The advent of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based technologies has revolutionized genome editing, with continued interest in expanding the CRISPR-associated proteins (Cas) toolbox with diverse, efficient, and specific effectors. CRISPR-Cas12a is a potent, programmable RNA-guided dual nickase, broadly used for genome editing. Here, we mined dairy cow microbial metagenomes for CRISPR-Cas systems, unraveling novel Cas12a enzymes. Using in silico pipelines, we characterized and predicted key drivers of CRISPR-Cas12a activity, encompassing guides and protospacer adjacent motifs for five systems. We next assessed their functional potential in cell-free transcription-translation assays with GFP-based fluorescence readouts. Lastly, we determined their genome editing potential in vivo in Escherichia coli by generating 1 kb knockouts. Unexpectedly, we observed natural sequence variation in the bridge-helix domain of the best-performing candidate and used mutagenesis to alter the activity of Cas12a orthologs, resulting in increased gene editing capabilities of a relatively inefficient candidate. This study illustrates the potential of underexplored metagenomic sequence diversity for the development and refinement of genome editing effectors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarrangouR, FremauxC, DeveauH, et al.CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science, 2007; 315(5819):1709–1712; doi: 10.1126/science.1138140
2.
GasiunasG, BarrangouR, HorvathP, et al.Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2012; 109(39):E2579–E2586; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208507109
3.
JinekM, ChylinskiK, FonfaraI, et al.A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science, 2012; 337(6096):816–821; doi: 10.1126/science.1225829
4.
HsuPD, LanderES, ZhangF. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell, 2014; 157(6):1262–1278; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010
5.
ZhangXH, TeeLY, WangXG, et al.Off-target Effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Genome Engineering. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids, 2015; 4(11):e264; doi: 10.1038/mtna.2015.37
6.
RostainW, GrebertT, VyhovskyiD, et al.Cas9 off-target binding to the promoter of bacterial genes leads to silencing and toxicity. Nucleic Acids Res, 2023; 51(7):3485–3496; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad170
7.
MakarovaKS, WolfYI, IranzoJ, et al.Evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems: A burst of class 2 and derived variants. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2020; 18(2):67–83; doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0299-x
8.
KooninEV, GootenbergJS, AbudayyehOO. Discovery of diverse CRISPR-Cas systems and expansion of the genome engineering toolbox. Biochemistry, 2023; 62(24):3465–3487; doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.3c00159
9.
ZetscheB, GootenbergJS, AbudayyehOO, et al.Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell, 2015; 163(3):759–771; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038
10.
ZetscheB, AbudayyehOO, GootenbergJS, et al.A survey of genome editing activity for 16 Cas12a orthologs. Keio J Med, 2020; 69(3):59–65; doi: 10.2302/kjm.2019-0009-OA
11.
FonfaraI, RichterH, BratovičM, et al.The CRISPR-associated DNA-cleaving enzyme Cpf1 also processes precursor CRISPR RNA. Nature, 2016; 532(7600):517–521; doi: 10.1038/nature17945
ZetscheB, HeidenreichM, MohanrajuP, et al.Multiplex gene editing by CRISPR-Cpf1 using a single crRNA array. Nat Biotechnol, 2017; 35(1):31–34; doi: 10.1038/nbt.3737
14.
ZhangXC, WangJM, ChengQX, et al.Multiplex gene regulation by CRISPR-ddCpf1. Cell Discov, 2017; 3:17018; doi: 10.1038/celldisc.2017.18
15.
CampaCC, WeisbachNR, SantinhaAJ, et al.Multiplexed genome engineering by Cas12a and CRISPR arrays encoded on single transcripts. Nat Methods, 2019; 16(9):887–893; doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0508-6
16.
LiSY, ChengQX, LiuJK, et al.Author Correction: CRISPR-Cas12a has both cis- and trans-cleavage activities on single-stranded DNA. Cell Res, 2024; 34(3):266–267; doi: 10.1038/s41422-024-00927-2
17.
