Even for the genetically accessible yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the CRISPR-Cas DNA editing technology has strongly accelerated and facilitated strain construction. Several methods have been validated for fast and highly efficient single editing events, and diverse approaches for multiplex genome editing have been described in the literature by means of SpCas9 or FnCas12a endonucleases and their associated guide RNAs (gRNAs). The gRNAs used to guide the Cas endonuclease to the editing site are typically expressed from plasmids using native Pol II or Pol III RNA polymerases. These gRNA expression plasmids require laborious, time-consuming cloning steps, which hampers their implementation for academic and applied purposes. In this study, we explore the potential of expressing gRNA from linear DNA fragments using the T7 RNA polymerase (T7RNAP) for single and multiplex genome editing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Using FnCas12a, this work demonstrates that transforming short, linear DNA fragments encoding gRNAs in yeast strains expressing T7RNAP promotes highly efficient single and duplex DNA editing. These DNA fragments can be custom ordered, which makes this approach highly suitable for high-throughput strain construction. This work expands the CRISPR toolbox for large-scale strain construction programs in S. cerevisiae and promises to be relevant for other less genetically accessible yeast species.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DiCarloJE, NorvilleJE, MaliP, et al.Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res, 2013; 41:4336–4343. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt135.
2.
GaoY, ZhaoY. Self-processing of ribozyme-flanked RNAs into guide RNAs in vitro and in vivo for CRISPR-mediated genome editing. J Integr Plant Biol, 2014; 56:343–349. DOI: 10.1111/jipb.12152.
3.
BaoZ, XiaoH, LiangJ, et al.Homology-integrated CRISPR-Cas (HI-CRISPR) system for one-step multigene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol, 2015; 4:585–594. DOI: 10.1021/sb500255k.
4.
MansR, van RossumHM, WijsmanM, et al.CRISPR/Cas9: a molecular Swiss army knife for simultaneous introduction of multiple genetic modifications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res, 2015; 15. DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/fov004.
5.
SwiatMA, DashkoS, den RidderM, et al.FnCpf1: a novel and efficient genome editing tool for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res, 2017; 45:12585–12598. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx1007.
6.
VerwaalR, Buiting-WiessenhaanN, DalhuijsenS, et al.CRISPR/Cpf1 enables fast and simple genome editing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast, 2018; 35:201–211. DOI: 10.1002/yea.3278.
7.
Adiego-PerezB, RandazzoP, DaranJM, et al.Multiplex genome editing of microorganisms using CRISPR-Cas. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2019; 366. DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnz086.
8.
RyanOW, SkerkerJM, MaurerMJ, et al.Selection of chromosomal DNA libraries using a multiplex CRISPR system. eLife, 2014; 3. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.03703.
9.
HorwitzAA, WalterJM, SchubertMG, et al.Efficient multiplexed integration of synergistic elleles and metabolic pathways in yeasts via CRISPR-Cas. Cell Syst, 2015; 1:88–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.02.001.
10.
JakočiūnasT, BondeI, HerrgårdM, et al.Multiplex metabolic pathway engineering using CRISPR/Cas9 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng, 2015; 28:213–222. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.01.008.
GenerosoWC, GottardiM, OrebM, et al.Simplified CRISPR-Cas genome editing for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Microbiol Methods, 2016; 127:203–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.06.020.
14.
FerreiraR, SkrekasC, NielsenJ, et al.Multiplexed CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing and gene regulation using Csy4 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol, 2018; 7:10–15. DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00259.
15.
LiZH, LiuM, LyuXM, et al.CRISPR/Cpf1 facilitated large fragment deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Basic Microb, 2018; 58:1100–1104. DOI: 10.1002/jobm.201800195.
16.
ZhangY, WangJ, WangZ, et al.A gRNA-tRNA array for CRISPR-Cas9 based rapid multiplexed genome editing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Commun, 2019; 10:1053. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09005-3.
17.
RyanOW, CateJH. Multiplex engineering of industrial yeast genomes using CRISPRm. Methods Enzymol, 2014; 546:473–489. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801185-0.00023-4.
18.
EasminF, HassanN, SasanoY, et al.gRNA-transient expression system for simplified gRNA delivery in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. J Biosci Bioeng, 2019; 128:373–378. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2019.02.009.
19.
MorseNJ, WagnerJM, ReedKB, et al.T7 Polymerase expression of guide RNAs in vivo allows exportable CRISPR-Cas9 editing in multiple yeast hosts. ACS Synth Biol, 2018; 7:1075–1084. DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00461.
VerduynC, PostmaE, ScheffersWA, et al.Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast, 1992; 8:501–517. DOI: 10.1002/yea.320080703.
22.
MilneN, LuttikMAH, Cueto RojasHF, et al.Functional expression of a heterologous nickel-dependent, ATP-independent urease in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng, 2015; 30:130–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.05.003.
23.
Solis-EscalanteD, KuijpersNG, BongaertsN, et al.amdSYM, a new dominant recyclable marker cassette for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res, 2013; 13:126–139. DOI: 10.1111/1567-1364.12024.
24.
HassingEJ, de GrootPA, MarquenieVR, et al.Connecting central carbon and aromatic amino acid metabolisms to improve de novo 2-phenylethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng, 2019; 56:165–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2019.09.011.
25.
LeeME, DeLoacheWC, CervantesB, et al.A highly characterized yeast toolkit for modular, multipart assembly. ACS Synth Biol, 2015; 4:975–986. DOI: 10.1021/sb500366v.
