CRISPR guide RNAs (gRNAs) can be programmed with relative ease to allow the genetic editing of nearly any DNA or RNA sequence. Here, we propose novel molecular architectures to achieve RNA-dependent modulation of CRISPR activity in response to specific RNA molecules. We designed and tested, in both living Escherichia coli cells and cell-free assays for rapid prototyping, cis-repressed RNA-interacting guide RNA (igRNA) that switch to their active state only upon interaction with small RNA fragments or long RNA transcripts, including pathogen-derived mRNAs of medical relevance such as the human immunodeficiency virus infectivity factor. The proposed CRISPR-igRNAs are fully customizable and easily adaptable to the majority if not all the available CRISPR-Cas variants to modulate a variety of genetic functions in response to specific cellular conditions, providing orthogonal activation and increased specificity. We thereby foresee a large scope of application for therapeutic, diagnostic, and biotech applications in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarrangouR, FremauxC, DeveauH, et al.CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science, 2007; 315:1709–1712. DOI: 10.1126/science.1138140.
2.
JinekM, ChylinskiK, FonfaraI, et al.A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science, 2012; 337:816–821. DOI: 10.1126.science.1225829.
3.
JinekM, JiangF, TaylorDW, et al.Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation. Science, 2014; 343:1247997. DOI: 10.1126.science.1247997.
4.
ThymeSB, AkhmetovaL, MontagueTG, et al.Internal guide RNA interactions interfere with Cas9-mediated cleavage. Nat Commun, 2016; 7:1–7. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11750.
5.
MullallyG, van AelstK, NaqviMM, et al.5′ modifications to CRISPR-Cas9 gRNA can change the dynamics and size of R-loops and inhibit DNA cleavage. Nucleic Acids Res, 2020; 48:6811–6823. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa477.
6.
GilbertLA, LarsonMH, MorsutL, et al.CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell, 2013; 154:442–451. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.044.
7.
QiLS, LarsonMH, GilbertLA, et al.Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell, 2013; 152:1173–1183. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022.
8.
DahlmanJE, AbudayyehOO, JoungJ, et al.Orthogonal gene knockout and activation with a catalytically active Cas9 nuclease. Nat Biotechnol, 2015; 33:1159–1161. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3390.
9.
ChenB, GilbertLA, CiminiBA, et al.Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell, 2013; 155:1479–1491. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.001.
10.
LiuY, ZhanY, ChenZ, et al.Directing cellular information flow via CRISPR signal conductors. Nat Methods, 2016; 13:938–944. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3994.
MaliP, AachJ, StrangesPB, et al.CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering. Nat Biotechnol, 2013; 31:833–838. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2675.
13.
ZalatanJG, LeeME, AlmeidaR, et al.Engineering complex synthetic transcriptional programs with CRISPR RNA scaffolds. Cell, 2015; 160:339–350. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.052.
14.
KonermannS, BrighamMD, TrevinoAE, et al.Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 complex. Nature, 2015; 517:583–588. DOI: 10.1038/nature14136.
15.
ShechnerDM, HacisuleymanE, YoungerST, et al.Multiplexable, locus-specific targeting of long RNAs with CRISPR-Display. Nat Methods, 2015; 12:664–670. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3433.
16.
LeeYJ, Hoynes-O'ConnorA, LeongMC, et al.Programmable control of bacterial gene expression with the combined CRISPR and antisense RNA system. Nucleic Acids Res, 2016; 44:2462–2473. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw056.
17.
GootenbergJS, AbudayyehOO, LeeJW, et al.Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science, 2017; 356:438–442. DOI: 10.1126/science.aam9321.
18.
KellnerMJ, KoobJG, GootenbergJS, et al.SHERLOCK: nucleic acid detection with CRISPR nucleases. Nat Protoc, 2019; 14:2986–3012. DOI: 10.1038/s41596-019-0210-2.
19.
GaliziR, JaramilloA. Engineering CRISPR guide RNA riboswitches for in vivo applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2019; 55:103–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2018.08.007.
20.
Anderson-LeeJ, FiskerE, KosarajuV, et al.Principles for predicting RNA secondary structure design difficulty. J Mol Biol, 2016; 428:748–757. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.013.
21.
RodrigoG, LandrainTE, JaramilloA. De novo automated design of small RNA circuits for engineering synthetic riboregulation in living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2012; 109:15271–15276. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1203831109.
22.