ChenP, ZhouJ, WanY, et al.A Cas12a ortholog with stringent PAM recognition followed by low off-target editing rates for genome editing. Genome Biol, 2020; 21(1):78; doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-01989-2
18.
YanWX, HunnewellP, AlfonseLE, et al.Functionally diverse type V CRISPR-Cas systems. Science, 2019; 363(6422):88–91; doi: 10.1126/science.aav7271
19.
MuruganK, SeetharamAS, SeverinAJ, et al.CRISPR-Cas12a has widespread off-target and dsDNA-nicking effects. J Biol Chem, 2020; 295(17):5538–5553; doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.012933
20.
FuBXH, SmithJD, FuchsRT, et al.Target-dependent nickase activities of the CRISPR-Cas nucleases Cpf1 and Cas9. Nat Microbiol, 2019; 4(5):888–897; doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0382-0
GootenbergJS, AbudayyehOO, KellnerMJ, et al.Multiplexed and portable nucleic acid detection platform with Cas13, Cas12a, and Csm6. Science, 2018; 360(6387):439–444; doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0179
23.
BroughtonJP, DengX, YuG, et al.CRISPR-Cas12-based detection of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Biotechnol, 2020; 38(7):870–874; doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0513-4
24.
YamanoT, NishimasuH, ZetscheB, et al.Crystal structure of Cpf1 in complex with guide RNA and Target DNA. Cell, 2016; 165(4):949–962; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.003
25.
DongD, RenK, QiuX, et al.The crystal structure of Cpf1 in complex with CRISPR RNA. Nature, 2016; 532(7600):522–526; doi: 10.1038/nature17944
26.
CofskyJC, KarandurD, HuangCJ, et al.CRISPR-Cas12a exploits R-loop asymmetry to form double-strand breaks. Elife, 2020; 9; doi: 10.7554/eLife.55143
27.
WörleE, JakobL, SchmidbauerA, et al.Decoupling the bridge helix of Cas12a results in a reduced trimming activity, increased mismatch sensitivity and impaired conformational transitions. Nucleic Acids Res, 2021; 49(9):5278–5293; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab286
28.
BabuK, AmraniN, JiangW, et al.Bridge helix of Cas9 modulates target DNA cleavage and mismatch tolerance. Biochemistry, 2019; 58(14):1905–1917; doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b01241
29.
BabuK, KathiresanV, KumariP, et al.Coordinated actions of Cas9 HNH and RuvC nuclease domains are regulated by the bridge helix and the Target DNA sequence. Biochemistry, 2021; 60(49):3783–3800; doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00354
30.
ParameshwaranHP, BabuK, TranC, et al.The bridge helix of Cas12a imparts selectivity in cis-DNA cleavage and regulates trans-DNA cleavage. FEBS Lett, 2021; 595(7):892–912; doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.14051
31.
MaE, ChenK, ShiHL, et al.Improved genome editing by an engineered CRISPR-Cas12a. Nucleic Acids Res, 2022; 50(22):12689–12701; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1192
32.
HuangH, HuangG, TanZ, et al.Engineered Cas12a-Plus nuclease enables gene editing with enhanced activity and specificity. BMC Biol, 2022; 20(1):91; doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01296-1
33.
RaftopoulouO, BarrangouR. Mining microbial organisms to discover and characterize novel CRISPR-Cas systems. Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering, 2023; 27:100469; doi: 10.1016/j.cobme.2023.100469
34.
BravoJPK, HallmarkT, NaegleB, et al.RNA targeting unleashes indiscriminate nuclease activity of CRISPR-Cas12a2. Nature, 2023; 613(7944):582–587; doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05560-w
35.
DmytrenkoO, NeumannGC, HallmarkT, et al.Cas12a2 elicits abortive infection through RNA-triggered destruction of dsDNA.
36.
Betancur-MurilloCL, Aguilar-MarínSB, JovelJ. Prevotella: A key player in ruminal metabolism. Microorganisms, 2022; 11(1); doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11010001
37.
