Releases of sterile males are the gold standard for many insect population control programs, and precise sex sorting to remove females prior to male releases is essential to the success of these operations. To advance traditional methods for scaling the generation of sterile males, we previously described a CRISPR-mediated precision-guided sterile insect technique (pgSIT), in which Cas9 and gRNA strains are genetically crossed to generate sterile males for mass release. While effective at generating F1 sterile males, pgSIT requires a genetic cross between the two parental strains, which requires maintenance and sexing of two strains in a factory. Therefore, to advance pgSIT further by removing this crossing step, here we describe a next-generation temperature-inducible pgSIT (TI-pgSIT) technology and demonstrate its proof-of-concept in Drosophila melanogaster. Importantly, we were able to develop a true breeding strain for TI-pgSIT that eliminates the requirement for sex sorting—a feature that may help further automate production at scale.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KniplingEF. Possibilities of insect control or eradication through the use of sexually sterile males. J Econ Entomol, 1955; 48:459–462. DOI: 10.1093/jee/48.4.459.
2.
DyckVA, HendrichsJ, Robinson AS (eds). Sterile Insect Technique: Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005.
3.
HendrichsJ. Use of the sterile insect technique against key insect pests. Sustainable Dev Int, 2000; 2:75–79.
4.
ScottMJ, ConchaC, WelchJB, et al.Review of research advances in the screwworm eradication program over the past 25 years. Entomol Exp Appl, 2017; 164:226–236. DOI: 10.1111/eea.12607.
5.
RendónP, McInnisD, LanceD, et al.Medfly (Diptera: Tephritidae) genetic sexing: large-scale field comparison of males-only and bisexual sterile fly releases in Guatemala. J Econ Entomol, 2004; 97:1547–1553. DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-97.5.1547.
6.
ThomasDD, DonnellyCA, WoodRJ, et al.Insect population control using a dominant, repressible, lethal genetic system. Science, 2000; 287:2474–2476. DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5462.2474.
7.
LavenH. Eradication of Culex pipiens fatigans through cytoplasmic incompatibility. Nature, 1967; 216:383–384. DOI: 10.1038/216383a0.
8.
XiZ, KhooCCH, DobsonSL. Wolbachia establishment and invasion in an Aedes aegypti laboratory population. Science, 2005; 310:326–328. DOI: 10.1126/science.1117607.
9.
BourtzisK, DobsonSL, XiZ, et al.Harnessing mosquito–Wolbachia symbiosis for vector and disease control. Acta Trop, 2014; 132:S150–S163. DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2013.11.004.
10.
MezaJS, Ul HaqI, VreysenMJB, et al.Comparison of classical and transgenic genetic sexing strains of Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) for application of the sterile insect technique. PLoS One, 2018; 13:e0208880. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208880.
11.
CrawfordJE, ClarkeDW, CriswellV, et al.Efficient production of male Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes enables large-scale suppression of wild populations. Nat Biotechnol, 2020; 38:482–492. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0471-x.
12.
PapathanosPA, BossinHC, BenedictMQ, et al.Sex separation strategies: past experience and new approaches. Malar J, 2009; 8Suppl 2:S5. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-S2-S5.
13.
LutratC, GiesbrechtD, MaroisE, et al.Sex sorting for pest control: it's raining men!. Trends Parasitol, 2019; 35:649–662. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2019.06.001.
14.
KandulNP, LiuJ, HsuAD, et al.A drug-inducible sex-separation technique for insects. Nat Commun, 2020; 11:2106. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16020-2.
15.
KandulNP, LiuJ, Sanchez CHM, et al.Transforming insect population control with precision guided sterile males with demonstration in flies. Nat Commun, 2019; 10:84. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07964-7.
16.
LiM, YangT, BuiM, et al.Eliminating mosquitoes with precision guided sterile males. Nat Commun, 2021; 12:5374. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25421-w.
17.
GibsonDG, YoungL, ChuangR-Y, et al.Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods, 2009; 6:343–345. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1318.
18.
KandulNP, LiuJ, BuchmanA, et al.Assessment of a split homing based gene drive for efficient knockout of multiple genes. G3 2019 Dec 27 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1534/g3.119.400985.
19.
