Abstract
Bioethical institutions around the world have recently evolved from their emergence as a response to the societal challenges posed by advances in life sciences and biotechnology. Over the past quarter century, there has been a shift toward greater interdisciplinarity and inclusivity, incorporating social sciences and public engagement into institutional bioethical practice. In this perspective, I examine the UK’s Nuffield Council on Bioethics as a case study of critical interdisciplinarity, contrasting it with more instrumental normative approaches. I highlight the Nuffield Council’s commitment to autonomous ethical inquiry, the problematization of foundational assumptions, and the development of a public-facing “non-expert discourse of experts.” The challenges faced by this model—including deriving positive normative conclusions, generalizing from situated reflection, and the ambivalent relationship with policymaking—emphasize the need for a globally resonant and action-oriented ethics to guide powerful scientific developments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.