A CRISPR Moratorium Isn't Enough: We Need a Boycott

Regalado A. Chinese scientists are creating CRISPR babies. Available online at https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612458/exclusive-chinese-scientists-are-creating-crispr-babies/ (last accessed July 15, 2019).

Cyranoski D . Russian biologist plans more CRISPR-edited babies. Nature, 2019; 570:145–146. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-01770-x.

Macintosh K . Heritable genome editing and the downsides of a global moratorium. CRISPR J, 2019; 2:272–279. DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2019.0016.

Davies K , Knoppers BM . From poetry to policy: an interview with Bartha Maria Knoppers. CRISPR J, 2019; 2:249–252. DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2019.29071.

Brokowski C . Do CRISPR germline ethics statements cut it?. CRISPR J, 2018; 2:115–125. DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2017.0024.

Hough SH , Ajetunmobi A . The future of CRISPR applications in the lab, the clinic and society. In: Precision Medicine, CRISPR, and Genome Engineering Moving from Association to Biology and Therapeutics. New York: Springer, 2017, pp. 157–178.

Lander E , Baylis F , Zhang F , et al. Adopt a moratorium on heritable genome editing. Nature, 2019; 567:165–168. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-00726-5.

WHO expert panel paves way for strong international governance on human genome editing. Available online at https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/19-03-2019-who-expert-panel-paves-way-for-strong-international-governance-on-human-genome-editing (last accessed July 15, 2019).

Hutson M. Why are AI researchers boycotting a new Nature journal—and shunning others? Science Magazine, May 17, 2018. Available online at https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/05/why-are-ai-researchers-boycotting-new-nature-journal-and-shunning-others (last accessed October 11, 2019).

Williams S. Scholars boycott meeting, citing misconduct accusations. The Scientist, August 30, 2019. Available online at https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/scholars-boycott-meeting--citing-misconduct-accusations-66377 (last accessed October 11, 2019).

Wadman M . US biologists adopt cloning moratorium. Nature, 1997; 389:319. DOI: 10.1038/38562.

Highfield R. Scientists boycott “human clone” conference. The Telegraph, September 12, 2001. Available online at https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1340261/Scientists-boycott-human-clone-conference.html (last accessed July 15, 2019).

Highfield R. Cloning congress cancelled. The Telegraph, September 28, 2001. Available online at https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1357865/Cloning-congress-cancelled.html (last accessed July 15, 2019).

Philipkoski K . The human clone: what gives? Wired, April 6 2002. https://www.wired.com/2002/04/the-human-clone-what-gives/ (last accessed October 11, 2019).

Cohen J. The untold story of the “circle of trust” behind the world's first gene-edited babies. Science Magazine, August 1, 2019. Available online at https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/08/untold-story-circle-trust-behind-world-s-first-gene-edited-babies (last accessed October 11, 2019).

Bonetta L . Academies called to task over human cloning débâcle. Nature, 2001; 412:667. DOI: 10.1038/35089199.