CRISPR-Cas9 is an RNA-guided nuclease that has been widely adapted for genome engineering. A key determinant in Cas9 target selection is DNA duplex unwinding to form an R-loop, in which the single-stranded RNA guide hybridizes with one of the DNA strands. To advance understanding on DNA unwinding by Cas9, we combined two types of spectroscopic label, 2-aminopurine and nitroxide spin-label, to investigate unwinding at a specific DNA base pair induced by Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9. Data obtained with RNA guide lengths varying from 13 to 20 nucleotide revealed that the DNA segment distal to the protospacer adjacent motif can adopt a “partial unwinding” state, in which a mixture of DNA-paired and DNA-unwound populations exist in equilibrium. Significant unwinding can occur at positions not supported by RNA/DNA pairing, and the degree of unwinding depends on RNA guide length and modulates DNA cleavage activity. The results shed light on Cas9 target selection and may inform developments of genome-engineering strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JinekM, ChylinskiK, FonfaraI, et al.A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science, 2012; 337:816–821. DOI: 10.1126/science.1225829.
2.
GasiunasG, BarrangouR, HorvathP, et al.Cas9–crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2012; 109:E2579–E2586. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1208507109.
3.
CongL, RanFA, CoxD, et al.Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science, 2013; 339:819–823. DOI: 10.1126/science.1231143.
4.
MaliP, YangL, EsveltKM, et al.RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science, 2013; 339:823–826. DOI: 10.1126/science.1232033.
5.
DoudnaJA, CharpentierE. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science, 2014; 346:1258096. DOI: 10.1126/science.1258096.
6.
HsuPD, LanderES, ZhangF. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell, 2014; 157:1262–1278. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010.
7.
KnottGJ, DoudnaJA. CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering. Science, 2018; 361:866–869. DOI: 10.1126/science.aat5011.
8.
JiangF, DoudnaJA. CRISPR-Cas9 structures and mechanisms. Annu Rev Biophys, 2017; 46:505–529. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-062215-010822.
9.
ZuoZ, LiuJ. Allosteric regulation of CRISPR-Cas9 for DNA-targeting and cleavage. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2020; 62:166–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2020.01.013.
10.
NishimasuH, RanFA, Hsu PatrickD, et al.Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell, 2014; 156:935–949. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.001.
11.
SternbergSH, ReddingS, JinekM, et al.DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature, 2014; 507:62–67. DOI: 10.1038/nature13011.
12.
SzczelkunMD, TikhomirovaMS, SinkunasT, et al.Direct observation of R-loop formation by single RNA-guided Cas9 and Cascade effector complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014; 111:9798–9803. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1402597111.
13.
JosephsEA, KocakDD, FitzgibbonCJ, et al.Structure and specificity of the RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9 during DNA interrogation, target binding and cleavage. Nucleic Acids Res, 2015; 43:8924–8941. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv892.
14.
JiangFG, TaylorDW, ChenJS, et al.Structures of a CRISPR-Cas9 R-loop complex primed for DNA cleavage. Science, 2016; 351:867–871. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad8282.
15.
BoyleEA, AndreassonJOL, ChircusLM, et al.High-throughput biochemical profiling reveals sequence determinants of dCas9 off-target binding and unbinding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2017; 114:5461. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1700557114.
DagdasYS, ChenJS, SternbergSH, et al.A conformational checkpoint between DNA binding and cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9. Sci Adv, 2017; 3:eaao0027. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aao0027.
18.
TangprasertchaiNS, Di FeliceR, ZhangXJ, et al.CRISPR-Cas9 mediated DNA unwinding detected using site-directed spin labeling. ACS Chem Biol, 2017; 12:1489–1493. DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.6b01137.
19.
SinghD, WangY, MallonJ, et al.Mechanisms of improved specificity of engineered Cas9s revealed by single-molecule FRET analysis. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2018; 25:347–354. DOI: 10.1038/s41594-018-0051-7.
20.
GongS, YuHH, JohnsonKA, et al.DNA unwinding is the primary determinant of CRISPR-Cas9 activity. Cell Rep, 2018; 22:359–371. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.041.
21.
OkaforIC, SinghD, WangY, et al.Single molecule analysis of effects of non-canonical guide RNAs and specificity-enhancing mutations on Cas9-induced DNA unwinding. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019; 47:11880–11888. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1058.
22.