StewartRD, AuffretMD, WarrA, et al.Compendium of 4,941 rumen metagenome-assembled genomes for rumen microbiome biology and enzyme discovery. Nat Biotechnol, 2019; 37(8):953–961; doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0202-3+,
38.
WilliamsonJR, CallawayTR, LourencoJM, et al.Characterization of rumen, fecal, and milk microbiota in lactating dairy cows. Front Microbiol, 2022; 13:984119; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.984119
39.
KimHS, KimDW, KimS, et al.Biochemical characterization of the two novel mgCas12a proteins from the human gut metagenome. Sci Rep, 2022; 12(1):20857; doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25227-w
40.
GoltsmanDSA, AlexanderLM, DevotoAE, et al.Novel type V-A CRISPR effectors are active nucleases with expanded targeting capabilities. Crispr J, 2020; 3(6):454–461; doi: 10.1089/crispr.2020.0043
PengY, LeungHC, YiuSM, et al.IDBA-UD: A de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics, 2012; 28(11):1420–1428; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174
43.
LangmeadB, SalzbergSL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods, 2012; 9(4):357–359; doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923
44.
NetheryMA, KorvinkM, MakarovaKS, et al.CRISPRclassify: Repeat-Based Classification of CRISPR Loci. Crispr J, 2021; 4(4):558–574; doi: 10.1089/crispr.2021.0021
45.
RusselJ, Pinilla-RedondoR, Mayo-MuñozD, et al.CRISPRCasTyper: Automated Identification, Annotation, and Classification of CRISPR-Cas Loci. Crispr J, 2020; 3(6):462–469; doi: 10.1089/crispr.2020.0059
JonesP, BinnsD, ChangHY, et al.InterProScan 5: Genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics, 2014; 30(9):1236–1240; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031
48.
BlumM, ChangHY, ChuguranskyS, et al.The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on. Nucleic Acids Res, 2021; 49(D1):D344–D354; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa977
49.
RouxS, EnaultF, HurwitzBL, et al.VirSorter: Mining viral signal from microbial genomic data. PeerJ, 2015; 3:e985; doi: 10.7717/peerj.985
50.
AltschulSF, GishW, MillerW, et al.Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol, 1990; 215(3):403–410.
51.
MenzelP, NgKL, KroghA. Fast and sensitive taxonomic classification for metagenomics with Kaiju. Nat Commun, 2016; 7:11257; doi: 10.1038/ncomms11257
52.
EdgarRC. Muscle5: High-accuracy alignment ensembles enable unbiased assessments of sequence homology and phylogeny. Nat Commun, 2022; 13(1):6968; doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34630-w
53.
LetunicI, BorkP. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res, 2021; 49(W1):W293–W296; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301
54.
GruberAR, LorenzR, BernhartSH, et al.The Vienna RNA websuite. Nucleic Acids Res, 2008; 36(Web Server issue):W70–W74; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn188
55.
LorenzR, BernhartSH, Höner Zu SiederdissenC, et al.ViennaRNA Package 2.0. Algorithms Mol Biol, 2011; 6:26; doi: 10.1186/1748-7188-6-26
56.
BienertS, WaterhouseA, de BeerTA, et al.The SWISS-MODEL Repository-new features and functionality. Nucleic Acids Res, 2017; 45(D1):D313–D319; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1132
57.
GuexN, PeitschMC, SchwedeT. Automated comparative protein structure modeling with SWISS-MODEL and Swiss-PdbViewer: A historical perspective. Electrophoresis, 2009; 30(Suppl 1):S162–S73; doi: 10.1002/elps.200900140
58.
WaterhouseA, BertoniM, BienertS, et al.SWISS-MODEL: Homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res, 2018; 46(W1):W296–W303; doi: 10.1093/nar/gky427
59.
