The principal function of archaeal and bacterial CRISPR-Cas systems is antivirus adaptive immunity. However, recent genome analyses identified a variety of derived CRISPR-Cas variants at least some of which appear to perform different functions. Here, we describe a unique repertoire of CRISPR-Cas-related systems that we discovered by searching archaeal metagenome-assemble genomes of the Asgard superphylum. Several of these variants contain extremely diverged homologs of Cas1, the integrase involved in CRISPR adaptation as well as casposon transposition. Strikingly, the diversity of Cas1 in Asgard archaea alone is greater than that detected so far among the rest of archaea and bacteria. The Asgard CRISPR-Cas derivatives also encode distinct forms of Cas4, Cas5, and Cas7 proteins, and/or additional nucleases. Some of these systems are predicted to perform defense functions, but possibly not programmable ones, whereas others are likely to represent previously unknown mobile genetic elements.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarrangouR, HorvathP. A decade of discovery: CRISPR functions and applications. Nat Microbiol, 2017; 2:17092. DOI: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.92.
2.
MohanrajuP, MakarovaKS, ZetscheB, et al.Diverse evolutionary roots and mechanistic variations of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Science, 2016; 353:aad5147. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad5147.
3.
HilleF, CharpentierE. CRISPR-Cas: biology, mechanisms and relevance. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2016; 371: DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0496.
4.
HilleF, RichterH, WongSP, et al.The biology of CRISPR-Cas: backward and forward. Cell, 2018; 172:1239–1259.
5.
MakarovaKS, WolfYI, KooninEV. The basic building blocks and evolution of CRISPR-cas systems. Biochem Soc Trans, 2013; 41:1392–1400. DOI: 10.1042/BST20130038.
6.
MakarovaKS, WolfYI, IranzoJ, et al.Evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems: a burst of class 2 and derived variants. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2020; 18:67–83. DOI: 10.1038/s41579-019-0299-x.
PetersJE, MakarovaKS, ShmakovS, et al.Recruitment of CRISPR-Cas systems by Tn7-like transposons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2017; 114:E7358–E7366. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1709035114.
10.
FaureG, ShmakovSA, YanWX, et al.CRISPR-Cas in mobile genetic elements: counter-defence and beyond. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2019; 17:513–525. DOI: 10.1038/s41579-019-0204-7.
11.
StreckerJ, LadhaA, GardnerZ, et al.RNA-guided DNA insertion with CRISPR-associated transposases. Science, 2019; 365:48–53. DOI: 10.1126/science.aax9181.
12.
KlompeSE, VoPLH, Halpin-HealyTS, et al.Transposon-encoded CRISPR-Cas systems direct RNA-guided DNA integration. Nature, 2019; 571:219–225. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1323-z.
13.
ÖzcanA, PauschP, LindenA, et al.Type IV CRISPR RNA processing and effector complex formation in Aromatoleum aromaticum. Nat Microbiol, 2018; 4:89–96. DOI: 10.1038/s41564-018-0274-8.
14.
Pinilla-RedondoR, Mayo-MuñozD, RusselJ, et al.Type IV CRISPR-Cas systems are highly diverse and involved in competition between plasmids. Nucleic Acids Res, 2020; 48:2000–2012. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1197.
15.
CrowleyVM, CatchingA, TaylorHN, et al.A type IV-A CRISPR-Cas system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa mediates RNA-guided plasmid interference in vivo. CRISPR J, 2019; 2:434–440. DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2019.0048.
16.
MakarovaKS, KaramychevaS, ShahSA, et al.Predicted highly derived class 1 CRISPR-Cas system in Haloarchaea containing diverged Cas5 and Cas7 homologs but no CRISPR array. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2019; 366: DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnz079.
17.
KrupovicM, KooninEV. Self-synthesizing transposons: unexpected key players in the evolution of viruses and defense systems. Curr Opin Microbiol, 2016; 31: 25–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2016.01.006.
18.
KrupovicM, MakarovaKS, ForterreP, et al.Casposons: a new superfamily of self-synthesizing DNA transposons at the origin of prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas immunity. BMC Biology, 2014; 12:36. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-12-36.
19.
BeguinP, CharpinN, KooninEV, et al.Casposon integration shows strong target site preference and recapitulates protospacer integration by CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res, 2016; 44:10367–10376. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw821.
20.
HickmanAB, DydaF. The casposon-encoded Cas1 protein from Aciduliprofundum boonei is a DNA integrase that generates target site duplications. Nucleic Acids Res, 2015; 43:10576–10587. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv1180.
21.
HickmanAB, KailasanS, GenzorP, et al.Casposase structure and the mechanistic link between DNA transposition and spacer acquisition by CRISPR-Cas. Elife, 2020; 9. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.50004.
22.
HudaiberdievS, ShmakovS, WolfYI, et al.Phylogenomics of Cas4 family nucleases. BMC Evol Biol, 2017; 17:232. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-1081-1.
