This study explored the perceptions of seniors who play digital games on the potential benefits of these games and on the factors associated with these perceptions.
Materials and Methods:
We developed and administered a questionnaire to a sample of 590 Canadian seniors in British Columbia and Quebec that addressed demographics, digital game practices, and perceived benefits.
Results:
Results of administering the questionnaire showed that cognitive benefits were reported more frequently than social or psychological benefits. First language and gender were associated with the benefits reported, with fewer Francophones and women reporting benefits. The most important factor found was whether or not they played online, as playing online was associated with greater perceptions of social, as well as cognitive, benefits.
Conclusion:
Social and cognitive benefits are reported by seniors from playing digital games and should be investigated through future experimental and quasi-experimental research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
NouchiR, TakiY, TakeuchiH, et al.Brain training game improves executive functions and processing speed in the elderly: A randomized controlled trial. PLos One, 2012; 7:1–9.
2.
MillerKJ, DyeRV, KimJ, et al.Effect of a computerized brain exercise program on cognitive performance in older adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2013; 21:655–663.
3.
MayasJ, ParmentierFBR, AndrésP, BallesterosS. Plasticity of attentional functions in older adults after non-action video game training: A randomized controlled trial. PLos One, 2014; 9:e92269.
4.
AngueraJA, BoccanfusoJ, RintoulJ, et al.Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature, 2013; 501:97–101.
5.
BootWR, ChampionM, BlakelyDP, et al.Video games as a means to reduce age-related cognitive decline: Attitudes, compliance, and effectiveness. Front Psychol, 2013; 4:1–9.
6.
BallesterosS, MayasJ, PrietoA, et al.A randomized controlled trial of brain training with non-action video games in older adults: Results of the 3-month follow-up. Front Aging Neurosci, 2015; 7:1–12.
7.
BelchiorP, MarsiskeM, SiscoSM, et al.Video game training to improve selective visual attention in older adults. Comput Human Behav, 2013; 29:1318–1324.
8.
WhitlockLA, McLaughlinAC, AllaireJC. Individual differences in response to cognitive training: Using a multi-modal, attentionally demanding game-based intervention for older adults. Comput Human Behav, 2012; 28:1091–1096.
9.
WolinskyFD, Vander WegMW, HowrenMB, et al.A randomized controlled trial of cognitive training using a visual speed of processing intervention in middle aged and older adults. PLos One, 2013; 8:e61624.
10.
ChenS, HuangY, ChiangI. Using somatosensory video games to promote quality of life for the elderly with disabilities. In: DIGITEL, 2012: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society; 2012:258–262.
11.
MubinO, ShahidS, Al MahmudA.Walk 2 Win: Towards designing a mobile game for elderly's social engagement. In: BCS-HCI'08: Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction, Volume 2. Swinton, United Kingdom: British Computer Society; 2008:11–14.
12.
Al MahmudA., MubinO, ShahidS, MartensJB.Designing social games for children and older adults: Two related case studies. Entertain Comput, 2009; 1:147–156.
13.
SchellR, HausknechtS, ZhangF, KaufmanD. Social benefits of playing Wii Bowling for older adults. Games Cult, 2016; 11:81–103.
14.
SeahT-W.Understanding the learning and social gameplay experience of older adults playing a Bingo digital game (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Burnaby, BC, Canada: Simon Fraser University;. 2015. http://summit.sfu.ca/item/16066 (accessed January31, 2016).
15.
ZhangF, KaufmanD. The impacts of social interactions in MMORPGs on older adults' social capital. Comput Human Behav, 2015; 51:495–503.
16.
ZhangF, KaufmanD. Older adults' social interactions in massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGs). Games Cult, 2016; 11:150–169.
17.
KirmanB, BjörkS, DeterdingS, et al.Social game studies at CHI'11. In: CHI EA'11: Extended abstracts on human factors in computer systems. New York: ACM; 2011:17–20.
18.
CornejoR, HernandezD, FavelaJ, et al.Persuading older adults to socialize and exercise through ambient games. In: ICPTHW, 2012: Proceedings from 6th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops. Washington, DC: IEEE; 2012:215–218.
19.
AllaireJC, McLaughlinAN, TrujilloA, et al.Successful aging through digital games: Socioemotional differences between older adult gamers and non-gamers. Comput Human Behav, 2013; 29:1302–1306.
20.
RosenbergD, DeppCA, VahiaIV, et al.Exergames for subsyndromal depression in older adults: A pilot study of a novel intervention. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2010; 18:221–226.
21.
SauvéL, RenaudL, KaufmanD, DuplàaE.Validation of the educational games for seniors: Live well, live healthy!. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2015; 176:674–682.
22.
De SchutterB.Never too old to play: The appeal of digital games to an older audience. Games Cult, 2011; 6:155–170.
23.
De SchutterR, Vanden AbeeleA. Designing meaningful play within the psycho-social context of older adults. In: Fun Games '10: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Fun and Games. Leuven, Belgium: ACM; 2010: 84–93.
GamberiniL, AlcanizM, BarresiG, et al.Cognition, technology and games for the elderly: An introduction to the ELDERGAMES Project. Psychnology J, 2006; 4:285–308.
27.
JungY, LiK, JanissaN, et al.Games for a better life: Effect of playing Wii games on the well-being of seniors in a long-term care facility. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment. New York: ACM; 2009:1–6.
28.
KhooE, CheokA, NguyenT, PanZ. Age invaders: Social and physical inter-generational mixed reality family entertainment. Virtual Real, 2008; 12:3–16.
29.
WollersheimD, MerkesM, ShieldsN, et al.Physical and psychosocial effects of Wii video game use among older women. IJETS, 2010; 8:85–98.
30.
GamberiniL, AlcanizM, BarresiG, et al.Playing for a real bonus: Videogames to empower elderly people. J Cyber Ther Rehabil, 2008; 1:37–48.
31.
BuizaC, SoldatosJ, PetsatodisT, et al.HERMES: Pervasive computing and cognitive training for aging well. In: IWANN '09: Proceedings of the 10th International Wok Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Part II: Distributed Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Bioinformatics, Soft Computing, and Ambient Assisted Living. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2009:756–763.
32.
KaufmanD, SauvéL, RenaudL, et al.Digital gameplay by older adults: Patterns, benefits, and challenges. Simul Gaming, 2016; 47:475–489.
33.
SauvéL, RenaudL, KaufmanD, DuplàaE.Can digital games help seniors improve their quality of life? In: SvacekS, UhomoibhiJ, CostagliolaG, McLarenBM, eds., Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer-Supported Education, Vol. 2.Setúbal, Portugal: Science and Technology Publications; 2016:94–102.
34.
Statistics Canada. Rates of Internet Use, by Age Group, Selected Years. Ottawa, Canada; Statistics Canada; 2014.
BeaudoinJ, KooliN, ThomaF, et al.Génération @: Portrait de l'utilisation d'internet et de l'ordinateur par les aînés internautes du Québec [Generation @: Portrait of Internet and computer use by older web surfers in Quebec]. Quebec, QC: CEFRIO; 2007.
37.
SalthouseTA.The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol Rev, 2003; 3:403–428.
38.
MinassianHT, RufatS, CoavouxS, BerryV. Comment trouver son chemin dans les jeux vidéo? Pratiques et représentations spatiales des joueurs [How to find the way in a video game? Space practices and representations of players]. L'espace Géographique, 2011; 40:245–262.
