JacksonSP, BartekJ. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature. 2009; 461:1071–1078. DOI:10.1038/nature08467.
2.
JasinM, RothsteinR. Repair of strand breaks by homologous recombination. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013; 5:a012740. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012740.
3.
PannunzioNR, WatanabeG, LieberMR. Nonhomologous DNA end-joining for repair of DNA double-strand breaks. J Biol Chem. 2018; 293:10512–10523. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.TM117.000374.
4.
HussmannJA, LingJ, RavisankarP, et al.Mapping the genetic landscape of DNA double-strand break repair. Cell. 2021; 184:5653.e25–5669.e25. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.002.
5.
RamsdenDA, Carvajal-GarciaJ, GuptaGP. Mechanism, cellular functions and cancer roles of polymerase-theta-mediated DNA end joining. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-021-00405-2.
6.
GallagherDN, PhamN, TsaiAM, et al.A Rad51-independent pathway promotes single-strand template repair in gene editing. PLoS Genet. 2020; 16:e1008689. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008689.
7.
RichardsonCD, KazaneKR, FengSJ, et al.CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in human cells occurs via the Fanconi anemia pathway. Nat Genet. 2018; 50:1132–1139. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-018-0174-0.
8.
RouetP, SmihF, JasinM. Introduction of double-strand breaks into the genome of mouse cells by expression of a rare-cutting endonuclease. Mol Cell Biol. 1994; 14:8096–8106.
ChenPJ, HussmannJA, YanJ, et al.Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes. Cell. 2021; 184:5635–5652 e29. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.018.
11.
KoblanLW, ArbabM, ShenMW, et al.Efficient C*G-to-G*C base editors developed using CRISPRi screens, target-library analysis, and machine learning. Nat Biotechnol. 2021; 39:1414–1425. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-00938-z.
