Abstract
This study examined how relative humidity affects the hourly PM2.5 readings of two collocated beta attenuation monitors in the field. Relationships between PM2.5 readings by a stationary beta gauge A and a portable beta gauge B were evaluated at various relative humidity (RH) setpoints and ambient RHs. The PM2.5 concentrations of two beta attenuation monitors were also compared with those of a collocated manual sampler. This work demonstrated that the mean PM2.5 concentrations by the beta gauge monitors with RHA and RHB (RH setpoint in beta gauge A and B) of 35% result in good agreement with those by the manual sampler. The PM2.5 readings of RHB of 35% correlated well with those 35% of RHA , whenever the inlet air of beta gauge B was conditioned with water vapor or the beta gauge was operated normally under ambient conditions. However, the PM2.5 readings of the beta gauge obtained at RH B=65% exceeded those obtained at RHA=35%. The mean PM2.5 readings for RH B65% to RHA = 35% were 1.91 and 1.26, with (ambient RH = 78.2–93.1%) and without (ambient RH = 61.3–77.1%) added water vapor in the inlet of the beta gauge, respectively. Experimental results demonstrated that the relative humidity markedly affected the beta gauge readings, especially at a high ambient RH. Accordingly, maintaining the RH setpoint of the beta attenuation monitor in an appropriate range for field monitoring is important.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
