al.The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med, 2009; 6:1–27.
23.
MoherD, LiberatiA, TetzlaffJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 2009; 6:1–6.
BiernackiP, WaldorfD. Snowball Sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociol Methods Res, 1981; 10:141–163.
26.
CohenJ.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1977.
27.
BorensteinM, HedgesLV, HigginsJPT, RothsteinHR. Converting among effect sizes. In: Introduction to Meta-Analysis, 2009, pp. 45–49.
28.
HigginsJPT, GreenS, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. v. 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. www.handbook.cochrane.org (accesed November 1, 2017).
29.
CooperH, HedgesLV, ValentineJC, eds. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009, 632 p.
30.
BorensteinM, HedgesLV, HigginsJPT, RothsteinHR. When does it make sense to perform a meta-analysis? In: Introduction to Meta-Analysis, 2009, pp. 357–364.
31.
CharlierN, De FraineB.Games based learning as a vehicle to teach new content: A case study. Proceedings of European Conference on Games Based Learning, 2010, pp. 40–46.
32.
CharlierN, De FraineB. Game-based learning as a vehicle to teach first aid content: A randomized experiment. J Sch Health, 2013; 83:493–499.
33.
AmaroS, ViggianoA, Di CostanzoA, et al.Kalèdo, a new educational board-game, gives nutritional rudiments and encourages healthy eating in children: A pilot cluster randomized trial. Eur J Pediatr, 2006; 165:630–635.
34.
CzuchryM, SiaTL, DansereauDF. Preventing alcohol abuse: An examination of the “Downward Spiral” game and educational videos. J Drug Educ, 1999; 29:323–335.
35.
FernandesSC, ArriagaP, EstevesF. Providing preoperative information for children undergoing surgery: A randomized study testing different types of educational material to reduce children's preoperative worries. Health Educ Res, 2014; 29:1058–1076.
36.
LennonJL, CoombsDW. The utility of a board game for dengue haemorrhagic fever health education. Health Educ, 2007; 107:290–306.
37.
UdinRD, KusterCG. A board game for sensitizing dental students to children with special needs. J Dent Educ, 1985; 49:111–114.
38.
MoyerJA, NelsonDL. Replication and resynthesis of an occupationally embedded exercise with adult rehabilitation patients. Isr Soc Occup Ther, 1998; 7:E57–E73.
39.
TorresA, MendezLP, MerinoH, MoranEA. Improving social functioning in schizophrenia by playing the train game. Psychiatr Serv, 2002; 53:799–801.
40.
FisslerP, KüsterO, SchleeW, KolassaI-T. Novelty interventions to enhance broad cognitive abilities and prevent dementia. Prog Brain Res, 2013; 207:403–434.
41.
OkitikaTA, BarnabasRV, RueT, et al.“Polio Eradication” game may increase public interest in global health. Games Heal], 2015; 4:195–201.
42.
BurghardtKJ, BowmanMR, HibinoM, et al.Using educational games to promote the seeking of a pharmacist and to teach key medication use messages: Results from an inner city health party. Res Soc Adm Pharm, 2013; 9:542–552.
43.
KhazaalY, ChattonA, PrezzemoloR, et al.Impact of a board-game approach on current smokers: A randomized controlled trial. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy, 2013; 8:3.
44.
AnyanwuEG.Anatomy adventure: A board game for enhancing understanding of anatomy. Anat Sci Educ, 2014; 7:153–160.
45.
MaclachlanM, ChimomboM, MpembaN. AIDS education for youth through active learning: A school-based approach from Malawi. International Journal of Educational Development, 1997; 17:41–50.
46.
McKayRB, LevineDM, BoneLR. Community organization in a school health education program to reduce sodium consumption. J Sch Health, 1985; 55:364–366.
47.
BartfayWJ, BartfayE. Promoting Health in Schools through a Board Game. West J Nurs Res, 1994; 16:438–446.
48.
OgunsileS, OgundeleB. Effect of game-enhanced nutrition education on knowledge, attitude and practice of healthy eating among adolescents in Ibadan, Nigeria. Int J Heal, 2016; 5240:1–10.
49.
SwiderskaN, ThomasonE, HartA, ShawBN. Randomised controlled trial of the use of an educational board game in neonatology. Med Teach, 2013; 35:413–415.
50.
BanduraA.Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol, 2001; 52:1–26.
51.
ConnollyTM, BoyleEA, MacArthurE, et al.A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Comput Educ, 2012; 59:661–686.
52.
SitzmannT.A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Pers Psychol, 2011; 64:489–528.
53.
ClarkDB, Tanner-SmithEE, KillingsworthSS. Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res, 2016; 86:79–122.
54.
WoutersP, van NimwegenC, van OostendorpH, van der SpekED. A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. J Educ Psychol, 2013; 105:249–265.
55.
LauHM, SmitJH, FlemingTM, RiperH. Serious games for mental health: Are they accessible, feasible, and effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychiatry, 2017; 7:13.
56.
CharlierN, ZupancicN, FieuwsS, et al.Serious games for improving knowledge and self-management in young people with chronic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Informatics Assoc, 2015; 23:230–239.
57.
BrennerPS, DeLamaterJD. Social desirability bias in self-reports of physical activity: Is an exercise identity the culprit?. Soc Indic Res, 2014; 117:489–504.
58.
KlesgesLM, BaranowskiT, BeechB, et al.Social desirability bias in self-reported dietary, physical activity and weight concerns measures in 8- to 10-year-old African-American girls: results from the Girls health Enrichment Multisite Studies (GEMS). Prev Med (Baltim), 2004; 38(suppl.):78–87.
59.
GaoZ, ChenS, PascoD, PopeZ. A meta-analysis of active video games on health outcomes among children and adolescents. Obes Rev, 2015; 16:783–794.
60.
VogelJJ, VogelDS, Cannon-BowersJ, et al.Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. J Educ Comput Res, 2006; 34:229–243.
61.
ChengS, ChanACM, YuECS. An exploratory study of the effect of Mahjong on the cognitive functioning of persons with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2006; 21:611–617.
ChengS-T, ChowPK, SongY-Q, et al.Mental and physical activities delay cognitive decline in older persons with dementia. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2014; 22:63–74.
64.
BaranowskiT, BlumbergF, BudayR, et al.Games for health for children—Current status and needed research. Games Health J, 2016; 5:1–12.
65.
Roediger IIIHL, ButlerAC. The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends Cogn Sci, 2011; 15:20–27.
66.
Roediger IIIHL, AgarwalPK, McDanielMA, McDermottKB. Test-enhanced learning in the classroom: Long-term improvements from quizzing. J Exp Psychol Appl, 2011; 17:382–395.
67.
ArnabS, LimT, CarvalhoMB, et al.Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. Br J Educ Technol, 2015; 46:391–411.
68.
CarvalhoMB, BellottiF, BertaR, et al.An activity theory-based model for serious games analysis and conceptual design. Comput Educ, 2015; 87:166–181.
69.
GirardC, EcalleJ, MagnanA. Serious games as new educational tools: How effective are they? A meta-analysis of recent studies. J Comput Assist Learn, 2013; 29:207–219.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