26.
de KokS, NijkampJF, OudB, et al.Laboratory evolution of new lactate transporter genes in a jen1Δ mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their identification as ADY2 alleles by whole-genome resequencing and transcriptome analysis. FEMS Yeast Res, 2012; 12:359–374. DOI: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2012.00787.x.
27.
GietzRD, SchiestlRH. High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc, 2007; 2:31–34. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2007.13.
28.
MikkelsenMD, BuronLD, SalomonsenB, et al.Microbial production of indolylglucosinolate through engineering of a multi-gene pathway in a versatile yeast expression platform. Metab Eng, 2012; 14:104–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2012.01.006.
29.
BaldiN, DykstraJC, LuttikMAH, et al.Functional expression of a bacterial alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase in the cytosol of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng, 2019; 56:190–197. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2019.10.001.
30.
DowerK, RosbashM. T7 RNA polymerase-directed transcripts are processed in yeast and link 39 end formation to mRNA nuclear export. RNA, 2002; 8:686–697. DOI: 10.1017/s1355838202024068.
31.
FlagfeldtD, SiewersV, HuangL, et al.Characterization of chromosomal integration sites for heterologous gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast, 2009; 26:545–551. DOI: 10.1002/yea.1705.
32.
MeijnenJP, RandazzoP, Foulquie-MorenoMR, et al.Polygenic analysis and targeted improvement of the complex trait of high acetic acid tolerance in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2016; 9:5. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-015-0421-x.
33.
BoonekampFJ, DashkoS, van den BroekM, et al.The genetic makeup and expression of the glycolytic and fermentative pathways are highly conserved within the Saccharomyces genus. Front Genet, 2018; 9:504. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00504.
34.
SalazarAN, Gorter de VriesAR, van den BroekM, et al.Nanopore sequencing enables near-complete de novo assembly of Saccharomyces cerevisiae reference strain CEN.PK113-7D. FEMS Yeast Res, 2017; 17. DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/fox074.
35.
LangmeadB, TrapnellC, PopM, et al.Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol, 2009; 10:R25. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25.
36.
BellaousovS, ReuterJS, SeetinMG, et al.RNAstructure: Web servers for RNA secondary structure prediction and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res, 2013; 41:471–474. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt290.
ImburgioD, RongM, MaK, et al.Studies of promoter recognition and start site selection by T7 RNA polymerase using a comprehensive collection of promoter variants. Biochemistry, 2000; 39:10419–10430. DOI: 10.1021/bi000365w.
39.
DorfmanBZ. The isolation of adenylosuccinate synthetase mutants in yeast by selection for constitutive behavior in pigmented strains. Genetics, 1969; 61:377–389.
40.
CreutzburgSCA, WuWY, MohanrajuP, et al.Good guide, bad guide: spacer sequence-dependent cleavage efficiency of Cas12a. Nucleic Acids Res, 2020; 48:3228–3243. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1240.
41.
GuillerezJ, LopezP, ProuxF, et al.A mutation in T7 RNA polymerase that facilitates promoter clearance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2005; 102:5958–5963. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0407141102.
42.
YooJ, KangC. Bacteriophage SP6 RNA polymerase mutants with altered termination efficiency and elongation processivity. Biomol Eng, 2000; 16:191–197. DOI: 10.1016/s1389-0344(99)00053-2.
43.
JorgensenED, DurbinRK, RismanSS, et al.Specific contacts between the bacteriophage T3, T7, and SP6 RNA polymerases and their promoters. J Biol Chem, 1991; 266:645–651.
44.
RongM, CastagnaR, McAllisterWT. Cloning and purification of bacteriophage K11 RNA polymerase. Biotechniques, 1999; 27:690, 692, 694. DOI: 10.2144/99274bm13.
45.
LeonettiJP, MechtiN, DegolsG, et al.Intracellular distribution of microinjected antisense oligonucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1991; 88:2702–2706. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.7.2702.
46.
FisherTL, TerhorstT, CaoX, et al.Intracellular disposition and metabolism of fluorescently-labeled unmodified and modified oligonucleotides microinjected into mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res, 1993; 21:3857–3865. DOI: 10.1093/nar/21.16.3857.
47.
SwartsDC, van der OostJ, JinekM. Structural basis for guide RNA processing and seed-dependent DNA targeting by CRISPR-Cas12a. Mol Cell, 2017; 66:221–233.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.03.016.
48.
LiaoC, SlotkowskiRA, AchmedovT, et al.The Francisella novicida Cas12a is sensitive to the structure downstream of the terminal repeat in CRISPR arrays. RNA Biol, 2019; 16:404–412. DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2018.1526537.
49.
Gorter de VriesAR, de GrootPA, van den BroekM, et al.CRISPR-Cas9 mediated gene deletions in lager yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus. Microb Cell Fact, 2017; 16:222. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-017-0835-1.
50.
WagnerJC, PlattRJ, GoldflessSJ, et al.Efficient CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Methods, 2014; 11:915–918. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3063.
51.
LeeK, ConboyM, ParkHM, et al.Nanoparticle delivery of Cas9 ribonucleoprotein and donor DNA in vivo induces homology-directed DNA repair. Nat Biomed Eng, 2017; 1:889–901. DOI: 10.1038/s41551-017-0137-2.
52.
JuergensH, VarelaJA, Gorter de VriesAR, et al.Genome editing in Kluyveromyces and Ogataea yeasts using a broad-host-range Cas9/gRNA co-expression plasmid. FEMS Yeast Res, 2018; 18. DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/foy012.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