GrothAC. Construction of transgenic Drosophila by using the site-specific integrase from phage C31. Genetics, 2004; 166:1775–1782. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.166.4.1775.
20.
BallardJWO, MelvinRG. Tetracycline treatment influences mitochondrial metabolism and mtDNA density two generations after treatment in Drosophila. Insect Mol Biol, 2007; 16:799–802. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2007.00760.x.
21.
ZehJA, BonillaMM, AdrianAJ, et al.From father to son: transgenerational effect of tetracycline on sperm viability. Sci Rep, 2012; 2:375. DOI: 10.1038/srep00375.
22.
ChatzispyrouIA, HeldNM, MouchiroudL, et al.Tetracycline antibiotics impair mitochondrial function and its experimental use confounds research. Cancer Res, 2015; 75:4446–4449. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1626.
23.
WangX, RyuD, HoutkooperRH, et al.Antibiotic use and abuse: a threat to mitochondria and chloroplasts with impact on research, health, and environment. Bioessays, 2015; 37:1045–1053. DOI: 10.1002/bies.201500071.
24.
OurryM, LopezV, HervéM, et al.Long-lasting effects of antibiotics on bacterial communities of adult flies. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2020; 96:fiaa028. DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa028.
AshburnerM, BonnerJJ. The induction of gene activity in Drosophila by heat shock. Cell, 1979; 17:241–254. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90150-8.
27.
DiDomenicoBJ, BugaiskyGE, LindquistS. Heat shock and recovery are mediated by different translational mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1982; 79:6181–6185. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.79.20.6181.
28.
PelhamHR, BienzM. A synthetic heat-shock promoter element confers heat-inducibility on the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene. EMBO J, 1982; 1:1473–1477.
29.
DreanoM, BrochotJ, MyersA, et al.High-level, heat-regulated synthesis of proteins in eukaryotic cells. Gene, 1986; 49:1–8. DOI: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90380-X.
30.
PetersenR, LindquistS. The Drosophila hsp70 message is rapidly degraded at normal temperatures and stabilized by heat shock. Gene, 1988; 72:161–168. DOI: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90138-2.
31.
StellerH, PirrottaV. Expression of the Drosophila white gene under the control of the hsp70 heat shock promoter. EMBO J, 1985; 4:3765–3772. DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb04146.x.
32.
BishopJG 3rd, CorcesVG. Expression of an activated ras gene causes developmental abnormalities in transgenic Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev, 1988; 2:567–577.
33.
BangAG, PosakonyJW. The Drosophila gene Hairless encodes a novel basic protein that controls alternative cell fates in adult sensory organ development. Genes Dev, 1992; 6:1752–1769.
34.
BellLR, HorabinJI, SchedlP, et al.Positive autoregulation of sex-lethal by alternative splicing maintains the female determined state in Drosophila. Cell, 1991; 65:229–239. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90157-T.
35.
BoggsRT, GregorP, IdrissS, et al.Regulation of sexual differentiation in D. melanogaster via alternative splicing of RNA from the transformer gene. Cell, 1987; 50:739–747. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90332-1.
36.
KemphuesKJ, RaffEC, RaffRA, et al.Mutation in a testis-specific beta-tubulin in Drosophila: analysis of its effects on meiosis and map location of the gene. Cell, 1980; 21:445–451. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90481-x.
37.
ChapmanT, BanghamJ, VintiG, et al.The sex peptide of Drosophila melanogaster: female post-mating responses analyzed by using RNA interference. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2003; 100:9923–9928. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1631635100.
38.
LiuH, KubliE. Sex-peptide is the molecular basis of the sperm effect in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2003; 100:9929–9933. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1631700100.
39.
XueL, NollM. Drosophila female sexual behavior induced by sterile males showing copulation complementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2000; 97:3272–3275. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3272.
40.
KandulNP, LiuJ, Sanchez CHM, et al.Reply to “Concerns about the feasibility of using ‘precision guided sterile males' to control insects.”. Nat Commun, 2019; 10:3955. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11617-8.
41.
MojicaFJM, MontoliuL. On the origin of CRISPR-Cas technology: from prokaryotes to mammals. Trends Microbiol, 2016; 24:811–820. DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.06.005.