23.
SpangA, SawJH, JørgensenSL, et al.Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nature, 2015; 521:173–179. DOI: 10.1038/nature14447.
24.
Zaremba-NiedzwiedzkaK, CaceresEF, SawJH, et al.Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity. Nature, 2017; 541:353–358. DOI: 10.1038/nature21031.
25.
WilliamsTA, CoxCJ, FosterPG, et al.Phylogenomics provides robust support for a two-domains tree of life. Nat Ecol Evol, 2020; 4:138–147. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-019-1040-x.
26.
MacLeodF, KindlerGS, WongHL, et al.Asgard archaea: diversity, function, and evolutionary implications in a range of microbiomes. AIMS Microbiol, 2019; 5:48–61. DOI: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.1.48.
27.
CaiM, LiuY, YinX, et al.Diverse Asgard archaea including the novle phylum Gerdarchaeota participate in organic matter degradation. Sci China Life Sci 2020 Mar 16 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1007/sl1427-020-1679-1.
28.
ImachiH, NobuMK, NakaharaN, et al.Isolation of an archaeon at the prokaryote-eukaryote interface. Nature, 2020; 577:519–525. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1916-6.
29.
MakarovaKS, WolfYI, KooninEV. Archaeal Clusters of Orthologous Genes (arCOGs): an update and application for analysis of shared features between Thermococcales, Methanococcales, and Methanobacteriales. Life (Basel), 2015; 5:818–840. DOI: 10.3390/life5010818.
30.
AltschulSF, MaddenTL, SchäfferAA, et al.Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res, 1997; 25:3389–3402.
31.
MakarovaKS, WolfYI, KooninEV. Towards functional characterization of archaeal genomic dark matter. Biochem Soc Trans, 2019; 47:389–398. DOI: 10.1042/BST20180560.
SodingJ. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics, 2005; 21:951–960. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti125.
34.
DrozdetskiyA, ColeC, ProcterJ, et al.JPred4: a protein secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res, 2015; 43:W389–394. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv332.
35.
MakarovaKS, WolfYI, KooninEV. Classification and nomenclature of CRISPR-Cas systems: where from here?. CRISPR J, 2018; 1:325–336. DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2018.0033.
36.
HarringtonLB, BurnsteinD, ChenJS, et al.Programmed DNA destruction by miniature CRISPR-Cas14 enzymes. Science, 2018; 362:839–842. DOI: 10.1126/science.aav4294.
37.
SteineggerM, SodingJ. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat Biotechnol, 2017; 35:1026–1028. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3988.
38.
EdgarRC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res, 2004; 32:1792–1797.
39.
MeierA, SodingJ. Context similarity scoring improves protein sequence alignments in the midnight zone. Bioinformatics, 2015; 31:674–681. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu697.
40.
PriceMN, DehalPS, ArkinAP. FastTree 2—approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One, 2010; 5:e9490. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490.
41.
BlandC, RamseyTL, SabreeF, et al.CRISPR recognition tool (CRT): a tool for automatic detection of clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats. BMC Bioinformatics, 2007; 8:209. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-209.
42.
ShmakovSA, SitnikV, MakarovaKS, et al.The CRISPR spacer space is dominated by sequences from species-specific mobilomes. MBio, 2017; 8. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01397-17.
43.
MakarovaKS, AravindL, WolfYI, et al.Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Biol Direct, 2011; 6:38. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6150-6-38.
44.
KrupovicM, BeguinP, KooninEV. Casposons: mobile genetic elements that gave rise to the CRISPR-Cas adaptation machinery. Curr Opin Microbiol, 2017; 38:36–43. DOI: S1369-5274(16)30171-0.
45.
MakarovaKS, WolfYI, ForterreP, et al.Dark matter in archaeal genomes: a rich source of novel mobile elements, defense systems and secretory complexes. Extremophiles, 2014; 18:877–893. DOI: 10.1007/s00792-014-0672-7.
46.
WalkerJE, SarasteM, RunswickMJ, et al.Distantly related sequences in the alpha- and beta-subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinases and other ATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold. EMBO J, 1982; 1:945–951.
47.
ShmakovS, et al.Diversity and evolution of class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2017; 15:169–182. DOI :10.1038/nrmicro.2016.184.
48.
KooninEV, MakarovaKS. Mobile genetic elements and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems: all the way there and back. Genome Biol Evol, 2017; 9:2812–2825. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evx192.
49.
KooninEV, MakarovaKS. Origins and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2019; 374:20180087. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0087.
50.
YanWX, HunnewellP, AlfonseLE, et al.Functionally diverse type V CRISPR-Cas systems. Science, 2018; 363:88–91. DOI: 10.1126/science.aav7271.
51.
SiguierP, GourbeyreE, ChandlerM. Bacterial insertion sequences: their genomic impact and diversity. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2014; 38:865–891. DOI: 10.1111/1574-6976.12067.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