MarshallR, MaxwellCS, CollinsSP, et al.Rapid and scalable characterization of CRISPR technologies using an e. coli cell-free transcription-translation system. Mol Cell, 2018; 69(1):146–157.e3; doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.12.007
60.
WanderaKG, CollinsSP, WimmerF, et al.An enhanced assay to characterize anti-CRISPR proteins using a cell-free transcription-translation system. Methods, 2020; 172:42–50; doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.05.014
61.
JacobsenT, TtofaliF, LiaoCY, et al.Characterization of Cas12a nucleases reveals diverse PAM profiles between closely-related orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res, 2020; 48(10):5624–5638; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa272
62.
MaxwellCS, JacobsenT, MarshallR, et al.A detailed cell-free transcription-translation-based assay to decipher CRISPR protospacer-adjacent motifs. Methods, 2018; 143:48–57; doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2018.02.016
63.
CollinsSP, RostainW, LiaoCY, et al.Sequence-independent RNA sensing and DNA targeting by a split domain CRISPR-Cas12a gRNA switch. Nucleic Acids Res, 2021; 49(5):2985–2999; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab100
64.
CostantinoN, CourtDL. Enhanced levels of lambda Red-mediated recombinants in mismatch repair mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2003; 100(26):15748–15753; doi: 10.1073/pnas.2434959100
65.
DatsenkoKA, WannerBL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000; 97(12):6640–6645; doi: 10.1073/pnas.120163297
66.
MillerMEB, YeomanCJ, ChiaN, et al.Phage-bacteria relationships and CRISPR elements revealed by a metagenomic survey of the rumen microbiome. Environmental Microbiology, 2012; 14(1):207–227; doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02593.x
67.
MonshizadehM, ZomorodiS, MortensenK, et al.Revealing bacteria-phage interactions in human microbiome through the CRISPR-Cas immune systems. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2022; 12:933516; doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.933516
BratovičM, FonfaraI, ChylinskiK, et al.Bridge helix arginines play a critical role in Cas9 sensitivity to mismatches. Nat Chem Biol, 2020; 16(5):587–595; doi: 10.1038/s41589-020-0490-4
70.
MeliawatiM, SchillingC, SchmidJ. Recent advances of Cas12a applications in bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2021; 105(8):2981–2990; doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11243-9
71.
MarraffiniLA, SontheimerEJ. CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA. Science, 2008; 322(5909):1843–1845; doi: 10.1126/science.1165771
72.
SapranauskasR, GasiunasG, FremauxC, et al.The Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR/Cas system provides immunity in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res, 2011; 39(21):9275–9282; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr606
73.
PyneME, BruderMR, Moo-YoungM, et al.Harnessing heterologous and endogenous CRISPR-Cas machineries for efficient markerless genome editing in Clostridium. Sci Rep, 2016; 6:25666; doi: 10.1038/srep25666
74.
Hidalgo-CantabranaC, GohYJ, PanM, et al.Genome editing using the endogenous type I CRISPR-Cas system in. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2019; 116(32):15774–15783; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905421116
75.
WimmerF, MougiakosI, EnglertF, et al.Rapid cell-free characterization of multi-subunit CRISPR effectors and transposons. Mol Cell, 2022; 82(6):1210–1224.e6; doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.01.026
76.
AlexanderLM, GoltsmanDSA, LiuJS, et al.Novel and Engineered Type II CRISPR Systems from Uncultivated Microbes with Broad Genome Editing Capability. Crispr J, 2023; 6(3):261–277; doi: 10.1089/crispr.2022.0090
77.
MosbergJA, LajoieMJ, ChurchGM. Lambda red recombineering in Escherichia coli occurs through a fully single-stranded intermediate. Genetics, 2010; 186(3):791–799; doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.120782
78.
YanMY, YanHQ, RenGX, et al.CRISPR-Cas12a-Assisted Recombineering in Bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2017; 83(17); doi: 10.1128/aem.00947-17
79.
SambrookJ, FritschE, ManiatisT. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: 1989.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