42.
ReardonS. Welcome to the CRISPR zoo. Nature, 2016; 531:160–163. DOI: 10.1038/531160a.
43.
ReardonS. CRISPR gene-editing creates wave of exotic model organisms. Nature, 2019; 568:441–442. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-01300-9.
44.
MorrisAC, SchaubTL, JamesAA. FLP-mediated recombination in the vector mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Nucleic Acids Res, 1991; 19:5895–5900. DOI: 10.1093/nar/19.21.5895.
45.
LycettGJ, CramptonJM. Stable transformation of mosquito cell lines using a hsp70::neo fusion gene. Gene, 1993; 136:129–136. DOI: 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90456-d.
46.
MatsubaraT, BeemanRW, ShikeH, et al.Pantropic retroviral vectors integrate and express in cells of the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1996; 93:6181–6185. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.6181.
47.
HuynhCQ, ZielerH. Construction of modular and versatile plasmid vectors for the high-level expression of single or multiple genes in insects and insect cell lines. J Mol Biol, 1999; 288:13–20. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2674.
48.
CarpenettiTLG, AryanA, MylesKM, et al.Robust heat-inducible gene expression by two endogenous hsp70-derived promoters in transgenic Aedes aegypti. Insect Mol Biol, 2012; 21:97–106. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2011.01116.x.
49.
KalosakaK, ChrysanthisG, Rojas-GillA-P, et al.Evaluation of the activities of the medfly and Drosophila hsp70 promoters in vivo in germ-line transformed medflies. Insect Mol Biol, 2006; 15:373–382. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00650.x.
50.
AhmedHMM, HildebrandL, WimmerEA. Improvement and use of CRISPR/Cas9 to engineer a sperm-marking strain for the invasive fruit pest Drosophila suzukii. BMC Biotechnol, 2019; 19:85. DOI: 10.1186/s12896-019-0588-5.
51.
FuG, CondonKC, EptonMJ, et al.Female-specific insect lethality engineered using alternative splicing. Nat Biotechnol, 2007; 25:353–357. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1283.
52.
ScheteligMF, TargovskaA, MezaJS, et al.Tetracycline-suppressible female lethality and sterility in the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens. Insect Mol Biol, 2016; 25:500–508. DOI: 10.1111/imb.12238.
53.
ClineTW. Two closely linked mutations in Drosophila melanogaster that are lethal to opposite sexes and interact with daughterless. Genetics, 1978; 90:683–698. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/90.4.683.
54.
AkmammedovA, GeiggesM, ParoR. Single vector non-leaky gene expression system for Drosophila melanogaster. Sci Rep, 2017; 7:6899. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07282-w.
55.
MalzahnAA, TangX, LeeK, et al.Application of CRISPR-Cas12a temperature sensitivity for improved genome editing in rice, maize, and Arabidopsis. BMC Biol, 2019; 17:9. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-019-0629-5.
56.
XiangG, ZhangX, AnC, et al.Temperature effect on CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing. J Genet Genomics, 2017; 44:199–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2017.03.004.
57.
MougiakosI, BosmaEF, WeeninkK, et al.Efficient genome editing of a facultative thermophile using mesophilic spCas9. ACS Synth Biol, 2017; 6:849–861. DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00339.
58.
LeBlancC, ZhangF, MendezJ, et al.Increased efficiency of targeted mutagenesis by CRISPR/Cas9 in plants using heat stress. Plant J, 2018; 93:377–386. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13782.
59.
RørthP. Gal4 in the Drosophila female germline. Mech Dev, 1998; 78:113–118. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-4773(98)00157-9.
60.
BonnerJJ, ParksC, Parker-ThornburgJ, et al.The use of promoter fusions in Drosophila genetics: isolation of mutations affecting the heat shock response. Cell, 1984; 37:979–991. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90432-X.
61.
BrandAH, PerrimonN. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development, 1993; 118:401–415. DOI: 10.1242/dev.118.2.401.
62.
DeLucaSZ, SpradlingAC. Efficient expression of genes in the Drosophila germline using a UAS promoter free of interference by Hsp70 piRNAs. Genetics, 2018; 209:381–387. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.300874.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
