Prime editors (PEs) were developed to induce versatile edits at a guide-specified genomic locus. With all RNA-guided genome editors, guide-dependent off-target (OT) mutations can occur at other sites bearing similarity to the intended target. However, whether PEs carry the additional risk of guide-independent mutations elicited by their unique enzymatic moiety (i.e., reverse transcriptase) has not been examined systematically in mammalian cells. Here, we developed a cost-effective sensitive platform to profile guide-independent OT effects in human cells. We did not observe guide-independent OT mutations in the DNA or RNA of prime editor 3 (PE3)-edited cells, or alterations to their telomeres, endogenous retroelements, alternative splicing events, or gene expression. Together, our results showed undetectable prime editing guide RNA–independent OT effects of PE3 in human cells, suggesting the high editing specificity of its reverse-transcriptase moiety.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnzaloneAV, RandolphPB, DavisJR, et al.Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature, 2019; 576:149–157. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4.
2.
YangL, YangB, ChenJ. One prime for all editing. Cell, 2019; 179:1448–1450. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.030.
3.
LinQ, ZongY, XueC, et al.Prime genome editing in rice and wheat. Nat Biotechnol, 2020; 38:582–585. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0455-x.
4.
AnzaloneAV, KoblanLW, LiuDR. Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat Biotechnol, 2020; 38:824–844. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0561-9.
5.
KimDY, MoonSB, KoJH, et al.Unbiased investigation of specificities of prime editing systems in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res, 2020; 48:10576–10589. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa764.
6.
JinS, ZongY, GaoQ, et al.Cytosine, but not adenine, base editors induce genome-wide off-target mutations in rice. Science, 2019; 364:292–295. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw7166.
7.
ZuoE, SunY, WeiW, et al.Cytosine base editor generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants in mouse embryos. Science, 2019; 364:289–292. DOI: 10.1126/science.aav9973.
8.
GrunewaldJ, ZhouR, GarciaSP, et al.Transcriptome-wide off-target RNA editing induced by CRISPR-guided DNA base editors. Nature, 2019; 569:433–437. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1161-z.
9.
ZhouC, SunY, YanR, et al.Off-target RNA mutation induced by DNA base editing and its elimination by mutagenesis. Nature, 2019; 571:275–278. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1314-0.
10.
ChenJ, YangB, YangL. To BE or not to BE, that is the question. Nat Biotechnol, 2019; 37:520–522. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0119-x.
11.
YangL, ChenJ. A tale of two moieties: rapidly evolving CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing. Trends Biochem Sci, 2020; 45:874–888. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2020.06.003.
12.
JinS, LinQ, LuoY, et al.Genome-wide specificity of prime editors in plants. Nat Biotechnol, 2021; 39:1292–1299. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-00891-x.
13.
LiX, WangY, LiuY, et al.Base editing with a Cpf1-cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat Biotechnol, 2018; 36:324–327. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4102.
14.
WangX, LiJ, WangY, et al.Efficient base editing in methylated regions with a human APOBEC3A-Cas9 fusion. Nat Biotechnol, 2018; 36:946–949. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4198.
15.
WangL, XueW, ZhangH, et al.Eliminating base-editor-induced genome-wide and transcriptome-wide off-target mutations. Nat Cell Biol, 2021; 23:552–563. DOI: 10.1038/s41556-021-00671-4.
16.
McKennaA, HannaM, BanksE, et al.The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res, 2010; 20:1297–1303. DOI: 10.1101/gr.107524.110.
17.
WilmA, AwPP, BertrandD, et al.LoFreq: a sequence-quality aware, ultra-sensitive variant caller for uncovering cell-population heterogeneity from high-throughput sequencing datasets. Nucleic Acids Res, 2012; 40:11189–11201. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks918.
18.
KimS, SchefflerK, HalpernAL, et al.Strelka2: fast and accurate calling of germline and somatic variants. Nat Methods, 2018; 15:591–594. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-018-0051-x.
19.
BolgerAM, LohseM, UsadelB. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics, 2014; 30:2114–2120. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170.
20.
NarzisiG, O'RaweJA, IossifovI, et al.Accurate de novo and transmitted indel detection in exome-capture data using microassembly. Nat Methods, 2014; 11:1033–1036. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3069.
21.
DingZ, ManginoM, AvivA, et al.Estimating telomere length from whole genome sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res, 2014; 42:e75. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku181.
22.
NersisyanL, ArakelyanA. Computel: computation of mean telomere length from whole-genome next-generation sequencing data. PLoS One, 2015; 10:e0125201. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125201.
23.
WangX, DingC, YuW, et al.Cas12a base editors induce efficient and specific editing with low DNA damage response. Cell Rep, 2020; 31:107723. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107723.
24.
LiaoY, SmythGK, ShiW. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics, 2014; 30:923–930. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656.
25.
ShenS, ParkJW, LuZX, et al.rMATS: robust and flexible detection of differential alternative splicing from replicate RNA-Seq data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014; 111:E5593–5601. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1419161111.
26.
McGrathE, ShinH, ZhangL, et al.Targeting specificity of APOBEC-based cytosine base editor in human iPSCs determined by whole genome sequencing. Nat Commun, 2019; 10:5353. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13342-8.
27.
LeiL, ChenH, XueW, et al.APOBEC3 induces mutations during repair of CRISPR-Cas9-generated DNA breaks. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2018; 25:45–52. DOI: 10.1038/s41594-017-0004-6.
28.
BaeS, ParkJ, KimJS. Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics, 2014; 30:1473–1475. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu048.
29.
JinS, FeiH, ZhuZ, et al.Rationally designed APOBEC3B cytosine base editors with improved specificity. Mol Cell, 2020; 79:728–740.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.07.005.
30.
ZuoE, SunY, YuanT, et al.A rationally engineered cytosine base editor retains high on-target activity while reducing both DNA and RNA off-target effects. Nat Methods, 2020; 17:600–604. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-020-0832-x.
31.
TsaiSQ, ZhengZ, NguyenNT, et al.GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat Biotechnol, 2015; 33:187–197. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3117.
32.
KimD, BaeS, ParkJ, et al.Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells. Nat Methods, 2015; 12:237–243, 1 p following 243. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3284.
33.
TsaiSQ, NguyenNT, Malagon-LopezJ, et al.CIRCLE-seq: a highly sensitive in vitro screen for genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease off-targets. Nat Methods, 2017; 14:607–614. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4278.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
