Prophages are widely spread among bacterial genomes, and they can have positive or negative effects on their hosts. A key aspect in the study of prophages is the discovery of their induction signals. Prophage induction can occur by inactivating a phage transcriptional repressor, which is responsible for maintaining the lysogenic state. This repressor can be inactivated through the bacterial SOS response. However, the induction signals for numerous prophages do not involve the SOS system, and therefore significant efforts are needed to identify these conditions. Similarly, curing bacterial strains of inducible prophages is a tedious process, requiring the screening of several colonies. Here, we investigated whether transcriptional silencing of a prophage repressor using CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) would lead to prophage induction. Using Escherichia coli phages λ and P2 as models, we demonstrated the efficiency of CRISPRi for prophage induction and for curing lysogenic strains of their prophages.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
IkedaH, TomizawaJ. Prophage P1, and extrachromosomal replication unit. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, 1968; 33:791–798. DOI: 10.1101/SQB.1968.033.01.091.
2.
RavinNV. N15: The linear phage-plasmid. Plasmid, 2011; 65:102–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2010.12.004.
3.
GilcreaseEB, CasjensSR. The genome sequence of Escherichia coli tailed phage D6 and the diversity of Enterobacteriales circular plasmid prophages. Virology, 2018; 515:203–214. DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2017.12.019.
4.
TouchonM, BernheimA, RochaEPC. Genetic and life-history traits associated with the distribution of prophages in bacteria. ISME J, 2016; 10:2744–2754. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2016.47.
5.
KimMS, BaeJW. Lysogeny is prevalent and widely distributed in the murine gut microbiota. ISME J, 2018; 12:1127–1141. DOI: 10.1038/s41396-018-0061-9.
6.
HayashiT, MakinoK, OhnishiM, et al.Complete genome sequence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 and genomic comparison with a laboratory strain K-12. DNA Res, 2001; 8:11–22. DOI: 10.1093/dnares/8.1.11.
7.
GandonS. Why be temperate: lessons from bacteriophage λ. Trends Microbiol, 2016; 24:356–365. DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.02.008.
8.
De PaepeM, TournierL, MoncautE, et al.Carriage of λ latent virus is costly for its bacterial host due to frequent reactivation in monoxenic mouse intestine. PLoS Genet, 2016; 12:e1005861. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005861.
9.
Bondy-DenomyJ, QianJ, WestraER, et al.Prophages mediate defense against phage infection through diverse mechanisms. ISME J, 2016; 10:2854–2866. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2016.79.
10.
WangX, KimY, MaQ, et al.Cryptic prophages help bacteria cope with adverse environments. Nat Commun, 2010; 1:147. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1146.
11.
AucouturierA, ChainF, LangellaP, et al.Characterization of a prophage-free derivative strain of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis IL1403 reveals the importance of prophages for phenotypic plasticity of the host. Front Microbiol, 2018; 9:2032. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02032.
12.
BarondessJJ, BeckwithJ. bor gene of phage λ, involved in serum resistance, encodes a widely conserved outer membrane lipoprotein. J Bacteriol, 1995; 177:1247–1253. DOI: 10.1128/jb.177.5.1247-1253.1995.
13.
Vaca PachecoS, García GonzálezO, Paniagua ContrerasGL. The lom gene of bacteriophage λ is involved in Escherichia coli K12 adhesion to human buccal epithelial cells. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 1997; 156:129–132. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1097(97)00415-1.
14.
MiroldS, RabschW, RohdeM, et al.Isolation of a temperate bacteriophage encoding the type III effector protein SopE from an epidemic Salmonella typhimurium strain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1999; 96:9845–9850. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9845.
15.
TaylorVL, FitzpatrickAD, IslamZ, et al.The diverse impacts of phage morons on bacterial fitness and virulence. Adv Virus Res, 2019; 103:1–31. DOI: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2018.08.001.
16.
FeinerR, ArgovT, RabinovichL, et al.A new perspective on lysogeny: prophages as active regulatory switches of bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2015; 13:641–650. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro3527.
17.
MatosRC, LapaqueN, Rigottier-GoisL, et al.Enterococcus faecalis prophage dynamics and contributions to pathogenic traits. PLoS Genet, 2013; 9:e1003539. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003539.
18.
GassonMJ, DaviesFL. Prophage-cured derivatives of Streptococcus lactis and Streptococcus cremoris. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1980; 40:964–966. DOI: 10.1128/aem.40.5.964-966.1980.
19.
BaluchJ, SussmanR. Correlation between UV dose requirement for lambda bacteriophage induction and lambda repressor concentration. J Virol, 1978; 26:595–602. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.26.3.595-602.1978.
20.
EulerCW, JuncosaB, RyanPA, et al.Targeted curing of all lysogenic bacteriophage from Streptococcus pyogenes using a novel counter-selection technique. PLoS One, 2016; 11:e146408. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146408.
21.
WangY, WangD, WangX, et al.Highly efficient genome engineering in Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus cereus using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Front Microbiol, 2019; 10:1932. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01932.
22.
BaeT, BabaT, HiramatsuK, et al.Prophages of Staphylococcus aureus Newman and their contribution to virulence. Mol Microbiol, 2006; 62:1035–1047. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05441.x.
23.
OppenheimAB, KobilerO, StavansJ, et al.Switches in bacteriophage lambda development. Ann Rev Genet, 2005; 39:409–429. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.113656.
24.
LittleJW, MichalowskiCB. Stability and instability in the lysogenic state of phage lambda. J Bacteriol, 2010; 192:6064–6076. DOI: 10.1128/JB.00726-10.
25.
OwenSV, CanalsR, WennerN, et al.A window into lysogeny: revealing temperate phage biology with transcriptomics. Microb Genom, 2020; 6:e000330. DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000330.