GreenAA, SilverPA, CollinsJJ, et al.Toehold switches: de-novo-designed regulators of gene expression. Cell, 2014; 159:925–939. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.002.
23.
KushwahaM, RostainW, PrakashS, et al.Using RNA as molecular code for programming cellular function. ACS Synth Biol, 2016; 5:795–809. DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.5b00297.
24.
IsaacsFJ, DwyerDJ, DingC, et al.Engineered riboregulators enable post-transcriptional control of gene expression. Nat Biotechnol, 2004; 22:841–847. DOI: 10.1038/nbt986.
KundertK, LucasJE, WattersKE, et al.Controlling CRISPR-Cas9 with ligand-activated and ligand-deactivated sgRNAs. Nat Commun, 2019; 10:1–11. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09985-2.
27.
IwasakiRS, OzdilekBA, GarstAD, et al.Small molecule regulated sgRNAs enable control of genome editing in E. coli by Cas9. Nat Commun, 2020Mar13 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15226-8.
28.
Hanewich-HollatzMH, ChenZ, HochreinLM, et al.Conditional guide RNAs: programmable conditional regulation of CRISPR/Cas function in bacterial and mammalian cells via dynamic RNA nanotechnology. ACS Cent Sci, 2019Jun4 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00340.
29.
OesinghausL, SimmelFC. Switching the activity of Cas12a using guide RNA strand displacement circuits. Nat Commun, 2019May7 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09953-w.
JinM, Garreau de LoubresseN, KimY, et al.Programmable CRISPR-Cas repression, activation, and computation with sequence-independent targets and triggers. ACS Synth Biol, 2019; 8:1583–1589. DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00141.
32.
FerryQRV, LyutovaR, FulgaTA. Rational design of inducible CRISPR guide RNAs for de novo assembly of transcriptional programs. Nat Commun, 2017; 8:14633. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14633.
33.
LiY, TengX, ZhangK, et al.RNA strand displacement responsive CRISPR/Cas9 system for mRNA sensing. Anal Chem, 2019; 91:3989–3996. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05238.
34.
LutzR, BujardH. Independent and tight regulation of transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via the LacR/O, the TetR/O and AraC/I1-I2 regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res, 1997; 25:1203–1210. DOI: 10.1093/nar/25.6.1203.
35.
PédelacqJ-D, CabantousS, TranT, et al.Engineering and characterization of a superfolder green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol, 2006; 24:79–88. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1172.
36.
PetersonJ, PhillipsGJ. New pSC101-derivative cloning vectors with elevated copy numbers. Plasmid, 2008; 59:193–201. DOI: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2008.01.004.
BikardD, JiangW, SamaiP, et al.Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR-Cas system. Nucleic Acids Res, 2013; 41:7429–7437. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt520.
40.
ShinJ, NoireauxV. An E. coli cell-free expression toolbox: application to synthetic gene circuits and artificial cells. ACS Synth Biol, 2012; 1:29–41. DOI: 10.1021/sb200016s.
41.
DunlopMJ, CoxRS, LevineJH, et al.Regulatory activity revealed by dynamic correlations in gene expression noise. Nat Genet, 2008; 40:1493–1498. DOI: 10.1038/ng.281.
42.
ShcherboD, MurphyCS, ErmakovaGV, et al.Far-red fluorescent tags for protein imaging in living tissues. Biochem J, 2009; 418:567–574. DOI: 10.1042/BJ20081949.
43.
ZadehJN, SteenbergCD, BoisJS, et al.NUPACK: analysis and design of nucleic acid systems. J Comput Chem, 2011; 32:170–173. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21596.
44.
SolovyevV, SalamovA.Automatic annotation of microbial genomes and metagenomic sequences. In LiRW (ed.). Metagenomics and its Applications in Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environmental Studies. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science, 2011, 61–78.
45.
FisherAG, EnsoliB, IvanoffL, et al.The sor gene of HIV-1 is required for efficient virus transmission in vitro. Science, 1987; 237:888–893. DOI: 10.1126/science.3497453.
46.
StrebelK, DaughertyD, ClouseK, et al.The HIV “A” (sor) gene product is essential for virus infectivity. Nature, 1987; 328:728–730. DOI: 10.1038/328728a0.
47.
ShinJ, NoireauxV. Efficient cell-free expression with the endogenous E. coli RNA polymerase and sigma factor 70. J Biol Eng, 2010; 4:8. DOI: 10.1186/1754-1611-4-8.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