ZhuX, ClarkeR, PuppalaAK, et al.Cryo-EM structures reveal coordinated domain motions that govern DNA cleavage by Cas9. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2019; 26:679–685. DOI: 10.1038/s41594-019-0258-2.
23.
IvanovIE, WrightAV, CofskyJC, et al.Cas9 interrogates DNA in discrete steps modulated by mismatches and supercoiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2020; 117:5853. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1913445117.
24.
ZhangS, ZhangQ, HouX-M, et al.Dynamics of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 in DNA target association and dissociation. EMBO Rep, 2020; 21:e50184. DOI: 10.15252/embr.202050184.
25.
LiuM-S, GongS, YuH-H, et al.Engineered CRISPR/Cas9 enzymes improve discrimination by slowing DNA cleavage to allow release of off-target DNA. Nat Commun, 2020; 11:3576. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17411-1.
26.
StrohkendlI, SaifuddinFA, RybarskiJR, et al.Kinetic basis for DNA target specificity of CRISPR-Cas12a. Mol Cell, 2018; 71:816–824.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.043.
27.
JiangW, SinghJ, AllenA, et al.CRISPR-Cas12a nucleases bind flexible DNA duplexes without RNA/DNA complementarity. ACS Omega, 2019; 4:17140–17147. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b01469.
28.
QinPZ, HaworthIS, CaiQ, et al.Measuring nanometer distances in nucleic acids using a sequence-independent nitroxide probe. Nat Protoc, 2007; 2:2354–2365. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2007.308.
29.
TangprasertchaiNS, ZhangXJ, DingY, et al.An integrated spin-labeling/computational-modeling approach for mapping global structures of nucleic acids. Method Enzymol, 2015; 564:427–453. DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2015.07.007.
30.
PannierM, VeitS, GodtA, et al.Dead-time free measurement of dipole–dipole interactions between electron spins. J Magn Reson, 2000; 142:331–340. DOI: 10.1006/jmre.1999.1944.
31.
WinglerLM, ElgetiM, HilgerD, et al.Angiotensin analogs with divergent bias stabilize distinct receptor conformations. Cell, 2019; 176:468–478.e11. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.005.
32.
AltenbachC. LongDistances—a program to analyze DEER data. EPR Newletter, 2021; 31:12–13.
33.
SchiemannO, HeubachCA, AbdullinD, et al.Benchmark test and guidelines for DEER/PELDOR experiments on nitroxide-labeled biomolecules. J Am Chem Soc, 2021; 143:17875–17890. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c07371.
34.
WorswickSG, SpencerJA, JeschkeG, et al.Deep neural network processing of DEER data. Sci Adv, 2018; 4:eaat5218. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aat5218.
35.
Fábregas IbáñezL, JeschkeG, StollS. DeerLab: a comprehensive software package for analyzing dipolar electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy data. Magn Reson, 2020; 1:209–224. DOI: 10.5194/mr-1-209-2020.
36.
JeschkeG, ChechikV, IonitaP, et al.DeerAnalysis2006—a comprehensive software package for analyzing pulsed ELDOR data. Appl Magn Reson, 2006; 30:473–498. DOI: 10.1007/BF03166213.
37.
SinghD, SternbergSH, FeiJ, et al.Real-time observation of DNA recognition and rejection by the RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nat Commun, 2016; 7:12778. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12778.
38.
JeschkeG, PolyhachY. Distance measurements on spin-labelled biomacromolecules by pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2007; 9:1895–1910. DOI: 10.1039/B614920K.
39.
CaiQ, KusnetzowAK, HubbellWL, et al.Site-directed spin labeling measurements of nanometer distances in nucleic acids using a sequence-independent nitroxide probe. Nucleic Acids Res, 2006; 34:4722–4730. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl546.
40.
DingY, KathiresanV, ZhangXJ, et al.Experimental validation of the ALLNOX program for studying protein–nucleic acid complexes. J Phys Chem A, 2019; 123:3592–3598. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b01027.
41.
JiangF, ZhouK, MaL, et al.A Cas9–guide RNA complex preorganized for target DNA recognition. Science, 2015; 348:1477–1481. DOI: 10.1126/science.aab1452.
42.
FuY, SanderJD, ReyonD, et al.Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nat Biotech, 2014; 32:279–284. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2808.
43.
ZhangJ-P, LiX-L, NeisesA, et al.Different effects of sgRNA length on CRISPR-mediated gene knockout efficiency. Sci Rep, 2016; 6:28566. DOI: 10.1038/srep28566.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