26.
RobertsJW, RobertsCW, CraigNL. Escherichia coli recA gene product inactivates phage λ repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1978; 75:4714–4718. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.75.10.4714.
27.
BroussardGW, OldfieldLM, VillanuevaVM, et al.Integration-dependent bacteriophage immunity provides insights into the evolution of genetic switches. Mol Cell, 2013; 49:237–248. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.012.
28.
BerngruberTW, WeissingFJ, GandonS. Inhibition of superinfection and the evolution of viral latency. J Virol, 2010; 84:10200–10208. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00865-10.
29.
NandaAM, ThormannK, FrunzkeJ. Impact of spontaneous prophage induction on the fitness of bacterial populations and host–microbe interactions. J Bacteriol, 2015; 197:410–419. DOI: 10.1128/JB.02230-14.
30.
LittleJW. Autodigestion of lexA and phage λ repressors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1984; 81:1375–1379. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.81.5.1375.
BertaniG. Lysogeny at mid-twentieth century: P1, P2, and other experimental systems. J Bacteriol, 2004; 186:595–600. DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.3.595-600.2004.
33.
BertaniG. Studies on lysogenesis. I. The mode of phage liberation by lysogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol, 1951; 62:293–300. DOI: 10.1128/JB.62.3.293-300.1951.
34.
Shimizu-KadotaM, SakuraiT. Prophage curing in Lactobacillus casei by isolation of a thermoinducible mutant. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1982; 43:1284–1287. DOI: 10.1128/aem.43.6.1284-1287.1982.
35.
QiLS, LarsonMH, GilbertLA, et al.Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell, 2013; 152:1173–1183. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022.
36.
BikardD, JiangW, SamaiP, et al.Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR-Cas system. Nucleic Acids Res, 2013; 41:7429–7437. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt520.
37.
DepardieuF, BikardD. Gene silencing with CRISPRi in bacteria and optimization of dCas9 expression levels. Methods, 2020; 172:61–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.07.024.
38.
CressBF, ToparlakOD, GuleriaS, et al.CRISPathBrick: modular combinatorial assembly of type II-A CRISPR arrays for dCas9-mediated multiplex transcriptional repression in E. coli. ACS Synth Biol, 2015; 4:987–1000. DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.5b00012.
39.
LemayM-L, RenaudA, RousseauG, et al.Targeted genome editing of virulent phages using CRISPR-Cas9. Bio-Protocol, 2018; 8:e2674. DOI: 10.21769/bioprotoc.2674.
40.
KellenbergerG, ZichichiML, WeigleJ. A mutation affecting the DNA content of bacteriophage lambda and its lysogenizing properties. J Mol Biol, 1961; 3:399–408. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(61)80053-3.
41.
OsterhoutRE, FigueroaIA, KeaslingJD, et al.Global analysis of host response to induction of a latent bacteriophage. BMC Microbiol, 2007; 7. DOI: 10.1186/1471–2180-7-82.
42.
BerngruberTW, LionS, GandonS. Spatial structure, transmission modes and the evolution of viral exploitation strategies. PLoS Pathog, 2015; 11:e1004810. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004810.
43.
Randall HazelbauerL, SchwartzM. Isolation of the bacteriophage lambda receptor from Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol, 1973; 116:1436–1446. DOI: 10.1128/jb.116.3.1436-1446.1973.
44.
HowesWV. Effect of glucose on the capacity of Escherichia coli to be infected by a virulent lamba bacteriophage. J Bacteriol, 1965; 90:1188–1193. DOI: 10.1128/jb.90.5.1188-1193.1965.
45.
GhisottiD, FinkelS, HallingC, et al.Nonessential region of bacteriophage P4: DNA sequence, transcription, gene products, and functions. J Virol, 1990; 64:24–36. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.64.1.24-36.1990.
46.
AsadulghaniM, OguraY, OokaT, et al.The defective prophage pool of Escherichia coli O157: prophage–prophage interactions potentiate horizontal transfer of virulence determinants. PLoS Pathog, 2009; 5:e1000408. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000408.
47.
Fillol-SalomA, Martínez-RubioR, AbdulrahmanRF, et al.Phage-inducible chromosomal islands are ubiquitous within the bacterial universe. ISME J, 2018; 12:2114–2128. DOI: 10.1038/s41396-018-0156-3.
48.
CasjensS. Prophages and bacterial genomics: what have we learned so far?. Mol Microbiol, 2003; 49:277–300. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03580.x.
49.
RayU, SakalkaA. Lysogenization of Escherichia coli by bacteriophage Lambda: complementary activity of the host's DNA polymerase I and ligase and bacteriophage replication proteins Q and P. J Virol, 1976; 18:511–517. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.18.2.511-517.1976.
50.
DatsenkoKA, WannerBL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2000; 97:6640–6645. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.120163297.
51.
HallezR, GeeraertsD, SterckxY, et al.New toxins homologous to ParE belonging to three-component toxin–antitoxin systems in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Mol Microbiol, 2010; 76:719–732. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07129.x.
52.
LehnherrH, MaguinE, JafriS, et al.Plasmid addiction genes of bacteriophage P1: doc, which causes cell death on curing of prophage, and phd, which prevents host death when prophage is retained. J Mol Biol, 1993; 233:414–428. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1521.
53.
BridgesBA, WoodgateR. Mutagenic repair in Escherichia coli: products of the recA gene and of the umuD and umuC genes act at different steps in UV-induced mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1985; 82:4193–4197. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.82.12.4193.
54.
SchaaperRM, DunnRL, GlickmanBW. Mechanisms of ultraviolet-induced mutation. Mutational spectra in the Escherichia coli lacI gene for a wild-type and an excision-repair-deficient strain. J Mol Biol, 1987; 198:187–202. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90305-6.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
